Cops bust gang pilfering petro products at Headland-Sada
Vasco:
Mormugao police have busted a ten-member gang involved in pilferage of petroleum products. Diesel worth Rs 1.8 lakh has been seized, along with five oil tankers and three goods rickshaws that were used by the accused to pilfer and transport the petroleum products.
Cash amounting to Rs 22.4 lakh has also been seized.
The gang, comprising Brito Macheal Raj, 49, and Suraj Jaiswar, 27, of Vasco, Vithal Metri, 40, of Navelim, and Muttpa Kangiri, 47, Mohan Patil, 50, Bablu Patel, 22, Gulab Patel, 49, Niraj Patel, 22, Umesh Kumar, 32, and Ramnayan Patel, 28, all residents of Dabolim, was operating behind the Sada sub-jail premises at Headland-Sada, police said.
A complaint was consequently lodged by police sub-inspector, Stanley Gomes, on behalf of the state. All the members of the gang were arrested under various sections of the BNS and the Petroleum Act, 1934, and were produced before the Vasco judicial magistrate first class, who remanded them in one-day police custody.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
Court Rejects Patanjali Ayurved's Petition Against Rs 273.5 Crore GST Penalty
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has dismissed Patanjali Ayurved Limited's petition challenging Rs 273.50-crore goods and service tax (GST) penalty. A division bench comprising Justices Shekhar B Saraf and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit rejected Patanjali's argument that such penalties constitute criminal liability and can be imposed only after a criminal trial. The bench was of the view that tax authorities can impose penalties under Section 122 of the GST Act through civil proceedings without requiring criminal court trials. The court clarified that GST penalty proceedings are civil in nature and can be adjudicated by proper officers. "After detailed analysis, it is clear that the proceeding under Section 122 of the CGST Act is to be adjudicated by the adjudicating officer and is not required to undergo prosecution," the bench said. Patanjali Ayurved operates three manufacturing units at Haridwar (Uttarakhand), Sonipat (Haryana) and Ahmednagar (Maharashtra). The company came under investigation following information received by authorities about suspicious transactions involving firms with high Input Tax Credit (ITC) utilisation but no income tax credentials. The investigation led to allegations that Patanjali "acting as a main person indulged in circular trading of tax invoices only on paper without actual supply of goods". The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Ghaziabad issued a show cause notice on April 19, 2024 to Patanjali Ayurved, proposing a penalty of Rs 273.51 crore under Section 122(1), clauses (ii) and (vii) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. Later, the DGGI dropped tax demands under Section 74 through an adjudication order dated January 10, 2025. The department found that "for all the commodities, the quantities sold were always more than the quantities purchased from the suppliers, thereby making the observation that all the ITC which was availed in the impugned goods was further passed on by the petitioner". Despite dropping the tax demand, authorities decided to continue with penalty proceedings under Section 122, prompting Patanjali to challenge this before the high court. After hearing both sides, the court in its judgment dated May 29 dismissed the petition.
New Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Allahabad HC rejects Patanjali Ayurved's plea against Rs 273.5 crore GST penalty
PRAYAGRAJ: The Allahabad High Court has dismissed Patanjali Ayurved Limited's petition challenging Rs 273.50-crore goods and service tax (GST) penalty. A division bench comprising Justices Shekhar B Saraf and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit rejected Patanjali's argument that such penalties constitute criminal liability and can be imposed only after a criminal trial. The bench was of the view that tax authorities can impose penalties under Section 122 of the GST Act through civil proceedings without requiring criminal court trials. The court clarified that GST penalty proceedings are civil in nature and can be adjudicated by proper officers. "After detailed analysis, it is clear that the proceeding under Section 122 of the CGST Act is to be adjudicated by the adjudicating officer and is not required to undergo prosecution," the bench said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Allahabad HC bins Patanjali's plea against Rs 273 crore GST penalty
File photo PRAYAGRAJ: Allahabad high court has dismissed a petition by yoga practitioner Ramdev's Patanjali Ayurved Ltd challenging a Rs 273.5-cr penalty imposed by GST authorities. In a recent order, a bench of Justices Shekhar B Saraf and Vipin Chandra Dixit rejected Patanjali's argument that such penalties constituted criminal liability and could be imposed only after a criminal trial. The court cited Section 122 of CGST Act, 2017, and held that such fines could be imposed through civil proceedings, without requiring criminal trials. The HC pointed out that GST penalty proceedings were civil in nature and could be adjudicated by proper officers and 'were not required to undergo prosecution'. According to GST authorities, Patanjali came under investigation following information about suspicious transactions involving firms with high input tax credit (ITC) utilisation but no income tax credentials. The investigation led to allegations that Patanjali 'indulged in circular trading of tax invoices only on paper without actual supply of goods'. Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI), (Ghaziabad circle) issued Patanjali a showcause in April 2024 proposing the penalty of Rs 273.51. The company then moved the HC.
