
Why Is China Buying So Much Gold?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The price of gold has been on a monumental rally in recent weeks, driven by renewed demand amid rising economic and geopolitical tensions.
Experts credited the surge to buying from the Asian market, and China in particular, telling Newsweek that gold bugs in both the public and private spheres appear to be increasingly banking on the metal's long-term safe-haven status, given the contemporary threats facing global trade.
Early last week, the metal broke through $3,500 per troy ounce for the first time in history. Although it has since dropped to just over $3,300, gold is still priced around 40 percent higher than this time last year—and well above what some analysts had previously expected it to reach by the end of 2025.
Why Is China Buying So Much Gold?
Why Is China Buying So Much Gold?
Photo Illustration by Newsweek
Adrian Ash, director of research at gold-trading platform BullionVault, said that the rise had been driven by Chinese private sector trade, with "huge jumps" in trading volumes observed on both the Shanghai Gold Exchange and the Shanghai Futures Exchange.
Joseph Cavatoni, senior market strategist at the World Gold Council, said that investors across the globe were hoping to "mitigate risks in the face of continued volatility." He told Newsweek that much of the recent surge had been driven by Chinese buying, adding that the transparent flows into the country's central bank community had been "record-setting."
Why Is China Buying So Much Gold?
Cavatoni noted that China—both private investors and state institutions—had been actively purchasing gold over the past 15 years but said the trade and conflict-related factors driving this trend had "amplified significantly" since the start of President Donald Trump's second term.
China has been the central target of the administration's attempt to overhaul global trade in America's favor; the country is exempted from the 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs, and its imports are now subjected to 145 duties when entering the U.S.
While Adrian Ash said it was often "too easy" to view gold's rising price as a barometer of such geopolitical tensions, there were few other ways of viewing the recent rush beyond China's attempt to mitigate the risk from U.S. policy and ensure its own economic sovereignty.
As stated by the China Gold Association last week—upon announcing a 30 percent year-on-year increase in first-quarter domestic gold bar and coin consumption—"Complex and changing geopolitics and economic uncertainty have further highlighted the hedging and value preservation functions of gold."
In line with this observed correlation, the spot price of gold was knocked from $3,500 in the middle of last week as the administration began softening its trade war rhetoric and hinted at an impending reduction in China's tariffs.
While Cavatoni said that central bank buying had been nothing short of "record-setting," Ash told Newsweek that it was "basically impossible" to assess how much was going into China's government reserves.
While the People's Bank discloses purchases to the International Monetary Fund (IM), he said that "nobody believes that what China's People's Bank actually says is the same as what it's actually doing and that, by definition, makes it unknowable."
As a result, a growing disparity has emerged between China's reported holdings and the estimates of analysts. Official reserves stand at around 2,292 tons as of March 2025, according to the World Gold Council, though some speculate that the true hoard could be in excess of 30,000 tons.
Is China Moving Away From the American Economy?
In addition to hoarding gold amid increasing financial and political uncertainties, China has also moved into the widespread adoption of financial instruments such as Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs).
Joseph Cavatino told Newsweek that, of the roughly $6 billion in ETF flows into Asia during the first three weeks of April, China accounted for $5.8 billion.
At the heart of both the new gold rush, the retreat to other non-dollarized assets, and the mid-April sell-off of U.S. Treasury Bonds lies an attempt by countries to diversify away from the American economy.
Gold bullion and U.S. dollars.
Gold bullion and U.S. dollars.
Bulent Camci/GDA via AP Images
"With the uncertainty of economic outlooks, we think that China, amongst others, are looking at diversification and taking action," Cavatoni said. "Holding gold helps Beijing mitigate the risk of too much reliance on the U.S. economy for trade flows, payments and investment purposes."
"To an extent, it's two fingers to the U.S. as well," said Adrian Ash. "Owning gold is literally the anti-dollar."
"They're trying to reduce their exposure to U.S. policy caprice," he added. "With the Trump administration, it's turned on a hairpin every day."
Both Ash and Cavatoni pointed to Trump's unpredictable manner of unveiling policy changes—via both official channels and social media posts—and the impacts these can have on the country's economy. This is in addition to the longer-term risks associated with America's rising national debt.
