McDonald's is heating things up with 3 new Spicy McMuffins
Next week, McDonald's is launching three spicy breakfast menu items: the Spicy McMuffin, Spicy Sausage McMuffin and Spicy Sausage McMuffin with Egg. The McMuffins will feature their traditional ingredients – cheese, egg, Canadian bacon or sausage, and a buttered English muffin, topped with Spicy Pepper Sauce, a news release states.
McDonald's launched the Egg McMuffin in 1975. The breakfast item was the brainchild of Herb Peterson, a McDonald's franchisee in Santa Barbara, California. Herb, according to previous USA TODAY reporting, presented the sandwich as a to-go version of a diner classic: Eggs Benedict. Roy Kroc, the businessman who transformed McDonald's into what it is today, loved the idea.
When will the Spicy McMuffin be available?
The Spicy McMuffin (and its subsidiaries) will be available for a limited time, at participating locations, starting on Tuesday, July 8.
Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asia-Pacific Fast Food Market Forecast and Company Analysis Report 2025-2033 Featuring McDonald's, Yum!, Domino's, Wendy's, Jack in the Box, Starbucks, Papa John's, KFC, Corteva Agriscience
The Asia-Pacific fast food market, valued at USD 270.22 billion in 2024, is projected to reach USD 465.12 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 6.22%. Key drivers include urbanization, a growing youth population, and demand for affordable dining. Increasing digital participation and international chain expansion in countries like China, India, Japan, and South Korea fuel growth. The market faces challenges such as growing health consciousness and supply chain disruptions. Trends highlight a rise in seafood, chicken, and pizza/pasta segments. Notable players include McDonald's, Yum! Brands, and Domino's. Asia-Pacific Fast Food Market Dublin, July 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Asia-Pacific Fast Food Market Size and Share Analysis - Growth Trends and Forecast Report 2025-2033" report has been added to Asia-Pacific fast food market was valued at USD 270.22 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 465.12 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 6.22% during the period from 2025 to 2033. Urbanization, an increasing young population, and rising demand for convenient and affordable dining are fueling market growth, as well as the fast growth of international and local fast food chains. In Asia-Pacific, fast food has gained immense popularity because of the changing lifestyles of consumers, rising urbanization, and exposure to Western cuisine. Younger generations, especially, are attracted to fast food because it is affordable, convenient, and offers a wide variety of tastes. Secondly, the increasing rate of working professionals as well as dual-income families has increased the demand for quick meal India, Japan, and South Korea are among those countries where both international and indigenous fast food chains are expanding rapidly. Furthermore, online food delivery apps have made fast food readily accessible than ever before. Several brands are localizing menus in order to tap into regional appetites, in addition to extending their appeal further. The fast food market within the Asia-Pacific region is ever-growing as shoppers look for speed, convenience, and great flavors when dining Drivers in the Asia-Pacific Fast Food Market Acceleration of Urbanization and Lifestyle TransitionUrbanization in Asia-Pacific nations has triggered time-starved lifestyles, primarily among the emerging workforce. As cities expand and more people work longer hours or commute farther, demand for quick and accessible meals has grown sharply. Fast food restaurants, both global and local, are meeting this need by offering affordable, on-the-go options. Urban consumers are increasingly seeking convenience over traditional meal preparation. Moreover, dual-income households have surged, boosting the preference for dine-out or home-delivered fast food. With city populations expected to keep rising, particularly in nations such as India, China, and Indonesia, the quick service industry is slated for further expansion. Urbanization is one of the region's dominant megatrends. At present, 54% of the world's urban population, or more than 2.2 billion individuals, live in Asia. By the year 2050, urban population in this region will rise by 50%, bringing another 1.2 billion more people. Cities in Asia and the Pacific are at the forefront of economic possibilities and are diligently striving to ensure a more sustainable and Domestic Chain ExpansionInternational fast food chains like McDonald's, Domino's, KFC, and Subway are going full throttle across Asia-Pacific by opening stores in tier 1, 2, and even tier 3 cities. Native brands are innovating too and providing regional tastes that are specifically designed to consumer tastes, such as rice-based bowls, seafood specialties, and vegetarian dishes. Franchising models, strategic alliances, and cost-effective supply chains have helped facilitate fast-paced outlet expansion. This increased physical presence, and aggressive promotion, makes fast food more available and desirable. Plus, the introduction of online order apps has extended visibility for small chains and has enabled them to reach customers beyond the physical space of a restaurant. June 2024, Dachser's logistics ingenuity and capacity expansion plans for the Asia-Pacific region match moves by global logistics players. With economic growth anticipated, Roman Mueller, Managing Director of Air & Sea