Peter Kyle warns he'd go to war for kids in facing down social media firms
Peter Kyle has said he would go to war for Britain's kids in facing down social media firms who fail to protect them online.
The Technology Secretary warned he is ready to use additional powers that kick in tomorrow to hold big tech firms to account on online safety.
After almost two years since the Online Safety Act (OSA) became law, Ofcom's code of practices for children's safety are finally being enforced from Friday.
Under the media regulator's codes, online sites must introduce robust age verification tools - including facial scans, photo ID and credit card checks - to stop underage kids accessing things they shouldn't, such as pornography. They have also been ordered to tame toxic algorithms and take faster action on removing harmful content including self-harm, suicide, eating disorders, extreme violence and dangerous online challenges.
Speaking to The Mirror, Mr Kyle said: 'We now have additional powers. No one should doubt my readiness to either use them or insist they be used to keep children safe. There is literally nothing I wouldn't do to live in a world where the stories I've heard from bereaved parents are never ever repeated here.
'So if anybody thinks that an awkward conversation or somebody else's sensitivities would stand in the way of me going to war for our kids, then they really get me wrong.'
Punishments for online firms that break UK laws include fines of up to 10% of global turnover from Ofcom or, in extreme cases, their platforms being switched off in the UK.
But the Molly Rose Foundation, founded by bereaved father Ian Russell after his 14-year-old daughter Molly took her own life having been bombarded by harmful content on social media, said the changes lack ambition and accountability.
Andy Burrows, chief executive of the charity, said: "This should be a watershed moment for young people but instead we've been let down by a regulator that has chosen to prioritise the business needs of big tech over children's safety." He said the "lack of ambition and accountability will have been heard loud and clear in Silicon Valley".
He added: "We now need a clear reset and leadership from the Prime Minister. That means nothing less than a new Online Safety Act that fixes this broken regime and firmly puts the balance back in favour of children."
Bereaved families have long been crying out for action on online safety after their children's deaths were linked to internet harms. Devastating stories include Archie Battersbee 's death at 12 years old after an online prank went wrong and the killing of 16-year-old Brianna Ghey, whose teenage murderer accessed videos of torture and murder on the dark web.
Mr Kyle said he has found it 'intensely frustrating' that it has taken more than a year of being in Government to get where we are. 'Government and parliament should have dealt with this years and years ago, and I am extremely regretful that there is a generation of children and former children who never had any protection or regard for what they were viewing online,' he said. 'Our whole society owes them an apology.'
The Cabinet minister has often acknowledged that the UK's online safety laws are 'lopsided' - and has long criticised the Tories for watering down the legislation when it passed through Parliament.
He said Friday's measures would not create a 'utopia from day one' but are a 'big step forward'. He admitted further legislation would be needed in the future but said Parliament must improve at being able to introduce more regular updates of the law "because the nature of online life is very fast evolving'.
Mr Kyle is also exploring a package of measures to help tackle the addictiveness of social media and ensure kids have a healthier relationship with the online world. He is considering a two-hour cap on how much time youngsters spend on social media, as well as night-time or school-time curfews.
Ofcom has been criticised for its painstakingly slow implementation of the OSA, which became law in 2023. The media regulator carried out several consultations to figure out its new codes for online firms, at a pace a world away from the fast evolving tech world.
The NSPCC warned Ofcom it must "show its teeth and fully enforce the new codes" if firms do not comply with the new rules. And Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza added: 'We cannot lose sight of the rapidly evolving online landscape, so in order for the Children's Code to be effective and fit for the future, it is essential the Code keeps pace with emerging technology.'
Ofcom chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes said: "Prioritising clicks and engagement over children's online safety will no longer be tolerated in the UK. Our message to tech firms is clear - comply with age checks and other protection measures set out in our codes, or face the consequences of enforcement action from Ofcom."
Ofcom said it has launched a monitoring and impact programme focused on some of the platforms where children spend most time including social media sites Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, gaming site Roblox and video clip website YouTube.
The sites are among those which have been asked to submit, by August 7, a review of their efforts to assess risks to children and, by September 30, scrutiny of the practical actions they are taking to keep children safe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Age verification tools on adult websites bypassed in seconds
Ethical hackers have shown Sky News how new age verification systems can be bypassed on pornographic websites in a matter of seconds. On Friday, toughened rules came into force that mean companies hosting adult content online must block under-18s using "highly effective age verification". That could include AI tools that use pictures to estimate someone's age, bank or ID checks. But hours later, two ethical hackers working with the cyber training group The Hacking Games demonstrated just how simple it is to get around the measures designed to protect young people on the internet. Using widely available technology, Chris Kubecka and Paula Popovici quickly accessed numerous pornography sites without ever verifying their ages. 3:53 Their devices were running standard software, and the tricks they used were simple. This, Ms Kubecka said, showed the systems will not be effective at stopping under-18s from accessing explicit content online. The simplicity of their method was confirmed by multiple viewers, who contacted Sky News to say they had also managed to bypass the systems. One viewer said it had taken him "less than 30 seconds". Although Sky News has verified the methods used by Ms Kubecka and Ms Popovici, we won't give details or name any software used. Some of the explicit websites they checked had not turned on any age verification, despite declaring in June that they would. In response to our findings, Ofcom said these checks "will help stop young children from stumbling across porn". The regulator added: "While the new rules have only been in place for a matter of hours, we will be actively assessing compliance to make sure platforms have age checks in place and that they are highly effective. "Companies that fall short can expect to face enforcement action." 1:36 A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology told Sky News: "We expect these laws to be robustly implemented by tech companies. If they fail to do so, the regulator is ready to take severe enforcement action, including tough fines." There is also a risk that age verification could push users towards more dangerous corners of the internet in search of pornography. By 10am on Friday, data suggested an extra 66,000 internet users in the UK had begun using the dark web. Ms Kubecka fears this number may only increase. "That is one of the concerns that I have because I don't want illegal or extreme content being normalised in our teens," she said. 1:22 Google Trends data shows searches for online tools to help people bypass age verification have surged, too. Ofcom told Sky News it had been clear that sites "must not encourage or direct users to get around age checks". "People should be aware that children and adults who use [certain software] to bypass age checks will not benefit from the wider protections offered by our online safety rules." Despite those warnings, in the days running up to the rules being enforced, advertising data shows companies were targeting UK users and promoting tools that could bypass the verification.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Minister doubles down on colleague's claim Farage on side of Jimmy Savile
The Reform UK leader is 'happy for there to be a free for all on the internet', the Transport Secretary said, as she defended Peter Kyle's comments. The Technology Secretary had accused Mr Farage of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers' over Reform's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act. Asked if she agrees with Mr Kyle's statement, Ms Alexander told Sky News: 'Nigel Farage is, in effect, saying that he is on their side because he's saying he's wanting to repeal the Online Safety Act. 'I think that the position of Reform in saying that they want to repeal the entirety of the Online Safety Act, which is one of the most important pieces of legislation when it comes to the protecting of our children and the safety of young people online, I think that, in effect, what Nigel Farage is saying is that he's totally happy for there to be a free for all on the internet. 'That's not the position of the Labour Government. It's not the position of me. It's not the position of Keir Starmer or Peter Kyle, and that is the point that the Technology Secretary was rightly making yesterday.' Mr Farage has demanded an apology from Mr Kyle, describing the remarks as 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'. Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, the minister had said: 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Following this, Clacton MP Mr Farage urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed. Writing in the Telegraph, Mr Kyle said proposals to overturn the Act 'makes my blood boil', as he argued repealing it would benefit 'disgusting predators who contact children and groom them online'. He added: 'I make no apologies for putting the interests of vulnerable children ahead of the interests of predators and child abusers – and the Reform leader's ego.' Also writing for the newspaper, Mr Farage said 'all of this is of course a deflection from the real problem with the Online Safety Act', as he raised concerns over ID checks. He added: 'In the name of safety, the Act poses the biggest threat to freedom of speech in this country in our lifetimes. 'In the name of protecting children, the law aims to regulate what adults are allowed to say or see – while doing nothing to make our children safer.' Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said making statements about overturning the Bill is 'very lazy' and 'not responsible'. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone. 'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.' The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Broadband provider fined over giving inaccurate caller locations in 999 calls
Gigaclear will pay £122,500 due to the issues with its caller location information for calls made between January 2022 and March 2024. It related to phone calls made over the internet, rather than a regular phone line – known as Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). During this period, when any of Gigaclear's VoIP customers called 999 or 112, inaccurate information about the caller's location was made available to the emergency services, the communications watchdog said. This affected a total of 948 calls. Ofcom said no members of the public reportedly experienced significant harm as a result, but said the breach of its rules warranted the penalty. George Lusty, Ofcom's enforcement director, said: 'Providing the emergency services with accurate location data can mean the difference between life and death. 'So it's vital that telecoms companies set up their systems correctly and test them thoroughly to make sure this happens. 'We won't hesitate to hold companies to account, and Gigaclear fell short on a number of basic levels, putting its customers at unacceptable risk for a prolonged period of time.' Gigaclear provides broadband for homes and businesses with a network across the south east and south west of England and the Midlands, focusing on rural communities. Ofcom's investigation found that Gigaclear failed to ensure its third-party supplier had correctly configured the systems that provide a caller's location to the emergency services. It also said the firm did not carry out effective testing, nor did it properly investigate a customer complaint relating to the issue. Gigaclear has since reconfigured its systems and taken action to prevent future issues, Ofcom said. The fine, which was reduced by 30% because of Gigaclear admitting to the issues and agreeing to settle the case, is passed onto the Treasury when it is paid. A spokesperson for Gigaclear said the firm 'deeply regrets the historic configuration' issue with its VoIP service. 'By the time we self-reported the issue to Ofcom in April 2024, we had already identified and rectified the error,' it said. 'We have undertaken a full post-incident review to implement the learnings from this incident and put in place processes to ensure that no similar issues arise again. 'At all times before and after the issue was fixed, all emergency calls placed by our VoIP customers were successfully connected. 'We are not aware of any actual harm to customers as a result of the issue, but we acknowledge the seriousness of the error and the importance of ensuring accurate caller location information is available to emergency services.'
