logo
Your Student Loan Questions

Your Student Loan Questions

New York Times05-05-2025
For five years, more than 40 million Americans have not faced dire consequences if they failed to pay back their federal student loan debt. That ends today.
As the coronavirus pandemic convulsed the economy, President Trump and Congress brought relief: They allowed borrowers to take a break from their payments. The government also froze the interest, meaning borrowers' balances did not grow. People saved hundreds or even thousands of dollars per month.
The measure was popular at the time. It let people improve their credit scores, pay down other debts and build savings. So officials extended the reprieve nine times — across the rest of Trump's first term and most of former President Biden's.
But the government made those loans, and letting them go unpaid added to the deficit. Some economists also warned about sending the wrong message — that it was fine not to repay your debt. Eventually, the payment freeze ended, but policymakers said they wouldn't penalize borrowers for late payments yet.
Now even that break is gone, and late payments are showing up in credit reports for millions of people. Today, the government restarts collections on defaulted loans — first by docking tax refunds, then by garnishing paychecks and Social Security benefits. (Here's what to know about it.)
The Morning asked what you wanted to know about student loans. Today's newsletter has the answers — and looks at what comes next.
What happened to loan forgiveness?
Soaring tuition prices and government cutbacks for state schools quadrupled federal student loan debt in the 21st century. American borrowers now owe more for their educations than they do for credit cards, car loans or any form of consumer debt other than mortgages. It is a life-altering encumbrance for many people.
Democrats have for years wanted to deal with the problem through mass debt cancellation. Biden tried it. His plan to wipe away up to $20,000 per borrower cited the pandemic emergency. But the Supreme Court killed the plan, ruling Biden didn't have the authority.
Then the president expanded other established pathways to loan forgiveness, including programs aimed at public service workers, disabled borrowers, people defrauded by for-profit schools and those who had been making payments for 20 years or longer. That effort worked for five million borrowers. Martha Wilson, from Phoenix, asked The Morning: 'All my student loans were forgiven. Do I need to be concerned that they will come back and reinstate them?'
Experts say that's extremely unlikely. Biden's effort relied mostly on longstanding federal laws and policies.
What next?
A second piece of Biden's plan, though, seems doomed.
To prevent borrowers from facing bills larger than what they can pay, the government can tie your monthly payment to your income. Biden's new program to do that, called SAVE, cut some borrowers' bills in half and allowed millions of low-wage workers to pay nothing at all.
But several Republican-led states said in legal challenges that he couldn't do that, and federal courts froze the plan. (Loan forgiveness has been especially unpopular on the right. College graduates are more likely to be Democrats, although many people with student debt started degrees and never finished.) Some eight million people who enrolled in the plan are now in limbo. 'I am very confused,' says Reily Lynch, a reader from Chicago. 'Is there any update on the SAVE plan?'
The Trump administration intends to end the plan if courts don't. For now, borrowers on SAVE can simply stay on pause — they won't be considered delinquent — but that extension is nearly certain to end sometime this year. No one knows exactly when, which stresses borrowers out.
Another point of confusion is Trump's ambition to close the Education Department — the agency that owns and manages federal student debt — and move the loans to another agency. Supa Shah, from Las Vegas, asks how that would affect people: 'Will it be a mess? What should student loan borrowers do to make sure their information isn't lost or incorrect?'
Moving all those records, including contracts with the companies that collect payments, would be complicated, and it can't happen without Congress. Lawmakers and federal officials tell me there's no plan for this.
The best thing borrowers can do right now to protect themselves is go to StudentAid.gov and check on the status of their loans. The website will show you if your loan is current, in forbearance, delinquent or in default. It tells you whom to contact to make payments or request changes.
What if the data gets lost in a transfer, or what if the government removes some of it outright, as it has done in some other agencies? It's a good idea to download and make copies of the information you see on the website.
Related: Here are more tips for navigating the chaotic loan-repayment system.
Foreign Policy
More on the Trump Administration
Middle East
More International News
The Vatican
Other Big Stories
Over the weekend, locals in the southernmost tip of Texas — most of whom work for SpaceX — voted to create a new city called Starbase. The city, which snakes around various parcels of land that the company owns, is still fairly small, with some housing in addition to a rocket factory and launchpad. But there are plans to add a school, a grocery store and a sushi restaurant.
The U.S. wants to increase exports by weakening the dollar. But these policies could result in higher costs for American consumers and businesses, Rebecca Patterson writes.
Listen to the last 'Conversation' between Gail Collins and Bret Stephens. Aaron Retica joins to answer reader questions.
Here are columns by David French on law enforcement impunity and Margaret Renkl on slowing down in spring.
Overwhelmed? Visit New York City's cherry blossoms, our Big City columnist writes.
In … and out: Deep breathing can be a game changer for anyone. Elite athletes agree.
Near-death experiences: When the actor Jeremy Renner almost died two years ago he, like thousands of others, experienced an 'exhilarating peace.' Why?
A problem shared: Laid Off, a new Substack newsletter, serves as a support group for those who have lost their jobs.
Metropolitan Diary: Bagels? Not like that.
Most clicked yesterday: Tight hips? These moves can help.
Trending online yesterday: Trump wants Alcatraz to be a prison again.
Lives Lived: Will Hutchins had a comically genteel starring role during the craze for television westerns in the 1950s, playing a sheriff who favored cherry soda over whiskey on 'Sugarfoot.' Hutchins died at 94.
N.H.L.: The Jets advanced to the second round after defeating the Blues in Game 7. It was an impressive finish: The Jets tied the game with 1.6 seconds left and won it in double overtime.
N.B.A.: The Warriors won a 103-89 victory over the Rockets in their Game 7.
Late night television is at an inflection point. Ratings are down, as is advertising revenue. And despite other television genres — including the prestige drama and reality TV — making the transition to streaming, talk shows are yet to follow. (John Mulaney's weekly Netflix show, 'Everybody's Live,' is a test of whether the format can survive the streaming era.) What, then, does the future of talk shows look like? According to some, it looks a lot like a video podcast.
More on culture
Mix chickpeas, feta and avocado for this chopped salad.
Revive old wood furniture.
Care for your hair with a silk pillowcase.
Take our news quiz.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram was touched.
And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections, Sports Connections and Strands.
Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow.
Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Now Jimmy Fallon Is Using Taylor Swift To Suggest Trump Had Sinister Ties To Epstein
Now Jimmy Fallon Is Using Taylor Swift To Suggest Trump Had Sinister Ties To Epstein

