BBC director pushes for higher licence fee after ‘grinding cuts'
The BBC director general has called for a higher licence fee after taking aim at a decade of 'grinding' cuts.
Tim Davie said he was open to reform of the fee and its enforcement, but made it clear that he wanted more money from the public to enable investment.
He said: 'I do want universal funding and I want proper investment and not begrudging, grinding cuts to the BBC, which you've had in the last 10 years, which have just not helped.'
The call for investment amounts to a demand for a higher licence fee, which makes up two thirds of the BBC's income. The BBC received around £3.7bn from the fee last year, which currently stands at £174.50.
It will rise in line with inflation until the end of the charter period in 2027. However, bosses have warned that previous cuts have left a black hole in the corporation's finances that have forced the BBC to wield the axe on programming and jobs in a scramble to cut £700m in costs.
The public service broadcaster said that its income from the licence fee dropped by 30pc in real terms between 2010 and 2020 after a series of freezes and cuts to the levy.
Mr Davie's comments come as the BBC is locked in discussions with ministers over the future of the licence fee.
The upcoming settlement is viewed as pivotal in deciding the broadcaster's future as it struggles to compete with new US streaming services and faces calls for the licence fee to be scrapped.
The BBC's declining income has been compounded by a fall in viewer numbers as audiences increasingly ditch the broadcaster in favour of rivals such as Netflix and Disney.
The number of UK households paying the licence fee dropped by roughly half a million last year, with younger viewers in particular turning their backs on the broadcaster.
The crisis has fuelled calls for the licence fee to be replaced with a different system such as a subscription service.
Speaking at the Deloitte and Enders Media and Telecoms conference in London, Mr Davie said his major concern was a 'mainstream weaponisation where people don't care' about the BBC.
He said the broadcaster would be wrong to 'assume' that the public cared about its future and had to prove its worth to the country.
He defended the BBC by saying it was not just a vehicle for programming but also 'venture capital for the UK', pointing to its ability to drive investment in cities such as Birmingham and Manchester.
Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, has previously branded the licence fee as 'unenforceable' and ruled out funding the BBC through general taxation.
Speaking in London on Tuesday, Ms Nandy said the Government wanted to 'support a BBC that is empowered to continue to deliver a vital public service, funded in a sustainable way'.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Disney Conservation Fund awards $1M grant to Florida Wildlife Corridor Foundation
The Disney Conservation Fund marked its 30th anniversary by awarding the Florida Wildlife Corridor Foundation a $1 million grant. The announcement was made during the Corridor Connect Summit at Disney's Coronado Springs Resort. The grant helps protect Florida's natural lands, wildlife, and endangered species, such as the Florida panther, black bear, and manatee. 'Nature is essential to our health and happiness, and here in Florida, we are tremendously fortunate to have such a rich diversity of awe-inspiring landscapes to enjoy,' said Yalmaz Siddiqui, Vice President, Environmental Sustainability at The Walt Disney Company. headlin The Florida Wildlife Corridor stretches nearly 18 million acres and connects important natural areas across the state. Disney said the donation will help train conservation teams and expand access to trails and natural areas. Over the past 30 years, the foundation has awarded the Florida Wildlife Corridor more than $132 million for community conservation programs. Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Greif Stock Triumphed on Thursday
The company published its second earnings release of the current fiscal year. This pleased investors largely because of a sizable earnings beat. 10 stocks we like better than Greif › Veteran industrial company Greif (NYSE: GEF) was a standout on the stock exchange Thursday. Investors, captivated by a very convincing earnings beat in the company's freshly reported second quarter of fiscal 2025, pushed the industrial packing specialist's share price up by nearly 16%. In doing so, Greif not only crushed the S&P 500 index's performance on the day (it landed in the red by 0.5%), but also that of many blue chip stocks. Greif published those quarterly results just after market close on Wednesday, divulging that its net sales inched up by 1% on a year-over-year basis to hit nearly $1.39 billion. The dynamic was similar on the bottom line, with GAAP net income bumping 0.5% higher to $54.5 million, or $1.22 per share. Although the consensus analyst estimate for revenue was higher, at $1.42 billion, pundits tracking the stock underestimated profitability. Collectively, they were anticipating Greif would only earn $1.12 per share in net income. In its earnings release, Greif management indicated a steady-as-she-goes approach to its business. It quoted CEO Ole Rosgaard as saying that "The resilience of our results, supported by deliberate portfolio moves and operational discipline, demonstrates that Greif is well-positioned for success and value creation now and in the future." Greif cautiously proffered selected guidance for the entirety of this fiscal year, raising the low end of its projection for non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to $725 million and its adjusted free cash flow to $280 million. Both estimates compare positively to the actual fiscal 2024 results of $694 million and just under $190 million, respectively. Greif isn't the most exciting company on the scene, but at times, it's the unexciting businesses that produce the most dependably pleasing results. This one does what it does well, and what's more it knows how to keep its investors happy with a relatively high-yield dividend. I think it' s a fine stock to own, even after the post-earnings pop. Before you buy stock in Greif, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Greif wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Greif Stock Triumphed on Thursday was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%
The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said Nato allies were 'very close, almost near consensus' to an agreement to significantly raise targets for defence spending to 5% of GDP in the next decade. The Trump administration official indicated he expected the increased target to be agreed at a summit in The Hague later this month – and confirmed that the headline figure was to be split into two parts. 'This alliance, in a matter of weeks, will be committing to 5%: 3.5% in hard military and 1.5% in infrastructure and defence-related activities. That combination constitutes a real commitment,' he said. Hegseth was speaking at a press conference at Nato headquarters in Brussels after the morning session of an all-day meeting of defence ministers from the 32-country transatlantic military alliance. 'I'm very encouraged by what we heard in there,' Hegseth told reporters. 'Countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment to Nato.' Nato's current target level for military spending, agreed at a summit in Cardiff in 2014, is 2% of GDP, but Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that European allies and Canada do not spend enough compared with the US. In an attempt to avoid Trump wrecking the first Nato summit of his second term, the alliance's new secretary general, Mark Rutte, proposed a 3.5% plus 1.5% target, though there is some ambiguity about the target date. Initial reports suggested that Rutte wanted allies to hit the target from 2032, though earlier this week British sources suggested the date could be 2035. Sweden's defence minister said he would like to see the target hit by 2030. Only Poland currently exceeds the 3.5% target for hard military spending at 4.32%, according to Nato figures, while the US defence budget, the largest in the alliance, amounts to 3.4% of GDP, at $967bn (£711bn). The UK spends 2.33% of GDP on its military, but has pledged to increase that to 2.5% by 2027 and to 3% some time in the next parliament. Earlier this week the prime minister, Keir Starmer, declined to set a firm date for the UK achieving 3% as he unveiled a strategic defence review. Related: Why is defence such a hard sell? The same reason Starmer is struggling in the polls | Martin Kettle Rutte will visit London on Monday to meet Starmer before the summit. Downing Street said the prime minister and the secretary general would 'talk about how we ensure all allies step up their defence spending now in order to respond to the threats that we face now'. Germany's defence minister, Boris Pistorius, said Berlin would need up to 60,000 additional troops to meet new Nato targets for weapons and personnel. 'We are stepping up to our responsibility as Europe's largest economy,' the minister said on Thursday. Germany, which currently spends 2.12% of GDP on defence, had been singled out by Trump as a laggard in spending, though until Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Berlin had been reluctant to be a leader in European military spending, partly due to the memories of the militarism of the second world war.
