logo
Building a nation: Papua New Guinea's 50 years of independence

Building a nation: Papua New Guinea's 50 years of independence

The Guardian7 days ago
In the early 1970s, Dame Meg Taylor remembers a sense of immense optimism as Papua New Guinea stood on the brink of independence. At that time she joined the staff of Sir Michael Somare, who would later become the country's first prime minister.
'There was a lot of hope,' said Taylor, diplomat and former secretary general of the Pacific Islands Forum.
'I still have very wonderful memories of sitting out on the old steps of the office … just thinking, 'What have we got ourselves into, and what an amazing opportunity that we have to build a country'.'
Now, as Papua New Guinea prepares to mark 50 years of independence from Australia, Taylor and other prominent figures reflect on a nation failing to live up to its promise. The Guardian interviewed dozens of people from across Papua New Guinea – including a former prime minister, ex-military commander and constitutional architect – and the Pacific for this series on the nation at 50.
They paint a picture of a country struggling to control violence and lawlessness, and divided on the path forward. The conversations revealed law and order, leadership and access to essential services as the biggest challenges facing the country of nearly 12 million people. They shared differing views on how to address social problems and what role Australia – its nearest neighbour and former colonial administrator – should play. Many highlighted the resilience of the population and expressed optimism about the future.
Peter O'Neill, who led Papua New Guinea from 2011 to 2019, said the founding fathers would not approve of 'the way the country has been managed.'
'I know that they would've been very disappointed that we have lost our way,' O'Neill told the Guardian.
'We have been blessed with a beautiful country with a lot of resources and beautiful people. All we need to do is manage ourselves in a better way,' O'Neill said.
Papua New Guinea was administered by Australia as a single territory from 1945. The territory included the former British protectorate of Papua and the former German colony of New Guinea. In 1972, Gough Whitlam promised that if elected Australia's prime minister, he would begin the transition to self-governance. He followed through on the pledge and on 16 September 1975, Papua New Guinea was granted independence. In a late night radio address that evening, Somare told the new nation: 'I wish to remind all that this is just the beginning. Now we must stand on our own two feet and work harder than ever before. We are indeed masters of our own destiny.'
Five decades on, Papua New Guinea is the largest Pacific nation after Australia with a young and growing population. About 40% live below the poverty line and in parts of the country, crime and violence are rampant. Many lack access to basic health services and education. Child mortality rates are ten times higher than Australia's.
Rich with gold, copper, oil and gas, minerals and energy extraction account for most of Papua New Guinea's export earnings. But this abundance has proved both a blessing and a curse, and its natural wealth has brought conflict, unrest and division. Corruption is rife. Poor infrastructure holds the economy back and young people across the country lack opportunity.
O'Neill believes independence was given to Papua New Guinea 'too soon'. He says not enough was done by the Australian colonial administrators to develop education and infrastructure in the country before they left.
Now, he points to mismanagement by leaders, inadequate policing and crime and violence as some of its biggest development challenges.
'Enforcement of the rule of law is absolutely nonexistent,' O'Neill said.
The sentiment is echoed by current prime minister James Marape, who last year said 'the greatest impediment facing us today is a lack of respect for our country's law.'
In a speech to the University of Papua New Guinea, Marape said if asked to rate the country's progress since independence on a scale of one to ten, 'I would not go past three.'
Marape did not respond to requests for an interview. Leader of the opposition Douglas Tomuriesa told the Guardian internal security has overtaken health and education as Papua New Guinea's most urgent challenge. He argues the general breakdown in law and order reflects deep structural issues, including scarce opportunities for young people, 'weak enforcement of justice and an under-resourced police force.'
'Limited trust in justice systems have left many communities feeling abandoned,' Tomuriesa said.
This has been most evident with the escalation of violence in the central and western Highlands regions. In recent years, fighting between tribes has devastated families and ruined local economies. Police in Enga province, in the Highlands region, told the Guardian hundreds of people are estimated to have been killed in conflicts this year.
