FIFA report highlights the inequities in women's soccer
FIFA on Monday released its annual report on the women's game, highlighting the inequities across the sport.
Soccer's world governing body expanded the fourth edition's scope from 34 leagues to 86 leagues and some 669 teams, providing a more accurate picture of the state of the game. It analyzed data in six areas: sporting, governance, financial landscape, fan engagement, data and digital, and player-related matters.
The report separated the leagues into three tiers, based on various criteria including whether the leagues had senior level competitions, the number of players that were on a 2023 Women's World Cup roster or a premier tournament like the Women's Euros, and the member association's budget for women's soccer.
The report found that the average gross salary across all tiers was $10,900, but that number was skewed by 16 clubs in the top tier that paid players an average of more than $50,000. The average salary for top-tier teams was $24,030 globally — less than a living wage in many places.
Women's soccer is not yet profitable, with top-tier leagues generating an average of $4.4 million in revenue but spending an average of $7.6 million. The lowest tier averaged $76,000 in revenue, with $182,000 in expenses. FIFA did not identify the individual clubs within each each tier.
Only 22% of the clubs surveyed had women's coaches, the report said.
The majority of top-tier leagues had domestic broadcast deals (91%) compared to 32% in the bottom tier. Just 42% of the third-tier teams have a title sponsor, compared to 69% at the top.
The report comes as FIFA introduced two more international club tournaments, the 2026 Women's Champions Cup and the 2028 Women's Club World Cup.
The organization announced earlier this month that 19 teams will take part in the first-ever Women's Club World Cup in January-February 2028.
The new Women's Champions Cup will include the six continental club champions and will be played in January next year.
It is hoped that the competitions spur more investment by keeping attention on the players even when it's not a Women's World Cup year.
'This month FIFA announced the timelines and formats for two new, landmark, global FIFA women's club competitions,' FIFA President Gianni Infantino said in a statement Monday. 'As we embark on the development of these tournaments, it is equally important that we offer insights and resources to women's football stakeholders so that together we can build on the solid foundations already in place. FIFA will utilize the findings to build tailor-made programs that will support member associations to continue to professionalize women's football — this is critical as we embark on a new era for women's club football on the global stage.'
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
21 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Vancouver's Dragon Boat Festival pushed out by FIFA World Cup
VANCOUVER - Organizers of the annual Concord Pacific Dragon Boat Festival in Vancouver say the event will be cancelled next year to make way for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Dominic Lai, the operations director with Dragon Boat BC, says the city declined to provide permits for 2026 edition of the festival. Lai says they have been told Vancouver's host city agreement for World Cup prohibits cultural and sporting events during a certain time frame and also restricts events within a certain radius of BC Place Stadium. The dragon boat festival usually takes place in late June, with last year's event drawing 200 teams from nine countries. He says the festival takes place in the restricted area, about 20 metres from the stadium that's set to host seven games during the World Cup next in June. A statement from Dragon Boat BC says the group had presented the city and the provincial government with different options for locations and time frames for its festival over the last few years, but it had not been successful in finding a solution. 'At this time, there is no confirmed support from the city and the province for the alternate scenarios we have presented,' it says. 'Without clear information and support, non-profit organizations like Dragon Boat BC will have to navigate the challenging operational and financial impacts of the host city agreement on their own.' The City of Vancouver directed a request for comment to the B.C. government. A statement from the Ministry of Tourism, Arts, Culture and Sport says it was aware that next year's dragon boat festival has been cancelled. It says the 2026 FIFA World Cup was announced in 2022, and many event organizers have used the 'lead time' to find alternative dates and locations. Lai says it's not as simple as changing the date, as the dragon boat festival depends on water conditions, the availability of docks and when competitors can attend. He likened the 2026 FIFA World Cup to 'the second pandemic' that is delivering a 'substantial' financial blow to his organization. Lai says hosting the FIFA World Cup is meant to benefit the entire community. 'The legacy of FIFA needs to be one where the community comes out stronger than before,' he says. 'That's really important to make sure that … all these community organizations are in a good place to benefit from these impacts after FIFA is gone.' The city and the B.C. government have said hosting seven matches is estimated to generate more than $1 billion in visitor spending and create some 18,000 jobs. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
10 years after offence: European Court of Justice rules in Seraing's favour in dispute with FIFA
