
Cheddar, stilton or brie: The best types of cheese for your body
Surprisingly, not all blue cheese makes the gut-friendly list. Those distinctive blue veins come from mould (Penicillium roqueforti), but some varieties like Stilton are known to contain gut-friendly bacteria, too. 'It's the cheeses that contain
Lactobacillus bacteria that are more likely to have beneficial effects,' says Dr Leeming. 'But we don't know much about the fungal species on blue cheese yet.'
Ageing doesn't necessarily make a cheese more gut friendly. 'Aged cheeses like Parmesan and Gruyère lose most of their live bacteria over time,' she says. The best cheese for gut health is aged long enough for healthy bacteria to thrive but not so long that they decline.
What about unpasteurised cheese?
'In theory, unpasteurised cheese is better for your gut health than pasteurised because of the extra potential for live microbes,' says Dr Leeming. But there are safety considerations.
A 2022 UK study found that while 82 per cent of unpasteurised cheeses were safe to eat, they aren't completely risk-free. Pregnant people, young children, frail older adults, and those with weakened immune systems, should avoid unpasteurised cheese, Dr Leeming says.
Is cheese good for bone health?
Cheese can help maintain strong healthy bones because it contains calcium, phosphorus, protein, and vitamin K2, says Alex Ruani, a doctoral researcher in nutrition science education at University College London and the chief science educator at The Health Sciences Academy.
'Some research indicates that regular, moderate cheese consumption could support bone strength in post-menopausal women and elderly individuals,' she says. This could be because nutrients in cheese can help reduce excessive bone loss. 'This happens when natural bone breakdown outpaces bone formation, leading to brittle bones, height loss and a higher risk of fractures,' Ruani says.
There's evidence that vegans generally have lower bone density than non-vegans, and a higher risk of fractures and osteoporosis. 'Vegans are advised to consume fortified plant-based alternatives or top up with supplements to maintain healthy bone density,' Ruani says.
Will cheese make you gain weight?
Full-fat cheese is generally high in calories. For example, a 30g serving of cheddar, one of most energy-dense cheeses, contains around 120 calories. Parmesan and Gruyère contain similar amounts. 'But although cheese is calorie-dense, in moderation it doesn't inherently cause fat gain and can be part of a healthy, nutrient-rich diet,' Ruani says.
A study of the latest evidence, published in Advances of Nutrition in 2023, found that moderate cheese intake doesn't necessarily lead to obesity and may even support weight management. This could be because cheese is high in protein and fat, which helps us keep full for longer. The same study found that eating cheese neither increased nor decreased the overall risk of death from any cause.
Some animal studies have suggested that butyric acid, a type of fat, may play a useful role in weight management, but there's limited good evidence for this.
How much cheese is healthy?
Although scientific opinion has changed about saturated fats in cheese, this isn't a green light to consume excessive amounts. 'Cheese can be part of a healthy diet, but you should look at your overall saturated fat intake and your own health needs
when deciding how much to eat,' says Dell Stanford, a senior dietitian at the British Heart Foundation. 'Cheese is also high in salt, which can raise your blood pressure. Having high cholesterol and high blood pressure put you at higher risk of a heart attack or stroke.'
Official guidelines recommend no more than 30g of cheese per day, a piece roughly the size of a matchbox. This aligns with recommendations for healthy people to limit their saturated fat intake to 11 per cent of total calories, or 220 calories per day as part of a 2,000-calories-a-day diet. For those with, or at high risk of cardiovascular disease, the recommended daily limit of saturated fat intake is 7 per cent of calories.
For some people, eating slightly more cheese than recommended is unlikely to do any harm. 'In healthy individuals, up to 40-60g of cheese per day is generally considered safe and likely beneficial for bone health without excess saturated fat or caloric intake,' Ruani says. 'But it's important to ensure we stay within the limit of saturated fat from all sources combined.'
Dr Feeney agrees that eating slightly more than the recommended amount is unlikely to be harmful. 'The saturated fat in cheese doesn't seem to have the detrimental effects of saturated fats from other sources,' she says. 'Bearing in mind that cheese is energy dense, someone who is concerned about their weight might like to eat less but from a heart health perspective, more than 30g is not a problem.'
