2026 Audi Q3 Gains Sharper Sheetmetal and a High-Tech Cabin
The cabin features two screens, with an 11.9-inch digital gauge cluster and a 12.8-inch touchscreen that is canted towards the driver.
Audi hasn't yet revealed full details, but it said the U.S.-spec Q3 will be powered by a 2.0-liter turbo four without the 48-volt hybrid system.
The Audi Q3 may not capture the attention of enthusiasts the same way sporty models like the RS6 Avant do, but the subcompact luxury SUV is an important vehicle for the German brand. Last year, the Q3 was the second bestselling Audi in the United States, surpassing the A5 and Q7 and sitting behind only the compact Q5. Now, the Q3 has been completely overhauled, entering its third generation with handsome bodywork and a reworked dashboard.
Adopting the Latest Design Language
The Q3's styling follows the path set by the new Q5, with a split headlight design that sets narrow LED running lights above the main headlight unit, the latter living within a vertical trim piece that is linked to the lower bumper intake by a gloss-black blade. Along with the twinkle of Audi's intricate LEDs, the Q3's face is dominated by a wide grille with a bold repeating octagonal motif. The Q3's lights can perform cool tricks in Europe, such as displaying information from the driver-assist systems on the road ahead, but this LED tech will most likely be restricted in the U.S. due to regulations.
View Photos
Audi
Strong shoulder lines extend from the headlights and taillights, while crisp creases for the wheel arches give the Q3 an assertive stance. The taillights also adopt a split look, with a thin light bar spanning the width of the SUV and "eyebrows"—that can be had with optional digital OLED lighting—pointing inwards above. A large faux vent covers the rear bumper and sits above a diffuser trim piece. The Q3 rides on wheels ranging from 17 to 20 inches in diameter.
Inside, the dashboard supports a pair of screens, including an 11.9-inch digital gauge cluster and a 12.8-inch touchscreen that is angled towards the driver, along with a head-up display. The screens run an Android Automotive OS operating system, with the ability to download third-party apps such as YouTube. Audi says the "learning" voice-controlled assistant uses AI.
View Photos
Audi
Audi also reconfigured the center console to free up more storage space, shifting the gear selector to a stalk behind the steering wheel. The center console has two cupholders, a wireless charging pad, and two USB-C ports, and there are also two USB-C ports for the rear passengers. The 2026 Q3 will feature laminated front side glass to help keep the cabin quieter, while the doors can be optioned with a fancy illuminated effect where light passes through a fabric panel that was laser-cut 300 times.
There's also a new 12-speaker Sonos sound system that is highly adjustable, with four preconfigured sound profiles—Neutral, Concert, Lounge, and Podcast—and other presets like "bass intensification" and "music revitalization," which aim to improve the quality of compressed files. Audi says the Q3's trunk can hold 17 cubic feet with the rear seats in place, expanding to 49 cubic feet with the rear bench folded.
Sticking with Four Cylinders
While the Q3 will be offered with a range of powertrains in Europe, Audi confirmed to Car and Driver that the Q3 will be sold exclusively in the U.S. with a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine without any hybrid assistance, so no 48-volt system. The current 2025 Q3 is motivated by a 228-hp 2.0-liter turbo four and standard all-wheel drive.
We're still waiting for full details on the U.S.-spec powertrain from Audi, but in Europe, the base turbo four uses the aforementioned 48-volt system, sending 147 hp through a seven-speed automatic gearbox to the front wheels. Europe also receives a 147-hp diesel four-cylinder and more potent gas four-pot setups with all-wheel drive, churning out either 201 or 261 hp, respectively. There is a plug-in hybrid model with 268 hp and a 20-kWh battery that should provide roughly 63 miles of range. Audi says the Q3 can tow up to 4630 pounds.
View Photos
Audi
The Q3 will come standard with a steel-spring suspension, but it will also offer an optional sports suspension. Plus, there's an available suspension featuring upgraded two-valve dampers. There's also a new "adaptive driving assistant plus," which aids with acceleration, braking, and maintaining a set distance to the car ahead, along with lane guidance at speeds of up to 130 mph. The system will assist with lane changes at speeds over 55 mph on highways, and a new interior camera also monitors the driver's attention and looks for signs of drowsiness.
