Lift Karnataka's Totapuri Mango Ban: Siddaramaiah writes to Andhra CM
It is learnt that the Chittoor District Magistrate had issued an order on June 07 prohibiting the entry of Totapuri mangoes from other states into the district. This sudden and unilateral move has caused great distress to the mango growers of Karnataka, especially those who grow Totapuri mangoes in significant quantities in the border areas. These farmers have long been linked to Chittoor-based processing units to sell their produce. The current restriction has disrupted this well-established supply chain and caused significant post-harvest losses, which will directly impact the livelihood of thousands of farmers, Siddaramaiah mentioned in his letter to the Andhra CM.
Such measures taken without prior consultation or coordination are against the spirit of the cooperative federal system. I am concerned that this may lead to tension and retaliatory measures. The stakeholders are already expressing their displeasure, which may disrupt the inter-state movement of vegetables and other agricultural commodities, Siddaramaiah mentioned.
"I urge you (Chandrababu Naidu) to intervene in this matter and request you to issue necessary directions to the district authorities to immediately revoke the order of the Chittoor district administration,' Siddaramaiah wrote in the letter.
Siddaramaiah urged that this issue should be taken seriously and prompt steps should be taken to restore smooth movement of agricultural produce in the interest of farmers' welfare.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump's gold tariff U-turn latest sign of shoot-first-ask-questions-later policymaking
Late on August 11, US President Donald Trump published another one of his policy-by-social-media posts, announcing that 'Gold will not be Tariffed!'. This came after prices of gold futures jumped following a Financial Times report on August 8 about the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency ruling that two types of gold bars — 1 kg and 100 ounce — should fall under a customs code that is subject to tariffs. Prices of gold futures rose sharply on Friday following the FT report that indicated gold bars imported into the US from Switzerland would attract the designated tariff of 39 per cent. This is crucial since Switzerland is the world's biggest refiner of the yellow metal, with gold exports in 2024 exceeding $100 billion. For the US, Swiss gold ranks first in terms of imports. However, relations between Switzerland and the US have been rather frigid over their trade balance. In 2024, Switzerland's exports to the US stood at $63.33 billion, resulting in a surplus of $38.28 billion for the European country — more than 50 per cent higher than the 2023 surplus of $24.53 billion. But the surplus for Switzerland has jumped more sharply in 2025, ballooning to $47.83 billion in just the first six months, as per US Census Bureau data, on the back of US' imports soaring to $75.87 billion — 216 per cent higher from the first half of 2024. Why? Because of Trump. The US President's threat of reciprocal tariffs starting April led to an eye-watering increase in the import of gold from Switzerland in the first three months of 2025. From January to March, a total of $62.32 billion worth of goods was imported by the US from Switzerland, resulting in a trade deficit of $54.27 billion. In the subsequent three months, the US has enjoyed a minor trade surplus of just over $2 billion on average. In the year ended June, Switzerland's gold exports to the US stood at just over $61 billion. Shoot first, question later The sharp increase in gold prices prompted action from the Trump administration, with the White House saying on August 8 that it would clarify 'misinformation' about tariffs on gold bars, prompting futures prices to cool down. Misinformation, however, may not be the best characterisation of developments. The US Customs and Border Protection's comments on July 31, seen by The Indian Express, came after New York-based MTB Metals — a subsidiary of Swiss precious metals refining and trading firm MKS PAMP — sought a tariff classification ruling. As has been reported elsewhere, Trump's Liberation Day tariffs of April 2 contained several exemptions, including a category of bullion. This category was understood to also cover large gold bars. It was thought that precious metals remelted by Swiss refineries and exported to the US could be shipped tariff-free, the FT reported, citing Christoph Wild, president of the Swiss Association of Manufacturers and Traders of Precious Metals. 'However, the custom code classification for different gold products is not always precise,' Wild said, with the FT adding it had been told by two refineries that they had temporarily reduced or halted exporting to the US due to the uncertainty. As it turns out, the US CBP's July 31 ruling to MTB Metals' query was as follows: the company wanted 1 kg and 100-ounce gold bars to come under the 7108.12.10 classification code as unwrought non-monetary gold bullion or dore. However, the CBP argued these bars could not fall under the said category as they were not 'unwrought' — they had been 'cast and have been stamped and needled or lasered with identifying information, and thus have been further processed'. As it turns out, the 7108.12.10 classification code sought by MTB Metals for the said gold bars was the only one related to gold that was exempt from import duties in the April 2 Liberation Day order. The problem, therefore, was not with the CBP's ruling, but the exemption order — it was not comprehensive enough. A similar casualty of the Trump administration playing fast and loose with trade policy has been Japan, which found to its surprise that while the European Union's trade agreement with the US had a 'no stacking' provision — this meant that the 15 per cent tariff on EU goods was the maximum — there was no such clause in the order on the 15 per cent deal struck between Tokyo and Washington. While the issue has since been smoothed over, it's the perfect illustration — like with the gold tariff reversal — of Trump's policy-making process: headlines first, details later.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Withdrawal of land pooling policy victory of farmers, labourers: Punjab BJP
In the face of mounting pressure from farmer bodies and opposition parties, the Punjab government on Monday withdrew its land pooling policy, which it had once termed 'farmer-friendly'. He said his party took a clear stand against this scheme from day one that it would not allow acquisition of even an inch of farmers' land. Chandigarh, Aug 12 (PTI) Punjab BJP working president Ashwani Sharma on Tuesday said the withdrawal of the land pooling policy by the AAP government is a big victory for farmers and labourers, and that his party's protests put pressure on the state government. The Punjab BJP on Tuesday held celebrations over the rolling back of the policy. 'Punjab and Punjabiyat have won. It is a big victory of farmers and labourers,' Sharma told reporters here. From day one, when the policy was released, the BJP took a clear stand that it would not let the AAP government acquire even an inch of land, he said. He further accused AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Satyendar Jain of 'looting' Punjab. 'Today, everybody knows Punjab is not run by Punjabis,' he said, claiming that AAP leaders sitting in Delhi call the shots. 'They (Delhi-based AAP leaders) brought the land pooling policy to loot Punjab,' the BJP leader charged. 'The BJP held protests at tehsil, block and district levels against the policy. We were to hold a protest, 'Zameen Bachao, Kisan Bachao' in Patiala on August 17. All these things put pressure on the state government,' Sharma said. He demanded that the state government issue a notification about scrapping of the policy. He said, 'Will Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann make a statement to ensure that not even a single inch of land of farmers will be acquired through any other way?' In a brief statement issued on Monday evening, the principal secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development said, 'The government hereby withdraws the land pooling policy dated May 14 and its subsequent amendments.' 'Consequently, all actions, like LOIs (letters of intent) issued, registration done, or any other action taken thereunder shall be reversed henceforth,' the statement said. The decision came days after the Punjab and Haryana High Court last week ordered an interim stay on the implementation of the policy for four weeks. In its August 7 order, the court held that the policy appears to have been notified in haste and concerns, including social impact assessment and environmental impact assessment, should have been addressed before its notification. PTI CHS DIV DIV This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
TDP MPs, MLAs urge HM Amit Shah to renew FCRA of RDT
A delegation of TDP MPs and MLAs from undivided Anantapur district along with Union ministers from the State submitted a representation to Union Home Minister Amit Shah seeking renewal of FRCA to Anantapur-based Rural Development Trust (RDT), in New Delhi on Monday (August 11). The delegation comprised of MPs Ambica Lakshminarayana and BK Pardhasaradhi from Anantapur and Hindupur respectively, TDPLP leader Lavu Srikrishna Devarayulu, MLAs Paritala Sunitha, Amilineni Surendra, Daggubati Venkateswara Prasad and others. They met Mr. Amit Shah along with Union Civil Aviation Minister Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu. The TDP delegation appraised Mr. Amit Shah about the various service activities done by the RDT in the drought-hit Anantapur region over the past 50 years and how the activities have brought a change in the life of the people of the region. They also informed the Union Minister about the various ongoing service activities of the RDT in health and education sectors and how they would be affected, if the services of the Trust come to a halt. They said that the lives of thousands of people would be impacted with the non-renewal of FCRA and urged Mr. Amit Shah to look into the application for renewal of RDT that was still pending. Speaking after meeting the Union Home Minister, MLAs Sunitha and others said that Mr. Amit Shah had responded positively to their representation and hoped a favourable decision from the Centre. The MLAs said they informed in detail the services being extended by the RDT to Mr. Amit Shah.
