China hopes for ‘positive' outcomes as US tariff deadline nears
BEIJING : Beijing is looking to Washington for 'positive' trade outcomes as a tariff truce between the world's two biggest economies remains in limbo, hours before higher tit-for-tat duties are due to return.
While the US and China slapped escalating tariffs on each other's products this year – reaching prohibitive triple-digit levels and snarling trade – both countries in May agreed to temporarily lower these levels.
But their 90-day halt in steeper levies is due to expire Tuesday, with all eyes now on a path forward.
'We hope that the US will work with China to follow the important consensus reached during the phone call between the two heads of state,' said Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian in a statement.
He added that Beijing also hopes Washington will 'strive for positive outcomes on the basis of equality, respect and mutual benefit.'
Although both sides reached a pact to de-escalate tensions after high-level talks in Geneva in May, their truce has been shaky.
In June, key economic officials convened in London as disagreements emerged and US officials accused their counterparts of violating the pact. Policymakers again met in Stockholm last month.
But even as both countries appeared to be seeking to push back the reinstatement of duties, US trade envoy Jamieson Greer said last month that president Donald Trump will have the 'final call' on any such extension.
Last week, US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview that it is likely Trump will further the pause by another 90 days.
The White House did not immediately respond to queries on the matter on Monday.
Trump said in a social media post late Sunday that he hoped China would 'quickly quadruple its soybean orders,' adding that this would be a way to balance trade with the US.
For now, fresh US tariffs on Chinese goods this year stand at 30%, while Beijing's corresponding levy on US products is at 10%.
Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has slapped a 10% 'reciprocal' tariff on almost all trading partners, aimed at addressing trade practices Washington deemed unfair.
This surged to varying, steeper levels last Thursday for dozens of economies.
Major partners like the European Union, Japan and South Korea now see a 15% US duty on their products, while the level went as high as 41% for Syria.
The 'reciprocal' tariffs exclude sectors that have been separately targeted, such as steel and aluminium, and those that are being investigated, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.
Trump has also taken separate aim at individual countries such as Brazil over the trial of former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of planning a coup, and India over its purchase of Russian oil.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
23 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Can Trump deploy the National Guard to US cities? Here's what the law says
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 — US President Donald Trump has called upon governors from several Republican states to deploy their states' National Guard to Washington, DC, which Trump has claimed is ridden with crime. As troops poured into DC, Trump on Tuesday also suggested that he might send the National Guard to other cities. Here's a look at the authority Trump has to deploy troops in DC and cities around the U.S. Does US law permit military policing? A federal law called the Posse Comitatus Act generally restricts the use of the US military for domestic law enforcement purposes. This 1878 law embodies a long-held American belief that involving the military in civilian affairs is a threat to personal liberty. But there are exceptions to the Act, and the law often does not apply to actions by National Guard troops under the command of a state's governor. What authority did Trump use to activate the National Guard in DC? Unlike other states, the National Guard of Washington, DC, a federal district, reports directly to the president and Trump has full authority to activate them. Trump announced on August 11 that he had ordered 800 Guard troops in response to what he said was high crime, a characterisation that Democratic mayor of Washington Muriel Bowser has disputed. Since then, governors of a half a dozen Republican-led states, including West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio, have announced deployments of National Guard troops in Washington at Trump's request. Governors often deploy National Guard in their own state to respond to natural disasters like hurricanes and Minnesota deployed its National Guard in 2020 to help restore order in the wake of protests after the murder of George Floyd by police. National Guard units also can be fully federalised and placed under federal authority and funding. The Trump administration has used a third approach, known as Title 32 status, to deploy National Guard troops to Washington. Under this hybrid approach, Guard members are serving under state command and control, but their duties are funded and regulated by the federal government. The Posse Comitatus Act doesn't apply to this hybrid approach because the troops remain under state control. Could Trump deploy troops to other states? When Trump announced his plans to mobilise the National Guard in Washington, he suggested that other liberal-leaning cities like New York City and Chicago could be next. But Trump has much less power over these cities than he does over the District of Columbia. Title 10 of the US Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the US Armed Forces, includes a provision allowing the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service to repel an invasion, to suppress a rebellion or to allow the president to execute the law. Trump cited this provision, known as Section 12406, when he sent National Guard units to California over the objections of Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump said he was invoking the provision to protect federal immigration agents and to protect federal property, which the administration has said was not a law enforcement function. In the case of Chicago, which is a so-called sanctuary city, Trump may argue that local laws that bar city officials from cooperating with federal immigration agents prevent the president from executing the law, justifying the military presence. Trump is almost certain to face legal challenges if he uses Section 12406 to send National Guard troops from Republican-led states into Democratic strongholds. A handful of states, including Rhode Island and Texas, have laws preventing other states' National Guard troops from entering without permission. Some Democratic-controlled states are considering similar legislation. Are there other ways Trump could deploy troops to cities? Trump could take the far-reaching step of invoking the Insurrection Act, which is an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. There are several conditions for invoking the act, including when there is an insurrection, rebellion or 'unlawful obstructions.' The Supreme Court has ruled that the president alone can determine if the act's conditions have been met. It has been used 30 times in US history, according to New York University's Brennan Center for Justice, a left-leaning public policy institute. Trump could be invited by a governor to invoke the act, as former President George H.W. Bush was in 1992 in response to riots in Los Angeles. Trump could invoke it on his own if there is a breakdown in law and order or it is needed to defend civil rights. It was invoked in the 1950s and 1960s to enforce school desegregation and protect civil rights marches against the objections of state governors. What happened in Los Angeles? Trump in June put California's National Guard under federal control and deployed them along with active duty USMarines in Los Angeles following protests against his immigration crackdown. The Justice Department argued that the administration had the authority to do this under Section 12406. Newsom sued, alleging that the administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act because soldiers engaged in law enforcement, including by briefly detaining people. A non-jury trial in San Francisco just wrapped up. A ruling from US District Court Judge Charles Breyer is expected soon but it would not be binding on other states and would almost certainly be appealed. — Reuters
Malay Mail
23 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Show of force: China to parade military hardware with Putin in attendance
BEIJING, Aug 21 — China will unveil a slate of new domestically produced military hardware that will showcase its 'powerful capability to prevail in modern war' at a parade next month, officials said Wednesday. The event, marking 80 years since the end of World War II, will see President Xi Jinping inspect troops in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin and other world leaders expected to attend. Millions of Chinese people were killed during a prolonged war with imperial Japan in the 1930s and 40s, which became part of a global conflict following Tokyo's attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. The ruling Communist Party has held a series of blockbuster events in recent years to commemorate its wartime resistance. On September 3, China's military will showcase its latest equipment, 'reflecting the evolution of modern warfare', said Major General Wu Zeke, an official at China's military commission. 'All of the weapons and equipment taking part in this review were selected from domestically produced, currently active main battle systems, with a significant proportion being newly unveiled equipment,' Wu told reporters at a briefing. These will include strategic heavy weapons, hypersonic precision systems, as well as unmanned and counter-unmanned equipment making their first public debut, he added. The parade, which will last around 70 minutes, will 'fully showcase our military's powerful capability to prevail in modern war', Wu said. It will also feature ground troops marching in formation, armoured columns, aerial echelons and other high-tech fighting gear. The Kremlin has confirmed Putin will attend, and Chinese officials said other world leaders are also expected to take in the scene. China in March raised its defence spending for 2025 by 7.2 per cent. The increase comes as Beijing's armed forces undergo rapid modernisation and eye deepening strategic competition with the United States. China has the world's second-largest military budget, but lags well behind the United States, its primary strategic rival. — AFP
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trump embarks on US$104mil bond-buying spree
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump has bought hundreds of bonds since he returned to office, including those sold by US companies affected by the sweeping changes to federal policies he's championed. The 690 transactions, the first of which was made the day after his inauguration, total at least US$103.7mill, according to a document released by the White House that disclosed the billionaire's investing activity this year through early August. In addition to municipal bonds issued by local governments, school boards, airport authorities and gas districts, Trump bought corporate debt in tranches of at least US$500,000 each from Qualcomm Inc, Home Depot and T-Mobile US on Feb 10. He also purchased at least US$250,000 of debt from Facebook owner Meta Platforms Inc later that month. The report, which all federal elected officials and appointees who trade must submit, doesn't provide exact amounts or prices, since only broad ranges of transactions involving stocks, bonds, commodity futures and other securities are required. Trump reported no sales. The investments provide another example of how the president, whose net worth is pegged at US$6.4bil by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, continues to pursue wealth accumulation while in office. Unlike his predecessors, Trump didn't divest or move his assets into a blind trust with an independent overseer. His sprawling business empire is managed by two of his sons and operates in several areas that intersect with presidential policy. Trump has held meetings with leaders of businesses whose supply chains have been upended by his implementation of the highest tariffs in decades as well as technology industry executives. The White House didn't immediately respond to an emailed request for comment on the 33-page filing, which was dated Aug 12 and provided to the Office of Government Ethics. In an earlier financial disclosure report spanning his activity in 2024, Trump listed hundreds of bonds held in personal investment accounts that are separate from his business empire. The latter encompasses properties like his Florida resort Mar-a-Lago, his stake in Trump Media & Technology Group Corp and crypto ventures that have added at least US$620mil to his fortune in recent months, according to the Bloomberg index. Under federal ethics law, presidents aren't required to divest assets that may pose conflicts of interest, but they have done so anyway. Trump is the first president to buck that since the law was passed in 1978. — Bloomberg
