'Broken heart': Fans send prayers as Erin Andrews reveals emotional setback in her surrogacy journey during podcast episode
Erin Andrews
, one of the most recognized faces on NFL sidelines, has shared heartbreaking news with her fans and listeners. The veteran Fox Sports reporter revealed during a recent episode of her podcast, Calm Down with Erin and Charissa, that the surrogate carrying her second child has suffered a miscarriage.
Erin Andrews opens up about heartbreaking miscarriage of surrogate during second pregnancy journey
This emotional disclosure came just months after Erin Andrews and her husband, former NHL star Jarret Stoll, celebrated the birth of their first child, Mack, via surrogacy in 2023. Their parenthood journey has been anything but smooth, marked by fertility struggles, medical challenges, and now, another devastating setback.
Speaking with honesty and vulnerability, Andrews didn't hold back. 'We got some real sh---- news today that our surrogate had miscarried,' she told her listeners.
'So I have dealt with this before, but things were going really, really well. And her little heartbeat and her numbers were really good — so much so I even told you guys a couple weeks ago because we thought we had such good news.'
Erin Andrews (Getty Images)
Andrews, 47, fought through emotion during the podcast, admitting that work had become a way to keep herself centered through pain. 'I've just been tearing up the whole time and trying to stay focused,' she told producer Ryan Musick.
'But I'm also really really good at suppressing my feelings and work really helps me with that.'
A journey marked by loss and courage
This isn't the couple's first experience with loss during the surrogacy process. Erin candidly mentioned that their first surrogate also experienced a pregnancy loss before their successful journey with Mack. Despite the heartbreak, Andrews made it clear that her openness is intentional.
"Been sitting here thinking about Taylor Swift's song, 'I Can Do It with a Broken Heart.'
I'm really good at doing this sh-- with a broken heart," she said.
"But I think I kinda made a promise to myself that when I was really open with how sh---- infertility has been and our journey with two surrogates, because we did lose…we had loss with our first surrogate and then luckily with our second one, we had Mack, that I was just going to be honest with people.'
Also Read:
Is Erin Andrews more of a beauty influencer than a NFL reporter now? Her skincare obsession raises eyebrows
Since the news broke, social media has flooded with sympathy. 'Praying for you,' one fan wrote. Another shared, 'If you read the sentence 'Erin Andrews' surrogate has experienced a miscarriage' and you don't feel like throwing up, I'm sorry you're lost.' The outpouring of love underscores the public's deep connection with Andrews — not just as a broadcaster, but as a woman courageously sharing her truth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Batting today is 'way easier' than 20-25 years ago': Kevin Pietersen after Joe Root's record-breaking knock vs India
Joe Root (Getty Images) NEW DELHI: England batting legend Kevin Pietersen has ignited fresh debate in cricketing circles by claiming that batting today is significantly easier than it was two to three decades ago. According to Pietersen, a noticeable dip in the quality of bowling across Test-playing nations has made life simpler for modern-day batters. His remarks came just a day after Joe Root surpassed Australia's Ricky Ponting to move into second place on the all-time list of Test run scorers, behind only Sachin Tendulkar . Taking to X (formerly Twitter) on Saturday, Pietersen wrote: Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! "Don't shout at me but batting these days is way easier than 20/25 years ago! Probably twice as hard back then!' Known for his bold personality both on and off the field, Pietersen—who played 104 Tests for England between 2005 and 2013 and scored 8,181 runs at an average of 47.28—has never shied away from expressing strong views. This time, he doubled down on the argument by pointing to a star-studded list of bowlers from the past, arguing that the modern game lacks comparable threats. 'Waqar, Shoaib, Akram, Mushtaq, Kumble, Srinath, Harbhajan, Donald, Pollock, Klusener, Gough, McGrath, Lee, Warne, Gillespie, Bond, Vettori, Cairns, Vaas, Murali, Curtley, Courtney and the list could go on and on…' he wrote, before challenging his followers: 'I've named 22 above. Please name me 10 modern day bowlers that can compare to the names above?' Pietersen's comments come at a time when batting records continue to tumble. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like After Losing Weight Kevin James Looks Like A Model 33 Bridges Undo Root's unbeaten 150 against India on Day 3 of the fourth Test in Manchester has now taken his career tally to 11,736 Test runs—closing in on Tendulkar's monumental 15,921. Manchester weather forecast - Rain, chilly winds in store on Day 4 and Day 5 While many have applauded the consistency and flair of batters in the current era, Pietersen's comments have reopened the discussion on how much the evolution of flat pitches, changed rules, and fading bowling firepower have contributed to inflated batting numbers. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Adam Sandler's Netflix movie Happy Gilmore 2 slammed by fans for its poor colour grading: 'Eminem looks like he has jaundice'
Adam Sandler's long-awaited sequel, Happy Gilmore 2, dropped on Netflix on July 25, and while it quickly soared into the platform's trending charts, not everyone is impressed. Fans are calling out the movie's oddly flat cinematography, questionable colour grading, and what many are calling a cheap, almost amateur look, despite a legacy tied to one of Sandler's most iconic films. Viewers have pointed out that the sequel's lighting and visual tone feel off, especially when scenes are directly compared to the original Happy Gilmore. Some are even sarcastically suggesting that the movie was filmed using iPhones or low-end equipment, criticising Netflix for prioritising content output over visual quality. What is Happy Gilmore 2 about? Happy Gilmore 2 picks up years after the events of Happy Gilmore, following Happy as he navigates a comeback tour after a long hiatus from professional golf. This time, he's mentoring a young, hot-headed prodigy while clashing with a new generation of players. The film mixes nostalgia with newer storylines, aiming to bridge the gap between long-time fans and a younger audience. Fans react to poor visuals and awkward colour grading One user wrote, 'Why does it look like it was made by a YouTuber? Why does Eminem look like he has jaundice? Did he need that much makeup?When they did the cutbackto the original movie, the lighting and colour grading were perfect. How did Adam Sandler watch this and go, 'Yeah, this will do''? Why does it look like it was made by a youtuber?why does eminem look like he has jaundice ?did he need that much makeup.?when they do the cut back to the original movie the lighting and color grading was perfect. how did adam sandler watch this and go "yeah this will do" 😭 Another said, 'This lowkey looks worse in quality than videos I have taken on my iPhone camera.' Others echoed the sentiment, 'Netflix ruined everything. Quantity over quality now.' 'They probably shot the new movie on iPhones or something.' Check out more reactions below: They probably shot the new movie on iPhones or something It all looks like YouTube skits nowadays looks like a superbowl commercial I don't understand why they stopped caring about good color pallets for films All the star cameos in Happy Gilmore 2 Despite the criticism, Happy Gilmore 2 does offer a buffet of unexpected celebrity cameos. Eminem makes a surprise appearance, though fans weren't too happy with his overdone makeup. Also popping up are sports legend Shaquille O'Neal, Rob Schneider (of course), Jennifer Aniston, Drew Barrymore, Chris Rock, Kevin James, and even former NBA player Charles Barkley. Pop star Bad Bunny and NFL champion Travis Kelce also make cameo appearances. The movie leans hard into the nostalgia factor, even cutting back to scenes from the original film to remind viewers where it all began. Still, for many fans, the celebrity cameos weren't enough to distract from the film's jarring visual downgrade. Whether Happy Gilmore 2 holds up as a worthy sequel or not might be up for debate, but fans definitely expected a better-looking film than what they got.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Twin towers: Kunal Pradhan writes on the Sincaraz saga