Deeply rooted in historical contests over land, disputes are governed by customs and beliefs that stretch back generations. Yet fighting has become more deadly as an influx of high-powered firearms transformed traditional conflicts into fatal confrontations. Retired Maj Gen Jerry Singirok, commander of the Papua New Guinea defence force during the 1990s, said gun violence has overtaken all other crimes. He said there is no government oversight of the use of illegal guns and it is 'crippling the nation.'
Outside Porgera, in Enga province, village leader Tomaiti Hando said his community had been devastated by violence.
'We've lost fathers, brothers and sons, and now I watch my grandsons growing up in this same violence,' Hando said. He called on Australia to help bring an end to the troubles in the Highlands.
'I want it to end for good and I hope that Australia can step in and address this. Australia is our big brother, our leaders have not been able to address this issue for decades,' Hando said, adding that tackling the root causes of conflicts are essential for 'lasting peace and stability.'
Gender equality is a significant challenge in Papua New Guinea, women are vastly underrepresented in parliament, have less access to health and education and face a high risk of violence. Two-thirds of women in Papua New Guinea will experience violence in their lifetime. Ruth Kissam – one of the country's leading human rights activists – describes the harm to women and girls as a 'systemic failure to protect our most vulnerable.'
'We are talking about a pandemic within our homes and communities. The reality is that for many women in Papua New Guinea, violence is a daily experience, not an isolated event,' said Kissam.
Many say limited opportunities for the surging youth population has contributed to unrest and violence. They point to access to education as a crucial plank of development. Taylor said without education 'you're going to have people who don't have hope.'
A report published by the World Bank in 2024 estimated 72% of ten-year-olds are unable to read, and only 18% of 20-to 24-year-olds have completed secondary or tertiary education. More investment in education is 'critical' to Papua New Guinea's economic future and could turn its young population into an 'engine of growth,' the report said.
Singirok also highlighted the need to lift education levels among younger generations, and said Papua New Guinea must invest to 'not only teach the core subjects but ethics, religion and all aspects of life where they are taught to live in harmony with others.'
To confront challenges, former and current politicians called for local communities to be given more control of their affairs.
John Momis is one of the country's constitutional fathers and former president of Bougainville. He argues too much power resides in the capital Port Moresby, and not in the villages and towns where so many live.
The 83-year-old is a respected politician who spent decades in the national parliament. In 1972, he was elected to parliament and Somare asked him to help lead the constitutional planning committee.
'Papua New Guinea was so highly diversified, we had 800 languages, the biggest number of languages in the whole world. The best way of uniting a highly diversified country is through decentralisation, giving power to the different provinces,' Momis said from his home in Bougainville.
'The problem today is the national government has monopolised power again. And they're just providing services to the poor people in the provinces,' he said.
Australia remains the country's biggest aid partner. In 2024-25, Canberra provided an estimated $637.4m in official development assistance (ODA). Over the last decade, Australia has provided about $6.2bn in ODA funding to Papua New Guinea.
Momis cautions that Australia 'should not just give to Papua New Guinea when they beg.'
'People must be both subjects and objects of development. People must drive development,' Momis said.
Tomuriesa, an MP for a district in Milne Bay province, said Australia can assist in rebuilding capacity in policing, governance, health and education.
'But aid must align with local priorities, and be delivered with transparency and accountability,' he said.
Looking ahead, Tomuriesa draws optimism from 'our people's resilience'. He said young people are eager to learn, small business sector is growing and women are stepping into leadership.
'The lesson is clear: where the people are empowered, progress follows,' he said.
Papua's New Guinea's natural strengths – productive land, rich culture and its people, give Taylor reasons for hope.
'The country is rich in resources, rich in I believe, in human capital, where you have a very strong agricultural base, who can cultivate and we can feed ourselves as we put our minds to,' Taylor said.
