logo
There can be a happy ending to the skorts vs shorts row

There can be a happy ending to the skorts vs shorts row

RTÉ News​12-05-2025

So, the countdown is now on. On Thursday week, 22 May, in Croke Park, with a throw-in time of 7.30pm, the Camogie Association will hold its Special Congress where the biggest crisis it has faced in its long and proud history may be put to bed.... or will it?
The skorts controversy has garnered so much attention that if they sold tickets on Ticketmaster to this Congress, it would have the potential to be a sellout.
A vote will be held on the introduction of a rule to allow players the option to wear skorts or shorts. If passed, it will go into effect almost immediately.
Never before has the camogie world found itself in newspaper headlines, radio bulletins and the Six One and Nine News on RTÉ One for such an extended period of time, and for all the wrong reasons.
In terms of PR, it has not been a good week at all for the Camogie Association. This was not helped by a total absence of leaders from the camogie world being out in the papers or any broadcast media for a number of days.
But for camogie leaders not to comment initially was perhaps unadvisable given this crisis was growing rather than dying.
To put out the fire, it is sometimes genuinely better to say something, so you are seen to be doing something, that way you control the message, rather than say nothing at all.
Consequently, the empty space was easily filled by others. The lesson to be learned here for the association is straightforward - communication is a key factor in any crisis.
spoke to RTÉ's This Week programme with Justin McCarthy.
Mr Molloy is a volunteer and clearly was trying his very best to find a solution within the parameters of the rules laid down in the association. I was actually delighted to hear him during what was a very fair but robust conversation. Finally, the people had heard directly from the Camogie Association after a week of drama. And Brian did well after a tough week to try and explain events.
He told the programme that his personal preference was to afford the players the option of wearing shorts. However, he said he was not in a position to unilaterally alter the existing rules.
Mr Molloy reminded listeners that rules are set by the Camogie Association members in congress and not by the president, with his role ensuring that the decisions taken in congress are honoured.
But where were others within the association itself? From my perspective, it seemed to be all left to Mr Molloy. I'm sure it was a very difficult week for him, trying to solve problems and bring people internally along with him in the best interests of the association.
The Camogie Association suggested two proposals during the week to the players.
The first proposal was to bring forward a Motion to next year's Congress, which would be supported by the Ard Chomhairle, the national governing body of the Camogie Association, to allow the choice to wear skorts or shorts, but that got short shrift. The players were not waiting for a year to pass.
The second proposal was to hold the Special Congress on 22 May, which was welcomed. However, this didn't dilute the Cork and Waterford players' resolve, and they said they were going to continue their protest by refusing to wear skorts for the Munster final, scheduled for last Saturday in the Ragg, near Thurles.
The players stood steadfastly together through it all, which would lead me to believe that there could be other potential issues at play, which may or may not appear down the road.
It was now a stalemate. Derogation was another option in the ether, but according to what I was told, that could not happen as it was not covered by the rule book.
So essentially, that meant it was not possible to relax the rule regarding what the players wore, not even under special circumstances.
However, the Dublin Camogie Board, who I think have shown real leadership in all of this, informed their referees in the middle of this crisis that they didn't want games cancelled or postponed over the issue and that it was all about getting the players playing the games.
So, their solution was simple - let the players play in their shorts and have the referees take note of what teams wore skorts or shorts and include it in their report back to the board. Games went ahead as planned – a pragmatic response I would suggest.
Yet that would not be allowed for the Munster final or for any other games between now and 22 May because it is not mentioned in the rule book.
I understand that fully – rules are rules – but when one section of your association sees sense, then why not make it universal until the Special Congress? It's not too much to ask I would say.
Once the Cork and Waterford players announced on Thursday that they were sticking to their guns and were going to wear their shorts for the Munster final, the spotlight reverted to the Camogie Association, and, primarily, the Munster Camogie Association branch.
Would they allow the match to go ahead, following Dublin's internal pathway by just getting referees to note the offending parties for wearing shorts? Or would they defer the game until after the Special Congress?
If it was the latter, then this decision should have been made on Thursday night or Friday morning at the latest to allow everybody involved - players, mentors, officials and families - to plan for the weekend.
Instead, the decision to postpone the game arrived at around 8.30pm on Friday night, about 16 hours before the game was due to be played in the Ragg. This was totally unacceptable to everyone and now people are rightly incensed.
The drama continued all day Saturday with all media outlets covering the late decision and the negative reactions from the players, former players and politicians. If there was a lesson on how not to do it, then this was it.
So where are we now? Thanks to being assigned to commentate on the wonderful and historic Leinster football final between Louth and Meath on RTÉ Radio 1, Sunday was the first day in over a week where I wasn't reporting on the skorts versus shorts controversy. That's a long time for any story to keep giving.
The focus might be off now this week, but the spotlight will fall again on the Camogie Association in ten days' time when they meet in Croke Park.
In all my conversations with people last week, not one person said to me they wanted to get rid of skorts. Not at all. They just want a choice.
The delegates have the choice to vote on one motion…to give their players the choice of wearing skorts or shorts.
There can be a happy ending here but if the motion is defeated and doesn't get the two-thirds majority needed to change the existing rule, I feel I will be back reporting on the skorts versus shorts issue for considerable time, as the players are focused and determined to achieve what they set out to do.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How did we get here?: Iran's nuclear programme and Israel's attempts to destroy it
How did we get here?: Iran's nuclear programme and Israel's attempts to destroy it

The Journal

time2 days ago

  • The Journal

How did we get here?: Iran's nuclear programme and Israel's attempts to destroy it

WESTERN GOVERNMENTS, PARTICULARLY the United States, have long suspected Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons that could act as a counter to the widely suspected but undeclared nuclear arsenal of its arch foe, Israel. After it launched a massive attack on Tehran this morning, Israel said it had targeted nuclear sites with the aim of preventing Iran from developing such weapons. Iran has a nuclear energy programme, but has not been shown to have nuclear weapons. The US has been in negotiations with Iran in recent months over how much uranium can be enriched. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60%, though still short of the 90% needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran insists it is its right to enrich uranium under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Yesterday, the board of governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) censured Iran for the first time in 20 years over its refusal to work with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones. 'In recent months, accumulated intelligence information has provided evidence that the Iranian regime is approaching the point of no return,' The Israeli military said in a statement this morning. 'The convergence of the Iranian regime's efforts to produce thousands of kilogrammes of enriched uranium, alongside decentralised and fortified enrichment compounds in underground facilities, enables the Iranian regime to enrich uranium to military-grade levels, enabling the regime to obtain a nuclear weapon within a short period of time,' it added. While the US and its allies have for years attempted to reach an agreement with Iran to prevent its developing nuclear weapons, Israel has forcefully opposed any such compromise. Bitter rivals and broken promises Iran and Israel are two major powers in the Middle East and despite having once had friendly relations – when Iran was a monarchy – the two are now each other's greatest rivals. Israeli leaders cast Iran as their country's greatest adversary and an existential threat to their allies in the West. The US has also sabotaged Iranian nuclear facilities in the past. For decades, Iran's leaders have openly called for the destruction of what they call the 'Little Satan' (Israel), as opposed to the 'Great Satan' (the United States of America), who they see as occupying powers in the Middle East who need to be expelled. Advertisement Israel has assassinated nuclear physicists, generals and Iranian allies over the last four decades or so. 'When we fight Iran, we're fighting the most radical and murderous enemy of the United States of America,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a speech to the US Congress in July 2024. 'We're not only protecting ourselves. We're protecting you… Our enemies are your enemy, our fight is your fight, and our victory will be your victory.' Israel has been vociferous in encouraging its allies in Europe and North America to sanction Iran, stoking fears among Western political leaders of what the country could do with access to nuclear weapons. Those concerns led US President Barack Obama, alongside the heads of a number of other countries, to sign an agreement with the Iranian government in 2015, which put limitations on the production of material that could be used to make atomic weapons in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. Israel opposed the deal and Obama's successor Donald Trump reneged on it during his first term in 2018, meaning the sanctions returned. Iran has held five rounds of talks with the United States in search of an agreement to replace the deal Trump tore up in 2018. 'If the issue is nuclear weapons, yes, we too consider this type of weapon unacceptable,' Foreign Minister Abbas, Iran's lead negotiator in the talks, said in a televised speech on 31 May of this year. 'We agree with them on this issue.' Trump has not ruled out military action but said he wants space to make a deal first, and has also said that Israel, and not the United States, would take the lead in any such strikes. Shadow war Over the last few decades, Israel and Iran have traded tit-for-tat attacks in what has been described as a shadow war. The two sides had resisted resorting to outright hostility between their armed forces until an Israeli airstrike killed senior Iranian military figures in an embassy in the Syrian capital of Damascus in April 2024, which prompted Iran to launch hundreds of drones and missiles at Israel, most of which were shot down with Western support. In July 2024, Israel then assassinated Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas, while he was visiting Tehran, stirring more fears of a full-scale war between the two regional powers that could involve the US, the UK, France and other Western states. Those fears were exacerbated once again when Israel killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah – a close ally of Iran – in September last year. Iran launched almost 200 rockets at Israel in return and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised Tehran would pay. Today's attacks were described by Iran as 'a declaration of war'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

