India-U.S. spat over trade and oil threatens wider fallout
India's opposition parties and the general public have urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to stand up to what they call bullying by Trump, who on Wednesday signed an executive order subjecting Indian imports to an additional 25% in duties on top of an existing 25% tariff, due to its big purchases of Russian oil.
While India has emerged in recent years as a key partner for Washington in its strategic rivalry with China, its large U.S. trade surplus and close relations with Russia — which Trump is seeking to pressure into agreeing to a peace agreement with Ukraine — have made it a prime target in the Republican president's global tariff offensive.
Trump's taunt that India could buy oil from arch enemy Pakistan has also not gone down well in New Delhi, said two Indian government sources. India has also rejected repeated claims by Trump that he used trade as a lever to end a recent military conflict between India and Pakistan.
In an unusually sharp statement this week, India accused the U.S. of double standards in singling it out for Russian oil imports while continuing to buy Russian uranium hexafluoride, palladium and fertilizer. On Wednesday, it called the tariffs "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," vowing to "take all actions necessary to protect its national interests."
But New Delhi knows that any further escalation will hurt it in matters beyond trade, said the sources. Unlike China, India does not have leverage like supplies of rare earths to force Trump's hand to improve the terms of any trade deal, they said.
In recent years, successive U.S. administrations, including Trump's first, carefully cultivated relations with India with an eye on it as a vital partner in long-term efforts to counter the growing might of China.
U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House in February. |
REUTERS
But analysts say Trump's recent moves have plunged the relationship back to possibly its worst phase since the U.S. imposed sanctions on India for nuclear tests in 1998.
"India is now in a trap: because of Trump's pressure, Modi will reduce India's oil purchases from Russia, but he cannot publicly admit to doing so for fear of looking like he's surrendering to Trump's blackmail," said Ashley Tellis at Washington's Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
"We could be heading into a needless crisis that unravels a quarter century of hard-won gains with India."
Indian state refiners have in recent days stopped buying Russian oil as discounts narrowed and pressure from Trump rose.
A more pressing challenge for India, analysts say, is the stark divergence between its priorities and Trump's political base on key issues such as work visas for tech professionals and offshoring of services. India has long been a major beneficiary of U.S. work visa programs and the outsourcing of software and business services, a sore point for Americans who have lost jobs to cheaper workers in India.
Relations with India risk becoming a "football in American domestic politics," warned Evan Feigenbaum, a former senior State Department official under the Republican presidency of George W. Bush.
"Issues that directly touch India are among the most partisan and explosive in Washington, including immigration and deportation, H1B visas for tech workers, offshoring and overseas manufacturing by U.S. companies, and technology sharing and co-innovation with foreigners," he wrote in a LinkedIn post.
Since a 2008 deal to cooperate on civilian nuclear technology, the two countries have deepened intelligence sharing and defense cooperation and expanded interactions with Australia and Japan through "the Quad" grouping aimed at containing China's dominance in the Indo-Pacific.
Pipelines of liquid cargo near a port in India. Indian state refiners have stopped buying Russian oil as discounts narrowed and pressure from Trump rose. |
REUTERS
But fractures have appeared, despite Modi's rapport with Trump in his first term and then former U.S. President Joe Biden.
Images in February of Indians deported by the U.S. on military planes, their hands and legs shackled, horrified the country just days before Modi went to see Trump seeking to stave off high tariffs.
The relationship was also seriously tested in late 2023 when the U.S. said it had foiled a plot with Indian links to kill a Sikh separatist leader on U.S. soil. New Delhi has denied any official connection to the plot.
"The Modi regime's credibility in the U.S. has gone down," said Sukh Deo Muni, a former Indian diplomat and a professor emeritus at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University.
"And maybe there are people who think that India or Modi had to be brought back on track, if not taught a lesson. And if that trend continues, I'm quite worried that the challenge is quite powerful and strong for India to navigate."
