
You Can No Longer Buy Paper Inflation Bonds With Your Tax Refund
If you were planning to use your tax refund to buy the paper version of inflation bonds, you're out of luck: That option has been eliminated.
The Treasury Department ended its tax-time savings bond program as of Jan. 1. The program was the last way to buy the paper version of I bonds, as Series I savings bonds are known. The bonds aim to protect savers against the rising cost of living by paying an interest rate linked to inflation.
Some people liked to give paper bonds as gifts, but others used the tax-time program because it let them buy as much as $5,000 in extra I bonds, beyond the allowed annual limit of $10,000 a person in digital bonds. (Couples filing jointly could buy a total of $25,000 in I bonds: $10,000 each, plus up to $5,000 with their refund.)
Now, all savings bonds are digital and must be bought online using the department's TreasuryDirect system. And the extra $5,000 option has ended. 'You may continue to purchase up to $10,000 of series I bonds in a calendar year,' the system's website says.
You can still get your tax refund sent to your checking account, say, and then use the money to buy digital I bonds via TreasuryDirect. What's going away is the ability to fill out a special form with your tax return and have the paper bonds bought with your refund.
The change was quietly announced with a website update last year, under the Biden administration.
The tax-time savings bond program was begun in 2010 to give tax filers, especially those with low and moderate incomes, a way to buy I bonds with their refunds. But the program 'was costly and not frequently used,' the TreasuryDirect site says. On average, 35,000 tax filers bought paper I bonds each year, representing .03 percent of tax filers and less than 10 percent of I bond purchasers. Mailing paper bonds risked fraud, theft, loss and delays, the site says, adding that buying savings bonds online is 'simple, safe and affordable.'
David Enna, founder of Tipswatch.com, a website that tracks securities that protect against inflation, said the government hadn't widely publicized its new I bond purchase policy. Some tax filers are likely to be disappointed, he said, because a popular strategy was to overpay taxes during a tax year to generate a tax refund to buy the bonds the next spring.
The loss of the option to buy an extra $5,000 in I bonds will probably be unpopular among buyers, he said. The $10,000 annual cap, he said, is 'too small,' because it takes years to buy enough bonds to generate significant interest.
I bonds, first issued in 1998, grabbed savers' attention during the pandemic-induced inflation surge. In 2022, the interest rate on I bonds rose to well over 9 percent, far outpacing rates on other safe options for cash.
The low-risk bonds pay a rate made up of two parts: a fixed rate, set when the bond is issued and staying the same for its 30-year life, and a variable rate that changes every six months — on May 1 and Nov. 1 — based on the Consumer Price Index. The Treasury Department applies a formula to combine the two parts into an overall rate.
Rates on I bonds have fallen to more pedestrian levels as inflation has eased. I bonds bought from Nov. 1, 2024, through April 30 are paying an annualized composite rate of 3.11 percent.
That means the bonds aren't a compelling way right now for parking short-term cash, said Jeremy Keil, a financial planner near Milwaukee who tracks the bonds, because safe alternatives, including high-yield savings accounts and certificates of deposit, are paying 4 percent or higher.
But the bonds remain attractive for people seeking a hedge against inflation over the longer term, he said. The current fixed rate on I bonds is 1.2 percent, one of their highest in recent years. Holders will also get a variable rate tied to inflation, he said. (When rates reset in May, it's likely that the base rate will stay about the same and the variable rate will increase, Mr. Keil said).
Here are some questions and answers about I bonds:
What else should I know about I bonds?
Interest on the bonds is exempt from state and local income taxes. You'll owe federal tax on the interest earned, but you can wait to pay it until you cash the bond, if you want.
You can't redeem the bonds until you have held them for at least a year. And if you cash them in before five years, you'll forfeit the last three months of interest as a penalty.
What should I do if I have paper I bonds?
You can hold them until you're ready to cash them in (at a bank, if you can find one that still does it, or by mailing them to the Treasury Department). Or you can convert them to electronic bonds using your online TreasuryDirect account.
