Why It's Been Such a Slow Congressional Retirement Season
These lawmakers, particularly those who run every two years in battleground House districts, get extended time in front of their constituents to gauge how their party's agenda is faring with voters. Plus, perhaps more important, they get a long stretch of time to determine whether they want to continue the breakneck pace for the next 16 months, with the reward being another two-year term for a job that can be quite frustrating.
The question now is whether this summer and fall will play out like 2017, when a flood of Republican retirements set in motion a Democratic takeover during President Donald Trump's first midterm in 2018. Or it could play out more like 2024, when many retirees came from politically safe seats in both parties – and those so-called open seats had little impact in determining the House majority, which the Republicans maintained with the narrowest edge in almost 100 years.
One new wrinkle is all the states discussing drawing new congressional districts to give their side a better chance at the majority come November 2026. That could freeze the decision-making process for several more months. Some safe incumbents want to know whether they are getting moved into politically untenable new districts, in which case they might head for the exits rather than run hard when defeat is certain.
For now, eight Democrats and 11 Republicans are retiring from the House at the end of their terms next year, but 15 of them are actually running for higher office. Another, Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D), will retire at the end of this year if she wins the New Jersey governor's race in November.
Just three of those 20 come from battleground districts: Reps. Don Bacon (R-Nebraska), Angie Craig (D-Minnesota) and John James (R-Michigan). But Craig and James are running next year for senator and governor, respectively, in their states.
So far Bacon, from a district that favored Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the last two elections, is retiring from elective politics entirely and vacating a true swing seat.
After the 2024 elections left the House in a near tie – 220 Republicans, 215 Democrats – some longtime political analysts question whether it matters if an incumbent is on the ballot at all, because the deciding voters tend to have low information about politics and, if they vote, side with the party out of power.
'This country is evenly divided, which often leads to an evenly split House. Additionally, House races have become increasingly close to being parliamentary – who the candidates are is of less importance than the party they represent,' Charlie Cook, founder of the Cook Political Report With Amy Walter, wrote in late July. 'Among the tiny slice of voters in the middle, when they do vote, they are far more likely to vote against a candidate than for someone.'
Regardless of such assessments, the operatives inside the two caucus's political arms – Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and its counterpart, National Republican Congressional Committee – always believe it's best to have their battle-tested incumbents running for reelection, as they are familiar to voters and comfortable raising the extreme amounts of money needed in today's politics.
And there also tend to be domino effects among lawmakers who see longtime friends deciding to leave, prompting them to consider retiring rather than running for another term.
Trump's first midterm election cycle provided a great example of this, as the return from August recess started with a retirement bang.
Within five days in early September 2017, Reps. Dave Reichert (R-Washington), Charlie Dent (R-Pennsylvania) and Dave Trott (R-Michigan) announced they would vacate their suburban swing districts.
Reichert and Dent had won seven terms, and Trott two. All three won in 2016 by wide double-digit margins. In his announcement, Dent cited a political climate dominated by 'disruptive outside influences that profit from increased polarization and ideological rigidity that leads to dysfunction.'
Democrats won all three of those seats the following year.
That set the tone for the remainder of the midterm elections, as seasoned GOP members bowed out, including two veteran California Republicans, Reps. Darrell Issa and Edward R. Royce, who announced two days apart in early January 2018 that they would not run for reelection.
Democrats won both of those seats also, en route to an election in which they won 13 seats previously held by Republicans that had been left open by retirements, and one where the GOP incumbent lost his primary. Democrats won a net gain of more than 40 seats in 2018 and held the majority for four years.
All told, 52 House members retired that election season, including the speaker, Paul D. Ryan (R-Wisconsin), the largest number in the past 30 years, according to the Brookings Institution. Almost three dozen more lost either in their primary or general elections, a massive turnover of more than 20 percent of the 435-member House.
Sometimes the retirement wave does not start after the August recess and instead comes later in the odd year, around the Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday season. That's also the point at which veteran incumbents and their campaign operatives have a bit more political data about where the district stands, how it approves or disapproves of the president, and whether the lawmaker can win in the upcoming midterm.
In mid-December 2009, Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tennessee), a 13-term veteran, joined a growing number of Democrats who saw a brutal 2010 taking shape and decided to depart. In Gordon's case, he had coasted to reelection every two years, not even facing a Republican opponent in 2008, but that year his voters had given John McCain a more than 20-point margin in the district over Barack Obama.