Logistics Asia-Pacific, spearheads the adoption and facilitation of Youth Population and Digital ParticipationAsia-Pacific hosts one of the world's most populous youth populations, especially in nations such as India, Indonesia, and the Philippines. In 2023, The world contains 1.8 billion youths, the most populous generation of youth ever. Youth from the Asia-Pacific Region account for 60 percent of the globe's youth at 750 million young individuals from the ages 15 to 24 years old. The cosmopolitan, techno-savvy generation is closely aligned with Western culture, internet trends, and cell phone accessibility. Fast foods are cashing in on that by introducing cell phone app campaigns, short-order menus, and influencer promotional campaigns. The ease of ordering online, supported by focused digital advertising and social media activity, has promoted higher trial and repeat consumption among Gen Z and millennials. As youth drive contemporary eating habits and welcome international flavors, fast food keeps expanding its cultural stronghold in the Fast Food Market Challenges Growing Health Consciousness and Demand for Healthy AlternativesAs the awareness of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases increases, consumers in Asia-Pacific are increasingly shifting towards healthier diets. Governments and health agencies are advocating nutritional literacy and pushing for lower consumption of high-fat, high-sugar foods - putting fast food in the spotlight. The image of fast food as unhealthy is deterring some consumers, particularly middle-aged consumers and parents. This change is compelling brands to rework menus, cut portion sizes, and add healthier alternatives such as salads, grilled foods, and low-calorie items. But taste, price, and health balance continues to be a challenge for most fast food chains that want to keep customers while enhancing nutritional Chain Disruptions and Increasing Operating CostsThe fast food sector depends significantly on effective logistics and availability of a consistent supply of ingredients such as poultry, dairy, wheat, and seafood. Disruptions created by geopolitical tensions, fuel price fluctuations, and climate change are now impacting raw material prices and availability. Inflation in some Asia-Pacific economies has also raised input and labor costs. These are constricting profit margins, particularly for smaller or local chains. Fast food companies are now having to invest in supply chain resilience, local sourcing, and cost-reduction initiatives, which can be costly and complicated - particularly in markets with different infrastructure and regulatory Fast Food Full-Service Restaurants MarketFull-service restaurants in Asia-Pacific fast food are increasing their following, particularly among customers looking for a mix of convenience and eat-in features. They have a wide range of menu offerings, table seating, and a less hurried environment than quick-service models. Full-service brands such as Pizza Hut and family-oriented Asian chains are increasing their market presence in city centers and shopping malls. Japanese, South Korean, and Chinese consumers appreciate dining out as a social experience and thus full-service models are favorite among families and groups. Moreover, increasing middle-class incomes and urbanization are the primary drivers of this segment's Fast Food Quick-Service Restaurants MarketQuick-service restaurants (QSR) form the backbone of the Asia-Pacific fast food market as they are sustained by the demand for affordable, quick, and convenient food among consumers. Players such as McDonald's, Burger King, and homegrown operators such as Lotteria are growing fast across major urban markets in economies such as China, India, and Indonesia. QSRs also provide various meal options, such as burgers and fries, rice bowls, and wraps, that fit regional tastes. Growing use of mobile apps for ordering, collaborations with food-delivery platforms like Grab and Zomato, and the emergence of cloud kitchens are also helping QSRs boost market penetration and expansion. Key Players Analysis: Overviews, Key Persons, Recent Developments, Revenue McDonald's Corporation Yum! Brands, Inc Domino's Pizza Inc Wendy's International Inc Jack in the Box Inc Starbucks Corp Papa John's International Inc Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) Corteva Agriscience Key Attributes: Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 200 Forecast Period 2024 - 2033 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2024 $270.22 Billion Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2033 $465.12 Billion Compound Annual Growth Rate 6.2% Regions Covered Asia Pacific Key Topics Covered: 1. Introduction2. Research & Methodology2.1 Data Source2.1.1 Primary Sources2.1.2 Secondary Sources2.2 Research Approach2.2.1 Top-Down Approach2.2.2 Bottom-Up Approach2.3 Forecast Projection Methodology3. Executive Summary4. Market Dynamics4.1 Growth Drivers4.2 Challenges5. Asia-Pacific Fast Food Market5.1 Historical Market Trends5.2 Market Forecast6. Market Share Analysis6.1 By Product6.2 By End User6.3 By Countries7. Product7.1 Pizza/Pasta7.2 Burgers/Sandwiches7.3 Chicken7.4 Asian/Latin American7.5 Seafood7.6 Others8. End User8.1 Full-Service Restaurants8.2 Quick-Service Restaurants8.3 Catering8.4 Others9. Countries9.1 China9.2 Japan9.3 India9.4 South Korea9.5 Thailand9.6 Malaysia9.7 Indonesia9.8 Australia9.9 New Zealand9.10 Rest of Asia-Pacific10. Porter's Five Forces Analysis10.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers10.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers10.3 Degree of Rivalry10.4 Threat of New Entrants10.5 Threat of Substitutes11. SWOT Analysis11.1 Strength11.2 Weakness11.3 Opportunity11.4 Threat12. Key Players Analysis For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Attachment Asia-Pacific Fast Food Market CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Miami Herald
