Elementary school students release trout in Mason-Dixon Historical Park
Back in September, elementary school classes throughout Monongalia and Marion counties were given 100 eggs to raise throughout the school year. Friday was the big day as the fish were released into Dunkard Creek. Along with the release, the students did a number of activities with organizations like the Avian Conservation Group and the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection.
Pennsboro Speedway cancels season opener due to 'unexpected damage'
Director of Trout Classroom Jennifer Ripley Stuekle told 12 News that the classes receive a 55-gallon aquarium along with the fish eggs, and that they become responsible for taking care of the fish, feeding them and maintaining the equipment. Trout in the Classroom officials told 12 News that they released 250 trout Friday.
Stuekle added that Trout in the Classroom is interdisciplinary as there's outdoor activity with spending time in Mason-Dixon Historical Park, chemistry with learning about water quality, biology and even art with a screen printing project for the day.
'It's all encompassing and it's just really an amazing project for the students to understand a really important resource in West Virginia,' Stuekle said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Plans in place to replace 2 Clarksburg bridges
CLARKSBURG, (WBOY) — For those who just can't get enough of road work in Clarksburg, there are now plans to replace two bridges in downtown Clarksburg, but not for a while. In a proposed plan, titled 'H. Laban White Memorial Bridge Project,' suggestions are made to replace the West Pike Street bridge that runs over Elk Creek, and the H. Laban White bridge, which runs over the West Fork River at the intersection of West Pike and Milford streets in Clarksburg. New replacement bridges are in the early stages of planning, with construction set to begin in 2029. 'They're old bridges, they were built back, I think, in the '30s, so they are historic and they, you know, lived their service life. It's time to replace them,' Assistant Director of Engineering Division with the West Virginia Division of Highways Mark White said. Why is the construction in downtown Clarksburg taking so long? A public informational meeting was held at the Clarksburg-Harrison County Library on Tuesday to give people a chance to ask questions and to make comments on the proposed project. At the meeting, informational packets were given out, as well as the opportunity to speak directly with engineers and other officials. 'So we are starting with initial design work. We're coming out, meeting with the public, showing them what alternatives we are looking at and trying to get their feedback on any information they have on this bridge,' White said. The project is in the early stages of development and ideas are still being proposed and worked on. White estimates that once the project begins, it could take a few years to complete. In the meantime, a temporary bridge is being proposed to maintain the flow of traffic during the construction of the new bridge. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Buzz Feed
4 days ago
- Buzz Feed
15 Stories By People Who Slept With Someone They Shouldn't Have
Recently, I came across a Reddit thread where user u/tellmeanon1 asked "Who is someone you have slept with that no one can ever know?" The stories had my jaw on the floor. Here's what people said: "I slept with my father's fiancée. It was a long time ago, and she's no longer alive, but I'm still not telling." "I slept with my college professor. Not once, but twice. Two different professors. They were both married. I should also mention—I'm a lesbian. They were females married to men at the time. One was an excellent hook-up; the other was okay. I've never told anyone due to my being actively in both of their classes at the time. What a time to be alive." "I slept with my stepsister. Let's call her Jennifer. Jennifer was the daughter of my dad's second wife, from her first marriage. We were adults, there was alcohol involved, but it was still good." "I slept with my mother-in-law. I was separated from my wife at the time, and she, my MIL, asked if I could paint her apartment. She would pay me, and I agreed. It was a three-day job, and I lived on the other side of town, so it was agreed that I would stay over. It was summer and really hot, and I worked in just shorts while she was hanging around in next to nothing. She was a widow, she wasn't a bad sort, and we had drinks at the end of the day. Anyhow, we slept together. She was better than her daughter." "Well, I slept with my 'first cousin' at my grandmother's funeral. But it's okay because my mom and her sister were both adopted from an orphanage, so we aren't actually blood-related. She was cute, and I was sleeping around a lot in those days. We hadn't seen or even spoken to each other since we were young. We just laughed when we saw each other at my grandfather's funeral. Of course, we hooked up that time too. A couple of years ago, my brother died, and she was there—ready—but I didn't have it in me." "I slept with my Year 10 English teacher 10 years later, after a school reunion. She was married. In an awkward and interesting plot twist, her youngest child and my eldest were in the same grade 1 class years later. I met her husband at a Father's Day thing at the school. I can't imagine the look on her face when he told her he'd met one of her former students." "I slept with my best friend's sister. I used to spend the night often at my best friend's house since he had a pool, hot tub, trampoline, and super cool parents who didn't really care what we did. One weekend, I got up in the middle of the night to get some water, and I received a text from her asking if it was me in the kitchen. I said yes, and she responded, 'Come to my room, I need to tell you something.' I went into her room, and we started talking. That evolved into making out, then to her going down on me. It went on for a long time and eventually evolved into having sex every time I went over. We did it for years, and my buddy never knew." "I slept with my best friend's twin sister. Twenty-two years ago, I rented a room in their house, and she worked the afternoon shift, so she'd get home around 10 p.m. She would come into my room, and we would do literally everything other than intercourse