US senator manhandled, handcuffed at Trump official's press conference
US senator manhandled, handcuffed at Trump official's press conference

RTÉ News​

time3 days ago

  • RTÉ News​

US senator manhandled, handcuffed at Trump official's press conference

A US senator from California was forcibly removed after interrupting a press conference being held by the US homeland security chief Kristi Noem. "I'm Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary," he said as two men pushed and shoved him from the room where Ms Noem was speaking about controversial immigration arrests that have rocked Los Angeles. Footage of the incident showed security agents forcing the senator to the floor and handcuffing him. Mr Padilla, one of two Democratic senators representing California in the upper chamber of Congress, can be heard trying to ask Ms Noem about the targeting of immigrants. Response to the incident was rapid. California Governor Gavin Newsom said Mr Padilla "is one of the most decent people I know". "This is outrageous, dictatorial and shameful. Trump and his shock troops are out of control. This must end now," he wrote on social media. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the episode "absolutely abhorrent and outrageous". "He is a sitting United States senator. This administration's violent attacks on our city must end." Ms Noem's press conference came after almost a week of protests in Los Angeles sparked by an immigration crackdown ordered by US President Donald Trump. The mostly peaceful protests have been marred by eye-catching violence including the torching of cars and rocks thrown at police officers. The White House responded with overwhelming force, sending 4,700 troops to the city, despite objections from local officials and the police, who said they had the manpower and ability to handle the demonstrations.

Fulbright programme board quit amid Trump interference
Fulbright programme board quit amid Trump interference

RTÉ News​

time4 days ago

  • RTÉ News​

Fulbright programme board quit amid Trump interference

The board overseeing the Fulbright programme, the prestigious exchanges between US and foreign scholars, have quit after accusing US President Donald Trump's administration of political interference. Members of the board, nominated by successive presidents, voiced alarm about "injecting politics and ideological mandates" into a long non-partisan programme. "The current administration has usurped the authority of the board and denied Fulbright awards to a substantial number of individuals who were selected for the 2025-2026 academic year," the board members said, in a resignation statement posted online. "The administration is also currently subjecting an additional 1,200 foreign Fulbright recipients to an unauthorized review process and could reject more," it said. "We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute." War on universities The Trump administration has waged war on US universities, which Vice President JD Vance described before taking office as "the enemy" due to their influence and the often left-leaning views in academia. Mr Trump has cut off billions of dollars in federal research funds for leading universities, over their purported lacklustre response to anti-Semitism during protests against Israel's offensive in Gaza. The Trump administration has also aggressively revoked visas for students, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio using an obscure law that allows him to remove foreigners deemed to go against US foreign policy interests. Mr Rubio recently suspended processing of visas for foreign students - who are a major source of revenue for US universities - so the State Department can ramp up screening of applicants' social media postings. Named after late senator J. William Fulbright, the scholarship founded in 1946 was seen as a major source of US soft power by bringing leading scholars to US universities and sending Americans overseas. The programme awards more than 8,000 grants each year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store