Market volatility complicates work for lawmakers in Alaska, a state whose fortunes are tied to oil
But the nearly three months since Trump's inauguration have been tumultuous, roiling Alaska's substantial federal workforce and raising questions about the reliability of federal funding.
And his on-again, off-again tariffs, and a related drop in oil prices, have compounded the uncertainty for Alaska lawmakers, who each year must craft a state budget based on volatile oil prices. The legislative session is set to end in mid-May, well before Trump's recently announced pause on higher tariffs for many countries expires.
The whiplash has worsened long-standing tension over how much money should go toward the yearly oil-wealth fund check most Alaska residents receive as opposed to education or other needs. Lawmakers have shown scant interest in raising taxes and have blown through billions in savings plugging recurring budget deficits dating back more than a decade.
'We're all in a pickle,' said House Speaker Bryce Edgmon, an independent who leads a coalition of Democrats, independents and two Republicans.
Alaska is no stranger to the boom-bust cycle of oil. The government spends more freely on infrastructure and other projects when prices are high and shutters facilities or slashes costs when they are low. Lawmakers base spending off twice-a-year revenue outlooks pegged to oil price and production forecasts.
A year ago, North Slope oil was around $90 a barrel. It settled in the low-to-mid-$70 range beginning last fall and hit as low as $65 this week before Trump announced the 90-day tariff pause.
At current prices, each dollar change in oil equates to about $35 million to $40 million in state revenue, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Finance Division. The March revenue forecast was based on $68-a-barrel oil for the upcoming budget year, down $2 from a December forecast.
Oil prices change frequently and plans by OPEC+ members to add more oil to the market could cause a price softening, said Dunleavy spokesperson Jeff Turner, who noted the governor is focused on Trump's executive order supporting increased oil and gas drilling, mining and logging in Alaska, and that it is "great to have an administration that supports Alaska's responsible resource development.'
Some state political leaders hope Trump's threatened tariffs could prompt countries like Japan, South Korea and Taiwan to invest in or commit to buying gas from a proposed massive liquefied natural gas project in Alaska. The project, repeatedly touted by Trump, has struggled for years to gain traction amid cost concerns, competition from other projects and questions about its economic feasibility.
Trump carried Alaska in November's election.
Besides oil, Alaska relies heavily on earnings from its nest-egg oil-wealth investment fund. The fund's principal is protected, but its earnings can be spent. Lawmakers cap withdrawals based on a percentage of the fund's average market value over a five-year period. The yearly dividend paid to residents has traditionally come from earnings, but since lawmakers also began using earnings for state services in 2018, there has been friction over how much should go toward each.
Dunleavy proposed a roughly $3,800 dividend per resident, which would cost $2.5 billion — two-thirds of this year's earnings withdrawal — and result in a deficit he suggested covering by tapping the state's diminished savings. That amount hews to a formula abandoned years ago by lawmakers as unaffordable.
The proposal is a nonstarter with legislative leaders, who are hearing pleas for more funding for K-12 schools squeezed by years of inflation and energy and health care costs. Education advocates also want the state to tackle a maintenance backlog that they say has created unsafe learning environments for students, including mold and structural issues at some schools.
Last year, residents received $1,702, a combined dividend and energy relief payment. The dividend the past five years has been as low as $992 in 2020 and as high as $3,284, another combined dividend and energy relief check.
House Majority Leader Chuck Kopp, a Republican, said politicians should not be 'even stoking the fantasy' of a dividend as large as Dunleavy proposed.
'We cannot pay an unsustainable dividend, and that dividend distorts the fiscal reality that we're facing,' he said. 'Do we need new revenue, or do we need to get a handle on the size of the dividend we're paying and honestly figure out how we're going to prioritize that?'
Some members of the bipartisan-led Senate have urged changes to oil taxes to raise revenue, but overall support has been limited.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
a minute ago
- CBS News
4 reasons why the Trump tariffs haven't caused U.S. inflation to soar
Despite a barrage of new tariffs imposed by the Trump administration this year on dozens of U.S. trade partners, the prices of goods and services across the U.S. have defied many economists' expectations and remained relatively stable. Economists caution that just because tariffs have yet to trigger a renewed bout of inflation, there is no guarantee that prices won't surge later this year. They note that recent data shows a modest rise in the cost of items including clothing, home furnishings and appliances. Tariffs — meaning the rate importers must pay at the border for imported goods — also take a long time to seep into the economy. That's because companies often trying to hold off on passing along higher costs to customers to avoid losing market share to rivals. Yet experts acknowledge that tariffs have yet to unleash the kind severe inflationary pressures that could cause prices to spike. For their part, White House officials have consistently maintained that foreign exporters — not American consumers — will bear the brunt of added tariff costs. "Despite the doom-and-gloom predictions of inflation and recession, it's been months since Liberation Day, and inflation is trending towards an annualized rate not seen since President Trump's first term, while a recent [Council of Economic Advisers] analysis found that prices of imported goods are actually declining," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch, alluding to the baseline and other tariffs President Trump originally announced on April 2. Here are four reasons economists say explain why inflation isn't jumping despite the highest U.S. tariffs in decades. Despite President Trump's many threats to jack up levies on imports, the actual average tariff rate being charged on U.S. imports is not as high as what has been announced, data shows. The average tariff rate on U.S. imports in June was 9% — well below the 15% that many economists were forecasting earlier this year following Mr. Trump's slew of tariff announcements, according to investment advisory firm Capital Economics. "It's not so much that the reaction to tariffs has been low, it's that the effective tariff rate increase has been relatively limited up until June," Mark Cus, an economist at Barclays, told CBS MoneyWatch. Actual U.S. tariffs remain lower than earlier estimates in part because countries facing steeper levies are sending fewer goods to the U.S., according to Barclays and Capital Economics. By contrast, countries with below average tariff rates are shipping more goods to the U.S. The upshot: Average tariff rates on imports are lower than many economists were projecting earlier this year. Additionally, many goods imported into the U.S. have been exempted from steeper tariffs. Of the roughly $258 billion worth of imports that hit the U.S. retail market in June, only 48% were subject to tariffs, Barclays data shows. For example, pharmaceuticals, some electronics, and many imports from Canada and Mexico are exempt from any new tariffs. "While dutiable goods face elevated tariff rates, a substantial portion of U.S. imports remains duty-free," Barclays analysts said in a recent report. "This is a major contributor to the low effective tariff rate." U.S. retailers built up their inventories earlier this year in expectation that the Trump administration would hike tariffs on imported products and parts. Many retailers are still selling those non-tariffed products, allowing them to delay price hikes, experts said. For example, "There was a big jump in imports of goods from Canada that would later be tariffed before the tariffs kicked in, and perhaps imports of those goods in May and June were relatively low, and that shows up as a smaller amount of dutiable goods," Barclays' Cus told CBS MoneyWatch. Eventually, experts warn, retailers will exhaust those lower-cost goods imported earlier in the year, which could lead to higher prices down the road. For now, many retailers are eating the additional tariff costs. Businesses "have been willing to absorb the initial hit via lower margins, although we suspect that was mostly a temporary development as those firms waited for more clarity on where tariff rates would settle," analysts with investment adviser Capital Economics said in a recent report. "We doubt that is a sustainable outcome over the longer term, however. As the uncertainty over tariff levels eases over the next couple of weeks, giving retailers more clarity on rates over the next year or two, we would expect more firms to raise prices," they said. Tariffs typically take many months to seep into company supply chains and and show up in the prices consumers pay at the store. The full impact of tariffs plays out not immediately but over an extended period of time, peaking roughly a year after they take effect, a June Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas report noted. That means any U.S. tariffs imposed this year could would be unlikely to have much of an impact on inflation until later this year and into 2026. "Up to now there has been only limited passthrough from tariffs into final consumer prices, but we still expect the impact to gradually mount in the second half of this year," Capital Economics analysts said in a report. A final possibility is that the fears that the Trump administration's turn toward protectionist trade policies would trigger another severe bout of inflation are overblown. The White House has maintained that such a shift will protect jobs, and make the U.S. more competitive globally. "The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be paid by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's best and biggest consumer market," the White House's Desai said in a statement.
Politico
a minute ago
- Politico
Winklevoss twins pump $21M into new crypto super PAC
The Digital Freedom Fund PAC is at least the third super PAC aimed at supporting pro-crypto candidates. Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss have emerged as influential players on the right, especially on cryptocurrency policy issues. |By Jasper Goodman 08/20/2025 03:58 PM EDT Cryptocurrency billionaires Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss said Wednesday they are pouring $21 million into a new group aimed at supporting conservative candidates who are friendly toward the digital assets industry, creating a new source of crypto campaign cash that is poised to shake up the 2026 midterms. The new group the twins are funding, the Digital Freedom Fund PAC, is at least the third super PAC aimed at supporting pro-crypto candidates. Unlike the largest crypto super PAC, a deep-pocketed group known as Fairshake that backs industry-friendly candidates in both parties, the Winklevoss-backed effort appears aimed at supporting only Republicans. The group 'will identify and support champions of President Trump's crypto agenda in primary races and the midterm elections,' Tyler Winklevoss said on X Wednesday. He added that if Republicans lose their majorities in Congress, 'Democrats will have power to slow down and interfere with' President Donald Trump's agenda.