because I was a 'gentleman' and didn't want to take her virginity. To this day, it was still the best head I've ever had." "I slept with my wife's twin sister, 15 years before she became my wife. Yes, they are identical. I slept with her sister in high school and married my wife in our 30s. I did not cheat on my wife. My wife and her twin hate each other and barely speak these days for completely unrelated reasons. Their relationship was shattered long before I even started dating my wife. My wife does not know and hopefully never will. Their personalities are night-and-day different. My wife—let's call her A—is quiet and reserved, smart and classy. Her twin—let's call her B—is wild, loud, and outgoing. I knew them both in high school as friends. I wanted to date my wife in high school for personality reasons, but she was dating my friend. I was at a party with drinks and recreational drugs when I hooked up with her sister. It was a one-time thing, and we were both messed up." "A coworker once bragged to me that he was sleeping with his wife's sister. His reason? 'She does everything my wife won't do.'" "I slept with my ex-girlfriend's younger sister. My ex and I broke up near the end of 2012 and we have always remained friends and stayed in touch. Whenever we are both single, we casually hook up a few times every couple of years, and it has never affected our friendship. In 2019, I was hanging out with both her and her sister at a karaoke bar, and my ex left. The younger sister and I drank a little too much, and she ended up taking me home. It was amazing. We started seeing each other for five months, a few times a week. We both knew it was forbidden fruit, though, and eventually stopped. I then casually went back to sleeping with my ex here and there." "I slept with my best friend's wife. I mean, we all know. It happened before they met. As a matter of fact, my friend and I were roommates at the time—he met her when she was leaving one morning. But we've all just decided to forget it ever happened." "I slept with my mom's best friend. They'd been friends for, like, 10 years. For reference, I'm 24. We were drinking one night, and out of nowhere, she told me she was a squirter. That was, in fact, my first squirter." "My junior year in college (1991), two of my friends had been dating since freshman year. One day, they got into a big fight and broke up. A couple of days later (Friday night), she showed up at my apartment with a bottle of rum, saying she needed someone to talk to. My roommate was out of town for the weekend, and a few rum and cokes later, we were naked and shagging. She didn't leave until Sunday afternoon, and we spent the entire weekend fooling around. They got back together a few days later. We never told anyone, and we're all still friends to this day. They're married now with two adult children." And finally, "I slept with a customer AND his dad, after I sold them the son's first car. I was 22 at the time. Son was 18 and in his freshman year of college. Dad came in, picked out the car. I took the son on a test drive without the dad. Son immediately started flirting with me. He texted me later that night and asked me to go to his dorm. I went and we hooked up on and off for about three months. I called his dad a few days later to thank him for the business. He came by a week later and told me he would like to take me out. I went out with dad several times. To this day, I still can't decide which one of them was better." Who is someone you slept with that no one can ever know about? Tell us us the comments or use the anonymous form below:
New York Times
05-08-2025
- New York Times
Tensions Flare Between Two Federal Agencies Charged With Aviation Safety
The relationship between the National Transportation Safety Board, the government entity that investigates civilian airplane accidents, and the Federal Aviation Administration, the agency responsible for aviation safety, can frequently be contentious, especially after a major national tragedy. Last week, a rift between those two main regulators of aviation safety spilled out into public view. Frustrations — and sometimes tempers — flared in uncommonly raw fashion during the board's marathon of investigative hearings into the deadly midair crash between a military helicopter and a commercial jet near Ronald Reagan National Airport in January. Board members grilled witnesses, including air traffic controllers and F.A.A. managers, over three days and 30 hours of public testimony. Jennifer Homendy, the N.T.S.B. chair, led other board members in accusing the F.A.A. of knowingly stymieing efforts to improve safety at Reagan National Airport and stonewalling parts of the board's investigation into the crash. And Ms. Homendy directly accused the agency of fostering a culture among the air traffic control operation that discouraged employees from raising legitimate safety concerns, including by wielding the threat of retaliation. 'There is and always has been a healthy tension between the two agencies,' said Jeff Guzzetti, a former accident investigator for the F.A.A. and the N.T.S.B. And while the level of public outrage on display during board hearings depends largely on the proclivities of its members, he added, 'in this particular case, it's a shift.' Ms. Homendy and the other board members were careful not to direct their ire toward Sean Duffy, the transportation secretary, or Bryan Bedford, the F.A.A. administrator. Still, the very public airing of grievances raised questions about the working relationship between the two agencies at a critical juncture. The N.T.S.B. makes safety recommendations, but it is up to the F.A.A. to put them into place. The crash at Reagan National Airport, and a series of near misses and tower outages at major airports in the months since, have dampened public confidence in the safety of flying, intensifying the need for cooperation. 