National Sports Bill: How is it different from National Sports Code?
With the introduction of the National Sports Governance Bill in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, India has taken a big step towards joining powers like the USA, UK, China, and Japan which have laws in place for streamlined administrative set-ups.
The bill, once it becomes an act, will complete a journey that started back in 2011 when the then Sports Minister Ajay Maken began his push for a legislation to set some benchmarks for the sports administrators.
The mostly long-serving administrators were and still are often accused of indulging in power struggles, infighting, financial misappropriation and showing a distinct lack of intent to overcome any of these issues.
But with the new bill, accountability will be in place through a National Sports Board, a National Sports Tribunal and the National Sports Election Panel.
All of this took shape over months of dialogue that current Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya undertook with stakeholders, soon after taking charge last year.
Once the bill was finalised, Mandaviya gave due credit to Maken, his political opponent from the Congress party, for "doing good work in shaping the National Sports Code, 2011" which was in operation till now.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep
ResMed
Buy Now
Undo
Bombay Sport Exchange Episode 1: Interview with Sanjog Gupta, CEO (Sports) at JioStar
"The National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 established good governance practices for sports bodies, essential for healthy development of sports in the country," stated the objectives of the new bill.
Here's a look at the timeline of how the code turned into a bill with significant changes.
The Journey
In 2011, the Ministry prepared Draft National Sports Development Bill and placed it before Cabinet for approval. However, it was met with vehement opposition due to strict capping of age and tenure for administrators.
In July 2013, the Ministry prepared a revised Draft National Sports Development Bill and placed it in public domain to invite suggestions and comments. However, this Bill was not pursued and a year later, the Delhi High Court upheld the Sports Code 2011.
In 2015, a Working Group was constituted for re-drafting of National Sports Development Code, 2011. But the inclusion of Indian Olympic Association top brass in this group was challenged in the Delhi High Court as a case of conflict of interest.
In 2017, a Committee was constituted under then sports secretary Injeti Srinivas, to prepare the '(Draft) National Code for Good Governance in Sports, 2017'. Olympic gold medal-winning shooter Abhinav Bindra, and other sports greats like Anju Bobby George, and Prakash Padukone, along with then then IOA head Narinder Batra were among the members in the committee.
The Draft Sports Code was also challenged in the Delhi High Court, which ordered that committee's report be submitted to it in a sealed cover.
In 2019, the Ministry constituted an Expert Committee under Justice (Retd.) Mukundakam Sharma to review the Draft Sports Code 2017 and "suggest measures for making it acceptable to all the stakeholders".
That same year, the Delhi High Court stayed the constitution of this committee, an order that is in effect till date.
In October 2024, the Draft National Sports Governance Bill was released to the public for comments and suggestions. There were extensive consultation sessions held with the IOA, the National Sports Federations, athletes, coaches, legal experts and even private bodies that are involved in athlete management. The bill was also shared with the International Olympic Committe and International Federations including World Athletics, FIFA, and the International Hockey Federation (FIH) among others.
The ministry received "over 700 responses" as part of the feedback from various stakeholders, including general public before it finally made its way to the Parliament.
Poll
Do you believe the National Sports Governance Bill will improve accountability in Indian sports administration?
Yes, definitely
No, not really
The differences with Sports Code
Age Cap: While the Sports Code capped the age of administrators at 70, the new bill allows an office-bearer to complete his/her tenure if they were less than 70 at the time of filing nominations. A further relaxation of another five years has been made for contesting elections if the international statutes and byelaws allow for it in the concerned sports body.
Tenure: The Sports Code allowed three terms with a cooling off period after two terms for the President and two terms for Treasurer and Secretary. The new sports bill allows office-bearers (President, Secretary General and Treasurer) to serve three consecutive terms of a maximum of 12 years and remain eligible for election to the Executive Committee after a cooling off period. "This has been done to ensure continuity and also to keep competent people within the system," a sports ministry source said.
Executive Committee: The sports code had no provision for mandatory women's representation in the committee whose strength was capped at 15. The new bill mandates that at least four members of the EC must be women along with two sportspersons of outstanding merit.
Regulatory Body: The sports code had no provisions for a regulatory body to oversee NSFs, leaving the power to recognise or derecognise in the hands of the sports ministry. But the sports governance bill outlines the creation of a National Sports Board which will fulfill this role.
The National Sports Tribunal, which will adjudicate sporting disputes, the National Sports Election Panel to oversee polls in NSFs and the Ethics Commission were not a part of the Sports Code. All these bodies will have a significant role to play once the bill becomes an act. PTI
For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the
India vs England Test match
here.