It was April 1, 2019, just another All Fools' Day in our strange world. Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz at the French Open in June. (Getty Images) Algerian president Abdelaziz Bouteflika faced massive protests after nearly 20 years in power; actor Felicity Huffman pleaded guilty in a varsity cheating scandal; British parliament voted against four Brexit alternatives; and a US judge rejected a plan by Donald Trump (in his first term) to send asylum-seekers to Mexico. Amid this global churning, in the Mediterranean port city of Alicante, two teenagers faced each other for the first time in the opening round of a nondescript Challenger tennis tournament. From Sexten, Italy: Jannik Sinner, 17. From Murcia, Spain: Carlos Alcaraz, 15. The world did not know it then, but the encounter would mark the start of two fairy-tale storylines: distinct yet connected, separate yet intertwined. Let's call it Sincaraz Day. Six years later, in June and July 2025, these two stories would collide over the course of two matches, played on two of the tennis world's biggest stages, the Stade Roland Garros in Paris and the All-England Club in London, setting the tone for a new era in sport. A passing of the torch, if you will, from the Federer-Nadal-Djokovic Age of the GOATs. Alcaraz came from two sets down to dismantle Sinner on the red Paris clay, and Sinner brushed off a first set loss to demolish Alcaraz on London's hallowed grass. If one had thoroughly dominated the other in both encounters, it wouldn't have been so significant. Sport needs rivalries that divide fan bases and consequently unite passion. Tyranny is boring, resistance is magnetic. Perfect match What makes the battle now underway between Sinner and Alcaraz so captivating is that they could not be more different, as players and as people. Though they are both consummate all-surface all-courters, Alcaraz has drawn different elements more sharply from the three legends he set out to replace. There is a touch of Roger Federer's artistry in the kinds of shots he can make — for example, the incredible down-the-line forehand from wide of the court to win the French Open title. There is a hint of Novak Djokovic's defence in the way he fights back from impossible positions in rallies — for instance, the desperate forehand slice to stay in the point, followed by a lunging drop shot to take the first set in the Wimbledon final. And there is the stamp of Rafael Nadal in how he alternates between incredible speed and unprecedented revs to control the tempo of every rally: drop shot, slice, top spin, then a burst of power for the winner. Sinner is more direct, a ruthless serve-plus-one and return-plus-one finisher against lesser opponents, and a relentless hitter of high-percentage shots when he is better matched. His is a meat-and-potatoes approach to tennis that is simplifying the formula for greatness: quick, prescient, precise and powerful. As the redoubtable sports commentator Peter Bodo wrote in Tennis magazine last year: 'If you tried to create a player with AI, you would probably end up with someone like Sinner.' Their personalities mirror their styles of play. If Alcaraz is the passionate Spaniard, conducting with the crowd while he's 'vamos'-ing his way through points, Sinner is the smiling assassin whose fist pumps are reserved for his coaching team and family. As in all such clashes of sporting philosophies, those who choose to love one of them will probably end up hating the other. Tied together Though Sinner and Alcaraz had won the last six Grand Slams before Wimbledon, claiming three each, the Italian was facing a crisis as he stepped on to the hallowed London grass. He was world No. 1, one of only eight players in history to amass 10,000 ranking points, and on the verge of becoming only the fifth (after Federer, Djokovic, Nadal and Andy Murray) to cross the 12,000 mark. Yet Alcaraz had defeated him at each of their last five meetings. Roland Garros, where Sinner lost in a five-and-a-half-hour battle after failing to convert three match points, further cemented the narrative that the Spaniard somehow had his number. The Wimbledon final, therefore, felt like a last chance to make it a real rivalry and hyphenate their legacies. Hyphenations are important, particularly in individual sport. When you think of one player, you must think of another, to make a legacy rise above statistics. Ali vs Frazier, Prost vs Senna, Kasparov vs Karpov, Navratilova vs Evert, McEnroe vs Borg, even Messi vs Ronaldo and Sachin vs Lara, are legends whose battles raged in lived history, irrespective of how many titles who won, to encapsulate our life and times. Now, just as the frenzy of Federer vs Nadal vs Djokovic was starting to fade, Sinner and Alcaraz have stepped forward. It may be early days for them, but Paris and London have shown that all the elements are in place for a fight for the ages. Pick whichever you like; more power to Sincaraz.
