Maharashtra to amend Animal Preservation Act to make it more stringent, launch crackdown on illegal abattoirs
Kadam said the bill for the proposed changes is likely to be introduced in the upcoming winter session of the Legislative Assembly.
Stating that cow slaughter will not be tolerated anywhere in the state, Kadam said the government is committed to ensuring that violations are met with swift and stringent action. 'We will strengthen the law so that repeat offenders cannot exploit the current legal framework. The amendments, when passed, will make provisions for harsher sentences and penalties,' he said.
The announcement comes days after a police raid in Badlapur (West), where 510kg of beef and a live calf were seized from an unauthorised slaughterhouse in the Dargah Mohalla area on June 9.
Raising the issue in the Assembly, BJP MLA Sanjay Upadhyay sought to know the government's stand on repeated violations of cow slaughter laws. The discussion saw participation from members across parties, including Amol Khatal, Atul Bhatkhalkar, Aslam Shaikh and Praveen Datke, who demanded stricter enforcement and legal deterrents.
Responding to the concerns, Kadam said that the government will initiate a state-wide campaign targeting unauthorised slaughterhouses. Police officials and municipal bodies have been instructed to collect intelligence and take action against those operating such establishments illegally. The government is also examining the possibility of prosecuting habitual offenders under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).
Kadam acknowledged the role played by cow protection groups and certain voluntary organisations in alerting police about such incidents. He said that in several cases, information shared by these groups has led to successful operations.
The government is now planning to formalise this coordination by issuing official identity cards to verified cow protection volunteers, after proper background checks. 'A structured channel of communication between police, gau rakshaks and NGOs will ensure quicker response and accountability,' said Kadam.
The minister also addressed concerns raised about cattle welfare. He said that the state government would continue supporting gaushalas, especially for housing abandoned, old or non-milking animals rescued during raids.
These shelters, run under the Department of Animal Husbandry, will receive the required assistance for infrastructure and maintenance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
Exclusion from Bihar voter roll won't affect citizenship: Poll body to top court
The Election Commission of India (ECI) has assured the Supreme Court that the citizenship of an individual would not be terminated if one is found ineligible for registration in the electoral rolls under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in a strong defence of the exercise in poll-bound Bihar in an 88-page affidavit, the poll watchdog said it had the authority to request proof of citizenship for "enabling the constitutional right to vote". "No parliamentary law can oust this jurisdiction of the ECI," it ECI's response was to charges by the opposition that SIR was just a "citizenship screening" exercise and would lead to mass disenfranchisement. POLL BODY ON AADHAAR Earlier this month, the Supreme Court refused to pause the electoral roll revision exercise in Bihar, but questioned its timing, coming months ahead of the Assembly top court also asked the ECI to consider Aadhaar, voter ID card, and ration card as valid documents during the verification drive. These are not included in the current 11-document its decision not to include Aadhaar, the election body said Aadhaar is merely proof of identity, and it cannot be accepted as a standalone document for SIR."Aadhaar does not help in screening the eligibility under Article 326. However, this is not to say that Aadhaar cannot be used to supplement other documents to prove eligibility. It is for this reason that the list is indicative and not exhaustive," the ECI affidavit ECI has claimed that a large portion of the population already possesses one or more of the 11 enlisted RECEIVED FROM 90% OF ELECTORSThe poll body said, as of July 18, enumeration forms from 90.12% of the 7.9 crore-strong electorate in Bihar have been collected. If deceased individuals and permanently shifted electors are considered, the SIR has effectively covered 94.68% of the electors who are untraceable despite multiple visits by the BLOs constitute a mere 0.01% of the electorate. The last date for collection of forms is July 25.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
19 years after Mumbai train attack, there is no closure — only unanswered questions
Nineteen years ago, sophisticated bombs ripped through seven local trains in Mumbai within 11 minutes. They killed 189 people, and injured 816. In less than three months, the Anti-Terrorism Squad of Maharashtra Police arrested 13 individuals, named another 15 in hiding as accused, and claimed to have cracked the case. Stringent anti-terror laws, from the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, were invoked, and the investigators claimed the accused had confessed to their crimes. They were subsequently tried and awarded sentences of life imprisonment and the death penalty in 2015. On Monday, the Bombay High Court acquitted 12 men, highlighting critical procedural lapses in the investigation. The 617-page verdict raises important questions about how an investigation in a case that shook the nation is riddled with worrying loose ends and gaps. Justice Anil S Kilor begins with a disquieting assessment of the case: 'Punishing the actual perpetrator of a crime is a concrete and essential step toward curbing criminal activities, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring the safety and security of citizens. But creating a false appearance of having solved a case by presenting that the accused have been brought to justice gives a misleading sense of resolution. This deceptive closure undermines public trust and falsely reassures society, while in reality, the true threat remains at large.' The High Court ruling points to a series of serious lapses in the investigation, from picking and choosing eyewitnesses, reliance on maps allegedly recovered from the accused, and how confessional statements were obtained. The court notes the serious allegations and medical evidence of custodial torture of the accused. The ruling shows that even the basic element of the case — the nature of the bombs used — was not established with cogent evidence by the prosecution. The state did not have adequate reasons or material evidence, the court held, to grant sanction to prosecute the accused under MCOCA. This is a crucial step in the process when stringent anti-terror laws are invoked. These are laws enacted with the stated goal of combating terror threats that give the state wide powers. They reverse the burden of proof, allow prolonged detention and powers of invasive surveillance, and relax evidentiary standards. It is worrying that Maharashtra Police could not establish the case even to this standard. 'The prosecution has utterly failed to establish the offence beyond a reasonable doubt against the accused on each count, it is unsafe to reach the satisfaction that the Appellants/Accused have committed the offences for which they have been convicted and sentenced,' the court said. Strict anti-terror laws provide a legal framework for the state. But rigorous and fair investigations are crucial for their effectiveness and legitimacy. It is true that there is immense pressure on the state when a gruesome attack, such as this one, is perpetrated on the people. But that makes it even more important that it holds itself to high standards of investigation. Botched investigations and trials that span decades do an added injustice to the victims. The state has a right to appeal the verdict before the Supreme Court, where the final word lies. For now, 19 years later, there is no closure for families of the victims.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
HC acquits all 12 accused
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Monday set aside a special court verdict that awarded the death sentence to five convicts in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts and refused the Maharashtra government's plea seeking confirmation of their sentences. The High Court acquitted all 12 accused in the case, including those sentenced to life imprisonment. The special bench of Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam C Chandak questioned the trustworthiness of certain prosecution witnesses and the Test Identification Parade (TIP) of some of the accused. The bench ordered their release, if they are not required to be detained in any other case, and directed all of them to execute personal bonds of Rs 25,000 each. Finding substance in the case of defence lawyers, the bench observed that the prosecution 'utterly failed to establish the offences beyond a reasonable doubt against the accused on each count.' The bench led by Justice Kilor held, 'It is unsafe to reach the satisfaction that the appellant accused have committed the offence for which they have been convicted and sentenced. Therefore, the accused judgment and order of conviction and sentence are liable to be quashed and set aside' There were 13 accused, of whom one was acquitted by the special court under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA). Of the 12, five were sentenced to death, one of whom died in prison during the pandemic, and seven were awarded a life term. The special bench passed the judgement over five months after it concluded the hearing on January 31. The Bombay High Court had conducted hearings over the span of six months from July last year. A series of bombs exploded on seven western suburban coaches, killing 189 commuters and injuring 824 on July 11, 2006. After an over eight-year trial, the special court under the MCOCA awarded the death penalty to five of the convicts, and life terms to seven others in September 2015.