She said the country's survival as a parliamentary democracy, despite decades of turmoil, is another positive sign – as is the enduring strength of traditional systems.
'There's still a lot of hope. We're only 50 years old in terms of modern constitutional Papua New Guinea. I'm not going to give up, and I know a lot of people in this country are not going to give up,' Taylor said.
Momis too, is hopeful about the future.
'I am an eternal optimist. I'm in the village and things are difficult, you know. But I think there's a lot of hope.'
Bethanie Harriman, Prianka Srinivasan and Martha Louis contributed to this report
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TARRIC BROOKER: How AI will affect YOUR job - whether you're a tradie or an office worker - and the ripple effects it will have on the property market and the careers of a generation
TARRIC BROOKER: How AI will affect YOUR job - whether you're a tradie or an office worker - and the ripple effects it will have on the property market and the careers of a generation

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

TARRIC BROOKER: How AI will affect YOUR job - whether you're a tradie or an office worker - and the ripple effects it will have on the property market and the careers of a generation

As the promise of a future defined by AI increasingly fills the airwaves and the debates within the halls of power around the globe, it is striking how different the perspectives are on what this future will look like, even just a few short years from now. At one end of the spectrum, there is the hopeful view that AI will help to dramatically improve productivity and act to kickstart broad-based growth in living standards. At the other, there is concern that AI could be the catalyst for one of the most challenging shifts for societies and economies in modern history. One of the figures taking the latter view is Ford CEO Jim Farley. 'AI is going to replace literally half of all white collar workers,' Mr Farley said in a recent conference address. 'I believe that AI and new technology have an asymmetric impact on our economy. That means a lot of things are helped a lot, and a lot of things are hurt,' Farley said. However, the Albanese government has spoken in positive terms about the potential impact of AI on the economy. In an address to the 'Australia's Economic Outlook 2025' conference in Sydney last week, the Prime Minister said artificial intelligence will deliver 'secure and fulfilling jobs' - not threaten them. That follows comments by Treasurer Jim Chalmers backing the minimal regulation of AI, arguing that the Albanese government's focus was on how technological progress can boost productivity, rather than implementing limits on its use. Aussie industries exposed to AI When it comes to the impact of AI by industry, it can vary considerably. According to an analysis by investment bank Goldman Sachs, over the next decade, 46 per cent of jobs in office and administrative support are exposed to AI. At the other end of the spectrum, in one of Australia's largest industries, the construction and resource extraction sector, just six per cent of jobs are exposed to AI. The rest of industries fall somewhere in the middle, with hands-on, blue collar roles significantly less likely to be impacted by the rise of AI. Overall, Goldman Sachs estimates that 300 million jobs could be diminished or lost over the next decade. Comparison with the Industrial Revolution As concern continues to build over the impact of AI on jobs and our society more broadly, parallels have been drawn with the impact of the Industrial Revolution - considered the period from the 19th century onwards where technologies such as mass production brought massive growth. Unfortunately, when one assesses the history of the Industrial Revolution and contrasts it with the promise of AI, it is clear they are two very different developments. The major difference between the Industrial Revolution and the promise of the AI is that one is hardware, the other is software. During that era, replacing a human with a machine was an expensive and time-consuming process. For example, to replace the farm workers separating grain from the husks and stems of crops with a steam powered threshing machine in the mid-19th century, it cost the equivalent of between five and ten times an average farmer's annual wage. Given the availability of loans and business finance more broadly in that era, the capital-intensive nature of the shift towards mechanised operations was gradual. This is illustrated in the relatively gradual shift in the proportion of people employed in agriculture over time. In 1820, 73 per cent of the American workforce was employed in agriculture. By 1855, the figure had fallen to 53 per cent of the workforce and to 40 per cent by the turn of the 20th century. Meanwhile, the cost of implementing an AI like ChatGPT in a business setting is as little as $46 per user per month. For a small fraction of an office's monthly budget for takeaway coffees, tools could be implemented that could have a transformative effect on the way we