'Warning signs were ignored, or just not known or identified or sought, which is quite tragic,' Ms. Homendy told reporters late Wednesday, after the first day of testimony. In a statement, the F.A.A. said officials 'have and will continue to fully support the N.T.S.B.'s investigation,' stressing that the agency had been proactive about addressing concerns and adopting the board's early recommendations. The statement added that 'if there has been any stonewalling, withholding of information or intimidation — those actions will be identified and remedied without hesitation.' The gloves had already begun to come off in the final hours of the hearing on Wednesday. Ms. Homendy lost her patience with F.A.A. managers who claimed they never knew that air traffic officials from Reagan National Airport had urged higher-ups to address the potential risks posed by a helicopter route, known as Route 4, that crossed under the descent path for airplanes landing on a supplementary runway, No. 33. The Army Black Hawk that crashed into the commercial jet on Jan. 29 was flying along Route 4, and at the time of impact, was 78 feet higher than the F.A.A.-mandated ceiling of 200 feet. A number of witnesses testified that the devices pilots relied upon to measure their altitude frequently were off by about 100 feet of helicopters' actual flying height. Air traffic controllers, knowing the risks, sought to make changes as part of a helicopter-focused working group at the airport — but were told by district managers that doing so would be seen as 'too political,' according to the transcript of an interview included in an N.T.S.B. report. 'Every sign was there that there was a safety risk, and the tower was telling you that,' Ms. Homendy told F.A.A. officials. She accused agency managers of routinely dismissing safety concerns raised by employees in the airport's air traffic control tower and of reassigning people who had previously voiced concerns after the accident. She also said they used F.A.A. bureaucracy as an excuse to avoid making needed changes. 'Are you kidding me? Sixty-seven people are dead,' she said, denouncing the F.A.A.'s process for reviewing safety recommendations. 'Fix it. Do better,' she added. By the last day of the hearings, Ms. Homendy was accusing F.A.A. officials outright of trying to stymie the N.T.S.B.'s investigation by withholding documents and data the board had been requesting for months. 'I think you're interfering in the investigation,' she charged, 'because you're basically telling us 'no' every way you can.' Aviation safety experts said it was understandable for tensions to run unusually high after the collision because of the magnitude and rarity of the tragedy — it was the first fatal crash involving a major American airline in over 15 years. But part of the N.T.S.B.'s visible agitation in the hearings could also be strategic, those experts said. The fact that the crash happened just outside the nation's capital — along with the fact that power brokers from the Trump administration and Congress are eager to respond — has created a unique opportunity for the board to influence sweeping changes. 'The intensity has increased partly because of the visibility of this particular catastrophe and the proximity to Washington,' said Alan Diehl, a former aviation safety official with the N.T.S.B. and the F.A.A. 'By doing that, the N.T.S.B. hopes to convince both the F.A.A. and Congress that we need a revolution,' he added, 'in both personnel policies within the F.A.A. as well as the funding policies.' Ms. Homendy, who spent more than 14 years on Capitol Hill before President Trump nominated her to fill one of the Democratic slots on the board, has a keen understanding of Washington dynamics, according to board watchers. She is known for being more public-facing and, at times, being more comfortable adopting an adversarial posture than some of her predecessors. But she was not alone last week in being pointedly critical of the F.A.A. J. Todd Inman, a Republican member of the N.T.S.B, also accused the agency of stonewalling the investigation. The F.A.A. withheld documents about staffing at the control tower for months, he charged, dumping thousands of pages on the board on the Friday before the hearing, only after Ms. Homendy appealed to agency and Transportation Department leaders for help. At another point, Mr. Inman lost his patience with officials' promises to do better. 'We'd like to be treated privately the same way we are publicly,' he said. Mr. Inman also accused the F.A.A. of refusing to share critical data about real-time flight tracking technology, forcing the safety board to spend $50,000 annually to evaluate it 'because the F.A.A. does not consider N.T.S.B. a trusted government partner.' F.A.A. officials in the hot seat frequently defended their agency. Nick Fuller, the F.A.A.'s acting deputy chief operations officer, responded to allegations that the agency had withheld documents and data by arguing that some of the board's requests had been unclear, and that 'in fact, we just gave you the latest and greatest' information. Mr. Fuller also pushed back on accusations from all three presiding board members that after the Jan. 29 accident, the F.A.A. had removed managers at Reagan National's control tower who had previously raised concerns about traffic, staffing or other safety pitfalls. He argued that staffing changes had not been retaliatory, but rather executed in the interest of solving the problem quickly. 'I was given a task to fix the facility risk between helicopters and fixed wing,' Mr. Fuller said, referring to airplanes, 'and it wasn't to work through a collaborative process and allow a few months — it was to get the job done immediately.' On several occasions during the hearings, Ms. Homendy sought assurances that F.A.A. employees who were called as witnesses in the investigation would not be retaliated against for their testimony — a step prompted by reports that some who had critical things to say were being harassed, she told reporters on Thursday after that day's testimony. 'Nobody can take what is clearly a safety issue and get it up through the offices that should be making the decision to ensure safety in the airspace — or somebody's ignoring them,' she told reporters. 'You raise a red flag, and two things happen: You don't get it, you don't get the safety change that you have asked for, or you're transferred out after an accident occurs.' But experts warned against assuming that the acrimony of the hearing would disrupt the two agencies' expert staff members from being able to work together. 'Overall, the process is healthy,' said John Cox, a former airline pilot who runs a safety consulting firm. 'Is there friction? Yes. Is it normal? Yes. Was last week a little more so than normal? Yes,' he added. 'Will that encourage F.A.A. to move more quickly? I hope.'
