Urgent reforms needed in Tshwane's waste management: Fleet mismanagement and theft exposed
The City of Tshwane's waste management department is struggling with poor fleet management, with inadequate supervisory oversight leading to neglected basic fleet control functions.
According to a recently approved council report, vehicle inspections are not being conducted, vehicle abuse is rampant, and fuel theft is a regular occurrence at the waste fuel depot.
The report, compiled by Abel Malaka, head of the metro's Environment and Agriculture Management Department, highlights years of underinvestment and inadequate maintenance as the root cause of the problem.
This has compromised the reliability of solid waste management services, necessitating significant reforms to reverse the decline.
The National Treasury has stepped in, introducing reforms for metropolitan municipalities, including performance-based incentives for good decision-making and performance.
Malaka noted that the reforms aim to tackle operational inefficiencies and structural issues, with specific milestones to be met by July 31, 2025.
However, the municipal office of the governance support officer (GSO) has raised concerns that the strategy may not effectively address the challenges related to waste fleet mismanagement if it fails to accurately identify the problems.
The GSO office pointed out that the correlation between poorly maintained landfill sites and vehicle condition is not reflected in the strategy.
This is not the first time the city's waste management department has faced criticism.
Two months ago, Member of the Mayoral Committee for Agriculture and Environment Management, Obakeng Ramabodu, reported finding over 80 workers at a Region 3 waste management depot with nothing to do due to a lack of resources and vehicles.
In a bid to stem the tide of theft, Deputy Mayor Eugene Modise last week warned workers against stealing equipment parts, equipment, or diesel at a handover ceremony for R11 million worth of horticultural equipment, saying such actions will lead to trouble with city management.
Malaka noted that waste management services in metropolitan municipalities are experiencing deteriorating infrastructure due to inadequate maintenance and investment backlogs caused by budget constraints.
This situation, he said, has significantly contributed to the decline in service performance.
Despite the challenges, Ramabodu welcomed the strategy, expressing hope that it will enhance waste management, particularly in waste collection and billing.
He said the city is open to innovations that can improve our billing system, leveraging the latest methods to ensure efficiency.
The strategy, he noted, is not just an internal initiative, but a directive from National Treasury, aiming for an independent and effective waste management strategy with a well-understood billing system.
[email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
9 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Kganyago cuts rates, hints at efforts to target 3% inflation
South African Reserve Bank governor Lesetja Kganyago announced a 25 basis points cut to the repo rate on Thursday, adding that the monetary policy committee (MPC) would start aiming for the lowest rung of its target band for inflation. Kganyago said with inflationary pressures, including tariffs globally, food price inflation has risen while fuel price inflation is falling at a slower rate, with inflation expected to average 3.3% for the rest of the year. The risks to the outlook appeared to be balanced. 'The MPC has decided to reduce the policy rate by 25 basis points to 7% with effect from August 1. The decision was unanimous. At our previous meeting we considered a scenario with a 3% inflation objective. We did this based on analysis that our existing 3% to 6% target is too high and too wide and should be reformed.' The decision comes a week after Statistics South Africa announced CPI ticked upward slightly from 2.8% to 3%. After announcing the rate cut, Kganyago said the MPC also agreed to zero in on the lowest point of the target band. He stressed that the inflation target remained at 3% to 6% and the work of the Bank and the National Treasury through the government technical advisory committee investigating a tighter inflation target was continuing. 'The MPC now prefers inflation to settle at 3%. We welcome the recent moderation in inflation expectations and would like to see expectations fall further. 'This would expand policy space and make our framework more robust to shocks. We will use forecasts with a 3% inflation anchor at future meetings. The Bank will also continue working with the National Treasury to complete target reform and achieve permanently low inflation.' He said the US has initiated trade negotiations with other countries and many countries have not yet secured trade deals with the largest economy in the world. While oil prices were elevated, monetary policy has demonstrated resilience. The repo rate announcement also comes the day after US Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell announced the rate in that country will remain the same despite explicit pressure from US President Donald Trump to cut rates.