work and the way our labour is demanded. This could scarcely be more different to the world of the Industrial Revolution, where implementing new technologies was an extremely expensive and time consuming endeavour. The impact of AI on the nation's property market will likely be directly proportional to the impact on the labour market. If a sizeable proportion of people are left effectively unemployable by the rapid evolution of technology in the workplace, then it's challenging to see how property prices don't take a hit without some form of policymaker intervention. But it's not the early 1990s anymore. Back then, banks were far less forgiving of mortgage holders in difficulty and thousands of people lost their homes. During the pandemic the banks, government and RBA adopted a strategy called 'Extend and Pretend'. It allowed mortgage holders to defer their payments. The normal rules were effectively suspended, rather than the usual arrears process being pursued. It's therefore not hard to imagine an equally unprecedented strategy being pursued to prevent people from losing their homes and the housing market from crashing, if the downside scenarios for the labour market were to be realised. Joke proposals about policies such as YouTube personality Florian Heisse's 'Mortgage Keeper' - which entails the federal government paying your mortgage, similar to JobKeeper - may switch from the realm of the somewhat amusing to that of reality. To what degree an intervention could be successful depends very much on the scale of the impact of AI on the ranks of the nation's workers and how businesses collectively adapt to that. AI revolution's effect on Gen Z There are some signs that the impact on the labour market has already begun to be felt in the United States, as the unemployment rate for recent college graduates rises. A recent report from research firm Oxford Economics concluded: 'There are signs that entry-level positions are being displaced by artificial intelligence at higher rates.' Molly Kinder, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, which studies the impact of AI, said: 'Employers are saying, 'These tools are so good that I no longer need marketing analysts, finance analysts and research assistants'.' The early reports from within US industry suggest that the immediate impact will be felt by Gen Z, as employers seek to automate largely entry level tasks that don't require a great deal of in-depth training. If the downside scenario were to be realised, this leaves the impacted members of Gen Z at something of an impasse. If they can't get their foot in the door because businesses are focused on entry level jobs being performed by AI, how can they get the work experience needed in order to get a more senior level role? On the potential upside for Gen Z, of all the generations, they are the most accustomed to the usage of AI and may have an advantage in adapting to the new employment roles of managing, refining and directing AI software. The impact on other generations and even older members of Gen Z who are more established in their careers is more uncertain, with a great deal more variation depending on what sort of role they are employed in. The positive scenario for workers The upside scenario of the proliferation of AI in the workplace hinges on the idea that it will either have a minimal net impact on overall employment, or will end up creating more jobs than it eliminates in net terms. The theory is that the impact on the labour market will be a net positive, due to the combination of new jobs focused on the burgeoning AI sector and the productivity increases that are expected to come with the widespread adoption of AI. At an individual business level, it is hoped that this will allow workers to focus on higher value and more vital tasks, while routine work is largely automated and allowed to run in the background. Regardless, while the outlook for the impact of AI remains highly uncertain, the world may soon be finding itself at a major crossroads, the type of shift that only comes up maybe once a generation. If AI fulfils even half its promised capabilities, it will be a turning point in history, for better or for worse. If AI fulfils even half its promised capabilities, it will be a turning point in history, writes commentator Tarric Brooker (above) On the other hand, it's possible that AI's impact may be more limited than anticipated in the remaining years of this decade. Business owners will soon determine whether or not the level of capability and accuracy provided by these new tools is right for their businesses. Despite the parallels that have been drawn with all manner of other technological leaps in the modern history of humanity, this could mark a rapid evolution in our history. Steam engines, flight, the personal computer and the internet all found a place in our societies and our lives gradually over time, with each one seeing a faster adoption than the last. But this time is different. This time, the overwhelming majority of us already hold the necessary hardware to use an AI agent in the palm of our hands.