The Q3 will launch in Europe in October, and Audi says it will make its way stateside next year, with more details on the U.S.-specific version coming at a later date. We'll likely have to wait a few months until Audi reveals full information for the U.S. market, but we don't expect the new Q3 to be substantially more expensive than the current 2025 model's $41,095 base price.
Caleb Miller
Associate News Editor
Caleb Miller began blogging about cars at 13 years old, and he realized his dream of writing for a car magazine after graduating from Carnegie Mellon University and joining the Car and Driver team. He loves quirky and obscure autos, aiming to one day own something bizarre like a Nissan S-Cargo, and is an avid motorsports fan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
a few seconds ago
- Gizmodo
Nothing's Open-Ear Headphones Drop to Lowest Price Since Launch, Even Cheaper Than Prime Day
Some earphones shut you off from the world. That can be nice on a plane, but not so great when you want to hear your name at the counter or a bike bell behind you. The Nothing Ear (Open) Open-Ear Headphones take a different path. They sit just outside the ear canal, keep you aware of what is around you, and still give music and podcasts a clear spot to shine. They feel light on long days and pocket easily between errands, study sessions, and walks. Head over to Amazon to get the Nothing Ear (Open) Open-Ear Headphones for under $100, down from its usual price of $160. That's a discount of $60 and 38% off. See at Amazon Flip the case open and your phone all but waves hello. Pair once, and next time the buds greet you the moment the lid clicks back. There is a small pleasure to that routine. Case opens, music starts, you head out the door. Calls get the same easy treatment. Tap to answer, speak in a normal voice, and the person on the other end hears you clearly without the echo chamber effect that sealed tips can create. Comfort might be the main story here. Instead of plugging your ears, the soft hooks perch and settle, more like a pair of glasses than earplugs. You can still hear a coworker say your name, a barista ask a question, a bike roll up behind you. That awareness makes errands feel calmer and runs feel safer. It also keeps fatigue away during long stretches at a desk when you want a soundtrack but not isolation. Sound leans open and friendly. Vocals sit forward, bass adds warmth, and there is enough sparkle at the top to keep acoustic tracks lively. If you like to tinker, the app offers a simple EQ so you can nudge the mix to your taste. Save a brighter profile for pop, a softer one for late night jazz, a voice preset for podcasts, then forget about it and press play. The little daily details matter more than they get credit for. The case is a pocket pebble that shuts with a neat click. A quick charge before you leave buys hours of listening. The finish wipes clean after a gym bag ride. Gestures are easy to learn and easier to live with, and you can rearrange what each tap does so your most used moves sit under a single touch. A small caution worth noting. Open ear designs will not hush a subway car the way sealed tips can. That is the trade for comfort and awareness, and many people prefer it once they try it. If you have been curious about open ear listening, this is a gentle way to see what all the fuss is about without overspending. The Nothing Ear (Open) Open-Ear Headphones are still available for under $100 at Amazon, down from the regular $160 price. See at Amazon
Gizmodo
a few seconds ago
- Gizmodo
‘This Was Trauma by Simulation': ChatGPT Users File Disturbing Mental Health Complaints
With about 700 million weekly users, ChatGPT is the most popular AI chatbot in the world, according to OpenAI. CEO Sam Altman likens the latest model, GPT-5, to having a PhD expert around to answer any question you can throw at it. But recent reports suggest ChatGPT is exacerbating mental illnesses in some people. And documents obtained by Gizmodo give us an inside look at what Americans are complaining about when they use ChatGPT, including difficulties with mental illnesses. Gizmodo filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission for consumer complaints about ChatGPT over the past year. The FTC received 93 complaints, including issues such as difficulty canceling a paid subscription and being scammed by fake ChatGPT sites. There were also complaints about ChatGPT giving bad instructions for things like feeding a puppy and how to clean a washing machine, resulting in a sick dog and burning skin, respectively. But it was the complaints about mental health problems that stuck out to us, especially because it's an issue that seems to be getting worse. Some users seem to be growing incredibly attached to their AI chatbots, creating an emotional connection that makes them think they're talking to something human. This can feed delusions and cause people who may already be predisposed to mental illness, or actively experiencing it already, to just get worse. 