12 hours ago
- Miami Herald
McDonald's shares key pricing decision customers won't like
A few months ago, my son and I were at Bradley Airport outside of Hartford, Conn. We wanted lunch at different places, so I gave him a $20 bill, thinking that should be enough for anything he wants to eat at a McDonald's. Sadly, $20 did not cover his 10-piece Chicken McNuggets meal. That combination, which came with fries and a drink, was a few pennies over $20, so he opted for the 6-piece combo. Now, everyone knows that airport restaurants face higher costs, but this markup seemed excessive. The same combo, ordered through Uber Eats (which often costs more than an in-store order), cost $10.49 in Port St. Lucie, Fla. The airport price was nearly double the cost, which does not reflect well on McDonald's and make you wonder whether the chain should offer some sort or standard pricing nationwide. That's something analyst John Ivankoe asked about during McDonald's (MCD) first-quarter earnings call. "It's fairly apparent looking around the country, the amount of core menu pricing difference that you have. And, obviously, I understand all the different economic and competitive reasons for that. But the reality is that there's not a lot of price certainty specifically around the core menu. So, do you think that, that is an opportunity? Is it a risk?" he asked. Image source:McDonald's restaurants are operated by franchisees, and the chain does not set minimum or maximum pricing. That's something CEO Chris Kempczinski talked about during the earnings call. "Well, at the end of the day, pricing is an inherently local decision, and it's informed by the trading area that exists around each of our individual restaurants. And our commitment and the focus is, we need to make sure that relative to the trading area that we're competing in that we're offering strong value, and that's what shows up on both the menu board and that also shows up with the promotions and digital offers that we're running," he added. Kempczinski aggressively pushed back at the the idea of uniform pricing. "So, I think about it less as around having predictability across the country around a common menu, and it's more about we need to be competitive within the trading areas that we're competing. I think if you look at what's been going on with menu prices right now, because the inflation has come down and we're not nearly seeing as inflationary environment as we saw certainly last year and into - in 2023, they're not seeing the big moves on core menu that you saw previously," he added. Kempczinski did acknowledge that inflation in the food space, at least for McDonald's, has slowed down. He believes franchisees understand that offering value-based pricing is important. "I think our franchisees also recognize how important it is for us to stay disciplined on this, and we look at pass-through rates, as I described earlier, to make sure that we understand the consumers' willingness to accept any pricing. So, that would be my comment on that," he shared. McDonald's global sales fell by 1%. Kempczinski wasn't surprised by that, but had admitted that some numbers were worse than he had planned for. "We expected global QSR industry traffic would be down in the first quarter, actual industry traffic fell more than we anticipated in several of our large markets, including the U.S. In the U.S., overall QSR industry traffic from the low-income consumer cohort was down nearly double-digits versus the prior year quarter," he said. The CEO also noted that McDonald's saw a weakness in another customer group. "Unlike a few months ago, QSR traffic from middle-income consumers fell nearly as much, a clear indication that the economic pressure on traffic has broadened. However, traffic growth from the high-income cohort remains solid, illustrating the divided U.S. economy, where low- and middle-income consumers in particular are being weighed down by the cumulative impact of inflation, and heightened anxiety about the economic outlook," he added. The answer to that, he believes, is value. "We know that leadership in value and affordability is paramount in an environment like this, and we have been expanding and refining our value proposition to meet the needs of our consumers, especially our low- and middle-income cohorts, as well as families internationally. Building upon the actions we began to take in 2024, we now have everyday affordable price menus, or EDAP, and entry-level meal bundles in each of our big five international operated markets," he shared. Buy one full‑price McValue item, then add a second item for just $1. Breakfast optionseligible: Sausage McMuffinSausage BiscuitSausage BurritoHash Browns Lunch/Dinner optionseligible: 6‑pc Chicken McNuggetsDouble CheeseburgerMcChickenSmall Fries McDonald's 5 Meal Deal: Available through summer 2025, this meal includes: McDouble or McChicken sandwich4‑piece Chicken McNuggetsSmall friesSmall soft drink (Some locations may charge $6). The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Head Start faces new worries about its future with Trump, GOP