‘Gross over-reach': Labor group urges Albanese to reject key parts of antisemitism envoy plan
‘Gross over-reach': Labor group urges Albanese to reject key parts of antisemitism envoy plan

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘Gross over-reach': Labor group urges Albanese to reject key parts of antisemitism envoy plan

A 'groundswell' of Labor rank-and-file members are urging the government to reject key recommendations from the federal antisemitism envoy, according to an internal lobby group, urging a focus on anti-racism education rather than more contentious ideas such as stripping funding from universities and arts bodies. Labor Friends of Palestine, an internal campaign group of members and politicians, said it was concerned about anti-Jewish hatred, but would be troubled about wider adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's contested definition of antisemitism, as recommended by Jillian Segal in a wide-ranging plan last week. Three co-convenors of the group have written to the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, saying they were 'deeply concerned' about parts of Segal's recommendations, describing her ideas about amending immigration law, changing school curriculums or potentially terminating funding to academics and artists as 'gross over-reach'. The group is also planning a campaign to gather further support from more Labor party branches. 'There is a groundswell of outrage among rank-and-file Labor members,' Peter Moss, a co-convener of Labor Friends of Palestine, told Guardian Australia. 'There is deep concern about the use of the IHRA definition which has been deployed to stifle criticism of the State of Israel.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Albanese is currently mulling a response to envoy Segal's 49 recommendations to stamp out anti-Jewish hate. It is widely expected the government could focus its response on the education and prevention measures in Segal's plan. More complex recommendations, such as defunding universities or academic grants, would face more significant debate. Guardian Australia reported on Friday that Segal's push for the federal government to 'require' the IHRA definition 'to be used across all levels of government and public institutions' will face pushback from some concerned Labor MPs and party members. That definition is contested in some quarters, with concerns it was increasingly being used to conflate antisemitism with criticism of Israel. Other Labor voices believed some criticism of Segal's report had been an overreaction, noting attacks on synagogues as an issue that required action. Albanese in 2021 committed federal Labor to the IHRA definition, as did then-prime minister Scott Morrison, and then-Labor premier Daniel Andrews in 2022. However it's understood that any federal push to codify or more widely embed the definition into various sectors would face internal pushback from some federal MPs. Albanese and Segal have both said legitimate criticism of the Israeli government, including its military actions in Gaza, would not be forbidden. Moss and his co-conveners told Albanese in their letter that many Labor members would reject the wider adoption of the IHRA definition, claiming it had been 'been deployed to stifle criticism of the policies and practices of the State of Israel and undermine the capacity of the Palestinian people to assert their rights under international law'. The group noted a 2023 open letter from more than 100 Israeli and international civil society organisations – including Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the American Civil Liberties Union – which asked the United Nations to reject the IHRA definition because it is being 'misused' to protect Israel from legitimate criticism. Moss and the group's other co-conveners also wrote to the prime minister of their concerns about some of Segal's recommendations. 'Proposals for amendments to immigration law, changes to school curriculum or reform of funding arrangements for universities and cultural institutions are beyond the scope or expertise of the Envoy and should be rejected,' they wrote. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Segal said on Friday that stripping funding would be a 'last resort', downplaying the potential for such a power to be used. Labor friends of Palestine said they 'share the Government's concerns about increased reports of antisemitic behaviour – just as we share concerns about increased rates of Islamophobia'. 'However the Plan makes some very broad claims that seem to be designed to create a sense of crisis rather than to foster social cohesion,' they wrote. Instead they said the government should focus on cultural and educational programs 'that promote and celebrate the full diversity of our multicultural society.' Moss and his co-conveners also urged Albanese to review the antisemitism envoy position itself, suggesting instead a broader-based program to combat all forms of racism. The Labor government also instituted an envoy to combat Islamophobia, Aftab Malik, who said last week his report would be sent to government in August. 'More than 100 members from around Australia have reached out to Labor Friends of Palestine in the past 24 hours asking us to speak out urgently on this issue,' Moss said. 'Labor members want the prime minister to reject the envoy's plan and review the envoy's position.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store