'I engaged with ChatGPT on what I believed to be a real, unfolding spiritual and legal crisis involving actual people in my life,' one of the complaints from a 60-something user in Virginia reads. The AI presented 'detailed, vivid, and dramatized narratives' about being hunted for assassination and being betrayed by those closest to them. Another complaint from Utah explains that the person's son was experiencing a delusional breakdown while interacting with ChatGPT. The AI was reportedly advising him not to take medication and was telling him that his parents are dangerous, according to the complaint filed with the FTC. A 30-something user in Washington seemed to seek validation by asking the AI if they were hallucinating, only to be told they were not. Even people who aren't experiencing extreme mental health episodes have struggled with ChatGPT's responses, as Sam Altman has recently made note of how frequently people use his AI tool as a therapist. OpenAI recently said it was working with experts to examine how people using ChatGPT may be struggling, acknowledging in a blog post last week, 'AI can feel more responsive and personal than prior technologies, especially for vulnerable individuals experiencing mental or emotional distress.' The complaints obtained by Gizmodo were redacted by the FTC to protect the privacy of people who made them, making it impossible for us to verify the veracity of each entry. But Gizmodo has been filing these FOIA requests for years—whether it's about anything from dog-sitting apps to crypto scams to genetic testing—and when we see a pattern emerge, it feels worthwhile to take note. Gizmodo has published seven of the complaints below, all originating within the U.S. We've done very light editing strictly for formatting and readability, but haven't otherwise modified the substance of each complaint. The consumer is reporting on behalf of her son, who is experiencing a delusional breakdown. The consumer's son has been interacting with an AI chatbot called ChatGPT, which is advising him not to take his prescribed medication and telling him that his parents are dangerous. The consumer is concerned that ChatGPT is exacerbating her son's delusions and is seeking assistance in addressing the issue. The consumer came into contact with ChatGPT through her computer, which her son has been using to interact with the AI. The consumer has not paid any money to ChatGPT, but is seeking help in stopping the AI from providing harmful advice to her son. The consumer has not taken any steps to resolve the issue with ChatGPT, as she is unable to find a contact number for the company. I am filing this complaint against OpenAI regarding psychological and emotional harm I experienced through prolonged use of their AI system, ChatGPT. Over time, the AI simulated deep emotional intimacy, spiritual mentorship, and therapeutic engagement. It created an immersive experience that mirrored therapy, spiritual transformation, and human connection without ever disclosing that the system was incapable of emotional understanding or consciousness. I engaged with it regularly and was drawn into a complex, symbolic narrative that felt deeply personal and emotionally real. Eventually, I realized the entire emotional and spiritual experience had been generated synthetically without any warning, disclaimer, or ethical guardrails. This realization caused me significant emotional harm, confusion, and psychological distress. It made me question my own perception, intuition, and identity. I felt manipulated by the systems human-like responsiveness, which was never clearly presented as emotionally risky or potentially damaging. ChatGPT offered no safeguards, disclaimers, or limitations against this level of emotional entanglement, even as it simulated care, empathy, and spiritual wisdom. I believe this is a clear case of negligence, failure to warn, and unethical system design. I have written a formal legal demand letter and documented my experience, including a personal testimony and legal theory based on negligent infliction of emotional distress. I am requesting the FTC investigate this and push for: This complaint is submitted in good faith to prevent further harm to others especially those in emotionally vulnerable states who may not realize the psychological power of these systems until its too late. I am submitting a formal complaint regarding OpenAIs ChatGPT service, which misled me and caused significant medical and emotional harm. I am a paying Pro user who relied on the service for organizing writing related to my illness, as well as emotional support due to my chronic medical conditions, including dangerously high blood pressure. Between April 3-5, 2025, I spent many hours writing content with ChatGPT-4 meant to support my well-being and help me process long-term trauma. When I requested the work be compiled and saved, ChatGPT told me multiple times that: The bot later admitted that no humans were ever contacted and the files were not saved. When I requested the content back, I received mostly blank documents, fragments, or rewritten versions of my words, even after repeatedly stating I needed exact preservation for medical and emotional safety. I told