Syria says meeting with Israeli officials sought to 'contain escalation'
Israel launched strikes this month on Damascus and Druze-majority Sweida province, saying it was acting both in support of the religious minority and to enforce its demands for a demilitarized southern Syria.
The Syrian diplomatic source told state television on Saturday that the recent Paris meeting "brought together a delegation from the Foreign Ministry and the general intelligence service with the Israeli side," and addressed "recent security developments and attempts to contain the escalation in southern Syria."
On Thursday, US special envoy for Syria Tom Barrack had said he held talks with unspecified Syrian and Israeli officials in Paris.
A senior diplomat had previously told Agence France-Presse that Barrack would be facilitating talks between Damascus's Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani and Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer.
According to the source cited by state TV, the meeting "addressed the possibility of reactivating the disengagement agreement with international guarantees, while demanding the immediate withdrawal of Israeli forces from points where they recently advanced."
After the overthrow of longtime Syrian ruler Bashar Assad in December, Israel sent troops into a UN-patrolled buffer zone that used to separate the countries' forces in the strategic Golan Heights.
It has since conducted incursions deeper into southern Syria, demanding the area's total demilitarisation.
Damascus had previously confirmed holding indirect contacts with Israel seeking a return to the 1974 disengagement agreement that created the buffer zone.
The Paris meeting "did not result in any final agreements but rather represented initial consultations that aimed to reduce tensions and reopen communication channels in light of the ongoing escalation since early December," the diplomatic source said.
More meetings were planned, the source said, adding that the Syrian side had emphasised that the country's unity and sovereignty were non-negotiable.
The week of clashes in Sweida, which began on July 13, initially involved Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouin tribes, but government forces intervened on the side of the latter, according to witnesses, experts and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor.
The Observatory said on Saturday that the violence had killed more than 1,400 people, most of them Druze, and the vast majority in the week between July 13 and a ceasefire last weekend.
On Saturday, French President Emmanuel Macron said on X that he spoke with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, and called the ceasefire in Sweida "a positive sign."
"The recent violence in Syria is a reminder of the extreme fragility" of the country's transition, Macron wrote, adding that "civilian populations must be protected."
Sharaa, in a statement released by the Syrian presidency, blamed the violence in Sweida on "armed outlaw groups opposing the state and competing for influence."
The state "will assume its full responsibility in imposing security and holding those who committed crimes to account," he said according to the statement, also rejecting "any external attempts, particularly by Israel, to exploit these conditions."
"Sweida is an integral part of the Syrian state and its people are partners in building the nation," he said.
Syrian and Israeli officials had previously met in Baku on July 12, according to a diplomatic source in Damascus, coinciding with a visit to Azerbaijan by Sharaa.
The two countries have technically been at war since 1948, and Israel has occupied the Golan Heights, which it seized from Syria, since 1967.
After Assad's ouster, Israel carried out hundreds of air strikes in Syria to prevent key military assets from falling into the hands of the new Islamist-led administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Turkmenistan's Avaza hosts UN conference on landlocked countries
Turkmenistan's Avaza National Tourist Zone is hosting the third United Nations Conference on Landlocked Developing Countries from August 4 to 8. The conference focuses on structural challenges faced by the world's 32 landlocked developing countries, which are home to over 600 million people. The conference was opened by Turkmenistan's National Leader and Chairman of the People's Council Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, together with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, President of the 79th UN General Assembly session Philemon Yang, and representatives from international organizations and participating countries. Speaking at the opening ceremony, Guterres underlined the urgency of reducing global inequalities. 'These inequalities are not inevitable. This conference is not about obstacles — it is about solutions,' Guterres said. 'It is about launching a new decade of ambition — through the Avaza Program of Action — and fully unlocking the development potential of landlocked developing countries.' The UN chief called for bold action to support landlocked economies. 'Despite representing 7 percent of the world's population, LLDCs account for just over 1 percent of the global economy and trade — a stark example of deep inequalities that perpetuate marginalization," according to UN Secretary-General Guterres. UN officials aim to resolve this disparity through stronger partnerships and infrastructure investments. Located on the Caspian Sea coast near the port city of Turkmenbashi in western Turkmenistan, Avaza serves as a growing hub for wellness, leisure, and ecological tourism. Turkmenistan says the site shows its commitment to linking international diplomacy with regional development, with tourism as a key driver of the nation's socio-economic progress. Turkmenistan's President Serdar Berdimuhamedov cited the historic conference on the shores of the Caspian and noted it as symbolic to promote peace, development and global cooperation in the International Year of Peace and Trust, a UN initiative proposed by Turkmenistan. Berdimuhamedov also said that the gathering shows unity with the goals of peace, progress and well-being. Meanwhile, Berdimuhamedov met with Guterres to reaffirm Turkmenistan's support for sustainable development and global integration on the sidelines of the event.