One Indian government source said India needs to gradually repair ties with the U.S. while engaging more with other nations that have faced the brunt of Trump tariffs and aid cuts, including the African Union and the BRICS bloc that includes Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa.
India is already making some moves with Russia and China.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to visit New Delhi this year and on Tuesday, Russia said the two countries had discussed further strengthening defense cooperation "in the form of a particularly privileged strategic partnership."
India has also boosted engagement with China, a change after years of tensions following a deadly border clash in 2020. Modi is set to visit China soon for the first time since 2018.
"Russia will attempt to exploit the rift between the U.S. and India by proposing the restoration of the Russia-India-China trilateral and new projects in defense," said analyst Aleksei Zakharov at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi.
"India will undoubtedly be mindful of structural factors such as sanctions against Russia and will seek to find a compromise with the Trump administration."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
US-China trade truce, Lam-Lee summit, Prabowo speech
Welcome to Your Week in Asia. India and Japan have been roiled by U.S. President Donald Trump's sharp changes on tariffs, but this week attention will be focused on China and its trade truce with the U.S. Businesses and markets will be watching closely to see if it will be extended, or a deal struck. Several countries will celebrate their independence anniversaries this week, with leaders giving speeches to mark the occasions and set out policy priorities for the year ahead. Get the best of our coverage of Asia and much more by following us on X, where our handle is @NikkeiAsia. We are also now on Bluesky, with the handle @ MONDAY Vietnam-South Korea summit Vietnam's top leader To Lam and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung will hold a summit followed by a state banquet as part of Lam's four-day state visit to South Korea through Wednesday. Lam will be the first foreign leader hosted by Lee since the South Korean president took office in June, and the visit comes at a time of blossoming bilateral ties. Lee's office said that more than 10,000 South Korean companies have operations in Vietnam, and the country is positioning itself to become the largest source of foreign investment in the Southeast Asian nation. TUESDAY U.S.-China trade truce ends The trade war truce between the world's two largest economies is due to expire, unless U.S. President Donald Trump extends it. The 90-day detente agreed in Geneva in May halted a cycle of tit-for-tat retaliation that had sent tariffs on each other soaring into triple digits. Negotiators met in Stockholm at the end of last month and agreed to seek an extension, but American officials said the final decision rests with Trump. The president has since said the two sides are "very close" to a deal. Data: Singapore revised gross domestic product, India inflation Earnings: Sea Monetary policy: Reserve Bank of Australia WEDNESDAY Earnings: GoTo, Commonwealth Bank Monetary policy: Bank of Thailand THURSDAY Jimmy Lai trial resumes The marathon trial of Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai reconvenes for closing arguments. The founder of the pro-democracy news outlet Apple Daily, which was forced to close in 2021, has been held in solitary confinement for nearly 1,700 days under the controversial national security law that China imposed on the city. Western governments and human rights groups have called for his release. CK Hutchison in the spotlight Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison releases its first-half earnings, with investors and observers looking for clues on the fate of its plan to sell dozens of global ports. The group earlier this year agreed to offload the maritime interests, including two ports around the Panama Canal, to a consortium including U.S. asset manager BlackRock. But the arrangement met heavy resistance from Beijing, and the exclusive negotiating period expired last month, when CK Hutchison said it would invite a "major strategic investor" from mainland China to join the buyers. Foxconn results Taiwan's Foxconn reports its full second-quarter earnings. The Apple and Nvidia supplier already disclosed record revenue for the three months through June thanks to booming demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing products. The world's largest contract electronics major faces uncertainties in coming quarters, however, including tariffs, a precarious geopolitical situation and questions over how long the AI investment bonanza will last. Earnings: Olam, Geely, Westpac FRIDAY Prabowo gives State of the Nation Address Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto is set to deliver his first State of the Nation Address, in which he