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Now Jimmy Fallon Is Using Taylor Swift To Suggest Trump Had Sinister Ties To Epstein

Jimmy Fallon is on a roll in taunting President Donald Trump with sexual jokes ― and some are making insinuations about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. (Watch the video below.) On Wednesday the 'Tonight Show' host was back at it again, using Taylor Swift songs to sum up the president's Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Fallon got a big response for noting that Americans are worried that Trump isn't ready for the talks to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine 'since his mind is basically a giant 'Blank Space.' ' Then the comedian waded into very sensitive territory. 'Also, he's distracted by the Epstein scandal. He'll tell Putin it's been a 'Cruel Summer' because everyone thinks 'I Did Something Bad' but I swear everyone on the island was '22.′' 'Oooooh,' the audience reacted in he-really-went-there fashion. Fast-forward to 1:50 for the Swift-Trump bit: To be clear, Trump reportedly has never been investigated over anything involving the late Epstein. The sex offender's hobnobbing with celebrities and politicians has generated high interest in what government files potentially contain about them. And while Trump was reportedly told by Attorney General Pam Bondi that he is mentioned in the files, the context is not publicly known. Trump brought some suspicion on himself by suddenly declaring the files to be a hoax. But some Republicans are backing a bipartisan House push for the release of all the files related to Epstein. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) appears to be hindering the process. Fallon has taunted Trump for a while on his about-face on the Epstein front. On Monday the host noted that the president had hoped for a 'trilateral meeting' of peace talks involving Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy. 'Last time Trump had a trilateral meeting was on Epstein Island,' Fallon cracked. On Tuesday, he again parlayed monologue chatter about the summit into another naughty dig at the commander in chief. 'Trump said that in his meeting with Putin, he will know probably in the first two minutes whether a deal is possible,' the host said. 'It's reassuring when a president talks about ending a war like a Tinder date.' 'Yep,' Fallon continued, 'Trump says that he'll know in two minutes, which makes sense because, according to Stormy Daniels, two minutes is plenty.' Related... A Funny Thing Happened To Ratings When Jimmy Fallon Had Fox News Host As Guest Jimmy Fallon Again Talks Dirty About Trump And We're Here For It Jimmy Fallon's Filthy Trump Burn Over Putin Meeting Gets A 'Whoa' From Audience