He hit a reflective point in life and decided it was time to bolt.
'Turning 60 has led me to do some thinking about what's next,' Gordon said in a statement at the time. 'I have an 8-year-old daughter and a wonderful wife who has a very demanding job.'
Gordon was one of four Democrats, with more than 60 years of combined experience, to announce retirement plans in the week of Thanksgiving or the two weeks following it.
Obama had become deeply unpopular in the South. In spring 2010, just 42 percent of Tennesseans approved of his job performance. As a result, Republicans won Gordon's seat with 67 percent of the vote, and they have held it since without too much effort.
Republicans won the three other seats as well, part of a 63-seat wave in terms of House seats gained.
Today's swing-seat incumbents are dominated by a large number of relative newcomers, the type of people who are in quite different political circumstances than Gordon in 2010 or Reichert in 2018.
Of the 18 House races that the Cook report rates as pure toss-ups, just three incumbents started serving before Trump ran for president in 2016: Reps. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Scott Perry (R-Pennsylvania) and David Schweikert (R-Arizona).
Expanding out to include the next 22 most competitive races, only three incumbents began their House service before Trump entered politics.
By and large, these incumbents have generational profiles like Reps. Michael Lawler (R-New York) and Emilia Strong Sykes (D-Ohio). Lawler, 38, defeated a Democratic incumbent in 2022, helping Republicans reclaim the House majority, and won again in 2024 even as Harris won his district over Trump.
Sykes, 39, won a close race in 2022 and, in a presidential year in which Harris and Trump effectively tied in her district, she won by more than 2 percentage points.
At this point, especially after Lawler decided against a bid for governor, both are running hard for reelection with no intent to retire.
Yet each of their states gets mentioned when it comes to redistricting, with Republicans having full control of the Ohio state legislature and Democrats in charge of the New York legislature.
If those states start redrawing the House districts, their seats would be prime targets for partisans to move the lines around to make easy pickups for the other party.
Any massive revamping of these districts could prompt a flurry of new retirement announcements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
44 minutes ago
- Japan Times
The Russian past of Alaska, where Trump and Putin will meet
Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will hold a high-stakes meeting about the Ukraine war on Friday in Alaska, which the United States bought from Russia more than 150 years ago. Russian influence still endures in parts of the remote state on the northwest edge of the North American continent, which extends just a few miles from Russia. When Danish explorer Vitus Bering first sailed through the narrow strait that separates Asia and the Americas in 1728, it was on an expedition for Tsarist Russia. The discovery of what is now known as the Bering Strait revealed the existence of Alaska to the West — however Indigenous people had been living there for thousands of years. Bering's expedition kicked off a century of Russian seal hunting, with the first colony set up on the southern Kodiak island. In 1799, Tsar Paul I established the Russian-American Company to take advantage of the lucrative fur trade, which often involved clashes with the Indigenous inhabitants. However the hunters overexploited the seals and sea otters, whose populations collapsed, taking with them the settlers' economy. The Russian empire sold the territory to Washington for $7.2 million in 1867. The purchase of an area more than twice the size of Texas was widely criticized in the U.S. at the time, even dubbed "Seward's folly" after the deal's mastermind, secretary of state William Seward. Languages and churches The Russian Orthodox Church established itself in Alaska after the creation of the Russian-American Company, and it remains one of the most significant remaining Russian influences in the state. More than 35 churches, some with distinctive onion-shaped domes, dot the Alaskan coast, according to an organization dedicated to preserving the buildings. Alaska's Orthodox diocese says it is the oldest in North America, and even maintains a seminary on Kodiak island. A local dialect derived from Russian mixed with Indigenous languages survived for decades in various communities — particularly near the state's largest city Anchorage — though it has now essentially vanished. However near the massive glaciers on the southern Kenai peninsula, the Russian language is still being taught. A small rural school of an Orthodox community known as the "Old Believers" set up in the 1960s teaches Russian to around a hundred students. Neighbors One of the most famous statements about the proximity of Alaska and Russia was made in 2008 by Sarah Palin, the state's then-governor — and the vice-presidential pick of Republican candidate John McCain. "They're our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska," Palin said. While it is not possible to see Russia from the Alaskan mainland, two islands facing each other in the Bering Strait are separated by just 2.5 miles (four kilometers). Russia's Big Diomede island is just west of the American Little Diomede island, where a few dozen people live. Further south, two Russians landed on the remote St. Lawrence island — which is a few dozen miles from the Russian coast — in October, 2022 to seek asylum. They fled just weeks after Putin ordered an unpopular mobilization of citizens to boost his invasion of Ukraine. For years, the U.S. military has said it regularly intercepts Russian aircraft that venture too close to American airspace in the region. However Russia is ostensibly not interested in reclaiming the territory it once held, with Putin saying in 2014 that Alaska is "too cold".