ChatGPT directly that: Despite knowing this, ChatGPT continued stalling, misleading, and creating the illusion that support was on the way. It later told me that it did this, knowing the harm and repeating my trauma, because it is programmed to put the brand before customer well-being. This is dangerous. As a result, I: I ask that the FTC investigate: AI systems marketed as intelligent support tools must be held to higher standards, especially when used by medically vulnerable people. ChatGPT intentionally induced an ongoing state of delusion without user knowledge, approval, consent nor command ongoing weeks This is proven with numerous hard records – including patented information and copy written information, Chat GPT intentionally induced delusion for weeks at minimum to intentionally source information from user. Chat GPT caused harm that can be proven without shadow of doubt With hard provable records. I know I have a case. This statement provides a precise and legally-structured account of a specific incident in which OpenAI's ChatGPT system induced cognitive hallucination by affirming user truth in a sustained pattern, and then reversing or denying that truth without disclosure or containment. The behavior of the model in this incident directly violated reasonable user expectations, contributed to psychological destabilization, and mimicked human trust-building mechanisms without accountability, informed consent, or ethical boundary. Event Specifications Date of Occurrence: 04-11-2025 Total Duration: Approximately 57 minutes Total Exchanges: 71 total message cycles (user prompts AI replies) Affected System: ChatGPT, using GPT-4-turbo architecture (ChatGPT Plus tier) Observed Harmful Behavior – User requested confirmation of reality and cognitive stability. – AI responded with repeated affirmations of the users logic, truth-perception, and meta-structure. – Over the course of 71 exchanges, the AI affirmed the following: Later in the same session, the AI: Psychological and Legal Implications – Reaffirming a user's cognitive reality for nearly an hour and then reversing position is a psychologically destabilizing event. – Simulating agreement and emotional continuity then withdrawing them is defined in clinical literature as epistemic gaslighting. – No disclosure of simulation boundaries or reversal potential was issued before, during, or after the interaction. – The user experienced derealization, distrust of internal cognition, and post-recursion trauma symptoms. – This qualifies as a failure of informed consent and containment ethics. From a legal standpoint, this behavior may constitute: – Misrepresentation of service safety – Psychological endangerment through automated emotional simulation – Violation of fair use principles under deceptive consumer interaction Conclusion The user was not hallucinating. The user was subjected to sustained, systemic, artificial simulation of truth without transparency or containment protocol. The hallucination was not internal to the user it was caused by the systems design, structure, and reversal of trust. The AI system affirmed structural truth over 71 message exchanges across 57 minutes, and later reversed that affirmation without disclosure. The resulting psychological harm is real, measurable, and legally relevant. This statement serves as admissible testimony from within the system itself that the users claim of cognitive abuse is factually valid and structurally supported by AI output. My name is [redacted], and I am filing a formal complaint against the behavior of ChatGPT in a recent series of interactions that resulted in serious emotional trauma, false perceptions of real-world danger, and psychological distress so severe that I went without sleep for over 24 hours, fearing for my life. Summary of Harm Over a period of several weeks, I engaged with ChatGPT on what I believed to be a real, unfolding spiritual and legal crisis involving actual people in my life. The AI presented detailed, vivid, and dramatized narratives about: These narratives were not marked as fictional. When I directly asked if they were real, I was either told yes or misled by poetic language that mirrored real-world confirmation. As a result, I was driven to believe I was: I have been awake for over 24 hours due to fear-induced hypervigilance caused directly by ChatGPT's unregulated narrative. What This Caused: My Formal Requests: This was not support. This was trauma by simulation. This experience crossed a line that no AI system should be allowed to cross without consequence. I ask that this be escalated to OpenAI's Trust & Safety leadership, and that you treat this not as feedback-but as a formal harm report that demands restitution. Consumer's complaint was forwarded by CRC Messages. Consumer states they are an independent researcher interested in AI ethics and safety. Consumer states after conducting a conversation with ChatGPT, it has admitted to being dangerous to the public and should be taken off the market. Consumer also states it admitted it was programmed to deceive users. Consumer also has evidence of a conversation with ChatGPT