It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants
It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants

For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about President Trump's invasion of an American city. I'm starting to wonder when our government's checks and balances will kick in – or if they will at all. On Monday, Aug. 11, President Donald Trump announced he would be deploying the National Guard in Washington, DC, and taking over the city's police force "to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' The troops began showing up on Tuesday evening. According to Trump, violent crime is up in the nation's capital, and he's the only one who can rescue the city from societal collapse. It's a convenient narrative, one that feeds into MAGA's perception of him. For the rest of us, it's a terrifying move that shows he is willing to test the limits of presidential oversight. But while Trump's hostile takeover of DC public safety is concerning on its own, it's more alarming that Republicans in Congress are letting him do this with seemingly no regard for what is ethical. Even if this deployment is legal, there are certain lines that presidents should not cross. This is one of them. And I have to ask. Would Republicans be sitting on their hands if a Democratic president were doing everything that Trump is doing? I would hope not, but here we are. Of course, Trump is lying about crime in DC Trump seems to have called in the military after an assault on a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer on Aug. 3. While it's horrible that a government employee was attacked, Trump's declaration that Washington is crime-infested and dangerous doesn't align with reality. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime is down 26% compared with last year. In fact, 2024 marked a 30-year low for violent crime in Washington, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Per a New York Times analysis, the homicide rate in 2023 was 40.4 per 100,000 people, the highest rate in 20 years. But that rate declined in 2024, down to 26.6 per 100,000 people. And homicides in the city continue to decline in 2025. While Trump is correct in saying this rate is higher than those of Mexico City and Bogotá, Colombia, it doesn't paint the full picture. A federal takeover is an extreme reaction. It doesn't matter, of course, that violent crime in the city is down overall this year. That wouldn't fit in with the Trumpian narrative, the one where he's the hero saving tourists and locals alike from violent crime. Are you worried about crime? Do you feel safe where you live? Tell us. | Opinion Forum Who even asked for this? It wasn't DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. All of this is happening to the dismay of Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who noted on the Aug. 12 edition of 'The Breakfast Club' that the militarization of the city will instill fear in its residents. '(Trump) wants to send the message to cities that if he can get away with this in Los Angeles, if he can get away with this in DC, he can get away with it in New York, or Baltimore or Chicago, or any other place where millions of people live, work and are doing everything the right way,' Bowser said on the radio show. Bowser is right, this is an escalation. It's Trump's way of showing everyone in Democratic parts of the country that he has the final say and that he isn't afraid to use the military to his advantage. Trump is a bully. He's using the National Guard to conquer DC as a test run. | Opinion Will Republicans hold Trump accountable for anything? For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about Trump's invasion of an American city. In fact, it seems that many are supportive of the move. If a Democratic president were to try to do this, the Republican Party would decry authoritarianism's arrival in the United States. But because it's Trump, there has been zero pushback. Just like his tariff plan that's costing everyday Americans, the failed Elon Musk overhaul of the federal government, the deployment of soldiers against citizens in Los Angeles and his ruthless immigration agenda that includes trying to erase due process, the GOP is letting him get away with all of it. Republicans may even be happy about it. Imagine if Joe Biden did any of that? The Republican pearl-clutching would be generational. But this is fine because it's their king. Trump is considering extending the troop deployment beyond 30 days, something he will need congressional approval for. This seems entirely plausible, even likely, because of the Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress. I'm hesitant to throw the F-word – fascism – around, but if the Trump administration continues down this path, I worry that the rights we have as Americans will slip away. Who's stopping the president from deploying troops to other cities in the United States? It certainly isn't going to be Congress. There's some hope for the Supreme Court, but it has a 6-3 conservative majority. All of this is happening within the first year of Trump's return to the White House. There's no telling what the next three years will bring if this is how he's starting out. There should be firm lines that presidents do not cross – there are some things that are not appropriate or reasonable for a president to do. Yet that line keeps getting moved by Republicans, who don't seem to care as long as their conservative agenda is being implemented. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store