As Peter Schiff, one of the world's most recognized gold bugs, said of China in a mid-April interview, "They are going to be moving money out of U.S. dollars, out of U.S. treasuries. They're buying more gold, they're buying euros, they're buying pounds, they're buying German and European sovereign debt as opposed to the US sovereign debt."
"We are in a lot of trouble as a nation because our deficit chickens are coming home to roost."
Where Can Gold Go From Here?
"We're having a hard time finding what would take the wind out of the sails for gold," Cavatoni told Newsweek.
Financial institutions have upped their forecasts for the yellow metal following the recent rally, Goldman Sachs giving a projection of $3,700 per ounce by the end of the year, and JPMorgan predicting prices above $4,000 by the second quarter of 2026.
However, Cavatoni said the very thing driving the recent surge could also be preventing it from breaking past these new milestones: Uncertainty.
The speed with which new developments are fundamentally changing American and global economic outlooks, he said, is "pushing and pulling on the price of gold."
"So risk and volatility and uncertainty are still very much on the minds of others," said Cavatoni. "And investors are right there smack dab in the middle."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Zelensky Addresses 'Complicated' Aftermath of Oval Office Blowup With Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in an interview that aired on Sunday revealed the difficulty that followed the high-profile blowup between himself and President Donald Trump in the Oval Office in late February. Zelensky, speaking with ABC News' Martha Raddatz in Ukraine, described the situation as "quite complicated" as he had to try and repair relations with his American counterpart. "It's important that I defend my position and I was trying to do that in the Oval Office," he said. Why It Matters Trump had said he would end the conflict in Ukraine within 24 hours of retaking office, but later he admitted that the situation was fairly complicated, at times saying that Ukraine is "more difficult, frankly, to deal with." Trump also said he worried Russian President Vladimir Putin may be trying to drag out peace negotiations while pressing on with the war that began in February 2022. The lack of progress has prompted Trump to start taking a more laid-back approach to the conflict, best encapsulated last week when he compared the warring nations to "young children fighting like a park." "You try to pull them apart and they don't want to be pulled apart," he said. "Sometimes you have to let them fight for a while." Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks to the media in Kyiv on May 19. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks to the media in Kyiv on May 19. Sergei Supinsky/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Trump and Zelensky had a falling out on February 28 when the Ukrainian leader visited the White House to sign a deal that would grant the U.S. access to his country's vast mineral reserves in a move the U.S. assured would create strong economic ties and deepen the threat to Russia continuing to escalate the conflict. In the now-famous exchange, Zelensky asked about the value of deals when Putin had broken previously agreed upon ones, which in turn provoked an angry response from Trump and Vice President JD Vance. Trump declared that Zelensky had "no cards" to play in the conflict and needed the U.S. to have any chance of survival. Speaking with Raddatz on Sunday through a translator, Zelensky maintained the need to defend his position and to stand up for his people. "We all saw that Oval Office, chaotic, disastrous meeting. I know after that meeting, you tried to repair that relationship. Tell us what it was like in the aftermath," Raddatz said. "It's quite complicated. You could watch it live, and it was very clear and very straightforward," Zelensky said. "I used to remind everyone: Cameras don't lie. Everybody could see on their television screens. I think the result of that meeting, I was very honest and open when I said that a small country is fighting for its life against the giant with all that evil they brought with their army and weapons to our land." He added: "Six hundred and thirty-one children lost their lives. For some, those are numbers, but for me, it's important that I defend my position and I was trying to do that in the Oval Office." President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28 in Washington, pair would not speak directly again until they came face-to-face two months later at the funeral of Pope Francis in late April. Photos from that meeting show the two presidents sitting in close and isolated conversation. Zelensky said Sunday that following that meeting, he would "like to believe that the relationship has changed for the better," but added, "I don't know for sure. I can't give you 100 percent guarantee." The Ukrainian president also said he would like to speak more with Trump, but that other people "communicate with the president more than me and they deliver different messages to him." However, continuing to work with the U.S. proves vital for the Ukrainian leader, who said he is "convinced that the president of the United States has all the powers and enough leverage to unite European leaders," whom he said are "all looking at President Trump as a leader for the free world, a free democratic world and they are waiting for him, so he has to do it. He must." Zelensky also addressed the potential end of U.S. military aid, saying once again, as he has so often in the past year, that "without it, there is a greater chance Russia will win and Ukraine will suffer much more loss of life, much more." Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky meets with President Donald Trump during Pope Francis' funeral at St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on April 26. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky meets with President Donald Trump during Pope Francis' funeral at St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on April 26. Office of the President of Ukraine via Getty Images What People Are Saying John Foreman, former United Kingdom defense attache to Moscow and Kyiv, previously told Newsweek: "[Trump's] statement that the U.S. is backing away from being a mediator shows his instinct for self-preservation having failed to deliver peace as he promised. We shouldn't be surprised. Trump has consistently used carrots rather than sticks. It is clear he values a relationship with Russia, and an odd friendship with Putin, over Ukraine." Secretary of State Marco Rubio told U.S. lawmakers last month: "What the president is trying to do is end...a bloody, costly war that neither side can win," adding Putin "hasn't gotten a single concession, he hasn't got a single sanction lifted." What Happens Next As Russia and Ukraine continue to attack each other, the prospect of successful peace talks remain distant. Meanwhile, a bipartisan sanctions bill is already awaiting approval in the U.S. Congress, which lawmakers hope could add pressure to Putin.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Arlington has more than enough apartments and temporary residents
Arlington's Planning and Zoning Commission erred by approving a flood of apartment developments. Arlington became overrun with apartments and temporary residents who brought layers of problems. Now, the commission risks doing it again. It is considering yet another apartment development at the former site of the Randol Mill Nursing and Retirement Villa. To the north along Randol Mill Road are scores of apartments. And they all usually have 'for lease' banners flying. We do not want or need more apartments in this area. The zoning applicant, Avenue 5 Residential, has nice developments in other parts of Arlington. But it's already received its fair share of our city. - Deborah Cartwright, Arlington Will there be a treaty to stop Russia from launching shells and missiles and killing people in Ukraine? President Donald Trump must decide quickly on a swift and certain answer. It appears Russian President Vladimir Putin is calling Trump's bluff, concluding the president won't impose sanctions on Russia. This is a moment of truth, and the American people better ask ourselves: Will Trump take a firm and decisive stand, or is he using a stalling tactic? - John Patrick King, Fort Worth I served on Fort Worth's Redistricting Task Force in 2020 to 2021. Our panel and the City Council respected our city's minorities. We did not reduce the voting strength of any minority to favor any incumbent, challenger or political party. Any redistricting that dilutes the voting strength of any minority is morally reprehensible and legally wrong. Disenfranchising minorities today will have serious future political consequences for those responsible, their parties and their communities. Redistricting is best done every 10 years. Tarrant County's process is premature. - Bill Schur, Fort Worth Maureen Dowd quotes Glenn Thrush in her column in Monday's Star-Telegram online Edition, 'Tech Bro had to go,' as saying that Donald Trump 'is employing the vast power of his office to redefine criminality to suit his needs — using pardons to inoculate criminals he happens to like, downplaying corruption and fraud as crimes, and seeking to stigmatize political opponents by labeling them criminals.' In light of recent revelations about Joe Biden's health and the questionable use of an autopen to sign documents, Thrush would do well to substitute 'Biden' for 'Trump' in that sentence. - Mark Swanson, Mansfield A high tariff has two purposes: to raise a lot of money for the federal treasury and to protect some American businesses against unfair foreign competition. It also results in a high sales tax for the American purchaser of imported products. Most economists forecast that the tariff wars will cost the American family around $1,000 a year. That cost is an indirect and variable sales tax that could reach 30% on Chinese materials and products imported under tariffs. Who wins? The U.S. Treasury. Who loses? The American public. Do we really want a sales tax of up to 30%? Tariffs accounted for the vast majority of federal revenue until the Civil War. Tariffs to protect American businesses from unfair foreign competition began in 1816. But high tariffs have been economic disasters. - Marshall J. 'Joe' McFarland, Stephenville


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