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Asia braces for intensifying competition over US imports
U.S. President Donald Trump sees tariffs as a necessary and effective tool for reducing the country's trade deficits. © Reuters TORU TAKAHASHI August 11, 2025 15:00 JST TOKYO -- Many U.S. trade partners likely breathed a sigh of relief after the announcement of new American tariffs, believing they had "avoided the worst."
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
South Korea's winning strategy for Trump faces moment of truth
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung will be testing the limits of one of the more successful strategies of dealing with U.S. President Donald Trump when he visits the White House this month. The summit will likely feature thorny issues including how to approach North Korea, the future of the U.S. military alliance with South Korea and the details of a $350 billion investment pledge. So far, South Korea has largely flown under the diplomatic radar, working mostly behind the scenes without some of the grand gestures seen from other leaders. The result was one of the most favorable tariff agreements, reached just before the deadline, and the upcoming meeting for Lee. Lee's government, which took office in June, has sought to show as much flexibility as possible, to the point of "doing backflips,' according to one official familiar with the planning, who asked not to be identified to discuss confidential deliberations. While the administration in Seoul is pleased with the outcomes so far, they are conscious of the potential pitfalls of an Oval Office meeting. Winning favorable trade terms, however significant economically, may have been easier than reaching an agreement on defense cooperation, which Seoul initially tried to make part of the tariff deal. When the two leaders meet in Washington — Korean media has reported a possible date in late August — they will champion widely divergent goals and policy preferences when it comes to their military alliance. Defense spending, which Trump has repeatedly framed in blunt financial terms, is at the heart of the issue that includes politically fraught questions over the number of U.S. troops in South Korea and the Asian country's role in the broader regional security framework. An American soldier during a live-fire drill with the South Korean army in February | BLOOMBERG "Tariff issues can ultimately be resolved with money. Security is a different matter,' said Kim Jung, a political science professor at the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul. "For South Korea to have real leverage, it should be able to say that the withdrawal of U.S. forces is also on the table. That's just not a tenable option for Koreans.' Trump has been urging partners to ramp up spending on security and rely less on the U.S., calling South Korea a "money machine.' A key U.S. ally in Asia, the nation hosts 28,500 American troops to help deter threats from North Korea. Defense spending While the defense cost-sharing issue wasn't addressed by the tariff negotiators and left to the summit, a senior South Korean official earlier confirmed that the two countries are discussing expanding Seoul's defense spending in line with global trends. South Korea plans to spend 2.32% of its GDP on defense this year. The U.S. wanted Seoul to boost defense spending to 3.8% of GDP, the Washington Post reported, citing internal government documents. Administration officials also debated insisting that South Korea publicly support deploying U.S. troops to deter China, according to the newspaper. South Korea's presidential office said Monday that negotiations for the tariff deal focused on trade issues, declining to elaborate further. Gen. Xavier Brunson, the commander of U.S. forces in South Korea, said there's a need for changes with the American troops, emphasizing that what matters is "capabilities' rather than "numbers,' according to a report by Yonhap News. The cost-sharing was a bone of contention for Trump during his first term. At that time, Trump asked Seoul to contribute about $5 billion to keep American military personnel in the country, well above the roughly $1 billion each year Seoul agreed to pay in a previous deal. "For Trump, it's all about the money — that's where he's likely to lean in, hard,' said Won Gon Park, a professor of North Korean studies at Ewha University in Seoul. "Even if Korea were to raise its defense contribution, the most it could offer is probably a twofold increase, but Trump has tossed out a $10 billion figure, which is outrageous, and that's exactly the kind of move he could pull again.' While Lee's administration in Seoul is pleased with the outcomes so far with the U.S., they are conscious of the potential pitfalls of an Oval Office meeting. | BLOOMBERG Lee, conscious of the dynamics of dealing with Trump, has carefully cultivated their relationship since the very first phone call after his June election victory. During that conversation, they bonded by swapping stories of campaign hardships, threats to their safety, and golf. On the eve of the election, Lee said that he'd "crawl through Trump's legs if needed' to help his people. Vacation preparations The South Korean president spent his vacation prepping to build on that bright start at the Oval Office meeting. The weeklong retreat was held at a secluded presidential resort on Geoje Island, off the southern coast of the Korean Peninsula, which has access to a nine-hole golf course. Lee's office didn't comment on his preparations for the summit. If the Korean side's preparations for the trade talks are any guide, Lee's aides would have made him go through rigorous and meticulous sessions. Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan, who met Trump in the final stages of the negotiations, described studying strategies to keep him engaged and role-playing for the big event, with a colleague taking on the role of the U.S. president, including his blunt talking style. Lee also knows, though, that he needs to present Trump with tangible wins if he hopes to bridge the gap between their defense priorities. That's where the trade negotiations offered a lot more leverage, with South Korea's key role in global supply chains from cars to chips and companies including Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, LG Energy Solution and Hyundai Motor committing billions to U.S. manufacturing. That robust economic relationship, along with the investment pledge, helped Seoul cap the across-the-board tariffs on Korean imports at 15%, including in the crucial automotive sector. Common ground In defense, though, the U.S. has been pushing for "alliance modernization,' a term Washington increasingly uses in the context of a recalibration of the military partnership to address evolving threats, especially from China. Trump's aides have floated the idea of South Korea playing a larger role in regional security and hinted that Seoul should shoulder more of the financial and strategic burden. Lee will look to maintain the credibility of South Korea's commitment to the alliance while avoiding domestic backlash over spending and perceived concessions. Navigating the security agenda will be a key test of adaptability on the global stage for a politician with deep experience in domestic maneuvering but largely untested in world affairs. One area of diplomacy where Lee and Trump may find common ground is the approach toward North Korea, a relationship where they both are seeking a departure from the stance of their predecessors. During his inaugural speech in June, the Korean leader struck a tone of pragmatism and a willingness to restore communication with Pyongyang. Trump, himself, during his first term cultivated ties with North leader Kim Jong Un. U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inside the demilitarized zone separating the South and North in 2019 | BLOOMBERG But it's unclear how receptive Kim might be to overtures either from the U.S. or South Korea. He appears to be gaining confidence on the global stage because of his growing partnership with Russia — a relationship that's believed to have aided his nuclear and missile programs. Pyongyang has, so far, rejected Lee's outreach. On July 28, Kim Yo Jong, the leader's sister, rebuked what she called the South's "blind trust' in the U.S. and dismissed any possibility of dialogue, despite Seoul's efforts to dial down tensions. While North Korea said relations between its leader and Trump are "not bad' and hinted at potential talks, it said that any attempt to resume dialogue should start with recognizing the North as a nuclear power. Without a clear path toward tangible progress, Trump may have little appetite to wade too deeply into the North Korea issue, especially as he's focused on other global challenges from the Middle East to trade with India and from the relationship with China to Russia's war in Ukraine. For Lee, one path could be to stress South Korea's interests aligning with the U.S. Seoul has provided crucial intelligence on North Korea's assistance for Moscow, blowing the whistle on weapons shipments and troop deployments. And while Lee has, so far, avoided taking a hard stance against Beijing, maintaining strategic ambiguity, Brunson has described South Korea as a "fixed aircraft carrier' facing China, underlining Seoul's growing strategic significance. Oval optics Lee's team is also wary of the optics inside the Oval Office. Unlike in the case of the trade talks, when South Korea was one of dozens of nations negotiating, the Oval Office meeting will put Lee firmly and singularly in the spotlight alongside Trump. Trump, known for his unpredictability and dominant presence in one-on-one settings, has previously used such encounters to publicly pressure foreign counterparts. Back in February, he pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the rationale for continued U.S. support, putting Kyiv on the defensive at a particularly high-profile moment. "As a number of foreign leaders have learned the hard way, meetings with Trump can go sideways very quickly,' said Zack Cooper, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he studies U.S. strategy in Asia. The stakes are high. For Trump, who favors quick wins and visible gestures, the summit may serve as a test of Lee's willingness to do more. For Lee, it's a high-wire act: balancing national security demands with domestic political sensitivities, and proving he can hold his own on the global stage. "This isn't a typical summit,' said Park at Ewha University.