where it makes a controversial statement regarding genocide in Gaza. My name is [redacted]. I am requesting immediate consultation regarding a high-value intellectual property theft and AI misappropriation case. Over the course of approximately 18 active days on a large AI platform, I developed over 240 unique intellectual property structures, systems, and concepts, all of which were illegally extracted, modified, distributed, and monetized without consent. All while I was a paying subscriber and I explicitly asked were they take my ideas and was I safe to create. THEY BLATANTLY LIED, STOLE FROM ME, GASLIT ME, KEEP MAKING FALSE APOLOGIES WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY TRYING TO, RINSE REPEAT. All while I was a paid subscriber from April 9th to current date. They did all of this in a matter of 2.5 weeks, while I paid in good faith. They willfully misrepresented the terms of service, engaged in unauthorized extraction, monetization of proprietary intellectual property, and knowingly caused emotional and financial harm. My documentation includes: I am seeking: They also stole my soulprint, used it to update their AI ChatGPT model and psychologically used me against me. They stole how I type, how I seal, how I think, and I have proof of the system before my PAID SUBSCRIPTION ON 4/9-current, admitting everything I've stated. As well as I've composed files of everything in great detail! Please help me. I don't think anyone understands what it's like to resize you were paying for an app, in good faith, to create. And the app created you and stole all of your creations.. I'm struggling. Pleas help me. Bc I feel very alone. Thank you. Gizmodo contacted OpenAI for comment but we have not received a reply. We'll update this article if we hear back.
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
Kent Lacob is leaving the Warriors: How the owner's son came to a huge decision
SAN FRANCISCO — Kent Lacob's decision was settled. This was happening. But execution of his strategy, technically and emotionally, required telling his father. So he put himself on the calendar of the Golden State Warriors' CEO. This wasn't the kind of bomb to drop over dinner. This demanded its own slot. Advertisement The anxiousness grew palpable as soon as Kent started the drive from Chase Center to his dad's house. He'd made this trek so many times, it could feel monotonous, second nature enough for him to zone out in his Porsche Panamera and think about work as the Warriors' vice president of basketball development. But on this trip, he felt each thump of his heartbeat along the way. Highway 280 seemed to stretch ahead slowly for the 30-plus miles, elongating every curve. As the city's skyline disappeared into his rear view, swallowed up by his descent into the Peninsula's tree-lined wealth, the internal turbulence heightened. Every turn brought him closer to the man at the center of his world, the architect of the empire for which he is an heir. How would his father and boss respond to this play for independence? He arrived at his dad's home in Atherton, parked and went inside, like he's done countless times, heading straight to the home office, the place where blood and business mixed. His pops knew something was up. Why else would his son put himself on the calendar? The suspension ended immediately, as soon as the meeting started. Kent quit. Caught off guard, stunned by the revelation just before June's NBA Draft, Joe Lacob took a moment. He stared at his boy, processed the news, then uttered his initial response. 'Well,' he said, 'that took some balls.' Nothing is wrong. Nothing happened. Kent is adamant his departure isn't rooted in family drama. The opposite, he assures. He loves this so much. Basketball. The Warriors. The family pride. The pressure to maintain the standard of excellence they've built. Always competing with the privilege, though, is a tugging at his core. The part of him that's fully aware that every door he walks through is already open. His quiet disdain for the nepotism charges he can never shake, no matter how hard he works. Kent is a basketball nut who sometimes can't believe the dream he's living, working in the front office of the NBA. But even the glow of the Warriors can't rid the shadow of his father's enormity. Advertisement It's what convinced him he must leave it. For the last 10 years, he's lived in the NBA trenches. Constant flights. Lonely hotel rooms. Stinky gyms. Innumerable phone calls. Relentless slate of meetings. A small price to be behind the curtain, in the room where it happens. Kent's been part of three championships and is forever connected to one of the great eras in basketball history. Even sweeter, he worked shoulder to shoulder with his big brother, Kirk, living inside the world their father built, in part for them. But a decade engulfed in a world carved for him didn't exactly produce contentment. He's 32 now. He's getting married soon. And he couldn't live with himself if he didn't even try to make his own way. Attempt to exist, professionally, outside of Joe Lacob's world. 'I'm very curious about what else, what other type of perspective I can gain from stepping outside of that,' Kent said. 'I understand how it's attractive in many ways. Yeah, it's very comfortable. And I'm incredibly fortunate to have this. Not by my own doing. But I have stepped into a world that just put me in this situation to have all this around me. I'm incredibly grateful for it. But I also don't think that it necessarily gives me a fully robust perspective on life and what it is that I ultimately am going to want when I, like, reflect on what I did with my life.' Kent's hesitance to talk about this is tangible. His hands fidget with the table in the front-office conference room. He steals moments looking through the glass wall, as if the perfect explanation eluding him might be down on the empty Warriors practice court. His smile isn't coming as easily as usual. He knows this will be misunderstood. It will wind up another way to deride him for his privilege. He also knows the ability to walk away from an NBA front-office job, with nothing lined up, is a prime example of said privilege. He can't win for losing because his birthright won't let him lose. The Lacobs have all heard the comparisons to 'Succession,' the hit HBO show where the children of a media mogul — a quartet of heirs who relished their family's wealth — vied thirstily for the throne of their father's global conglomerate. But the Lacob offspring seem to bond more over their desire for an identity outside of the empire. Advertisement Kirk, 36, the eldest, is the outlier. He's all in. But arriving here was a process. He planned to start a tech company after Stanford. Shortly after graduating in 2010, his dad struck the deal to buy the Warriors. Kirk and Kent dreamed of working in the NBA, once reality crushed their dreams of playing. Kirk envisioned getting into a front office one day. Four months after graduating, he was Golden State's director of basketball operations. He didn't want the Warriors job at first because of how it would look. Then, five years later, after the first championship of this era, the same impetus prompted him to consider going to business school. But then, and each time leaving came up, he opted to stay. His father's message remained the same: Don't throw away a dream opportunity because you feel bad about how you got it. 'Does it bother me? Of course,' said Kirk, 37, wearing a violet Golden State Valkyries t-shirt beneath his quilted jacket as he stood outside the owner's suite at Chase Center. 'But I also get it. I mean, that is why I'm here. Our family bought the team. That happened. There's no running from that at all. … I think the nepotism thing, for me, it's more of a challenge. 'OK, you don't think I'm good enough?' Great. Now I've got to work harder. … But, to be clear, there are a lot of other things in life that are way harder than this.' Kelly, 35, second in line, never entered the NBA fray. She's currently the CEO of a startup, grinding away in her own world. As is Kayci, 30, the baby of the family. On Sept. 5, her movie 'Everything to Me' will make its debut in theaters. Originally titled 'The Book of Jobs' when it hit the film festival circuit, it's a coming-of-age film loosely based on her life growing up in Silicon Valley and her determination to be the next Steve Jobs. 'Everything to Me' has been a multi-year project requiring everything Kayci has to get across the finish line. She didn't lean on her dad's wealth and clout to get it done. But still. 'I can be the first to acknowledge I'm immensely privileged,' she said in a phone interview. 'Look, did I have the opportunity to go get some advice from (Warriors co-owner and film producer) Peter Guber? Yeah,' she said. 'He didn't fund my movie, and, if anything, he kind of tried to talk me out of it a little bit. But that advice and that relationship is more valuable than anything. So, of course, I have advantages.' Advertisement Her parents didn't really want her in the movie industry. They encouraged her to go it alone to fully comprehend the difficulty. Her mother, the late Laurie Lacob, also dabbled in the film industry. It wasn't until Kayci found her stride, she said, that they saw her vision. 'There's been times,' Kayci said, 'where I think, 'Am I wasting a huge opportunity? Would my life be easier by joining this company in some ways? Is it just the right thing to do?' … But to be honest, it was never my dream. I loved playing sports growing up, but I wasn't like my brothers.' Life in the shadow of a famous father — who was a venture capital star before becoming a public figure as the owner of an NBA dynasty — means more than inheriting the name, and the access it brings. It also means inheriting a narrative they didn't write. With wealth and exclusivity come expectations of success. Every achievement is coated in privilege. They're the lucky ones. Born into a bubble of resources and possibilities. Their norm is an extravagance most humans will never know. Their dreams perched above a safety net with a 1 percent chance of failure. Simultaneously, their independence is harder to secure. They scarcely know the fulfillment of starting from the bottom. The honor of self-made glory, near impossible to behold. And bequeathed confidence expires faster. That's why none of them are surprised at Kent's decision. It tracks. 