
The telltale signs to spot a liar – from slow hand clue that's a real giveaway & the trick they use to call your bluff
Research suggests people lie once every day on average, ranging from little fibs to spare your feelings, to serious deceit by cheating partners.
4
4
It turns out our ability to spot liars isn't all that good, with little over half (54 per cent) of us able to pick up on a porkie.
And the reason is because we're looking out for the wrong signs, Geoff Beattie, Professor of Psychology at Edge Hill University, told The Sun.
"There are no telltale signs of lying per se," he explained.
"There are indicators of planning in speech when you're making something up.
"And there are indicators of negative emotions.
"A lot of people feel shame or guilt or embarrassment when they're lying.
"But some people don't, which of course makes it more complicated."
Here are some of the biggest misconceptions about spotting a liar.
Eye contact
4
Eye contact is the biggest telltale sign that people seem to believe in.
The problem is, every liar knows of that trick and will do everything in their power to stop themselves from avoiding eye contact.
How close you get to a person can unintentionally affect their eye contact too, making it appear like they're lying when they're not.
"My mother always said she could tell when I was lying, she said, because you just can't look me in the eye," explains Professor Beattie.
"She would lean forward when she'd ask the question and research has shown the police do exactly the same thing.
"You've got somebody, you think they're guilty, you lean forward.
"Well, the point about eye contact, it's also affected by interpersonal distance.
"So if you're sitting very close to someone and they lean forward, you look away."
Fidgeting and movements
Another misconception is that fidgeting or excessive shifting is a sign that someone is lying to you.
If anything, you need to look out for less movement, Professor Beattie says.
"They think people are going to be nervous and therefore they move more," he continued.
"All the indication is that people move less when they're lying.
"So, what they're trying to do is they're trying to dampen down behaviours to give less away.
"The best indicators of lying seems to be that people make fewer hand movements and fewer foot movements when they're lying, not more as people expect."
However, gesture-speech mismatches could be a sign.
Often when people speak they tend to move their hands to emphasis what they're saying.
For example, if someone is talking about a long journey they might stretch their arms and hands out.
"If they don't dampen down their gestural movement, occasionally they will say something and the gestural movement doesn't match what they're saying," he adds.
Smiles
A liar may use a smile to mask their emotions - but how long it stays on their face matters.
Those telling a porkie tend to smile and it fades quickly, whereas those with not lying have smiles that fade a lot slower from their face.
There's also something called micro-expressions, which are the really brief expressions that start appearing just before you get the masking smile in place - but they're so quick most people miss them.
"If you play the videos back in slow motion, people can say, oh, there's something quite strange there or I didn't notice that," Professor Beattie says.
"There's a kind of look of fear or look of sadness which they didn't pick up."
Professor Beattie has published a book on the subject called Lies, Lying and Liars: A Psychological Analysis.
4