will explain the government's priority programs for the coming year. The speech will also include key economic targets, highlighting the administration's fiscal direction under his leadership. The address comes ahead of Indonesia's 80th Independence Day celebrations on Sunday. Independence days marked South Korea will mark 80 years since the end of occupation by Japan during its National Liberation Day holiday. The day customarily features the announcement of presidential pardons, and this year local media have reported that prominent left-wing politician and former Justice Minister Cho Kuk, convicted of forging credentials, could be a recipient. India, meanwhile, will celebrate the end of British rule over the South Asian nation, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi set to deliver a speech from the historic Red Fort in New Delhi. On Sunday, Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong will address his country's National Day Rally, after the city-state's 60th anniversary of independence on Aug. 9. Ong Beng Seng sentencing A Singaporean court is set to sentence property tycoon Ong Beng Seng after he pled guilty to his role in a gifts scandal involving former Transport Minister S. Iswaran. The latter was given a year's prison term, which he finished serving in June. Ong could potentially receive a fine, as the 79-year-old, who has multiple medical issues, could be deemed too frail for jail time. Data: Japan GDP, Malaysia GDP
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Why It's Been Such a Slow Congressional Retirement Season
The odd-year summer break from legislative action on Capitol Hill can be a tense waiting period to see how incumbents feel back home. These lawmakers, particularly those who run every two years in battleground House districts, get extended time in front of their constituents to gauge how their party's agenda is faring with voters. Plus, perhaps more important, they get a long stretch of time to determine whether they want to continue the breakneck pace for the next 16 months, with the reward being another two-year term for a job that can be quite frustrating. The question now is whether this summer and fall will play out like 2017, when a flood of Republican retirements set in motion a Democratic takeover during President Donald Trump's first midterm in 2018. Or it could play out more like 2024, when many retirees came from politically safe seats in both parties – and those so-called open seats had little impact in determining the House majority, which the Republicans maintained with the narrowest edge in almost 100 years. One new wrinkle is all the states discussing drawing new congressional districts to give their side a better chance at the majority come November 2026. That could freeze the decision-making process for several more months. Some safe incumbents want to know whether they are getting moved into politically untenable new districts, in which case they might head for the exits rather than run hard when defeat is certain. For now, eight Democrats and 11 Republicans are retiring from the House at the end of their terms next year, but 15 of them are actually running for higher office. Another, Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D), will retire at the end of this year if she wins the New Jersey governor's race in November. Just three of those 20 come from battleground districts: Reps. Don Bacon (R-Nebraska), Angie Craig (D-Minnesota) and John James (R-Michigan). But Craig and James are running next year for senator and governor, respectively, in their states. So far Bacon, from a district that favored Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the last two elections, is retiring from elective politics entirely and vacating a true swing seat. After the 2024 elections left the House in a near tie – 220 Republicans, 215 Democrats – some longtime political analysts question whether it matters if an incumbent is on the ballot at all, because the deciding voters tend to have low information about politics and, if they vote, side with the party out of power. 'This country is evenly divided, which often leads to an evenly split House. Additionally, House races have become increasingly close to being parliamentary – who the candidates are is of less importance than the party they represent,' Charlie Cook, founder of the Cook Political Report With Amy Walter, wrote in late July. 'Among the tiny slice of voters in the middle, when they do vote, they are far more likely to vote against a candidate than for someone.' Regardless of such assessments, the operatives inside the two caucus's political arms – Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and its counterpart, National Republican Congressional Committee – always believe it's best to have their battle-tested incumbents running for reelection, as they are familiar to voters and comfortable raising the extreme amounts of money needed in today's politics. And there also tend to be domino effects among lawmakers who see longtime friends deciding to leave, prompting them to consider retiring rather than running for another term. Trump's first midterm election cycle provided a great example of this, as the return from August recess started with a retirement bang. Within five days in early September 2017, Reps. Dave Reichert (R-Washington), Charlie Dent (R-Pennsylvania) and Dave Trott (R-Michigan) announced they would vacate their suburban swing districts. Reichert and Dent had won seven terms, and Trott two. All three won in 2016 by wide double-digit margins. In his announcement, Dent cited a political climate dominated by 'disruptive outside influences that profit from increased polarization and ideological rigidity that leads to dysfunction.' Democrats won all three of those seats the following year. That set the tone for the remainder of the midterm elections, as seasoned GOP members bowed out, including two veteran California Republicans, Reps. Darrell Issa and Edward R. Royce, who announced two days apart in early January 2018 that they would not run for reelection. Democrats won both of those seats also, en route to an election in which they won 13 seats previously held by Republicans that had been left open by retirements, and one where the GOP incumbent lost his primary. Democrats won a net gain of more than 40 seats in 2018 and held the majority for four years. All told, 52 House members retired that election season, including the speaker, Paul D. Ryan (R-Wisconsin), the largest number in the past 30 years, according to the Brookings Institution. Almost three dozen more lost either in their primary or general elections, a massive turnover of more than 20 percent of the 435-member House. Sometimes the retirement wave does not start after the August recess and instead comes later in the odd year, around the Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday season. That's also the point at which veteran incumbents and their campaign operatives have a bit more political data about where the district stands, how it approves or disapproves of the president, and whether the lawmaker can win in the upcoming midterm. In mid-December 2009, Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tennessee), a 13-term veteran, joined a growing number of Democrats who saw a brutal 2010 taking shape and decided to depart. In Gordon's case, he had coasted to reelection every two years, not even facing a Republican opponent in 2008, but that year his voters had given John McCain a more than 20-point margin in the district over Barack Obama. He hit a reflective point in life and decided it was time to bolt. 'Turning 60 has led me to do some thinking about what's next,' Gordon said in a statement at the time. 'I have an 8-year-old daughter and a wonderful wife who has a very demanding job.' Gordon was one of four Democrats, with more than 60 years of combined experience, to announce retirement plans in the week of Thanksgiving or the two weeks following it. Obama had become deeply unpopular in the South. In spring 2010, just 42 percent of Tennesseans approved of his job performance. As a result, Republicans won Gordon's seat with 67 percent of the vote, and they have held it since without too much effort. Republicans won the three other seats as well, part of a 63-seat wave in terms of House seats gained. Today's swing-seat incumbents are dominated by a large number of relative newcomers, the type of people who are in quite different political circumstances than Gordon in 2010 or Reichert in 2018. Of the 18 House races that the Cook report rates as pure toss-ups, just three incumbents started serving before Trump ran for president in 2016: Reps. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Scott Perry (R-Pennsylvania) and David Schweikert (R-Arizona). Expanding out to include the next 22 most competitive races, only three incumbents began their House service before Trump entered politics. By and large, these incumbents have generational profiles like Reps. Michael Lawler (R-New York) and Emilia Strong Sykes (D-Ohio). Lawler, 38, defeated a Democratic incumbent in 2022, helping Republicans reclaim the House majority, and won again in 2024 even as Harris won his district over Trump. Sykes, 39, won a close race in 2022 and, in a presidential year in which Harris and Trump effectively tied in her district, she won by more than 2 percentage points. At this point, especially after Lawler decided against a bid for governor, both are running hard for reelection with no intent to retire. Yet each of their states gets mentioned when it comes to redistricting, with Republicans having full control of the Ohio state legislature and Democrats in charge of the New York legislature. If those states start redrawing the House districts, their seats would be prime targets for partisans to move the lines around to make easy pickups for the other party. Any massive revamping of these districts could prompt a flurry of new retirement announcements.
Yomiuri Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Expands Use of Tariffs to Reach National Security Goals
President Donald Trump's freewheeling use of tariffs as a tool of American power may have been more extensive than was publicly known, encompassing an array of national security goals as well as the interests of individual companies, according to internal government documents obtained by The Washington Post. This month, State Department officials considered demanding that U.S. trading partners vote against an international effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the oceangoing container ships that are the backbone of global trade. In a draft 'action memo,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio was told that department officials had sought 'to inject this issue into the ongoing bilateral trade negotiations' with maritime nations such as Singapore. That move came after administration officials this past spring debated broadening trade negotiations with more than a dozen nations, including by requiring Israel to eliminate a Chinese company's control of a key port and insisting that South Korea publicly support deploying U.S. troops to deter China as well as Seoul's traditional rival, North Korea, the documents said. Administration officials saw trade talks as an opportunity to achieve objectives that went far beyond Trump's oft-stated goal of reducing the chronic U.S. trade deficit. In the first weeks after the president paused his 'reciprocal' tariffs April 9 to allow for negotiations, officials drew up plans to press countries near China for a closer defense relationship, including the purchase of U.S. equipment and port visits, the documents said. 'This is the first time I've seen that type of request in a trade agreement. When you're sitting at the negotiating table, you're not talking about this stuff,' said Wendy Cutler, who spent more than a quarter century in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and is now vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute in Washington. The latest sign that Trump views tariffs as the Swiss Army knife of diplomacy came this week, when he threatened to impose a 50 percent tariff on Indian goods to compel New Delhi to halt Russian oil purchases that the U.S. says support Russia's war in Ukraine. In an eight-page list of 'supplemental negotiating objectives,' U.S. officials acknowledged that potential accords would cover issues, including military basing, 'not traditionally found in a trade agreement.' Officials also discussed pressing other nations to provide concessions for individual companies including Chevron, one of the world's 10 largest oil producers, and Elon Musk's Starlink. The negotiating document contained suggestions from other Cabinet departments in response to a request by the office of U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and bore a handwritten notation indicating that it was a May 1 draft. It is not clear whether the provisions were discussed in the negotiations. Trump has announced several framework trade agreements with the European Union, Japan, Vietnam and others. But the administration has not released formal texts. A USTR spokesperson declined to comment. 'The document sent shock waves through the government,' said one State Department employee who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the press. 'This isn't normally how it works.' Trump on several occasions has publicly mixed trade and unrelated issues. In January, the president said he would impose tariffs on Colombian goods unless that country's leader agreed to accept deported migrants, which he eventually did. Last month, Trump threatened 50 percent tariffs on imports from Brazil if the government did not halt its prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro for allegedly fomenting a coup. On April 2, Trump described his tariffs as a response to other nations' unfair trade practices that would reduce the $1.2 trillion U.S. merchandise trade deficit. The import taxes could be lowered for countries that 'align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national security matters,' his executive order said. As U.S. negotiators scrambled to prepare for simultaneous talks with 18 top trading partners, suggestions poured in from across the administration. The South Korean government should be urged to endorse a change in the positioning of U.S. troops stationed there under the U.S. Forces Korea command, according to an early draft of a U.S.-Korea agreement. Among the goals listed was a requirement that 'Korea will issue a political statement supporting flexibility for USFK force posture to better deter China while continuing to deter [North Korea],' it said. The U.S. also wanted Seoul to boost defense spending to 3.8 percent of GDP, up from 2.6 percent last year, and to increase its $1 billion-plus contribution to cover the annual costs of basing the roughly 28,500 American troops in South Korea. In a July 28 press briefing, Woo Sang-ho, South Korea's senior secretary for political affairs, confirmed that defense issues were 'on the negotiation list.' But they were not in the agreement that Trump announced two days later. Trump nodded to his concerns over allied burden-sharing tariff remarks April 2 in the Rose Garden, during what he dubbed 'Liberation Day.' 'We take care of countries all over the world. We pay for their military. We pay for everything they have to pay. And then when you want to cut back a little bit, they get upset that you're not taking care of them any longer,' the president said. The negotiating document showed that administration officials planned to push several governments including Taiwan, India and Indonesia to increase their defense spending or to buy more U.S. military hardware. Such national security considerations may help explain why most countries did not retaliate against the U.S. with their own tariffs on American goods, said Phil Luck, director of the economics program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'They don't think this is just an economic competition. They're concerned we will escalate above that [and] pull out of NATO or change troop deployments,' said Luck, who served as the State Department's deputy chief economist in the Biden administration. Indeed, some Trump officials envisioned using the trade negotiations to contain Chinese strategic influence. Administration officials hoped that Trump's threat of a 49 percent tariff on Cambodian goods would persuade government officials in Phnom Penh to allow the 'U.S. Navy to conduct annual (or bi-annual) ship visits and training exercises at Ream Naval Base' in southwestern Cambodia. Washington had grown concerned over a Chinese naval presence at the facility, which offers direct access to the contested South China Sea. The U.S. wanted the Cambodian government to prohibit Chinese military 'deployments outside of Ream,' the document said. Israeli officials were to be pushed 'to remove Chinese port ownership in Haifa,' a coastal city in northern Israel. In 2015, China's Shanghai International Port Group, a majority state-owned company, won a 25-year contract to operate a new automated container-handling facility there. U.S. concerns over the Chinese presence in Haifa date to the Biden administration. U.S. Navy vessels have often docked at an Israeli navy base that is adjacent to the commercial port. U.S. officials also worried about another port under Chinese control in the northern Australian city of Darwin, which hosts about 2,500 U.S. Marines on a rotational deployment. China's Landbridge Group signed a 99-year lease to operate the Australian port in 2015. U.S. negotiators wanted a 'signal' from the Australian government of its 'intent to revisit its arrangement on the operation of the Port of Darwin by a China-backed firm.' During the Australian election campaign this year, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged to return the port to local ownership. But port worries were just one element of a broader anti-China proposal. In East Africa, the administration wanted Madagascar to refuse to permit 'China to establish military bases and expand military cooperation.' Another East African nation, the tiny island of Mauritius, should conduct a study on removing telecom equipment made by China's Huawei, ZTE and Hikvision from its telecom and surveillance networks. And officials wanted Argentina to consult with U.S. experts about implementing 'control measures' at Chinese space installations in that country to 'ensure their exclusively civilian use.' The draft also suggested ways the U.S. government could prioritize the interests of specific companies. In Lesotho, a poor southern African nation that Trump had threatened with 50 percent tariffs, negotiators wanted the government to finalize deals with 'multiple U.S. firms.' OnePower, a renewable energy start-up, should be granted 'a five-year withholding tax exemption' and a license to develop a 24-megawatt project. Regulators should waive a legal requirement for Starlink, Musk's satellite-based internet provider, to provide a physical address in Lesotho before conducting business there, the document said. In mid-April, Newsday, a newspaper in Maseru, the capital of Lesotho, reported that there was no evidence of a Starlink office at the location the company had given as its registered address, 'raising serious legal and regulatory concerns.' In Israel, U.S. officials wanted the government not to 'proceed with any draft regulations or potential plans to force Chevron to sell its interests or status as operator in one of its offshore natural gas fields.' The Houston-based energy company has been operating in Israel since 2020. 'Chevron engages regularly with government officials and key stakeholders at home and abroad as a normal course of business. While we do not discuss details, our conversations always focus on the benefits we believe we bring to the communities where we operate, including the Eastern Mediterranean,' Chevron said when asked if it had requested U.S. government help. The administration continues to leverage trade talks for broader gains. McCoy Pitt, the senior official in the State Department's international organization affairs bureau, wrote the secretary of state this month about linking trade talks with hopes of killing a global climate change deal. Pitt urged Rubio to approve a strategy before a scheduled October vote by members of the International Maritime Organization on limiting greenhouse gas emissions by large container ships. The U.N. agency in April approved draft regulations, which the State Department memo described as a 'global carbon tax.' Pitt's memo, titled 'Protecting U.S. Shipping Interests by Defeating the International Maritime Organization's 'Net-Zero Framework,'' said that as part of any trade deal with the U.S., countries 'are instructed' or 'would be expected' to vote against the IMO proposal. Through an online portal, the State Department said: 'We do not comment on purportedly leaked documents. We do, however, look forward to the story on how the Trump Administration is using reciprocal trade negotiations to benefit and fight for the American people.'
