Democratic fight over party's future arrives in a Michigan congressional race
Democrats' internal battle to shape the future of the party has arrived in a Detroit-area congressional district, where a liberal group that has clashed with establishment leaders in recent years is making its first foray into the 2026 midterm elections.
Justice Democrats, a political organization with a record of backing younger, more liberal challengers against older, more moderate Democratic incumbents, said on Monday its first primary challenge of the 2026 midterm elections. The group endorsed Michigan state Rep. Donavan McKinney, 32, against incumbent Rep. Shri Thanedar, 70, in a largely Democratic district.
The race encapsulates some of the generational and ideological fault lines running through the party since a disappointing 2024 election largely shut the party out of power and prompted impassioned debate about how to rebuild. Justice Democrats praised McKinney as a climate-focused, working-class candidate who has firsthand experience with challenges such as eviction, compared to Thanadar — who grew up poor in India then built a fortune with chemical and pharmaceutical businesses — who it portrayed as self-promotional.
Thanedar, who is Indian American, has faced serious intraparty opposition before in his district, which has a plurality Black population. He drew a 2024 primary challenge from Detroit City Councilwoman Mary Waters, who is Black, and defeated her by double digits.
In an interview, McKinney, who is Black, emphasized the district is among the poorest in the country and argued his campaign was more about class than race or ideology. 'This is about the working class versus the 1 percent,' he said. 'At the end of the day, I know the struggles of my community. I lived it.'
Justice Democrats has successfully supported some high-profile leftist candidates in U.S. House primaries in recent years, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York). It has helped unseat five Democratic incumbents since it began in 2017. But it has also experienced setbacks: Last cycle, the group was forced to play defense to protect its own incumbents from primary challenges in some of the most expensive House races in the country. In the process, it lost two members of the 'squad' of liberal representatives they had worked to elect, Reps. Jamaal Bowman in New York and Cori Bush in Missouri.
As Democrats grapple with how to respond to President Donald Trump's second term, a growing number of candidates have started primary challenges against incumbents they have accused of not acting swiftly or aggressively enough.
Some Democrats have also expressed frustration with a party leadership that features a number of older elected officials who have served in office for many years. Their anger grew after President Joe Biden's decision to run for reelection before dropping out, and after some Democrats backed a GOP funding bill this year to avert a government shutdown. This year, two Democratic members of Congress in their 70s have died in office, furthering young candidates' urgency to confront aging party leaders.
'The moment is ripe to reshape the makeup of Congress, and voters will only be energized enough to elect a Democratic majority in November if they can vote for Democrats they actually believe in the primaries. Voters are demanding that the Democratic Party be more progressive and usher in a new generation of leaders,' Justice Democrats said in a statement announcing their endorsement.
A quickly expanding cohort of Gen Z and millennial candidates have announced efforts to topple Democratic incumbents, largely in safe blue seats. DNC Vice Chair David Hogg recently said his political organization would back challengers against House Democrats in safe seats, drawing immediate blowback from other members of the party. DNC Chairman Ken Martin on Thursday denounced the move, saying that 'no DNC officer should ever attempt to influence the outcome of a primary election.'
Trump's approval rating is in decline, and some independent voters are starting to sour on Trump and his agenda, offering opportunity for Democrats to make gains. But the party faces its own challenges.
A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll found that Americans trust Trump over congressional Democrats, 37 percent to 30 percent when it comes to dealing with the country's major problems, and see the Democratic Party as somewhat more out of touch 'with the concerns of most people' than either Trump or the GOP. Voters and strategists have called for Democratic elected officials to do more to break through and show that they are doing all they can to fight Trump.
McKinney was elected to the Michigan state House in 2022, representing parts of Wayne and Macomb counties. Before that, he was the political director of Climate Power, a national climate organization, and of a health care union. Alexandra Rojas, executive director of Justice Democrats, said in a statement that McKinney 'represents the future the Democratic Party should be fighting for: working class people taking our power back from multimillionaires to deliver for everyday people.'
Thanedar was elected in 2022, after serving in the state House, and is a member of the New Democrats Coalition and the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
Adam Hollier, a former state senator who campaigned against Thanedar in 2024 but unexpectedly failed to qualify for the ballot, said earlier this month he would challenge Thanedar again.
