‘Some leaders see politics in everything'—Delhi minister takes swipe at Rahul's stand on stray dogs
In an interview to ThePrint, Sood hit out at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his comments over the Supreme Court's order on removal of stray dogs.
New Delhi: Terming stray dog menace as a major issue, Delhi minister Ashish Sood has said that politicising the issue is not right and emphasised that a balanced approach has to be maintained.
Sood said the decision will be examined and it will be implemented in a legal manner.
'A policy decision will be taken and a policy will be formed. Dog lovers should pursue their love and common citizens should be able to exercise their right to life comfortably.
'A balance has to be made between these two. There is also a legal aspect in it. The balance that will be made in all these things can also be called a policy. You can also call it living together in the city but certainly the government is looking at it seriously and will find a solution,' he added.
When asked how several leaders, including those from the opposition, have pointed out that dog shelters cannot be constructed overnight and that the municipal corporations require major funds, Sood said politicising the issue at this juncture is not right.
'Naturally, this cannot be done (building shelters overnight). If the Supreme Court has said something, then experts will evaluate it. What to do and what not to do will be shaped up in the coming days. This has become the nature of some leaders and some ideologies. To see politics in everything and to create what are called hindrances in everything.. They say it will not happen, it will not happen,' he said.
Sood termed it a civic issue and said that while dog lovers have a right but the people who are being attacked also have a right to live. 'Both have to go simultaneously. So it has to be that these are two parallel lines which have to run together. We have to understand this. And by making such comments you only make things worse. You are not making any positive contribution in that, helping the government or the public,' he added.
Regarding the recently passed Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, to curb the increasing commercialisation of school education, Sood accused the erstwhile AAP government of conniving with some private schools and allowing them to increase fees arbitrarily.
''For years, private schools hiked fees unchecked, our new law regulates schools, stops profiteering and focuses on strengthening government schools.'
In a blistering attack on AAP's 'education model', Sood said, 'swimming pools in schools aren't education revolution, Delhi had them in 1980 too. There is a need to improve learning outcomes and focus on improving and creating infrastructure'.
'AAP was a government of corrupt people. It is a party of thieves. Why don't they talk about the fees of the remaining 1,400 schools? Because their own people operate such schools. Their MLAs have schools. Their councillors have schools in unauthorised colonies. Though running school is not the issue, anyone can run it, but increasing fees in an arbitrary manner is bad,' the Delhi education minister alleged.
However, Sood said the real good of the people lies in a law which regulates the fees in a systematic manner.
'Fees will increase..but in a regulated way. We had the courage to face all the elements who operate as 'fee-mafia'. Those who used to give money under the table to the Aam Aadmi Party, who used it to fund their elections, we have shown this courage by standing in front of such elements,' he claimed.
Sood further alleged that during the AAP government's tenure, few schools used to get permission to increase fees multiple times.
'Tell me how it happened in a school where you have surplus funds and you get the opportunity to increase fees. Your account shows surplus. Then you get the opportunity to increase fees. They used to take money. There was collusion. They used to take money under the table. They used to take money to contest elections,' he alleged.
Sood also questioned the delay over implementation of National Education Policy (NEP) and questioned why the AAP government did not do so during their tenure. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 recommended setting six years as the minimum age for admission to Class 1. As a result, all schools will now be required to add an additional year to the foundational stage.
'NEP 2020 is a national policy. Delhi is the national capital, refusing to implement it over politics is pathetic,' Sood said, pointing out that circulars were issued to ensure Class 1 admission at the age of 6 from next year.
The Delhi government, he said, would implement every vertical of the NEP.