Here we look at the different types of cheeses and their average nutritional profile (nutritional values are based on a 30g serving unless otherwise indicated):
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Students fast tracked for autism diagnosis while children wait years
University students will be fast-tracked for autism diagnosis while children continue to wait years, The Telegraph can reveal. Students will be taken out of the regular local services amid surging referrals for young people, according to a trial at University College London starting in the upcoming academic year. Those still on the current waiting lists will still have to wait several years while students use the dedicated service. The NHS is providing £80,000 in funding to UCL, which is setting up a first-of-its-kind autism clinic to focus solely on students. The university-specific NHS clinic will investigate if the approach improves wait list times for both the general population as well as students during the course of the project from October 2025 until November 2026. Officials have said university students pose a 'specific challenge to the dynamics of adult waiting lists' because students can spend longer waiting for an appointment than the length of a degree. This serves to inflate waiting times for the general public in the neighbouring area as well as failing the student, officials say. There has been a 15-fold increase in the number of 18-24 year-olds seeking an appointment for an autism diagnosis since 2019, official data show. Demand for specialist clinics has soared since the Covid-19 pandemic as a result of increased awareness of autism symptoms, often driven by social media. The huge waiting lists mean people often wait several years to be seen by a clinician and get a diagnosis. This overburdening of autism services is forcing individuals with profound autism who require 24/7 care, including non verbal people, to suffer serious delays to their treatment with lifelong ramifications. In the contract between the NHS England and UCL, officials wrote: 'Removing student populations from local specialist autism teams could positively impact the waiting list.' A recent report found that almost a third of self-harm and suicide cases among university students involve neurodiverse individuals, including those with ADHD and autism Autism waiting lists have ballooned in recent years for all ages but most noticeably in under-25s. Telegraph analysis reveals that there were more than a quarter of a million people awaiting an appointment for a diagnosis in March 2025, the most recent available data, up from 17,400 in April 2019. Almost 75,000 children under 10 are on the waiting list, up more than 12-fold in six years from less than 6,000. There are almost 91,000 people between 10 and 25 currently awaiting a referral, up 12-fold from 7,700 pre-pandemic. In contrast, there are just 735 over-65s on the waiting list. However, this is up more than 11-fold itself from just 65 in 2019. An NHS England spokesman told The Telegraph: 'Backed by NHS funding, University College London is trialling a first-of-its-kind dedicated autism clinic and assessment referral pathway for university students. 'The aim is to test whether separating students from the mainstream waiting list leads to faster diagnosis and better support during the often-challenging transition to higher education. 'The project will also identify ways to improve how autistic and neurodivergent students are supported during university, as well as looking for ways to improve NHS services for autistic people more generally.' The system will only be open to UCL students as part of the pilot programme. A UCL spokesman said: 'The project has a number of aims including to pilot and evaluate a referral pathway for UCL students, so that if they suspect they are autistic, they can get a timely assessment at UCL. 'Given current waiting lists in NHS adult services, some people needing autism assessment at university cannot get their assessment until after they graduate.' Other goals of the project are to improve support that can be offered to autistic students and also improve training to clinicians. The UCL spokesman added: 'It is intended that this research will generate a range of new ideas for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of autism services, that can be adopted in settings across the country, such as NHS autism assessment clinics and general mental health services. 'This has the potential to contribute to improvements in the quality of services and waiting times nationally.' 'Diagnosis can be lifesaving' Mel Merritt, the head of policy and campaigns at the National Autistic Society, said: 'This trial is an opportunity to provide faster diagnosis and better support for autistic university students. 'An autism diagnosis is often life changing and can be lifesaving. University is an important transitional time for many young autistic people and it's important they receive a timely diagnosis so they can get the right support. 'Nine in 10 people wait longer than the recommended 13 weeks and the average wait time is more than 14 months, with many waiting years. 'Without a diagnosis, avoidable crises can develop and, while it shouldn't be the case, often support isn't provided until someone has a diagnosis. At school, this means children and young people miss out on years of their education. 'The Government must provide urgent funding for diagnosis services across the country to end this worsening crisis, and make sure autistic people and their families get the support they need.'


Spectator
14 hours ago
- Spectator
I've finally come round to honey
Honey enjoys almost superpower status. It is credited with healing viral infections, cuts, hay fever and insomnia, to name but a few of honey-curing maladies. On a regular basis, a particular honey is discovered that bodybuilders swear by, or religious leaders have considered akin to holiness. I had never been keen, considering it an overly sweet inconvenience of a food: however fancy the spoon used to dispense it, it somehow always ends up on my hands (and my hair) before it reaches the yoghurt. I have tended to stick with a very good quality dark brown sugar when in need of something to take the bitter edge off English strawberries. I long dismissed gushing reviews from friends about honey-infused booze, having once had a terrible experience as a result of picking up what I thought was an extremely good Tennessee whiskey and finding it tasted sweet as hell. I did try drizzling it on ice cream – but all it did was congeal into a hard lump. Then I read an article about the stuff, in which I was horrified to learn that 70 per cent of the shop-bought honey in the UK contains added sugar. At first, I felt vindicated, since this would account for the too-sweet aspect I didn't like – but, curious, I bought some natural, organic, raw honey. I wanted to taste the real thing. Yes, I have been to Greece where