During the 2024 primary, the head of the Congressional Black Caucus at the time, Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nevada), endorsed Hollier over Thanedar. So did some other members of the caucus. McKinney said he has been 'in communication' with the caucus and expects members to be involved in the primary.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident
California Sen. Alex Padilla is getting plenty of mileage out of his scuffle with the Secret Service and federal authorities in Los Angeles Thursday. Padillas Senate and campaign accounts posted a total of seven outraged videos in the first 24 hours after the altercation. Viral videos of the incident show a Secret Service agent dragging a fuming Padilla out of a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and he identifies himself as a senator only as hes being pushed out the door. The agent then forces Padilla to the ground, while two agents handcuff him. Padilla, however, wasnt arrested. Within the hour, agents released him with no charges. Dozens of Democratic members of Congress then jumped to Padillas defense, denouncing the action while casting the Secret Service and FBI agents involved as an extension of what they labeled as President Trumps totalitarian police state. Sen. Schumer called the Secret Services use of force "cruel and unacceptable." "This was a deliberate attempt to intimidate an elected official whose only offense is standing up for the voiceless," Schumer said. "But its not just about Sen. Padilla, its about every person who dares to speak truth to power." Republicans and conservative commentators countered that it was all a big publicity stunt and noted that a Padilla staffer filmed the tussle and then quickly distributed it to the media in the room. "Sen. Padilla didnt want answers - he wanted airtime," Rep. Byron Donalds said on Fox News Thursday night. "Shoving past security for a viral moment is a stunt, not leadership. If he cared about solutions, hed have asked for a meeting. But like most Democrats, he just wants the spotlight." "Alex Padilla is an embarrassment to California," said Steve Hilton, who is running for governor in California as a Republican. "Hes a complete nonentity. Thats why they didnt recognize him … [he has] zero accomplishments and now this pathetic stunt as his only claim to fame." Yet, one Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, an ardent Trump critic, condemned Padillas treatment as "shocking at every level" and "not the America I know." Secret Service experts argue nothing could be further from the truth - that the agent was simply following normal protocol. Padilla, they said, actually received preferential treatment by not being arrested and jailed for his menacing display. The Secret Service agent warned Padilla, whom agents did not recognize as a senator and who wasnt wearing his Senate pin, to back away from Noem and then forcibly removed him when he ignored their entreaties. "They can represent this however they want, but those agents made the right decision to get him out of the room," Charles Marino, a former Secret Service agent told RealClearPolitics. "He did not have a congressional pin on, he was yelling and closing distance very quickly to make it to the front of the room to confront Noem." "Look, hes not above the law. Anyone taking those actions would been treated far worse - they would have been arrested and been forced to spend some time in jail," Marino said. "Who was escalating the situation? When you look at Padillas action, taken in totality, the agents had no other choice." Instead of dragging him to a cell, federal agents released the senator after the incident. Then Noem met with Padilla for 15 minutes and gave him her cell phone number to discuss matters further. "We probably disagree on 90% of the topics, but we agreed to exchange phone numbers and continue to talk - that is the way it should be in this country," Noem told Fox News Thursday afternoon. The Homeland Security Department issued a statement Thursday defending the federal agents actions, arguing that Padilla chose "disrespectful political theater" over constructive congressional oversight. Padilla, the agency said, "interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem." "Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers repeated commands," the department added. "@Secret Service thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately." Several other Secret Service sources backed up Marinos account. "Any sudden movement towards a protectee that feels threatening, especially when that person has not been identified, the policy is 100% to prevent further escalation or movement toward Noem," said a source in the Secret Service community. "We would have done the same thing for anyone threatening [former DHS Secretary] Mayorkas." Even though the situation escalated very quickly, the agent still followed the basic rules of engagement for law enforcement, the source asserted. Agents and officers first ask a person to move away from the protectee, then they tell them firmly to move away, and if those warnings arent abided, then they can use physical force to move the threatening person away. "Its a pretty common law enforcement way of relaying information and taking action, because emotions can get the best of people, and agents are forced to err on the side of protection," the source added. After the two assassination attempts against Trump, agents are highly attuned to aggressive behavior and working to ensure theyre not involved in any security lapses. "In this day and age, you can see what a split-second hesitate could result in," one former agent remarked. "Could you imagine if the agent didnt respond, and Padilla got on the stage and hit [Noem]?" The agency has been knocked around for months for the egregious security failures in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13 and then nearly two months later during another close call against Trump at his West Palm Beach golf course. And just because its Padilla who was attending a press conference doesnt mean assaults against a Cabinet secretary or president are unlikely to occur. During a December 2008 press conference in Iraq, an Iraqi journalist threw both of his shoes at former President George W. Bush in a pique of outrage. Secret Service agents with their zero-fail mission have to be poised to respond to all types of unexpected threats, which sometimes come with no warning at all. Back in 2005, during Bushs visit to the country of Georgia, a man attempted to assassinate Bush and then-Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili by throwing a hand grenade at both of them. "Listen, we dont always know who you are if youre not wearing your [congressional] pin," the source said. "Youre coming at [Noem] in an aggressive manner, and you didnt heed our warnings to stop. If you get into the buffer zone, we have to take you down. All public officials should know, and I would hope understand, that." Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics' national political correspondent.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for 2024 burglary charge starts Monday