'We have sent a circular to schools. See, one year will be added before the child comes to first class. The parents who are studying now have made provision for their finances, the school has made their rooms, teachers, their curriculum accordingly. We have issued a circular. It has been done now. Those who have the means can do it. Otherwise, from next year, admissions will be done accordingly,' he said.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: How SC's order on stray dogs got two Gandhi families speaking in a single voice
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
All private schools to follow new fee regulation law, says Delhi education minister
New Delhi, The Delhi government has brought all 1,700 private schools in the city under a new fee regulation law, with provisions for parental participation and veto power on fee hikes, Education Minister Ashish Sood said on Friday. Speaking at a "Parents' Town Hall" in Janakpuri, Sood said the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, passed in the Monsoon Session of the Assembly, seeks to end arbitrary fee increases and ensure transparency in the fee fixation process. About 200 parents attended the interaction, where the minister explained key provisions of the law, including penalties for non-compliance. Schools that raise fees without government approval will face fines ranging from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 10 lakh, with double penalties if excess charges are not refunded, he said, according to an official statement. The bill also grants the Director of Education powers similar to those of a sub-divisional magistrate to ensure uniform action against violations, it stated. Committees comprising parents, teachers, school management and government representatives will be involved in setting school fees, it read. Sood said the new law closes a loophole in the 1973 rules, under which only 300 schools were covered for the fee regulation. "Now, all private schools in Delhi will come under the ambit of fee regulation," he said. The minister criticised previous governments for failing to establish a transparent system for private school fee control. "Those who claimed to have brought an education revolution did not make real improvements in government schools," he said, adding that many parents opted for private schools because of the poor state of public education facilities. As per the bill, decisions on fee proposals must be made by school-level committees by July 15, district-level committees by July 30, and finalised by September. If no decision is reached within 45 days, the matter will be referred to an appellate committee. Sood said the law was drafted after consultations with parents and education experts to curb the commercialisation of education and safeguard the interests of students. PTI Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hans India
44 minutes ago
- Hans India
MyVoice: Views of our readers 16th Aug 2025
Rahul's dereliction of protocol The decision of the Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi to absent himself from the nation's Independence Day celebration at the Red Fort is not merely a dereliction of protocol but also of symbolism. In the theatre of democracy, moments such as these transcend partisanship; they are occasions when we set aside our ideological cudgels to affirm a shared national identity. The absence sends an unfortunate semaphore: that political schism can supersede patriotic solidarity. One need not be in concord with the government to stand in concert with the Republic. Rahul Gandhi did not diminish the government but the gravitas of the Opposition's own constitutional role. Independence Day is a day when the tricolour should eclipse the party flag. Mohit Rawal, Ujjain Modi erred by praising RSS I endorse the criticism against Prime Minister Narendra Modi's address to the nation on I- Day in which he praised the RSS on its 100th year. This has been condemned by CPI(M) leader M A Baby, who pointed out that RSS has a dubious record and it was banned after Gandhi's assassination. Modi may be seeking RSS support in the wake of the political turmoil that has emerged after Rahul Gandhi's 'vote chor' accusations. Dr T Ramadas, Visakhapatnam Testing times for Modi This is further to your editorial 'Challenges galore for Modi' (Aug 15). It is truly testing time for India, and the BJP-led NDA government at the Centre, particularly when the opposition is irrationally up in arms against the ECI and EVMs. They are also questioning the deletion of names in the revised electoral roll in Bihar despite the poll panel's clarification in this regard. The previous one decade of the BJP rule was truly creditable with various achievements, which many people thought would be impossible like the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, 'Operation Sindoor', removal of 'triple talaq' and implementation of the 'Waqf Amendment Act'. The divisive politics being played out by the opposition, coupled with the US targeting India with a 50 per cent tariff on exports to America, is unmissable. K V Raghuram, Wayanad Centre should have a contingency plan In the grand bazaar of Indian politics, 'deep state' is on a mission to fracture the BJP by creating political chaos. It is essential that the Narendra Modi government at the Centre develops a serious contingency plan to counter future tensions. Whether the claims to provoke disruptions prove accurate or not, the government cannot remain silent at a time when the nation sits in the crosshair of a high-stakes geopolitical game. This is even as the Election Commission is determined to improve accuracy and efficiency. K R Srinivasan, Secunderabad-3 Civic officials must act I wish to highlight the growing distress of residents in low-lying areas like Malakpet, Kishanbagh, Jiyaguda, and Chaderghat as the Musi River overflows following heavy rains and the opening of the Himayat Sagar floodgates. Every monsoon, these neighbourhoods face inundation, road closures, and evacuation. While immediate steps such as traffic diversions and rescue efforts are appreciated, they unfortunately remain short-term fixes. It is imperative for the authorities to implement long-term measures—strengthening embankments, desilting the Musi, and improving drainage—to prevent recurring crises. It calls for a permanent solution. Without proactive action, thousands will continue to suffer the agony of heavy losses and displacement each year. Uthkarsha, St Francis college for Women Push carts causing obstruction People from Vijayawada are subject to several hardships because of push carts that have been left on the busy Sivalayam street, Satyanarayana puram. No one has a clue about who has left the carts. These are also causing worry to the locals as they have remained unclaimed for a long time. This is causing inconvenience to nearby bank customers, hospital patients and others, who park their vehicles here. It is also a posing threat to incriminating activities. We urge the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation to remove the carts and bring respite to the people. M Janardhana Rao, Vijayawada-520011
Hans India
44 minutes ago
- Hans India
Stagnant politics, fresh chaos – Opposition's I-Day gift to the nation
The Rahul Gandhi-led INDIA bloc's 'Vote Chori' storm is political theatre, masking fear of a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) that could expose fake voters, including illegal migrants. Their obstruction in Parliament, petty vendettas, intolerance to dissent, and hollow cries of 'Save Democracy' reveal a deeper aim — to pre-empt electoral defeat. While ignoring vital debates on defence, GST reforms, and governance, they chase headlines with stunts like exploiting Minta Devi without consent. The Election Commission must ignore such noise, conduct a transparent nationwide SIR, and protect electoral integrity. True democracy needs facts, not theatrics — and the voters, not politicians, will have the final say. One may like or dislike Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but there are lessons to learn from him. Ignore those unwilling to change. Give no quarter to peddlers of false narratives. And do not dignify Congress and the Rahul Gandhi-led INDIA bloc's 'Vote Chori' drama — a spectacle more about theatrics than truth — with endless rebuttals. Their posturing on electoral integrity rings hollow, given the glaring irregularities during their own 54 years in power. Modi chooses to counter the Opposition from appropriate platforms, connecting directly with people rather than indulging in endless 'Tu Tu Mein Mein.' By contrast, the Opposition shamelessly held Parliament hostage for 19 days, recycling the same accusations, staging protests inside and outside, refusing debates — and then claiming democracy is under threat. This isn't about saving democracy. It's about saving political careers. The Opposition refuses to shed its stale, failed narrative — the same approach that buried the Left — and treats Parliament as enemy territory. This obstructionism is itself becoming a threat to democracy. Consider the GST reforms bill, which could be a genuine Diwali gift to the citizens. Or the Sudarshan Chakra defence system — a multi-layered shield using advanced technology to protect strategic sites. These are serious matters worthy of debate. Instead, the Opposition fixates on the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) of electoral rolls, fearing it will expose bogus voters — particularly ahead of the Bihar elections. On Agni veers too, their politics is petty. Agni veers played a vital role in Operation Sindoor. Yet Rahul Gandhi declared in Parliament, 'We will do away with Agni veers.' Which means we will allow the enemy to get strengthened. His stance echoes Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy's destructive vendetta politics in Andhra Pradesh — undoing the good solely to spite political rivals. The Leader of Opposition in utter disregard for parliamentary practices prefers addressing fellow Opposition MPs as if at a CWC meeting, instead of addressing the Chair. True leaders refine policies for better results. But here are politicians who dismantle useful schemes, grant the government a free run, and then claim credit for 'exposing' it. Their hypocrisy is breathtaking. They allege their freedom of speech is curtailed but will not tolerate dissent within their own ranks. Rahul forced Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah to sack minister K N Rajanna for pointing out that the voter rolls Rahul questioned were prepared when Congress was in power and questioning bluntly, 'Why was everyone silent back then.' This exposed the hollowness of Rahul who alleged that over a lakh bogus voters existed in Mahadevpura, which cost the Congress the seat while the fact is that it has been a traditional BJP stronghold. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav showed similar intolerance by expelling MLA Pooja Pal for praising Yogi Adityanath's role in bringing mafia don Atiq Ahmed to justice for murdering her husband on the ninth day of her marriage. Unable to admit the real reason for fear of losing minority votes, Akhilesh cited a year-old whip violation. Pal's words were clear: 'I am a victim first… All people in Prayagraj disturbed by Atiq Ahmed have been given justice by the CM. I stand by my statement.' I have been saying this from day 1, even when I was in the party. I have been expelled only today, she added. She said perhaps her party could not hear the women in Prayagraj who were even more worried than her. 'But I am their voice, I have been elected as an MLA and sent to the Assembly. I am the voice of mothers and sisters who have lost their loved ones. The INDIA bloc's pettiness extends to objecting to the Operation Sindhoor logo on Independence Day invitations, and to three lady officers — Colonel Sophia Qureshi, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, and Commander Prerna Deosthalee — appearing on Kaun Banega Crorepati. It may be a commercial show, but it violates no military ethics. These officers will inspire young Indians, especially women, just as doctors used the platform during Covid-19. For Congress, Independence Day seems to be about celebrating itself — as if only it delivered freedom. While Congress played a central and indispensable role in India's fight for independence, many groups and individuals contributed to the freedom struggle. Another example of lack of strategy is Rahul Gandhi's refusal to authenticate the so-called 'atom bomb' voter list document is telling. His excuse — that he needn't sign because he has already taken an MP's oath — is laughable. Rule 389 of the Lok Sabha's Rules of Procedure is clear: when a member quotes a document, the Speaker can demand authentication. An oath is no licence to bypass verification — just as a court wouldn't accept 'I took an oath once' instead of a signed affidavit. The Opposition fears the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) as it fears that they will lose the votes of illegal Bangladeshi migrants and the like. Fake voter entries and deletion of genuine ones are not new. The Election Commission of India (ECI) must seize this golden opportunity to rise above the political noise and conduct a transparent nationwide SIR. The process should be free from distractions, as political cry-babies will always cry, but voters deserve accuracy and integrity in the rolls that decide their future. But the opposition believes only in theaatrics. On August 12, they paraded in T-shirts reading 'Minta Devi 124 Not Out.' But Minta Devi herself spoiled the show, saying her voter details were already being corrected, and objecting to her photo being used without consent. This was political self-sabotage at its finest. Will they apologise? Unlikely. For Rahul, removing stray dogs from streets is 'inhuman' — but exploiting a poor woman for political gain is acceptable. Now the INDIA bloc plans a nationwide 'Vote Chori' agitation and signature campaign, even demanding Lok Sabha's dissolution. Yet will they explain why Sonia Gandhi's name appeared on voter rolls in 1980 when she was still an Italian citizen? Most damning, in the past 12 days, not one booth-level or block-level agent from these parties has filed a complaint with the ECI about bogus voting. They've found nothing wrong in practice — yet they howl in public. This is no longer petty politics; it's a deliberate attempt to undermine faith in India's elections so that when defeat comes — as it has repeatedly over the past decade — they can cry foul at the referee. From 'Chowkidar Chor Hai' to 'Vote Chori,' Rahul Gandhi's playbook is the same: make a headline-grabbing allegation, milk it in the media, avoid proof, and quietly drop it when facts fail to fit. In the process, they corrode the very institutions they claim to defend. The ECI must now move fast: clean the rolls, strengthen verification, ensure absolute transparency — and refuse to be distracted by political drama. This is about protecting democracy, not from imaginary 'vote thieves' but from those who cry 'Save Democracy' while undermining it. And perhaps the INDIA bloc's real panic is simpler: they can already see defeat looming in Bihar. The voters, as always, will deliver the final verdict. (The author is former Chief Editor of The Hans India)