Washington Post
a minute ago
- Washington Post
Marisa Bellack, Lynh Bui and Alexis Sobel Fitts appointed to leadership positions in the Futures Department
We're pleased to announce a series of leadership appointments in Futures. Marisa Bellack becomes a senior assignment editor overseeing Climate & Science coverage; Lynh Bui becomes a senior assignment editor overseeing Health coverage; and Alexis Sobel Fitts becomes a senior assignment editor overseeing our Technology and Media coverage. Alexis Sobel Fitts A champion of revelatory reporting who has guided some of our biggest scoops and most ambitious enterprise, Alexis will oversee the tech team from the corporate campuses of Silicon Valley to the halls of power in Washington. Since joining The Post in 2021, Alexis has edited probing stories that illuminate the political and cultural impact of the industry, its key figures and the rise of artificial intelligence. Her team dug into Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service as well as Musk's transformation from environmental champion to anti-climate change enforcer. Her team broke news on Donald Trump's designs on TikTok amid a broader rethinking of his relationship with Silicon Valley. And she has produced deep stories about key figures helping to propel the nation's shift to the right, including the pro-Trump wellness guru who ran for vice president and the investor who emerged as an unlikely leader in the movement to end DEI. Alexis has produced revelatory stories about AI's impact in the real world alongside pieces that investigate its inner workings. Late last year, she edited a ground-breaking report on the use of AI by the Israeli military in the war on Gaza. And she has spearheaded some of our most impactful projects on social media, including our coverage of the Facebook Papers in 2021 and our exclusive 2022 report on 'Mudge,' the Twitter whistleblower. Before coming to The Post, Alexis was deputy editor of Jezebel and a senior editor at Wired. She has covered tech since 2013 when, as a senior writer at the Columbia Journalism Review, she developed a beat examining how technology giants were influencing media and the spread of information. Raised in Philadelphia, Alexis holds a master's degree from Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and a bachelor's degree in English literature from Yale University. Lynh Bui As acting health and science editor for the past six months, Lynh has overseen some of the scoopiest reporting in Washington as the health team generated revelation after revelation about Donald Trump and Robert F Kennedy Jr.'s remaking of the federal health establishment, with major implications for everyday Americans. She joined the desk last year as deputy health and science editor, where she collaborated with our gifted science writers to capture the awe and wonder of exploration and experimentation. She helmed stories that looked deeply at Lucy, the celebrity of the fossil world; offered readers an interactive tour of the Andromeda galaxy; and provided a compelling behind-the-scenes look at surgeons' first attempt to remove a spinal tumor through a patient's eye. Lynh joined health and science from the Metro staff, where she served as an editor since 2020 managing coverage of the federal courthouse in D.C. and the D.C. Circuit appellate court as well as Maryland's police departments and courts. Lynh helped direct coverage of some of the most urgent topics in the region including the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and the more than 1,000 prosecutions that followed. Lynh helped run coverage of Trump's prosecution in D.C. and was part of the team leading The Post's coverage of the Key Bridge collapse in Baltimore last year. Lynh arrived at The Post in 2012 as one of the first American University fellows on Metro, while simultaneously earning her master's degree in journalism. She joined the staff and ultimately covered police and courts on Metro for six years. During that time, she was part of the team that examined how 8-year-old Relisha Rudd disappeared from a D.C. homeless shelter in 2014, reported extensively on the death of Freddie Gray in police custody in Baltimore and anchored The Post's foray into augmented reality while covering the officers' trials. An Arizona native, Lynh previously worked at the Arizona Republic and earned her bachelor's degree in journalism and mass communications from the Walter Cronkite School at Arizona State University. Marisa Bellack Marisa has spent 18 years at The Post helping to shape beautiful and thought-provoking stories, running complex coverage of big news events and launching creative new initiatives. She has guided an extensive body of work on extreme weather, environmental challenges and discoveries related to the natural world, both in her most recent position of Climate Solutions editor and before that as Europe editor, overseeing bureaus in London, Berlin, Brussels, Paris and Rome. She helped lead coverage of the coronavirus pandemic, anticipating that what was happening in Italy would soon hit the United States, tracking how the virus spread and transformed societies, and explaining how new vaccine technology, then untested in the real world, might be key to resuming normal life. She ran a team of a dozen Post staffers at the COP26 summit in Glasgow. She was also part of the team that won the 2022 Polk Award for Technology Reporting, for an investigation that revealed how spyware intended to help governments track terrorists and criminals was used to hack the phones of journalists, human rights activists and others. Marisa started at The Post in 2007 as digital opinion editor. She inaugurated real-time commentary on PostPartisan and hired Ann Telnaes to experiment with animated cartoons. She pulled back the veil on the editorial board by inviting readers to debate previously unnamed writers. She also debuted the America's Next Great Pundit competition and orchestrated a crowdsourced Washington spy serial with columnist and author David Ignatius. As deputy editor of The Post's Sunday Outlook section, Marisa commissioned and shepherded ideas essays – many of them future-oriented. Among those were a cover story anticipating how solar geoengineering could lead to geopolitical conflicts; an essay on why sociable robots can't be good friends to kids; a piece investigating the claims of a 'brain strengthening' company; and a piece on how invoking historical comparisons can make it harder to see the future. Marisa went to college at the University of Pennsylvania and earned master's degrees at the London School of Economics and Harvard's Kennedy School.