Can I still buy electronic I bonds directly, using my income tax refund?
No. According to the I.R.S. Form 1040 instructions for 2024, 'The program allowing for your refund to be deposited into your Treasury Direct account to buy savings bonds, as well as the ability to buy paper bonds with your refund, has been discontinued.'
Form 8888, which filers could previously use to direct refunds to buy the bonds, can be used to split a direct deposit refund into two accounts, like a checking or savings account or even an individual retirement account. But it cannot be used to deposit a refund into a TreasuryDirect account, said a Treasury Department spokesman.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
MAGA's blue-collar base waits patiently for populist payoff
President Trump 's second term has been a payday for the powerful, exposing a disconnect in his promise to deliver for "the forgotten man" of America's working class. Why it matters: The populist paradox at the heart of MAGA — a movement fueled by economic grievance and championed by a New York billionaire — has never been more pronounced. Trump's blue-collar base remains fiercely loyal, energized by his hardline stances on immigration, trade and culture — and patient that his economic "Golden Age" will materialize. But so far, the clearest financial rewards of Trump's tenure are flowing upward — to wealthy donors, family members, insiders and the president himself. The big picture: Trump's inner circle has shattered norms around profiting from the presidency, dulling public outrage to the point where even the most brazen access schemes draw only fleeting scrutiny. Take crypto: The top holders of Trump's meme coin were granted an exclusive dinner last month at the president's Virginia golf club, where some paid millions for access. The White House refused to release the guest list, but wealthy foreigners — including a Chinese billionaire who faced SEC charges under the Biden administration — were among those revealed to be in attendance. Trump's sons, meanwhile, are spearheading a family crypto venture that has raked in hundreds of millions of dollars. Trump Media, the parent company of Truth Social, is raising $2.5 billion to buy Bitcoin. All of this — plus a flurry of lucrative real estate deals overseas — is playing out as Trump presides over U.S. foreign policy and the fate of crypto regulation. Zoom in: Now take Trump's relationship with his donors. His Cabinet is the wealthiest in American history, stocked with mega-donors whose combined net worth reaches well into the billions — even discounting estranged former adviser Elon Musk. Trump has granted pardons or clemency to a stream of white-collar criminals and wealthy tax cheats, many of whom hired lobbyists, donated to the president or raised money on his behalf. The Wall Street Journal found that the biggest corporate and individual donors to Trump's inauguration later received relief from investigations, U.S. market access and plum postings in the administration. The other side: Trump officials wholly reject the premise that the administration's policies don't benefit the working-class Americans who voted for the president en masse. The White House points to cooling inflation, plummeting border crossings, and the tariff-driven re-shoring of manufacturing as evidence of Trump delivering on his core promises. They frame his crypto push, AI acceleration and deregulatory agenda as driving forces behind a pro-growth tide that will lift all boats — including for middle- and working-class Americans. Reality check: Inflation may remain benign for now, but there are growing signs businesses are experiencing higher prices and passing some or all of those costs directly through to consumers, Axios managing editor for business Ben Berkowitz notes. While companies have made encouraging public statements about re-shoring, in almost all of those cases it's too soon for any shovels to be in the ground. What to watch: Trump's "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" is packed with populist red meat, including the extension of his first-term tax cuts, the elimination of taxes on tips and overtime, and $1,000 " Trump Accounts" for newborns. "All his hopes and dreams on that front are pinned to that reconciliation bill," one MAGA operative told Axios, characterizing it as "the bulk" of Trump's legislative agenda for the middle class. "The president expects the Senate to quickly pass the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, codifying huge tax cuts that will mean permanent savings for hardworking Americans," White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said. Between the lines: Several independent analyses project that the wealthiest Americans would benefit most from the bill. A Penn Wharton study that found the top 10% of earners would reap 70% of the legislation's total value. The Congressional Budget Office projects that Medicaid work requirements and other health care cuts would leave about 11 million people uninsured by 2034. Millions could also be forced off of food stamps. "Medicaid, you gotta be careful," former Trump adviser Steve Bannon said on his "War Room" podcast in February. "Because a lot of MAGAs are on Medicaid, I'm telling you. If you don't think so, you are dead wrong." Factory investments in red districts are expected to suffer most from the bill's rollback of clean energy credits included in President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The bottom line: Inside the MAGA movement, there's little concern about who's getting rich as long as Trump keeps fighting the culture wars, deporting immigrants and tearing down liberal institutions.


Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
Big Beautiful Bill Looks To Reverse Affordable Care Act Coverage Gains
The House budget reconciliation bill, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' includes large cuts in Medicaid spending that could lead to millions of newly uninsured individuals if the legislation passes in the Senate. The proposed law also contains provisions that alter the Affordable Care Act exchange landscape, potentially leading to millions more uninsured. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that at least five million current marketplace enrollees would lose coverage by 2034. The nonpartisan and policy research firm KFF says the number of people with marketplace plans could shrink even more, by around eight million. Changes in the ACA marketplace would make coverage more expensive, as enhanced tax credits expire, and harder to obtain as open enrollment windows shorten, the paperwork burden for beneficiaries increases and automatic re-enrollment ends. Americans who purchase health coverage through the ACA marketplace exchanges could also soon face higher out-of-pocket maximums in their coverage plans, which means higher cost-sharing. The United States Treasury Department announced in Sept. 2024 that almost 50 million people have obtained healthcare coverage through marketplace exchanges created by the ACA since its enactment more than a decade ago. The Department data show that one in seven Americans have been or are covered by the law. And between President Biden's inauguration in Jan. 2021 and Sept. 2024, 18.2 million Americans got ACA coverage for the first time. Rising enrollment since 2021 has been driven by an expansion under the Biden Administration of premium tax credits to include individuals and families with household incomes up to 400% of the federal poverty level, which equates to $58,000 for a single person and $120,000 for a family of four. Republican lawmakers in both the House and Senate, in concert with the Trump administration, are now looking to reverse some of those gains. The ACA has gone through a tumultuous history since it was signed in 2010. The law has faced repeated calls for repeal by Republicans. For several years following its passage it wasn't a particularly well-liked piece of legislation, Yet the ACA is now more popular than ever, with over 60% of the public having a favorable view of the law, according to KFF. The ACA is a comprehensive reform bill, passed by Congress in 2010, that increases health insurance coverage for the uninsured and implements a wide range of reforms to the health insurance market as well as an expansion of Medicaid, the public insurance program that provides health coverage to low-income families and individuals. Importantly, under the ACA, individuals who may have been uninsured due to preexisting conditions or limited finances can secure affordable health plans through the health insurance marketplaces established by the law. The demographics of people on Medicaid are fairly similar to those enrolled in ACA plans. The legislation has its critics. They point to certain flaws in design and implementation, Indeed, in the early years under the Obama Administration, insurers exited in droves and premiums rates increased substantially. Under the first Trump administration, ACA enrollment fell overall while numbers of uninsured rose by more than two million. Following unsuccessful efforts to scuttle the ACA, the president issued executive orders to 'improve ACA market dynamics.' ACA exchanges did stabilize in the latter half of Trump's first term as insurers returned and the rate of premium growth decreased. When Biden assumed office, his administration sought to enlarge the ACA program and counter several of the changes implemented by the first Trump administration that had shrunk its size. The Biden administration was largely successful in terms of increasing the number of people who signed up in the ACA exchanges and reducing the percentage of Americans without health insurance. Troubled times for folks enrolled in the ACA exchanges aren't solely because of possible passage of the budget reconciliation bill. CVS Health announced last month it will pull Aetna out of the ACA marketplace in 2026, leaving about one million people across 17 states searching for new healthcare coverage. Aetna's withdrawal from the marketplace will mark the second time the carrier stepped away from the ACA exchanges. The company left the ACA marketplace in 2018 and came back in 2022. Other carriers left the individual health insurance marketplace in 2017 and 2018 amid uncertainty over whether the ACA would be repealed or replaced. While there isn't the same kind of uncertainty now regarding the ACA's survival, disruption is occurring in the space. This could soon lead to more carriers exiting the market.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hunting for big game: Trump tariff inflation