House Speaker Says Deploying Marines in Los Angeles Not 'Heavy-Handed'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, defended Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's call to place active-duty U.S. Marines near Los Angeles on "high alert" amid ongoing protests, saying during a Sunday interview appearance on ABC News that the move is not "heavy-handed." Newsweek has reached out to Johnson for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Federal immigration enforcement operations sparked protests across California for a second day in a row on Saturday. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carried out raids in Paramount, Los Angeles County, following similar actions at several locations throughout other parts of the city on Friday. The Trump administration has pledged to carry out the largest mass deportation in U.S. history and has conducted numerous ICE raids, some of which have swept up individuals with proper documentation. Earlier this week, protests erupted over claims that detainees were being held in the basement of a federal building—allegations ICE has denied. A spokesperson previously told Newsweek that the agency "categorically refutes the assertions made by immigration activists in Los Angeles." Some protestors have thrown rocks at law enforcement, with one allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail, as well as burning items in the street. Agents have used tear gas on the crowds. The clashes highlight deepening conflicts between sanctuary jurisdictions and federal immigration policy, as Trump has implemented sweeping changes through executive orders and utilized the wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expand deportation authority. President Donald Trump announced the deployment of 2,000 National Guard to quell the protests. California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the move, saying local law enforcement was already mobilized and the presence of the National Guard was "purposefully inflammatory," would "escalate tensions" and "erode public trust." Los Angeles Police Department officers move to disperse a protest after federal immigration authorities conducted an operation on June 6 in Los Angeles. Los Angeles Police Department officers move to disperse a protest after federal immigration authorities conducted an operation on June 6 in Los Angeles. AP Photo/Jae C. Hong What To Know Hegseth said in a Saturday evening post on X, formerly Twitter, that in addition to mobilizing guards, nearby Marines may also be called upon, writing, "And, if violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." The violent mob assaults on ICE and Federal Law Enforcement are designed to prevent the removal of Criminal Illegal Aliens from our soil; a dangerous invasion facilitated by criminal cartels (aka Foreign Terrorist Organizations) and a huge NATIONAL SECURITY RISK. Under President... — Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) June 8, 2025 Camp Pendleton, located north of San Diego, has more than 42,000 active-duty Marines and sailors. On Sunday morning, ABC News' This Week journalist Jonathan Karl asked Johnson about Hegseth's warning and if Americans would "really see active-duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles?" The House speaker responded: "One of our core principles is maintaining peace through strength. We do that on foreign affairs and domestic affairs as well, I don't think that's heavy-handed. I think that's an important signal." The phrase "peace through strength" has become a core slogan and guiding principle of the second Trump administration. Karl followed up, asking, "You don't think sending Marines into the streets of an American city is heavy-handed?" "We have to be prepared to do what is necessary, and I think the notice that that might happen might have the deterring effect," Johnson said. Newsom, who has been criticized by the Trump administration for not doing enough to stop the protests, called Hegseth's statement about preparing Marines "deranged behavior." Karl also asked Johnson about the president's deployment of the National Guard, which was announced last night but not in the streets. "I think the president did exactly what he needed to do. These are federal laws. We have to maintain the rule of law, and that is not what is happening. Gavin Newsom has shown an inability or anunwillingness to do what is necessary there, so the president stepped in," Johnson said, adding that the move shows "real leadership, and he has the authority and responsibility to do it." In a late Saturday night post on Truth Social, Trump wrote: "Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest. We have an incompetent Governor (Newscum) and Mayor (Bass) who were, as usual (just look at how they handled the fires, and now their VERY SLOW PERMITTING disaster. Federal permitting is complete!), unable to to handle the task..." Newsom reshared the post on his X account, writing: "For those keeping track, Donald Trump's National Guard had not been deployed on the ground when he posted this." Troops arrived in the early hours of Sunday. What People Are Saying Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat, said on CBS News' Face the Nation on Sunday: "Every governor is going to make their own decisions based on the situation. In this case, Governor Newsom has made clear that he wants local law enforcement protecting the citizens, and he's asked the president not to inflame the don't want to inflame things by threatening to bring in the Marines or deporting people by mistake." Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote in a Saturday X post: "A message to the LA rioters: you will not stop us or slow us down.@ICEgov will continue to enforce the law. And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said in an X wrote on Saturday: "This is a difficult time for our city. As we recover from an unprecedented natural disaster, many in our community are feeling fear following recent federal immigration enforcement actions across Los Angeles County. Reports of unrest outside the city, including in Paramount, are deeply concerning. We've been in direct contact with officials in Washington, D.C., and are working closely with law enforcement to find the best path forward. Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social Saturday night: "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" What Happens Next The National Guard has arrived in Los Angeles and a third day of protests are expected.