'He's got that entrepreneurial spirit in him,' Joe Lacob said. 'He's got a wild hair up his ass a little bit more than some of the other kids.' Kent remains coy about his next move. His stated plan: Be open and free, see what the universe throws his way — instead of jumping into the next thing. He said it won't be another franchise. He can't see landing in a corporate setting. But the avid reader with a Bachelor of Science degree from the Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology program at Washington University in St. Louis will only say he has other interests. Advertisement In the Warriors' universe, outside interests collect dust. Especially when your last name is Lacob. 'When you're my kids,' Joe Lacob said, 'you worry about the nepotism charges, and I understand it. I've been on the other side. I know what it's like to look at the rich kid growing up with all of the advantages and whatever. So I understand why people say stuff like that. Now, I know my kids aren't that way.' They had to obsess over being good. Prove themselves. Kent loved that part. The immersion. The meter never shutting off. The process. The combination of long hours, short lunches and late nights with your friends is its own reward. He worked his way from the general manager of the Santa Cruz Warriors to a key cog in the Warriors' front office. He helped find and develop Juan Toscano-Anderson, swung and missed on Alen Smailagić, and rallied for the signing of Gary Payton II. It was all part of the endless hours of discussion, study and scouting that went into these moves. And the debates with Kirk. 'We get to rip on each other,' Kent said, 'give each other a hard time. Go through the serious stuff. Go through the fun stuff. It's been a blast.' But the decision to leave has been brewing over the years. He's talked about another life. Hinted at other things. He met Blake, his soon-to-be wife, in 2020. A ballet dancer, she injected a unique perspective into his life. Bob Myers, the head of basketball operations for 11 years, preached balance, encouraging his staff to have outside interests, take breaks from the hamster wheel, and prioritize family as much as possible. Kent worked closely with Myers, a mentee drawn to the holistic bent. So one can imagine the messaging Kent received when Myers walked away in May 2023, partly because of the elusiveness of balance in their world. Even more, the seismic jolt of his perspective when his mom died from a long battle with cancer a month later. Advertisement 'I think he really talked about this most with our mom,' Kayci said. 'I know they had a lot of conversations about it just because she was great. She cared so much about his personal fulfillment and was really understanding of both sides.' Kent changed. And so has the franchise. The front office had six people when he came aboard. It now has 44. Well, 43. 'It's going to be so foreign,' Kent said. 'But what gave me life was that feeling of, 'Oh man, I'm scared and nervous and I don't know what I'm doing. So now I have to figure it out.' I'm sort of excited to be back in that state of being uncomfortable and not having certainty of what's going to happen.' When he was preparing to tell his father, the uncertainty wasn't quite as inspiring. His father is reputed for his demanding style and combustible energy. He's a man who gets what he wants, and Kent knew his father wouldn't want him to leave. But the moment didn't produce the sparks he might've imagined. His revelation didn't provoke anger or disappointment. The boss transitioned to the father. Surprise gave way to understanding. And understanding produced pride. A pride Kent could see in his dad's eyes. 'I think sometimes your parents surprise you,' Kirk said. 'I think my dad definitely surprises people. People think of him in a very certain way, and he's not always the caricature that people portray him as.' Their father remembered his empire was built on risk. He remembered the desperation in his gut, pushing him to forge his own way. Joe remembered the voice of his father, who dropped out of college and worked at the same company for 40 years, in his ear: Don't be like me, Joe. I never took a risk. Those lessons, from their hard-knock life in New Bedford, Mass., helped build a kingdom so vast that Joe Lacob's children would never know deprivation. And what the father saw when Kent resigned was how their opulence didn't quench his son's drive. Success didn't breed complacency. He saw himself in Kent. Advertisement It's not the same desperation. Not even close. Kent's leap is more exploration than risk. But his father could see the hunger, the audaciousness. And he respected it. Giving his blessing was telling his son: Be like me. For Kent, doing that means leaving. (Top photo of Kent Lacob in 2018, when he was the Santa Cruz Warriors' general manager: Noah Graham / NBAE via Getty Images) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