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Is prowling for catcallers really the best use of police time?' Fury as undercover cops pose as joggers to catch wolf-whistlers
Police chiefs have sparked fury after undercover officers posed as joggers to catch men catcalling women - with campaigners branding it a 'nightmarish' clampdown on free speech. Activists have argued police should be using their resources to tackle criminal activity such as knife crime and theft - not 'prowling the streets in search of lawful but disapproved remarks'. It comes after Surrey Police sent two officers out running at rush hour to show the scale of harassment that women are facing. A spokesman for the force said of the patrols: 'These behaviours may not be criminal offences in themselves, but they need to be addressed.' Condemning the crackdown, The Free Speech Union said: 'Britain is in the grip of a surge in serious crime. In the year to March 2025, shoplifting rose 20 per cent, theft from the person climbed 15 per cent , and robberies topped 78,000. 'And Surrey Police's answer? "Jog On": a county-wide sting in which female officers, dressed as joggers, run through public spaces trailed by squad cars, ready to swoop on anyone who cat-calls, wolf-whistles or makes sexually suggestive comments. 'Perhaps Surrey Police should take their own advice and "just think" about whether prowling the streets in search of lawful but disapproved remarks is really the best use of police time in a county, and a country, grappling with so many actual crimes.' The union compared the campaign to Philip K. Dick's 1956 novella The Minority Report, which imagined a 'pre-crime' police unit hunting those who it believed would commit a crime. 'Across the country, Dick's nightmarish logic is fast becoming a technocratic rationale driving the authorities to clamp down on freedom of expression,' the union said. The Free Speech Union condemned Surrey Police's crackdown on catcalling The Boxing Saves Lives organisation also hit back at the campaign, suggesting police have better things to do Surrey Police sent the joggers out under the belief that acts such as catcalling could 'lead on to other behaviours'. But the Boxing Saves Lives organisation hit back at the claims, arguing that 'performative boll**** like this makes [women] think [police] have their finger on the pulse'. 'Have they got nothing better to do than to go finding new and inventive ways to be oppressed?', they wrote. 'This is not to say catcalling men aren't the absolute worst toss*** ever, but you'd be pretty pissed off if they told you they didn't have resources to attend a burglary, but had coppers free to jog round the streets to fight crimes they've prioritised to show how righteous they are. 'Women and girls will be failed all the time by the police, but performative boll**** like this makes them think they have their finger on the pulse.' Free speech activists argued police should instead be focusing on enforcing existing laws. A Surrey Police spokesperson said: 'Our priority is not only to tackle and solve crime but also to prevent it from happening in the first place.' Reporters from the news outlet LBC joined officers on patrol during the evening rush hour in Reigate, Surrey. During the operation, plain clothes police officers, who were dressed in athletic jogging gear, headed to areas identified as 'harassment hotspots'. Meanwhile, specialist units waited nearby to intervene at the first sign of abuse. According to LBC, the two female undercover cops were 'targeted within minutes' by a man in a large truck who 'honked at them and made gestures out the window'. Inspector John Vale said: 'One of our officers was honked at within ten minutes — then another vehicle slowed down, beeping and making gestures just 30 seconds later - that's how frequent it is. 'Someone slowing down, staring, shouting - even if it's not always criminal - it can have a huge impact on people's everyday lives and stops women from doing something as simple as going for a run. 'We have to ask: is that person going to escalate? Are they a sexual offender? We want to manage that risk early.' PC Abby Hayward, one of the police officers who posed as a jogger, said that catcalling is something many women are subjected to every day. She said that the behaviour was 'so common' and that it needed to be addressed. Surrey Police said that since they launched the 'Jog On' campaign four weeks ago, 18 arrests have been made for various offences including sexual assault and theft. Inspector Vale added: 'We know that this kind of harassment is significantly under reported thanks to a study carried out by Surrey County Council this year, which revealed that of 450 female residents surveyed, 49 per cent never reported. 'To date, we have made a number of interventions following reports of harassment of our plain clothes runners. 'In these cases, it was deemed appropriate to provide education around anti-social behaviour. 'For repeat offenders or where the behaviour is more serious, we will robustly pursue all criminal justice outcomes. 'We recognise this is a significant worry for women and girls, and we'll continue to patrol running routes throughout Redhill.' He continued: 'This type of harassment isn't just being experienced by communities in Reigate and Banstead, but communities across the whole of Surrey, and it's unacceptable. 'We have female officers and staff members who have been the subject to such behaviour when off duty. 'The message I would like to impart to perpetrators is this; your actions will not be tolerated. 'Please reflect and ask yourself 'is this how you would treat or want your partner, mother, sister to be treated?' 'The next time you see a female jogger, just think, they could be a police officer with colleagues nearby ready to stop you. Your behaviour is not welcome in Surrey.'


The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Teen girl ‘sexually assaulted' on bus in broad daylight as cops release CCTV in hunt for man
COPS have released a CCTV image of a man after a teenage girl was reportedly sexually assaulted on a bus. Officers were called to reports of the horrific incident at around midday on June 4. Cops have since launched an urgent investigation and are appealing for the public's help to identify the man in the picture. He is described as being of mixed heritage, about 5ft 10ins tall, aged in his 20s or 30s with short wavy black hair, short black facial hair. Avon and Somerset Police said: "Officers spoke to the victim, however the offender had already left the First Bus 24 service by the time they were alerted. "We have been in contact with First Bus and have circulated the images among officers and are now appealing for the public's support in identifying the pictured man." 1


The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Disclosing suspects' ethnicity and migration status is dangerous
We share the concerns of the Runnymede Trust and the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants that the proposal to allow police to reveal the ethnicity and migration status of crime suspects has scant regard for community safety (Campaigners criticise UK plans to reveal suspects' ethnicity and migration status, 10 August). After another summer of far-right discontent, the Institute of Race Relations, which monitors national developments, is concerned about the focus in some communities on vigilante justice, often justified in terms of hunting down paedophiles. The danger is that local punishment squads could deal out their own form of summary justice against anyone perceived to be an asylum seeker or a foreign criminal, with the colour of their skin marking them out for FeketeDirector, Institute of Race Relations It is not surprising that the police have been given new official guidance to issue information about the ethnicity of suspects (New guidance for UK police on releasing suspects' ethnicity and migration status, 13 August). It is astonishing, however, that the debate continues without any acknowledgment that the very attempt to classify people by racial origin is a founding principle of the worst governments of the past century. Urged to self-classify, as we are in many official forms for seemingly good reasons, no one seems prepared to say simply that the very attempt to classify people by 'racial origin' is in itself an abhorrent first step on the road to apartheid, 'remigration' and StubbsBridport, Dorset The nonsensical notion of 'transparency' has raised its ideologically loaded head again in the latest front to be opened up in the culture wars (Routinely disclosing the ethnicity of police suspects is a very dangerous step to take, 13 August). If 'transparency' is really the most important motivating factor here rather, than, say, appeasement of unpleasant far‑right views, surely the annual earnings of the accused, or their highest level of educational attainment, would be more significant in helping to portray a profile of those who are accused or suspected of criminal activity. Eddie Duggan Ipswich, Suffolk Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.