China Unveils Game-Changing First Drone ‘Mothership'
Observers, however, have noted key vulnerabilities and said the behemoth, teased at China's flagship air show in November, amounts to "propaganda."
Newsweek contacted the Pentagon for comment by email.
The People's Liberation Army continues its rapid buildup, with an eye to supplanting the U.S. as the leading military power in the Asia-Pacific. Its warship count now exceeds the U.S. Navy's, and it possesses growing anti-access/area-denial capabilities, such as its vast missile fleet.
China has also been investing heavily in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and swarm technologies in a bid to achieve air superiority in a wartime scenario-for instance, an invasion of Beijing-claimed Taiwan.
Built by the state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China, the Jiu Tian drone has a wingspan of 82 feet and runs on a turbofan engine, China Central Television said in a Saturday broadcast.
It has a maximum range of 4,350 miles and a 15-kilometer (9.3 miles) ceiling, and it can exceed 435 miles per hour.
What sets the aircraft apart is its ability to launch smaller drones mid-flight from both sides of its fuselage.
With a maximum payload of six tons, it can carry up to 100 small UAVs, including loitering drones-shown in a computer-animated promotional video pouring out of the plane like bees from a hive.
In addition to swarm-launching, the drone can be armed with a mix of air-to-air, anti-ship and air-to-ground missiles, as well as 1,000-kilogram (about 2,200-pound) guided bombs.
The Jiu Tian is also built for modularity. Its payloads can be swapped out in under two hours, depending on the mission-electronic warfare, strike and support, emergency rescue-making it suitable for a range of civilian and military roles.
It can also serve as a communications relay for the smaller drones it launches, allowing remote operators to control them from behind the front lines using a man-in-the-loop system. That could let short-range drones operate well beyond their typical limits.
Still, the drone carrier's size presents a tempting target for modern air defense systems, meaning it would likely need to rely on air suppression support.
Additionally, even at its stated maximum altitude, the drone would be well within the range of several modern air-defense systems, including the U.S.'s THAAD and Patriot PAC-3, Taiwan's Sky Bow III, Japan's Aegis BMD, and South Korea's KM-SAM Block II.
User @MCCCANM, a self-described former U.S. Air Force instructor with 30,000 followers, wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "I'm not a fighter pilot, but this is like trying to sneak into near-peer enemy airspace with a formation of KC-10s [retired tanker and cargo aircraft]. It's not remotely survivable...a gigantic missile magnet. This is just classic propaganda."
The "mothership" will conduct its first test flight at the end of June, CCTV reported.
Related Articles
New Microbe Discovered Aboard Chinese Space StationMap Shows US Command Ship in Pacific Amid China Navy ChallengeFirst Cracks Emerge in US-China Trade TruceFrontline US Aircraft Carrier Near China Prepares for Military Action
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Fury as Writer's Mom Decides To Become an 'Author'—but There's a Twist
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Reddit post has ignited fierce debate online after a user expressed frustration that their mother wrote an entire book using AI—and is now calling herself an "author." The post, made by /u/Royal-Average8115 in the subreddit "Mildly Infuriating," quickly gained traction with more than 7,700 upvotes. According to the poster, it all began when their mom started using ChatGPT to write polished posts for her LinkedIn profile. "At first it was just for her LinkedIn and she posted it there," they wrote. "It got thousands of views, people are commenting and reposting and they're all talking about how insightful the posts are but really the words are not her own not in the slightest, not even the idea is hers." Newsweek has contacted to /u/Royal-Average8115 for comment via Reddit. We could not verify the details of the case. At first, the poster tolerated it, believing someone would eventually call it out. According to the poster, only one person did, and their mother chose to ignore it. Things escalated when she decided to publish an AI-written eBook on Amazon. The poster wrote that their mom justified the decision by saying "everyone uses AI" and insisting that it was perfectly acceptable. "Now she's calling herself an author," the poster added. "You can't be author if AI is the writer!!" What especially rankled the poster was that their mother planned to continue using AI to generate more content for future books, seeking to build a self-sustaining writing business. As a lifelong writer, the poster described the situation as deeply frustrating. They recounted their own creative struggles—such as pacing a room to perfect character dialogue or losing pages of hard-won inspiration—and found it disheartening that their mother could simply prompt a chatbot and claim the title of "author" without putting in the same effort. The situation has sparked a broader discussion about AI's role in publishing and whether using tools such as ChatGPT undermines the integrity of authorship. A stock image of someone typing on a laptop. A stock image of someone typing on a laptop. Antonio_Diaz/iStock / Getty Images Plus Author Chris Mannino weighed in with Newsweek, saying the flood of AI-generated books "saturates and dilutes an already heavily oversaturated market and cheapens the work of those of us who put in hours and years of effort." "That said, I do use AI as a tool in my fundraising job, and I also use AI as a tool for marketing my books. Trying to pretend AI doesn't exist is foolish, but there are definite lines," he said. Maryann Karinch, a co-author of How to Spot a Liar and publisher at Armin Lear Press, also voiced concern. "I see AI as a great help in organizing material and exploring alternate ways of phrasing something—not 'creating.' As long as the material is identified as AI generated, I have no problem with it being available for sale, but my company would never publish it," she told Newsweek. Karinch said she ran submissions through AI and plagiarism detectors. In one case, she returned a section of a manuscript to an author after discovering 74 percent of it was AI-generated. The author admitted that the section had come from an AI tool. Colin