The Brief Minnesota Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for a burglary charge starts Monday morning in Becker County. Mitchell, a DFL lawmaker representing Woodbury, is accused of breaking into her stepmother's home in Detroit Lakes in April of 2024. She said her father had just died, and wanted some of his personal belongings her stepmother wouldn't give her. Mitchell was supposed to go to trial in January, but it got pushed back so she could finish her work with the Minnesota Legislature. BECKER CO., Minn. (FOX 9) - A Minnesota senator accused of breaking into her stepmother's Detroit Lakes home in April 2024 heads to trial on Monday. What we know Nicole Mitchell, a DFL Senator who represents Woodbury, pleaded not guilty to one count of burglary after she was arrested inside her stepmother's Detroit Lakes home back in April 2024. On Feb. 6. 2025, an additional charge for possession of burglary or theft tools was added. Mitchell was originally scheduled for trial in January, but got it pushed back so she could finish out the legislative session. That ended earlier this week in a special session. The trial starts Monday morning at 8:30 a.m. in Becker County, and cameras are being allowed in the courtroom. That means you can see daily clips of the trial on and on FOX 9's YouTube page. Timeline A criminal complaint states Detroit Lakes police responded to a reported burglary at a home around 4:45 a.m. on April 22, 2024. At the scene, police found Mitchell in the home's basement dressed in all black. Officers say they also found a flashlight covered with a black sock on Mitchell. Officers searched for a black backpack that was stuck in a window at the scene and recovered two laptops, a cellphone, a driver's license, Senate identification and miscellaneous Tupperware, according to the complaint. Mitchell reportedly told investigators she was "just trying to get some of my dad's things" and added "clearly, I'm not good at this." The complaint states that Mitchell explained to police that her father had just died, and she wanted sentimental items her stepmother refused to give to her. Mitchell said those include her father's ashes, pictures, clothes and other sentimental items. What they're saying In May of 2024, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and democratic leaders called for Mitchell to resign after she was charged with the burglary. She appeared before the Senate's Ethical Conduct Subcommittee in May of 2024 as members considered whether the lawmaker adhered to the highest standards of ethical conduct required of a state senator. However, she refused to answer questions and invoked her 5th Amendment rights. While Democrats have previously argued to allow for due process before taking action, the Minnesota DFL Chairman Ken Martin released a statement Thursday morning calling for her resignation. "The Minnesota DFL believes that all elected officials should be held accountable, including members of our own party. While Sen. Mitchell is entitled to her day in court, her continued refusal to take responsibility for her actions is beneath her office and has become a distraction for her district and the Legislature. Now that her constituents have had full representation through the end of the legislative session, it is time for her to resign to focus on the personal and legal challenges she faces," said Martin.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest
A new national poll indicates that Americans are divided over President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to the nation's second most populous city. Aiming to extinguish escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids carried out by ICE at his administration's direction, Trump sent in National Guard troops and even mobilized Marines. The unrest and the moves by the president have dominated national headlines for a week. Forty-one percent of adults nationwide questioned in a Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School poll said they support the president's move, with 44% opposed and 15% unsure. The survey was conducted on Tuesday and questioned over 1,000 adults nationwide, including roughly 200 in blue-state California. First On Fox: Immigrant Voters Abandon Democrats On Immigration Issue Support for the president's actions among the California respondents stood at 32%, with 58% opposed. Read On The Fox News App The poll also highlighted an expected massive partisan divide. Click Here For The Latest Fox News Polling Eight-six percent of Republicans surveyed supported the president's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to the streets of LA, with more than three-quarters of Democrats giving a thumbs down on Trump's move. A third of independents approved of the sending of the troops, with nearly half opposed and nearly one in five unsure. Trump took control of California's National Guard without the permission of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the first time in 60 years that a president has federalized National Guard troops without a governor's request. Newsom, leading the resistance to Trump's moves, took legal action to try and reverse the order. Trump Deployment Of Troops To Quell La Rioters Latest Page In President's Political Playbook A federal district court judge this week ruled that Trump's moves were illegal and ordered him to return control of the National Guard troops to Newsom. But a federal appeals court quickly temporarily blocked the lower court judge's ruling. The survey also indicates Americans are divided over whether they support (39%) or oppose (40%) the protests. Just over one in five (21%) were unsure of their support or opposition. Seventy percent of Democrats — but just 39% of independents and only 6% of Republicans — support the aims of the protesters. According to the poll, Americans are also divided over whether the protests have been mostly peaceful (35%) or mostly violent (37%).Original article source: Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest