logo
Talking Britain down is no help to young people

Talking Britain down is no help to young people

Times09-07-2025
I t is hard not to notice that Britain is in a bad mood. This is not the usual cultural self-deprecation, but something more corrosive. A mood of deep, almost masochistic despair has crept into our public discourse — the sense that the country is fundamentally broken and that nothing can change.
As a first-year university student, just beginning to confront the adult world in which I am to build a life, I find this national mood increasingly disorientating. At the very moment my generation is being told to step up — to work, to contribute, to find our place — we face a wall of fatalism. The economy is broken, we are told. The NHS? Beyond help. Getting on to the housing ladder? Think again. Let's not even start on welfare reform; the entire system, it seems, is doomed.
This mood used to belong to the political extremes. The populist right has long cast Britain as a fallen nation, betrayed by the 'metropolitan elites'. The radical left has framed it as irredeemably imperialist and structurally unjust. But now that language has drifted into the reformist centre ground. Many of those who once championed steady, incremental change now appear to believe that the system is so dysfunctional it may not be worth trying to fix at all.
Robert Colvile, director of the Centre for Policy Studies, wrote in The Sunday Times this week that 'the consensus is profoundly depressing', and that the British state has become so broken it 'increasingly needs radical solutions'. Rory Stewart, the patron saint of centrist dads, now sounds uncannily like Dominic Cummings in his critiques of dysfunction. Even Simon Case, the former cabinet secretary, warns of a looming debt crisis over which politicians have little control. Is Sir Keir Starmer the last member of the establishment who still believes the system can deliver, or has he too lost faith?
If young people are told again and again that the country is broken beyond repair, what incentive is there to invest in it? Why build a future in a failed economy? Why feel a duty to a country that no longer believes in itself? What makes all this even more baffling is that, by most objective measures, Britain is still a functioning, relatively wealthy and stable democracy. We have free and fair elections. Our institutions, for all their frustrations, remain among the best globally. We enjoy broad civil liberties and a lively civil society.
Of course, there are serious challenges, but pessimism is no substitute for policy, and resignation is not a strategy. So here's my plea: stop indulging the narrative of decline. Because if Britain is written off, do not be surprised when my generation downs tools and walks away.
Charlie Rowan is a first-year student at Cambridge University
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CEO of UK's water regulator Ofwat to step down
CEO of UK's water regulator Ofwat to step down

Reuters

time23 minutes ago

  • Reuters

CEO of UK's water regulator Ofwat to step down

LONDON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Britain's Ofwat said on Tuesday its chief executive, David Black, would step down following a government decision last month to abolish the water regulator. In a statement, which came after Sky News first reported the story, Ofwat announced that Black has decided the "time is right to pursue new opportunities" and would step down at the end of August. An interim replacement is set to be appointed in due course, the regulator added. It comes after environment minister Steve Reed said last month he had agreed to abolish Ofwat as part of a regulatory overhaul. Britain will create a new powerful regulator for its water industry following public fury over sewage spills.

Lithuania asks NATO for more air defences after drones land on its territory
Lithuania asks NATO for more air defences after drones land on its territory

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Lithuania asks NATO for more air defences after drones land on its territory

VILNIUS, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Lithuania's foreign ministry has written to the NATO military alliance asking it to strengthen its air defences, it said on Tuesday, after two military drones have crossed into its territory from Belarus in less than a month. "This must not be only Lithuania's responsibility, because we are defending the eastern NATO flank," Foreign Minister Kestutis Budrys told reporters. NATO and European Union member Lithuania borders Russia and Moscow's ally, Belarus. The letter from Lithuania's foreign and defence ministers to NATO General Secretary Mark Rutte said the alliance must show it is ready to defend "every centimetre of its territory". In the most recent incident, a drone crossed into Lithuania on July 28, which Lithuania suspects was directed by Russia at Ukraine, but that it was disoriented by Ukraine's defences, Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said on Tuesday. The drone was found crashed in a military training area about 100 kilometres (62.14 miles) from the border with Belarus and contained 2 kg (4 lb) of explosives, the chief of staff of the Lithuanian army, Dainius Paskevicius, told reporters. Sakaliene had earlier identified the object as a Gerbera drone, a wooden copy of an Iranian-designed Shahed kamikaze drone, which Russian military is known to use. Another Gerbera drone entered Lithuania from Belarus on July 10, causing alarm before authorities determined it was not dangerous. Then-prime minister Gintautas Paluckas and Speaker of Parliament Saulius Skvernelis were briefly taken to bomb shelters in response to the drone entering Lithuanian airspace, according to their spokespersons. NATO was not immediately available for comment.

Trump envoy to land in Moscow as US 'peace or sanctions' deadline looms over Putin
Trump envoy to land in Moscow as US 'peace or sanctions' deadline looms over Putin

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump envoy to land in Moscow as US 'peace or sanctions' deadline looms over Putin

US President Donald Trump 's peace envoy is expected to travel to Moscow imminently ahead of Friday's deadline for Russia to agree a ceasefire with Ukraine. Steve Witkoff is likely to hold urgent discussions with senior Kremlin officials as soon as Wednesday in a bid to bring Russia to the negotiating table. Russia could face economic sanctions from Friday, affecting itself and trading partners such as China and India, unless Vladimir Putin agrees to talks. President Trump initially gave President Putin 50 days to strike a peace deal then cut the time to '10 to 12 days'. Ahead of the deadline, Russia has pulled out of a nuclear missile agreement intended to limit numbers of short to medium range missiles in Europe. Witkoff has been criticised for the tone of his previous visits to Russia. At times he has appeared fawning in Putin's presence and has failed to secure any concessions. After one meeting earlier this year, Putin presented Witkoff with a portrait of President Trump to take back to the White House. This afternoon, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed on social media he has spoken President Trump. But he did not mention the deadline. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed today he and US President Donald Trump enjoyed a 'productive' conversation on Tuesday about ending the three-year conflict. President Zelensky described their conversation as 'productive' with the 'key focus of course being ending the war'. He added Ukraine and the United States have 'coordinated our positions' while the Russians have 'intensified the brutality of their attacks'. President Trump's plan is to hit Russia with 'secondary tariffs' in a bid to end the war. These will punish states that purchase Russian energy supplies, making it more expensive for these countries to sell goods into the United States. As a major importer of Russian oil, India is particularly vulnerable. Its government has protested the unfairness of the strategy, claiming India's critics also import Russian goods. Trump has accused of India of 'fuelling [Russia's] war machine'. India has called the 100 per cent secondary tariffs 'unjustified and unreasonable'. Ukraine claimed earlier this week that it has found Indian-made components inside Russian attack drones fired at its cities. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also said to be personally close to Putin. They appear to share a warm relationship and are economic allies. Putin is widely expected to ignore Trump's deadline. While the US President has repeatedly excused Putin's failure to agree peace terms. But with President Trump under pressure in the US over his connections to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, he may adopt a tougher stance towards Putin. President Trump signalled his intent last week by publicly stating he had repositioned a pair of US nuclear submarines closer to Russia to keep the Kremlin in check. Russia responded strongly declaring it was pulling out of a nuclear missile agreement due to 'destabilising actions' by Western powers. So far, the Kremlin's only step towards peace has been a pledge by Putin's spokesperson Dmitry Peskov that the Russian President will meet President Zelensky. But the offer was subject to caveats around Russia's demands for a negotiated end to the conflict. Witkoff is expected to outline economic sanctions the US is likely to impose on Russia. Peskov has said the Kremlin considers its contacts with US Special Envoy Witkoff 'important and useful'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store