My safari hat has been on for a month in search of big-game inflation. I blame Walmart (WMT) CFO John David Rainey for making me get into this wardrobe. "And so we'll work hard to try to keep prices low. But it's unavoidable that you're going to see some prices go up on certain items," Rainey told me in mid-May after Walmart reported first quarter earnings. Rainey — responding to my question on the impact of new Trump tariffs — said increases would be noticeable in a few short weeks. "Well, if you've got a 30% tariff on something, you're likely going to see double digits [in price increases]," Rainey warned. I've been on high alert ever since for signs of eye-popping inflation that brings back the discussion of a potential Fed rate hike this year (which has gone dormant). Or, at the bare minimum, renewed market volatility due to a more uncertain outlook. By and large, my hunting expeditions have come up short. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for April rose by a seasonally adjusted 0.2%. The tame jump put the 12-month inflation rate at 2.3%, its lowest since February 2021. This report hit the wires on May 13, before an inflation-indicator company like Walmart warned about the looming effects of tariffs. Still, a data point is a data point. Also surprisingly docile was the inflation expectations reading in the University of Michigan's May sentiment report. Year-ahead inflation expectations were little changed at 6.6% versus April's 6.5%. The uptick marked the smallest increase since the election and ended a four-month streak of "extremely large" jumps in near-term inflation expectations. Long-term inflation expectations dropped to 4.2% in May from 4.4% in April. This was the first decline since December 2024. Again, a data point is a data point. While I hate to be the bearer of bad news, I have started to scope inflation charging out on the prairie. What I'm seeing seems to validate what Rainey told me and could set the stage for negative surprises for the bulls on inflation report days. New research from Morgan Stanley analyst Alex Straton shows that major retailers still reliant on China and other markets for production have begun to jack up prices a good bit. The average footwear year-over-year price increase tallied 13% in May, according to Straton's research. The prior six-month average was 1%. Under Armour (UA) and ON Holdings (ONON) were cited as being aggressive on recent price hikes. Some apparel pricing looked even worse, per Straton. Gap (GAP), for instance, hiked its average apparel pricing by 20% in May. Macy's (M) clocked in with a 12% apparel price increase, Levi's (LEVI) with 9%, and Nike (NKE) by 10%. Meanwhile, those aforementioned price increases at Walmart appear to be happening as Rainey promised. Customers are posting pics on the Walmart subreddit of large price increases on toys and apparel. "We also put in place some selective price actions," HP (HPQ) CEO Enrique Lores explained to me about how he is offsetting tariffs on parts that make up PCs and printers. "We think that the industry-wide price increases that we see, and especially the increased economic uncertainty, will have an impact on demand," he said, "and therefore we continue to expect that the market will grow, but we feel it will grow at a lower pace than we were expecting." Bottom line: If you've been complacent on tracking inflation, don't be. It's beginning to rear its ugly head and could devour your portfolio this summer if not careful. The Yahoo Finance team is heads down on our annual fall Invest conference. It's shaping up to be our most impactful one yet! At this invitation-only event, our guests will delve into the most critical issues powering global markets with our newsroom. Key themes include artificial intelligence, cryptocurrencies, and prosperity. Engage in Q&As following thought-provoking conversations with renowned investors, policymakers, economists, and other leading experts. For the first time, we will host two investor education rooms: one led by yours truly and one by the dynamic duo of data master Jared Blikre and veteran trader Kenny Polcari. I strongly encourage you to register now here before we are out of tickets. I will continue to remind you about Invest each Sunday in this newsletter. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data