Supporters of Head Start are worried about the program's future as it faces Trump administration calls for budgetary cuts ahead of the next school year. The free, federally funded program for low-income families provides education for infants through preschoolers and had enjoyed bipartisan support for most of its 60-year history. But worries are mounting for both Head Start staff and parents. The Project 2025 blueprint calling for deep federal cuts proposed Head Start's elimination, and while calls to cut its budget have diminished, advocates don't feel the program is safe. The administration also is looking at enrollment changes that could impact students lacking permanent legal status who are covered by Head Start. 'A lot of people have called this death by a thousand cuts, what we've seen in the past six months,' said Casey Peeks, senior director of Early Childhood Policy at the Center for American Progress. Head Start seemed to escape the worst possible fate after a report earlier this year by USA Today that said the White House was ready to adopt the Project 2025 blueprint and eliminate it. Despite the fears, President Trump's final proposal didn't include an increase or decrease in Head Start funding. It kept the program at the same funding level as last year. Other early preschool programs, Preschool Development Grants and the Child Care Access Means Parents in Schools, were cut in the budget. Still, the flat funding could hurt as more families seek to use Head Start in an era of rising costs. 'We do have concerns that flat funding … would equate as a cut to Head Start and Early Head Start programs, given cost of living, inflationary costs, as well as just higher costs of operating services, the needs to be able to provide a competitive wage in order to have staff,' said Tommy Sheridan, deputy director for the National Head Start Association. A report last week released by the Government Accountability Office found a temporary funding freeze to Head Start at the beginning of the administration was illegal. The move put programs into chaos, and some even briefly shut down during the pause. While funding was mostly spared, Head Start has watched the Trump administration target staff and enrollment changes. In April, around 50 percent of staff at the Office of Head Start were cut and all staff at regional offices of Head Start were fired. 'We're also seeing a lot of chaos and panic among Head Start staff. They don't know if their jobs are as secure as they once were, which is really causing a problem, because it's not just Head Start, but across the early childhood sector there is a workforce shortage and these types of concerns, lack of reliability, it really doesn't help with the retention issues that are already a problem in normal circumstance,' said Peeks. The latest curveball thrown at Head Start was a notice from the Department of Health and Human Services that said undocumented students can no longer participate in the programs. The directive did not come with any clear instructions, sending programs into confusion as immigration status was never considered in Head Start's history. Twenty Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit against the directive while the federal government argued it 'ensures that public resources are no longer used to incentivize illegal immigration.' 'There's still a lot of confusion about what exactly it means, and we're encouraging people not to take action until there's more guidance or clarity on who exactly it affects and what the Head Start programs are required to do,' said Melissa Boteach, chief policy adviser for Zero to Three. 'But I think an important point is that it has a chilling effect, regardless, and that if you're [an] immigrant family, regardless of what your status is in terms of legal permanent residence, or mixed status family or refugee or whatever it is, you're legitimately scared of sending your child to an Early Head Start or Head Start program,' she added. Some fear this is just the beginning of an effort to go after the program despite previous bipartisan support, including during the first Trump administration. In Trump's first four years in office, Head Start received funding increases and greater support, especially at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. There are signs the program could come under more pressure from Republicans who say Head Start has not been accountable enough in how it has spent money. Days after Trump came into office, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce highlighted a report by the Government Accountability Office regarding abuse and negligence in Head Start programs, including child safety concerns and lack of oversight over classroom materials. 'These programs continue to suck up millions in taxpayer funding without serious accountability or oversight. We have an obligation to protect these children and end this gross negligence immediately,' Committee Chair Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) said at the time. Proponents of Head Start argue there is data to show it helps lower crime rates, reduces health care costs and increase tax revenue. 'This is proof of the effectiveness of Head Start, and the effectiveness and the impact of the investment that Head Start has been making,' said Sheridan. 'And so, we believe that there's really no sound reason to interfere with that, and we believe that Congress and the administration should come together and really commit to building on the 60 year of bipartisan support that Head Start has had, and double down on that fundamental commitment that our country has made to children and to our collective future.'