As per HLN, the European Court of Justice has ruled in RFC Seraing's favour, after the club were in dispute with FIFA regarding third-party owners. The problems stem from 2015, when Seraing transferred the economic rights for several players to the Maltese company Doyen Sports. However, according to FIFA, this violated the ban on Third Party Ownership (TPO). The Belgian news outlet explains that. 'this means that a party other than a football club owns part of the economic rights to a player and can thus profit from transfer fees, loan fees, and image rights.' FIFA imposed a transfer ban on the club for four transfer windows and a fine of 150,000 Swiss francs (over 136,000 euros). These sanctions were upheld by the International Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and the Swiss Federal Court, with FIFA being based in Switzerland. The case was also brought before the Belgian court, but it declared itself incompetent in the matter. Belgian law recognises the authority of rulings by the CAS. An appeal was subsequently filed, and the Court of Cassation referred the matter to the European Court of Justice. The Advocate General of the Court had already issued an opinion in the case in January. Now the European Court agree, ruling that 'it is essential that arbitration does not undermine the rights and freedoms that athletes, clubs, and the like derive from the fundamental rules of EU law.' According to the Court, 'national courts must therefore have the power to thoroughly review the compatibility of arbitration awards from the CAS. Furthermore, if a national regulation or a sports federation's regulation prevents national courts from exercising their jurisdiction, the courts are obligated to disapply the regulation.' GBeNeFN | Max Bradfield
New York Times
a day ago
- New York Times
EU court rules CAS decisions can be reviewed by national courts
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled Friday that decisions made by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) can now be reviewed by national courts to ensure compliance with European Union (EU) law. The ruling means that certain decisions from governing bodies such as FIFA can be challenged outside of Switzerland. If the legislation or rules of world football's governing body are deemed to 'prevent the national courts or tribunals from exercising their powers,' said courts or tribunals are now 'required to disapply that legislation or those rules'. Advertisement CAS, an institution independent of any sports organisation, handles significant legal sporting cases such as doping and contract disputes. The court is based in Lausanne, Switzerland. Officials and clubs had previously been bound to accept verdicts made by CAS. Switzerland's supreme court decides upon CAS verdicts which have been challenged, but have rarely overturned the verdicts. The ECJ said in a statement that national courts or tribunals of member states 'must be empowered to carry out, at the request of individuals or of the court's or tribunal's own motion, an in-depth judicial review as to whether arbitral awards made by CAS are consistent with EU public policy'. The verdict directly relates to the 10-year legal battle between FIFA and Belgian club RFC Seraing, who, alongside Maltese investment fund Doyen Sports, opposed the governing body's rules on third-party ownership of the economic rights of players. FIFA imposed several registration bans and a fine of 150,000CHF ($184,700) on Seraing, sanctions which were upheld by CAS and the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. The club subsequently put the case before the Belgian court of first instance and court of appeal, but found it could not carry out a new assessment of the compatibility of the verdict with EU law, with CAS' decision holding the authority of res judicata — effectively meaning it cannot be pursued further. After the club put the case before the court, the ECJ ruled that such authority is incompatible with EU law. It said: 'The application of rules of this kind deprives individuals of the possibility of obtaining, from the courts or tribunals of the Member States, effective judicial review of such arbitral awards.' In quotes carried by the Associated Press, Seraing's lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont said the club should be compensated for the sanctions imposed on it by FIFA and said the implications of the ECJ ruling challenge the legality of all 'forced arbitrations' by mandated international sports federations. Advertisement 'In summary, the (court) has definitively ended the procedural deception used by international sports federations to evade the proper application of EU law through the imposition of compulsory arbitration outside the EU,' Dupont said. CAS issued a statement Friday saying it acknowledges the ECJ's ruling that its awards 'should be limited to EU public policy only' while adding that only six per cent of the court's decisions are appealed to the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT). 'ICAS also acknowledges recognition by the CJEU that sports arbitration is a legitimate mechanism ensuring a uniform treatment of sporting disputes and a consistent application of sporting rules,' the statement added. The ECJ's ruling on Friday marks another landmark verdict under EU competition law. In the last two years, it challenged the authority of UEFA and FIFA by ruling the governing bodies acted unlawfully in blocking the creation of the proposed Super League, while ruling last year in the Lassana Diarra case that some FIFA rules regarding players transfers were acting contrary to EU law in relation to freedom of movement. FIFA declined to comment when approached by The Athletic.
