Excruciating Moment Kemi Badenoch Struggles To Answer BBC's Fundamental Liz Truss Question
Kemi Badenoch looked bewildered when asked by the BBC if former prime minister Liz Truss was still a member of the Conservative Party.
The current Tory leader served as the international trade secretary during Truss's short time in Downing Street in autumn 2022.
But, since unveiling £45bn of unfunded tax cuts in her mini-Budget, subsequently being kicked out of office by her own MPs and then losing her parliament seat in last July's general election, Truss has become a sore spot for the Conservatives.
Badenoch's own shadow chancellor Mel Stridetook aim at the former prime minister in a speech on Thursday, arguing that she had destroyed the party's reputation for economic competence.
So on Friday, the BBC's political editor Chris Mason asked Badenoch: 'Why not throw her out of the party?'
Badenoch frowned and asked: 'Is she still in the party?'
'Well, you tell me,' Mason said.
'Well, you tell me!' Badenoch laughed. 'You're the one asking the question.'
'You're the party leader,' he replied.
Badenoch deflected by saying Stride's speech focused on how the mini-Budget did not 'balance'.
Asked if that 'wrecked the Conservative brand,' she replied: 'Look at what happened, people didn't understand why we had done that, and so our reputation for economic competence was damaged.'
Mason tried again: 'So why not kick Liz Truss out then?'
Badenoch said the Tories are trying to show the public what their economic plans are, but claimed it 'is not about any particular individuals'.
'I don't want to be commenting on previous prime ministers,' the Conservative leader said. 'They've had their time. What am I going to do now? Removing people from a political party is neither here not there in terms of what it is your viewers want to see.'
He replied: 'Well, maybe it is though, because maybe it would send a signal. Because you appear to be saying today that you're happy to have Liz Truss as a member of the Conservative Party.'
Badenoch said: 'Chris, Liz Truss is not in parliament anymore. She's not in parliament anymore.
'We need to focus on how we're going to get this country back on track. What we have right now is a Labour government, it's Keir Starmer.
'We need to stop talking about several prime ministers ago and talk about the prime minister we've got now and what he's doing to the country.'
Truss's press secretary later told HuffPost UK that he believes the ex-PM is still a member of the Conservative Party.
"Is she [Liz Truss] still in the party?" Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch asks @ChrisMasonBBChttps://t.co/2RdRyC7yfkpic.twitter.com/hbIaFZAXgQ
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) June 6, 2025
Kemi Badenoch Says Introducing Trump-Style Travel Ban Could Be 'Viable' For UK
Kemi Badenoch Claims Nigel Farage's Reform UK Is 'Another Left-Wing Party'
'She Will Get Better': Mel Stride's Attempt To Defend Kemi Badenoch Backfires Spectacularly
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Welcome for housing pledge - but is it too late for some?
Danielle has moved four times in the last nine months with her three children. They became homeless after receiving a section 21 "no fault" eviction order from their landlord, and since then their local council has placed them in a shared house, as well as in hotel rooms. Despite the government's promises to fund more affordable and social housing, Danielle told the BBC she doesn't expect a council house to become available "any time soon". In Wednesday's Spending Review, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced her plan to deliver the government's manifesto pledge to build 1.5 million new homes this parliament. The government committed to spend £39bn across 10 years for social and affordable housing in England - a move described by many social landlords and housing charities as a game-changer. Many parts of the country currently face an acute shortage of affordable and social housing. London's social housing waiting lists are at a 10-year high, according to analysis of government data by London Councils published earlier this year. The government says this investment, amounting to an average of £3.9bn a year, will be "significantly higher than what the previous government spent on affordable housing, which was an average of £2.3bn per year". Affordable housing is a wide-ranging category which includes properties let at rents of no more than 80% of local market rates, as well as shared ownership homes and social rent properties which are set at about 50% of market levels. More detail - including where the homes will be built, who will build them, and how much funding will be allocated to building socially rented homes - is still awaited. Seven ways the Spending Review affects you What has the chancellor has announced? The key points Watch: Where the money is being spent Danielle says the government's announcement feels "too late" to help her family now - but she hopes it means better chances for her children in the future. For her a permanent home "would be everything, everything". "It's security for my children, it's to know that we are never going to be put in a position like this again." Being moved every few weeks has been extremely disruptive. "It's been awful, absolute hell, it's turned all of our lives upside down. My children are constantly having to readapt." She has now been moved to temporary accommodation 18 miles from their school. "My children have to be up so early, at 5am, and then are expected to give 100% at school." You could almost hear the sigh of relief from social landlords when the billion-pound housing investment was announced. Many had warned that without significant funding and certainty, the government would never reach its housebuilding target. The government has also guaranteed how much social landlords will receive in rents over the next 10 years, meaning housing associations can plan how much they have to invest in building. Kate Henderson, head of the National Housing Federation, described the announcement as "transformational" and "the most ambitious Affordable Homes Programme we've seen in decades". Charlie Trew, head of policy at Shelter, agrees this is a "a really big moment" for the sector, but said the government needs to set a "clear target" for exactly how many social rent homes are planned. "The issue with so-called 'affordable housing' is that often it's not affordable at all and priced out of reach of people on low incomes," Mr Trew told the BBC. Shelter analysis shows that in more than four in 10 local authorities in England, a one-bed "affordable rent" home is "unaffordable for an individual on low pay", Mr Trew added. For this reason, he said it was important for the government to set a social rent target that would "focus this funding on social rent so that the cash delivers genuinely affordable social rented homes with rents tied to local incomes." Meanwhile, housebuilders said that while the announcement was good news in the long term, they were hoping for a boost now for the wider housing sector - such as a reintroduction of the help-to-buy scheme. Neil Jefferson, CEO at the Home Builders Federation, said that a year into the new parliament, housing supply and investment were "still lagging well behind where they should be". "This will likely persist until government grapples with the challenges being faced by prospective first-time buyers trying to get on the housing ladder," he said. 'Constant stress': Families tell BBC of life in limbo due to housing crisis Key points at a glance from the Spending Review Rachel Reeves outlines boosts for NHS and housing
Bloomberg
42 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Pentagon Mulls Scrapping Aukus Agreement With Australia and UK
The Pentagon has launched a review of the Biden-era Aukus pact to develop nuclear-powered submarines with Australia and the UK, as the Trump administration looks to shift the burden for collective defense to allies and make sure the US has enough warships of its own. The review will study whether the deal, signed by President Joe Biden's team in 2021, is 'aligned with the President's America First agenda,' the Pentagon said in a statement.
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Will the U.S. Pull Its Weight in NATO?
America's allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are set to approve a historic defense-spending increase. Is the U.S. prepared to keep pace? President Trump campaigned on raising NATO's defense-spending target from 2% to 3% of gross domestic product. Once elected, he pressed for 5%. At the NATO summit in the Netherlands later this month, allies (including the U.S.) will pledge to spend 3.5% of GDP on 'core defense' and another 1.5% on defense-related spending such as industrial and infrastructure investments as soon as 2030. Increasing NATO's defense spending is an overdue but welcome demonstration of collective urgency and political will. Effectively implemented, increased investment will bolster deterrence, but only if the U.S. joins Europe to meet NATO's new target. Achieving 3.5% in 2030 will require a defense budget of $1.27 trillion, roughly $380 billion more than today. Such investment is necessary and prudent. If NATO allies need to spend 3.5% of GDP to deter and defend against Russia, the U.S. needs to spend at least that much to deal with the even greater threat posed by China. For comparison, the U.S. spent roughly 6% during the Reagan years to defeat the Soviet Union.