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
A timeline: Ravindra Jadeja, Washington Sundar and the final-hour handshake drama at Old Trafford
Ben Stokes and Ravindra Jadeja (AFP Photo) NEW DELHI: Ravindra Jadeja , Washington Sundar , and Shubman Gill struck brilliant centuries as India battled their way to a morale-boosting draw in the fourth Test on Sunday. Starting their second innings 311 runs behind, India defied the odds on a fifth-day pitch, thanks to Gill (103), KL Rahul (90), Jadeja (107*), and Washington (101*), who all stood tall with the bat. With the series now standing at 2-1 in England's favour, the fifth and final Test will be played at The Oval in London from July 31. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! While India's gritty batting display took centre stage, the match wasn't short on drama—especially the series of 'handshake' incidents that stirred controversy on the final day. THE HANDSHAKE OFFER AND REFUSAL In the final hour of play, England skipper Ben Stokes offered a handshake, effectively suggesting the match be called a draw. Indian batters Ravindra Jadeja (on 89) and Washington Sundar (on 80) declined the offer. The refusal frustrated Stokes and several England players. Ben Stokes press conference: On handshake controversy, India fightback, his own fitness Poll What did you think of India's performance in the fourth Test? Outstanding Average Disappointing Impressive under pressure ENGLAND'S REACTION Stokes approached the umpire with the suggestion, but Jadeja and Sundar, both nearing centuries, chose to continue batting. Moments later, stump mics caught a verbal exchange between Harry Brook , Zak Crawley, and Jadeja. Crawley and Ben Duckett were seen questioning India's intent to play on. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo Stokes sarcastically asked Jadeja, 'Do you want to score a hundred against Harry Brook?' Jadeja calmly responded, 'I can't do anything.' INDIA PUSH ON – JADEJA HITS BACK Despite the remarks, Jadeja stayed composed and continued batting with a smile. In what seemed like a mark of protest, Stokes handed the ball to Harry Brook. Jadeja responded by smashing Brook for a six to reach his third Test century. Gautam Gambhir fiery press conference: Slams critics, big update on Jasprit Bumrah, Karun vs Sai WASHINGTON JOINS THE PARTY Washington Sundar soon followed, bringing up his maiden Test hundred. Their centuries capped off a remarkable comeback and helped India draw the Test. POST-MATCH Despite the earlier tension, Stokes eventually shook hands with both Jadeja and Sundar after the match ended in a draw. GILL EXPLAINS Shubman Gill later revealed that the decision to bat on came from Jadeja and Sundar themselves. 'They batted brilliantly and were in their 90s. We felt they deserved their hundreds,' said Gill. He added, 'Every match going till the last session on the last day. So many learnings. Each Test teaches you something new.' For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Alex De Minaur lifts Washington Open trophy after epic final set comeback
Alex De Minaur pulled off a stunning comeback to defeat Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 5-7, 6-1, 7-6(3) and capture the Washington Open title on Sunday, marking his 10th career ATP title . The Australian showcased remarkable resilience, rallying from a set down and saving three match points in a dramatic final set. — mubadalacitidc (@mubadalacitidc) Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category The match began with both players trading early breaks before Fokina seized momentum in the opening set, using clean forehand winners to break again and take it 7-5. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo But De Minaur bounced back impressively in the second, dominating with aggressive returns and precise shot placement. He converted two of four break chances and sealed the set with an ace in just over 30 minutes. — mubadalacitidc (@mubadalacitidc) The decider saw Davidovich Fokina regain control with a break, and he appeared poised to win when serving at 5-3. However, nerves crept in, and a long forehand gave De Minaur the break back. The Spaniard had three match points on De Minaur's serve later in the set but failed to convert, as the Australian held firm under pressure. Live Events — mubadalacitidc (@mubadalacitidc) In the decisive tiebreak, De Minaur kept his composure while Fokina faltered with unforced errors. The seventh-seeded Australian raced ahead and closed out the match. It was a gutsy, mental triumph for De Minaur, who proved his tenacity once again on the big stage. For Fokina, the final marked another near miss in his pursuit of a first ATP title.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
IND vs ENG 4th Test: Former England skipper sides with Ravindra Jadeja - 'I understand why India did it'
Ravindra Jadeja celebrates his century during day five of the 4th Test Match vs England (Photo by) India battled their way to a hard-fought draw on Day 5 of the fourth Test at Old Trafford, but it was Ravindra Jadeja 's refusal to settle for a draw despite a mutual offer from England that triggered a stir. As the final hour approached, with the match meandering towards a draw, England captain Ben Stokes offered a handshake to close out the contest. But Jadeja, fresh off leading a resilient fightback alongside Washington Sundar, declined the offer and pressed on. His determined century, under immense pressure after an early collapse (India were 0/2 in their second innings), became the turning point in India's bid to save the Test. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! While Stokes later said his gesture was driven by practicality, India skipper Shubman Gill and head coach Gautam Gambhir stood firmly behind Jadeja's call to continue batting. Adding weight to that view, former England captain Alastair Cook backed Jadeja's decision as the right one. 17:23 Ben Stokes press conference: On handshake controversy, India fightback, his own fitness 'It was the right decision for them to carry on, for the momentum they're getting from it,' Cook said on BBC Sport. 'When you're out in the field for 140 overs, you get frustrated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Swelling and internal bleeding in the brain, help this baby Donate For Health Donate Now Undo It's a little bit of frustration for England, but I understand why India do it.' Cook added, 'Five years down the line, you look at the scorecard, you see two brilliant hundreds to save the game—plus obviously Gill's as well—so it will be forgotten about Harry Brook's 37-mile-an-hour ball.' Poll Do you agree with Ravindra Jadeja's decision to continue batting despite the draw offer? Yes, it was a brave decision No, they should have accepted the draw With the five-match series poised at 2-1 in England's favour, the final Test now becomes a must-win for India. Given how they clawed their way back into this one, India will head into the decider with renewed confidence and momentum. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