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
Woman claims BMW Financial Services' non-cooperation led to R787,000 debt
A South African woman claims that BMW Financial Services failed to assist her when she struggled to make payments on her R787,000 vehicle, leading to a distressing financial battle that raises questions about consumer rights and corporate responsibility. Image: Supplied A woman who bought a car through BMW Financial Services is accusing the motor company of failing to cooperate when she indicated that she was unable to continue making payments to her car. The woman, who has chosen to remain anonymous, purchased a BMW 218i Gran Coupe M Sport in October 2021, with the vehicle being financed through BMW Financial Services. According to the terms of the agreement, she was granted a credit facility exceeding R787,000 to cover the cost of the vehicle. This financing arrangement came with an estimated monthly repayment obligation of more than R11,000, placing a significant financial commitment on her. She was able to maintain her monthly instalments for just over six months before coming to a realisation that the monthly instalments were financially not viable as it was consuming nearly half her salary leaving her with insufficient funds to cover her basic financial needs and other financial obligations. This growing strain on her finances forced her to reassess her ability to continue honouring the credit agreement, prompting her to reach out to BMW Financial Services to seek relief or explore alternative solutions. She explained that after recognising the financial strain, she approached BMW Financial Services to request assistance in selling the vehicle, hoping to find a solution that would alleviate her debt burden. However, she was informed by the motor company that the total amount required to settle the outstanding debt on the vehicle was R814,000. At the same time, BMW offered to purchase the vehicle for only R600,000, which would leave her with a significant shortfall of R214,000. Despite her efforts to engage and find a mutually beneficial resolution, she alleges that no further assistance, guidance, or alternative options were provided by the company. This left her feeling abandoned and solely responsible for the substantial debt, with no meaningful support from the institution that had financed the purchase. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading "After mounting arrears and further attempts to engage BMW, our client voluntarily surrendered the vehicle on June 7, 2022 – the valuation provided by BMW reflected a large shortfall, and she took back the vehicle in an effort to secure a better private offer," said her attorney, Liesel Kriel. After relocating from Gauteng to Durban in an effort to improve her financial circumstances, she said she actively sought out better trade-in or resale offers for the vehicle. She managed to secure more favourable valuations from multiple third-party dealers, which exceeded the initial offer made by BMW. In a bid to resolve the matter, she submitted the alternative quotes to BMW Financial Services, along with supporting financial documentation detailing her income and financial hardship. However, despite her proactive approach and willingness to cooperate, she claims that BMW failed to respond and completely ignored her submissions. To her shock, she later discovered in November 2022 that the vehicle had been transferred out of her name as far back as June 2022 without her knowledge, permission, or any formal notification. This discovery raised serious concerns for her, not only about the handling of the vehicle but also about the lack of transparency and communication from BMW Financial Services throughout the process. After the shocking discovery she lodged a complaint against BMW with the Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa (MIOSA), which directed her to the National Credit Regulator (NCR) due to the matter relating to reckless lending. According to her, it was around this time that , she was also informed that legal proceedings had been instituted against her by BMW Financial Services. She expressed shock and frustration, particularly because she had previously notified BMW in writing, via email, of her change of address following her relocation from Gauteng to Durban. Despite this clear communication, she claims that BMW continued to serve legal documents at her former address, effectively depriving her of the opportunity to respond to or engage with the legal process in a timely and meaningful manner. As a result, she believes that BMW acted negligently and unfairly, further compounding her distress and legal vulnerability. She said the NCR process was plagued with delays – it was only in June 2024 that the NCR advised her the matter had not been considered and then issued a non-referral notice, prompting her to refer the matter to the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT). During the tribunal proceedings, it was noted that woman had opted not to defend herself when the case was in the High Court, and as a result, her claims of reckless lending against BMW were not considered. In February 2025, the NCT held that the high court is a competent forum that had already reached a decisive conclusion on her failure to honour her financial commitments. "Any subsequent ruling by the tribunal regarding reckless lending will impact the high court's judgment, which goes against the principle of res judicata," said the tribunal. She said following the judgment, in March 2025, BMW attempted to