there was one of those honeycomb sections at the hotel breakfast, with a proper wooden spoon for swirling, and delicious thick creamy yoghurt to accompany it – but by then I had already told myself I didn't really like it, sticking with a dollop of strawberry jam instead. What a fool I have been. It all began with a very pricey small jar from a good delicatessen – one where they don't rip you off to the point you need a mortgage. I had brought a wedge of Parmesan home from Bologna, and I knew that honey and cheese go together. This particular honey was gently scented with black truffle, so clearly intended for savoury food, and when drizzled on top of a slice of the cheese and eaten with nothing but some ripe pear, it was a revelation. I was hooked. How fickle I am. Next stop, the organic type – expensive, but night and day compared with the supermarket stuff. I became intrigued: what about cooking with it? I added the tiniest drizzle to a dressing for a raw Asian-type salad made with bean sprouts, carrots, sugar snap peas, green beans, shallots, and topped with some crispy duck. Shaken up with some red chilli, fresh ginger and garlic, lemon juice, soy sauce, and half sesame, half peanut oil, it is a total joy. The cheap stuff tastes just like syrup – which is fine if syrup is what you want. But who wants syrup when you can have small-batch, raw, natural honey, unpasteurised, straight from hive to table and infused with orange blossom, a faint whiff of pine or thyme? I've now tried a cocktail with a drop of honey blended with dry gin and plenty of lemon juice, garnished with unwaxed lemon zest. Not only does it taste great – it also solves the problem of those crunchy bits of undissolved brown sugar at the bottom of the glass. Since converting, I have become somewhat ridiculous: there are currently six different honeys in my cupboard. I do have a limit, though, and am aware of the existence of both honey aficionados and unscrupulous operators seeking to make a massive profit by ripping you off. The wildly expensive manuka honey that Nigella may well courier over from New Zealand is not for me. Nor do I plan on beekeeping to make my own. One of the cheesecloth-clad regulars at the farmers' market sells the stuff he harvests from his own garden – and his arms look as if he's wound up more than one of his bees.

Leader Live
6 days ago
- Leader Live
Talking therapy for depression and anxiety ‘less effective for young adults'
Younger people may find it 'harder to navigate services set up for adults' – with attendance to therapy sessions hampered by stressful life events in the late teens and early 20s, experts suggest. Researchers warned there is an 'urgent need' to ensure the best possible mental healthcare for people aged 16-25 amid rising rates of mental health conditions. NHS talking therapy for conditions like anxiety and depression can include cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), counselling, and guided self-help using workbooks or online courses. To explore ways in which services could be tailored to younger people, experts from University College London (UCL) analysed data from 1.5 million people who had attended NHS talking therapies in England between 2015 and 2019, including more than 309,758 people aged between 16 and 24. Using self-reported scores from questionnaires taken before and after treatment, researchers found younger adults were 25% less likely to meet the threshold for reliable recovery after having talking therapy. They were also 17% less likely to meet criteria for reliable improvement when compared to those aged 25-65. Professor Argyris Stringaris, of UCL psychiatry, suggested people aged 16-24 may find it harder to regularly attend therapy sessions. He said: 'Young people may find it harder to navigate services which have been set up for adults, and are more likely to miss sessions or stop attending altogether. 'Additionally, the late teens and early 20s are a point of transition for many people, which can involve plenty of stressful life events and changes that may make it more difficult to consistently attend. 'Working together with young people should help optimise the content of treatment and the ways in which it is delivered. 'Finally, young people may suffer from depression and anxiety problems that may differ somehow in their causes from those affecting adults; early onset depression could have different causes and may require different approaches to treatment. This is an area that requires a lot of new basic and clinical research.' Researchers said the findings, published in Lancet Psychiatry, suggest future studies should consider tailoring mental health services to young people. Dr Rob Saunders, of UCL psychology and language sciences, said: 'Talking therapy is an effective treatment for depression and anxiety disorders, and particularly tends to be preferred to pharmacological treatment by younger adults. 'Our analysis shows that talking therapies offered by the NHS are effective for younger adults, but as they are more effective for working-age adults, we believe there is work to be done to improve services for young adults. 'Rates of depression and anxiety in young adults are rising, so there is an urgent need to ensure we are offering them the best possible mental health care.' The latest Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, published in June, found more than a quarter of people aged 16-24 reported having so-called 'common mental health conditions', which include generalised anxiety disorder, depressive episodes, phobias, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and panic disorder. The figure was up from 17.5% in 2007. An NHS spokesperson said: 'This study finds talking therapy is still helpful for young people and so we would urge them to come forward for care with our world-leading talking therapies service which provides evidence-based mental health support to more than a million people a year, with nine in 10 patients receiving support within six weeks.' Olly Parker, head of external affairs and research at the charity YoungMinds, said: 'Growing up today is incredibly tough. 'Many young people are experiencing multiple pressures which impact their mental health, including poverty, inequality, intense academic pressure, and the online world. It's no wonder so many are struggling. 'We know many young people face long waits for mental health support and become more unwell while waiting, which can lead to needing more urgent care. We need to take an evidence-led approach to getting support right, ensuring young people are involved in choosing the treatments that work best for them. 'These findings must serve as another wake-up call to Government that urgent action is needed to reverse the decline in young people's mental health. This looks like a cross-government response that asks why so many young people are struggling, with radical solutions to address these root causes of poor mental health.'