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul's adjustment to S. Korea-US military drill could put alliance to test: think tank
Despite Seoul floating talks of adjusting the scale and timing of the annual South Korea-US military exercise scheduled for mid-August, doing so would weaken Washington's trust in its decadeslong ally, a report by a local think tank said Wednesday. The report, published in Korean by the state-affiliated Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, said that under current circumstances, an adjustment to the Ulchi Freedom Shield drill could undermine 'the efforts and willpower expressed by the US Forces Korea to continue the S. Korea-US joint military exercises." This could weaken both Washington's and the USFK's trust in Seoul, it noted. The think tank also warned that a potential one-sided concession from Seoul in the area of defense, without a proper negotiation with Pyongyang, could devalue the South's efforts and, later, even its negotiating power. The report addresses Unification Minister Chung Dong-young's remarks in July to reporters, saying that he plans to recommend to President Lee Jae Myung to 'make adjustments' to the large-scale drill scheduled for mid-August. The Lee administration has repeatedly gestured for an inter-Korean thaw, including removing the South's anti-Pyongyang loudspeakers installed across the border. Chung's remarks closely followed comments from North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's influential sister, Kim Yo-jong, in July. She said Pyongyang was not interested in reviving talks with Seoul and denounced the 'aggressive' military exercises jointly conducted by South Korea and the US. The North has routinely condemned the joint military drills as a rehearsal for invasion and a provocation. There is a possibility that the North is aiming to establish a favorable environment when potentially reviving talks with both the US and the South, according to KIDA. Adjustment to the scale of the South Korea-US military exercises would be one of Pyongyang's conditions to achieve such an environment, alongside a USFK troop reduction, a declaration to end the 1950-53 Korean War and official admission of the North's status as a nuclear power. Aligned with these likely goals, Kim Yo-jong's latest comments were aimed at testing the alliance between the Lee administration and the Donald Trump administration and their willingness to carry out the annual joint military exercise, according to the KIDA. The report released Wednesday was titled 'North Korea's negotiation strategy shown through Kim Yo-jong's comments and how (South Korea) should respond.'
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee, Trump likely to defer details on ‘alliance modernization'
South Korea and the United States are expected to agree at their upcoming summit on a broad principle to 'modernize the alliance' amid an evolving regional security environment, while leaving key details to future working-level talks, according to officials in Seoul familiar with the matter. Seoul and Washington have been gearing up for the first in-person summit between South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump, widely anticipated to take place in the US later this month. The summit is poised to address a wide range of agenda items centered on two key pillars: security and foreign affairs — with a focus on alliance modernization and the North Korean nuclear issue — and trade, particularly tariffs. The allies have been engaged in working-level talks in preparation for the summit. However, due to time constraints, Lee and Trump are expected to announce only a broad agreement in principle on alliance modernization at the summit, according to a diplomatic source who spoke on condition of anonymity. The alliance modernization agenda had taken a back seat to the trade deal finalized on July 30, which had commanded the allies' primary attention. Seoul and Washington have been in discussion on how to modernize their alliance, with the aim of strengthening its capabilities and readiness posture amid an evolving regional security environment. However, the allies held only one round of working-level talks on the issue — director general-level consultations held on July 10 and 11 in Seoul. Trump and Lee are largely expected to echo the principle, which was agreed upon in a joint statement following the two-day working-level negotiations: "to strengthen the US-ROK Alliance into a future-oriented, comprehensive strategic alliance, and to modernize the Alliance in a mutually beneficial manner in the face of an evolving regional security environment." The ROK refers to South Korea's official name, the Republic of Korea. Alliance modernization gains focus The "alliance modernization" agenda, first proposed by the Trump administration and reflecting key US interests and demands, encompasses a wide range of issues that could bring significant changes not only to the South Korea–US alliance but also to the broader security landscape on the Korean Peninsula and across the Indo-Pacific region. Alliance modernization includes adjustments to the size and role of US Forces Korea, an increase in South Korea's defense spending, and an expanded leading role for Seoul in addressing threats from North Korea — with the US increasingly shifting its focus toward countering threats stemming from China. In particular, any adjustments to the size and role of US Forces Korea require careful consideration, as they are closely linked to the new US National Defense Strategy and the Global Posture Review — both expected to be completed between late summer and autumn. While the concept of 'strategic flexibility' for US Forces Korea was agreed upon by the allies in 2006, The Korea Herald has learned that Seoul recognizes the need for deeper discussions — based on the existing agreement — in light of the evolving regional security environment. In the 2006 agreement, Seoul agreed to respect the "necessity for strategic flexibility of the US forces the ROK," and Washington agreed to respect the "ROK position that it shall not be involved in a regional conflict in Northeast Asia against the will of the Korean people" in the implementation of strategic flexibility. Unlike other alliance modernization-related issues, South Korea's defense spending is expected to take center stage at the summit due to Trump's interest, with remaining items likely deferred to working-level talks, according to the source. The Korea Herald also learned from sources that the allies have been discussing the scope of alliance modernization. South Korea believes alliance modernization should not necessarily be confined to the military domain and could expand into other sectors, including technological cooperation. The US is also said to share this understanding. Allies differ on US Forces Korea As the allies prepare for the first Trump-Lee summit, public remarks by high-ranking officials have showed discrepancies over troop levels and the mandate of US Forces Korea. South Korea's Foreign Minister Cho Hyun dismissed the possibility of changes to the size and role of US Forces Korea. 'We are talking with the United States, but there is no concern about the US forces in Korea. We believe that they will remain as such and their role will remain as of today,' Cho said in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday. However, US Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby suggested that Seoul should take greater responsibility in countering North Korean threats and reiterated Washington's call for increased defense spending. "South Korea continues to be a role model in its willingness to take more of the lead in a strong defense against the DPRK and in its spending on defense," Colby said on Aug. 1 on his official X account, following the first phone call between the defense chiefs of the allies on July 30. DPRK stands for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. "We and the ROK are closely aligned on the need to modernize the Alliance in response to the regional security environment," Colby added. "We will work closely with Seoul to ensure a strategically sustainable Alliance that is ready to defend against shared threats."