enforce the judgment and execute the warrant at her erstwhile address – the address was later amended. "Due to BMW's lack of cooperation, our client had no choice but to obtain legal assistance and as such our offices proceeded to launch a rescission application based on the pending regulatory processes and improper service," said Kriel. Kriel said BMW has opposed the rescission application, raising technical defences, including the time delay in bringing the application. "BMW maintains that our client was aware of the proceedings, had a chance to respond, and that the regulatory complaints were merely delay tactics," Kriel added. When approached for comment, BMW declined to speak on the matter, stating that it remained sub judice. "I have, however, determined the matter is still being considered by a court. We cannot, therefore, provide comments to you at this time," said BMW spokesperson, Hailey Philander. In closing, the woman's case reflects the complex and often frustrating journey consumers face when navigating disputes with large financial institutions. Despite her efforts to seek assistance from BMW Financial Services, the National Credit Regulator, and eventually the National Consumer Tribunal, procedural technicalities and jurisdictional limitations ultimately stood in the way of her reckless lending claim being meaningfully assessed. The High Court's prior ruling based on her failure to defend the matter effectively closed the door to further adjudication by the Tribunal, citing the legal principle of res judicata, which prevents re-litigation of issues already decided by a competent court. The attempted enforcement of the judgment at her former address and the subsequent legal wrangling over the rescission application have only added to the woman's sense of being sidelined by a system she believes failed to accommodate her financial vulnerability. Her legal representative, Kriel, argues that the mishandling of notices and the disregard of pending regulatory processes justify reopening the case. BMW, however, continues to oppose the rescission, framing the delays and regulatory complaints as tactical manoeuvres rather than legitimate grievances. With BMW declining to comment further due to the matter being sub judice, the case remains in legal limbo highlighting the wider challenges consumers face when trying to assert their rights in the face of institutional power and procedural complexity. IOL
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
Fixing SA's water woes means curtailing municipalities' free-spending ways
A look at two reforms that aim to thwart municipalities' spendthrift ways. The seemingly impossible task of preventing municipalities from spending water and electricity revenues on salaries and other services has been debated at national level for more than a decade. Now, it is finally receiving the attention it deserves. Two reforms in particular aim to curtail municipalities' spendthrift ways. National Treasury's amended Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) regulations came into effect in June, exempting infrastructure projects below R2 billion from some of the more cumbersome procurement processes. This will unlock opportunities at the municipal level, says Chito Siame, head of private equity at Mergence Investment Managers. 'In water, this could support more localised projects such as wastewater upgrades, pipe replacement, or alternative water sources in drought-prone areas,' says Siame. Read more BLSA welcomes approach to performance and accountability of municipalities 'Encouragingly, there is also movement on project preparation and financial structuring, supported by development finance institutions and the Infrastructure Fund. These reforms signal growing alignment between the public sector's development goals and the private sector's capacity to deliver at scale.' ALSO READ: Fixing SA's water crisis starts with accountability Ring-fencing and SPVs Another planned reform is to ring-fence electricity and water revenues at the municipal level to ensure funds are used specifically for maintaining and upgrading related infrastructure. In theory, municipalities are expected to spend 8% of their property, plant and equipment valuations on maintenance, but very few do. Some do close to zero. The result is visible across the country in untended water leaks, deteriorating roads and electricity outages. Municipalities owe Eskom close to R100 billion and a further R23.4 billion to SA's nine water boards. Revenues are being collected from residents and, in many cases, not paid over. Money is being used at a frightening rate to fund ever-larger salary bills and other services (including tenders). Rand Water CEO Sipho Mosai, speaking at a PSG Think Big presentation this week, said the ring-fencing of municipal water revenues will go a long way to recovering the nearly R8 billion it is owed for bulk water services. 'Water services are highly profitable for municipalities, but these funds are used for other services. In the future it will be ring-fenced, and that will go a long way to servicing this debt.' Auditor-General Tsakani Maluleke sees municipalities as a particularly weak link in the governance chain, with mayors, municipal councils and executive teams failing in their oversight duties. 'When councils are unstable, performance suffers, budgets go unfunded, and infrastructure crumbles,' said Maluleke at a recent press briefing. Kasief Isaacs, CEO of Creation Capital, which will launch an infrastructure fund later this year, says private sector partnerships are one way to fix municipal water issues, but these require special purpose vehicles (SPVs) to manage the service end-to-end and to preserve the water revenue stream. To function effectively, these SPVs must have their own management and budget. 