Cooper, an AI and education strategist, offered a more nuanced take. Cooper, who works globally with schools and startups and also runs a personalized children's book company, drew a comparison between AI and ghostwriting. He argued that if someone has genuine expertise and uses AI as a productivity enhancer—like a calculator or an editor—they shouldn't be discredited. "The ethical dilemma arises not from the use of AI but from its misuse," Cooper told Newsweek. The real concern, he added, lies with "overnight experts" who pump out AI-generated content on topics they barely understand while posing as authorities. In his view, authorship in the AI era should be defined by "expertise, intent, and transparency—not just keystrokes." Meanwhile, commenters across Reddit were equally outraged. "I see c**p like this all the time on LinkedIn," one user wrote. "People posting these long, clearly AI-written commentaries. What annoys me even more is that the people commenting on them seem like bots too?" Another added: "Jokes aside, I really dislike what AI is doing to art. The same thing is happening with music. There was a case with a moderately popular rock band (~1M monthly listeners on Spotify) that was AI generated." One user shared their own workplace experience, writing: "AI is being used where I work, in accounting, to make some tasks easier by suggesting options." They went on to say they believed AI-generated work should come with clear labeling. "I think there should be an 'AI generated' label on everything that is published that way," the user wrote, adding, "There need to be a lot more regulations." Do you have any viral videos or pictures that you want to share? We want to see the best ones! Send them in to life@ and they could appear on our site.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Texas Data Centers Use 50 Billion Gallons of Water as State Faces Drought
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Two data centers in San Antonio have used 463 million gallons of water in the past two years. The Alamo City facilities, owned by Microsoft and the Army Corps, have drained water from the surrounding area despite difficult drought conditions throughout Texas. Newsweek contacted the San Antonio Water System for more information via email. Why It Matters In 2025, data centers across the state are projected to use 49 billion gallons of water, enough to supply millions of households, primarily for cooling massive banks of servers that power generative AI and cloud computing. As Texas attracts tech giants with business-friendly policies and an independent energy grid, water resources have had to keep pace with both population growth and high-technology infrastructure. The surge in the data centers' water use comes as Texas endures prolonged drought, with about a quarter of the state still experiencing dry conditions despite intermittent heavy rain and flooding. Stock Image: A Texas resident surveys land and water flow near a flow meter station in Quemado, Texas, on February 22, 2023. Stock Image: A Texas resident surveys land and water flow near a flow meter station in Quemado, Texas, on February 22, 2023. Getty Images What To Know In San Antonio, data centers operated by Microsoft and the Army Corps consumed 463 million gallons between 2023 and 2024, even as local residents were restricted to watering lawns once per week under Stage 3 drought rules. The Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC) estimated that Texas data centers would use 49 billion gallons of water in 2025, with consumption projected to soar to 399 billion gallons annually by 2030—representing almost 6.6 percent of the state's total water usage. While midsize data centers typically use 300,000 gallons daily, comparable to consumption by 1,000 households, large-scale facilities such as those recently built or planned in Texas can consume as much as 4.5 million gallons daily. Unlike electricity, where Senate Bill 6 granted the Electric Reliability Council of Texas authority to cut power to data centers and other heavy users during emergencies, no analogous state law exists to regulate their water use. Most data centers rely on evaporative cooling, which consumes large volumes of water and results in significant waste lost to evaporation. What People Are Saying Margaret Cook, a water policy analyst at the Houston Advanced Research Center, told Techie + Gamers: "These centers are showing up in places that are very water-stressed. There's no requirement for them to have conversations with communities about how much water they'll use. "So any of these communities that are allowing data centers in their community are gambling against being able to get new water from future state water plans, from future funding cycles. They're using up the water that was allocated to their population for the future." What Happens Next No state legislation limits water usage by Texas data centers, though lawmakers passed new provisions to suspend their power access during grid stress events. The Texas Water Development Board's next State Water Plan is not scheduled for completion until 2027.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
AAPL: Apple Stock Jumps as China iPhone Sales Drive Blowout Q3
Aug 1 - Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) traded nearly 2% higher in premarket action Friday after posting fiscal third?quarter results that topped Wall Street expectations. Strong iPhone sales in China drove the upside, giving the tech giant a much?needed boost in a market that had been a drag for the past year. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The company reported revenue of $94.04 billion, surpassing the Street's $89.35 billion forecast. iPhone sales reached $44.58 billion, well ahead of estimates at $40.29 billion, while China delivered $15.37 billion in revenue, up 4% from a year earlier. Analysts noted that government stimulus helped lift demand during the period, setting the stage for Apple's upcoming iPhone 17 cycle. Wedbush reiterated its "Outperform" rating and a $270 price target on the stock, calling the iPhone performance in China the star of the show. Mac and Services also posted double?digit growth, contributing to the company's strong top? and bottom?line performance. The better?than?expected results mark an encouraging shift for Apple in its core Asian market, where recent quarters faced headwinds. Investors now look to the next iPhone launch to keep momentum going. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