'One of the problems we have faced up to now is around this issue of ring-fencing. Another issue is interdepartmental dependencies. You dig up a road to repair a broken pipe or need to procure a subcontract and are forced to rely on other departments for these services. Those interdependencies are difficult to manage. The SPV should be allowed to manage this entire process,' says Isaacs. ALSO READ: Rand Water maintenance deepens Joburg water crisis eThekwini breaks the ice In April, the eThekwini Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal announced it would follow National Treasury's guidance and ring-fence revenues from water sales to ensure it had sufficient budget to repair and maintain its water infrastructure, reduce non-revenue water and illegal connections, and repair leaks. Not surprisingly, eThekwini reports a significant reduction in water leaks and is now in the procurement stage to bring in a private sector partner to help reduce non-revenue water. There has been stiff opposition from the unions to the government's tentative embrace of PPPs, which are seen by some as a betrayal of the national democratic revolution. They would rather see municipalities better managed than handed over to private operators for profit. These fears are not unfounded, as customers of Thames Water in London discovered. It was privatised in 1989 and over the years paid out £10.4 billion in dividends while accumulating close to £20 billion in debt, much of which was used to fund these payouts rather than fix ageing infrastructure. By 2023, it was said to be close to financial collapse, prompting the UK government to consider nationalising it. 'Rather than viewing PPPs as a threat to municipal control, we should frame them as enablers, tools to deliver better outcomes, strengthen financial sustainability, and ensure that communities receive the reliable services they deserve,' says Siame. 'Standardised PPP templates, municipal support programmes and ring-fenced revenue models could go a long way to building trust and capability in this space.' In the future municipal water services could be run by water boards, private operators, or the municipalities themselves, provided they meet the standards required. The two privately run water systems operating in SA – Siza Water in Ballito in KwaZulu-Natal and Silulumanzi in Mbombela, Mpumalanga – have achieved enviable efficiencies, with water losses of 15-20% against the national average of 47%, all while supplying the 250 000 and 500 000 customers in both areas considered indigent – meaning they get free basic water. The question is, does SA have a water shortage or a leaking pipe problem? Actually, it has both. National rainfall is about half the global average, but nearly half the water distributed is lost to leaks and other problems. Non-revenue water – water that earns no revenue – exceeds 47% nationally, which is way ahead of the global average of 37%. The cost of this is conservatively estimated to be north of R7 billion a year. It simply leaks away, untreated and unbilled. The reasons are many: burst pipes, degraded infrastructure, broken pumps, and increasingly, sabotage. The water boards are generally well run, so the problem is happening at the municipal level. Moneyweb previously reported on criminal gangs deliberately destroying municipal infrastructure so the water mafias can sell water from tankers at extortionate rates – often with the connivance of councillors. ALSO READ: At least R900 billion needed to fix SA's water woes Operation Vulindlela The water issue also has the attention of President Cyril Ramaphosa's Operation Vulindlela, aimed at reforming key bottlenecks to promote faster economic growth. It's in the process of establishing a National Water Resources Infrastructure Agency to take over the functions, staff, and assets of the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority, responsible for feeding water to Gauteng. This will be flanked by the appointment of a new Independent Economic Regulator for the water sector and the establishment of a Water Partnerships Office to assist in implementing performance-based contracts to reduce non-revenue water at six metros – eThekwini, Tshwane, Mangaung, Buffalo City, Nelson Mandela Bay and Polokwane. Part of the funding for this will come from the newly created Infrastructure Fund, which ultimately aims to manage around R100 billion and disburse a range of financing options for infrastructure projects. Parliament is also reviewing the Water Services Amendment Bill, which aims to separate water service authorities (mainly municipalities responsible for water delivery) from water service providers (such as Rand Water, which supplies municipalities in bulk). Under the current Water Services Act, municipalities often act as both water service authorities and providers, meaning they regulate themselves. This leads to weak oversight, poor accountability, and mismanagement. The evidence shows they frequently fail to enforce performance standards such as water quality or address inefficiencies like non-revenue water losses. All of this will hopefully culminate in municipalities being stripped of many of the powers and privileges that helped create the national water crisis in the first place. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
