Pentagon aims to boost US rare earth supply with local firms
The Pentagon signed a multibillion-dollar deal last week to become the largest shareholder in rare earths producer MP Materials and also agreed to several financial backstop measures for the company.
The move - which the defense official said reflected a desire to 'share the risk' inherent in minerals projects - sparked questions across the mining sector about whether other companies could see similar investments from the U.S. military.
The Pentagon has invested almost $540 million into critical minerals projects and 'will continue such efforts in accordance with congressional appropriations and statutory authorities,' the official said.
'Rebuilding the critical minerals and rare earth magnet sectors of the U.S. industrial base won't happen overnight, but (the Pentagon) is taking immediate action to streamline processes and identify opportunities to strengthen critical minerals production,' the official added.
The U.S. government and military recognize that the country no longer can produce or process many critical minerals, but plans to 'take the necessary time and precautions to produce critical minerals and associated products in a safe and responsible fashion,' the official said, adding that approach was unlike China's.
Chinese mining standards are considered to be lower than those in the United States.
The MP deal structure reflects a 'unique approach' by the U.S. government to 'account for the difficulties in establishing and sustaining production of critical rare earth magnets in a market environment in which China controls much of the supply chain,' the official said.
The Pentagon investment in MP was undertaken via a Cold War-era law known as the Defense Production Act, as well as its Office of Strategic Capital, the official said. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
9 minutes ago
- The Star
Urgent need for 'global approach' on AI regulation: UN tech chief
GENEVA: The world urgently needs to find a global approach on regulating artificial intelligence, the United Nations' top tech chief said this week, warning that fragmentation could deepen risks and inequalities. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, head of the UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) agency, told AFP she hoped that AI "can actually benefit humanity". But as concerns mount over the risks posed by the fast-moving technology – including fears of mass job losses, the spread of deepfakes and disinformation, and society's fabric fraying – she insisted that regulation was key. "There's an urgency to try to get... the right framework in place," she said, stressing the need for "a global approach". Her comments came after US President Donald Trump this week unveiled an aggressive, low-regulation strategy aimed at ensuring the United States stays ahead of China on AI. Among more than 90 proposals, Trump's plan calls for sweeping deregulation, with the administration promising to "remove red tape and onerous regulation" that could hinder private sector AI development. Asked if she had concerns about an approach that urges less, not more, regulation of AI technologies, Bogdan-Martin refrained from commenting, saying she was "still trying to digest" the US plan. 'Critical' "I think there are different approaches," she said. "We have the EU approach. We have the Chinese approach. Now we're seeing the US approach. I think what's needed is for those approaches to dialogue," she said. At the same time, she highlighted that "85 percent of countries don't yet have AI policies or strategies". A consistent theme among those strategies that do exist is the focus on innovation, capacity building and infrastructure investments, Bogdan-Martin said. "But where I think the debate still needs to happen at a global level is trying to figure out how much regulation, how little regulation, is needed," she said. Bogdan-Martin, who grew up in New Jersey and has spent most of her more than three-decade career at the ITU, insisted the Geneva-based telecoms agency that sets standards for new technologies was well-placed to help facilitate much-needed dialogue on the issue. "The need for a global approach I think is critical," she said, cautioning that "fragmented approaches will not help serve and reach all". As countries and companies sprint to cement their dominance in the booming sector, there are concerns that precautions could be thrown to the wind – and that those who lose the race or do not have the capacity to participate will be left behind. 'Huge gap' The ITU chief hailed "mind-blowing" advances within artificial intelligence, with the potential to improve everything from education to agriculture to health care – but insisted the benefits must be shared. Without a concerted effort, there is a risk that AI will end up standing for "advancing inequalities", she warned, cautioning against deepening an already dire digital divide worldwide. "We have 2.6 billion people that have no access to the internet, which means they have no access to artificial intelligence", Bogdan-Martin pointed out. "We have to tackle those divides if we're actually going to have something that is beneficial to all of humanity." Bogdan-Martin, the first woman to serve as ITU secretary-general in the organisation's nearly 160-year history, also stressed the need to get more women into the digital space. "We have a huge gap," she said. "We definitely don't have enough women... in artificial intelligence." The 58-year-old mother of four said it was "a big honour" to be the first woman in her position, to be "breaking the glass ceiling (and) paving the path for future generations". But she acknowledged there was a lot of pressure, "not just to achieve, but to almost overachieve". Bogdan-Martin, who is being backed by the Trump administration to stand for re-election when her four-year mandate ends next year, said she was eager to stay on for a second term. "There is a lot to do." – AFP
The Star
9 minutes ago
- The Star
Peace meeting between Thailand and Cambodia begins in Putrajaya
PUTRAJAYA: The much-anticipated peace meeting between leaders of Malaysia, Thailand, and Cambodia officially began at 3.15 p.m. on Monday (July 28) at Kompleks Seri Perdana. The closed-door session is chaired by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai in attendance. These high-level talks aim to resolve the recent border conflict between Thailand and Cambodia. Also present are US Ambassador to Malaysia Edgard D. Kagan and Chinese Ambassador to Malaysia Ouyang Yujing, signifying strong international backing for the mediation. Both Washington and Beijing have urged restraint and encouraged a diplomatic solution to the growing tensions. A live broadcast of a joint press conference is expected later this evening, where the three leaders are likely to announce the outcomes of the meeting. Anwar had earlier said that both Thailand and Cambodia had approached Malaysia to mediate the talks, with an immediate ceasefire being the foremost agenda item. He said the discussion between the two leaders came about after US President Donald Trump urged them to find a solution to the crisis. He also mentioned that a team from Malaysia and possibly some from neighbouring countries are set to monitor the discussion to ensure it is executed well. "So, within our means, we try our best. We are given that confidence and respect, and they are of course our close friends, our neighbours, and we work together,' said Anwar.
The Star
9 minutes ago
- The Star
Indonesian solar panel manufacturers brush off potential US tariffs
JAKARTA: Solar panel manufacturers in Indonesia are not overly concerned that their United States counterparts have filed trade petitions with Washington that might result in new tariffs, provided that Jakarta pushes for greater domestic adoption of solar photovoltaic systems. Beny Sulaiman, business development and commercial director at PT Jembo Energindo, told The Jakarta Post on Wednesday (July 30) that 'the concerns in Indonesia are relatively small' since the domestic market could absorb locally made solar panels, as long as the government supported this. 'Indonesia is a big country with abundant market potential for renewables. On top of that, the government has been very supportive in significantly increasing [the share of] renewables in the [national] energy mix,' said Beny, who is also an executive at the Indonesian Solar Module Manufacturers Association. The trade petitions, which seek to impose antidumping and countervailing duties, were filed earlier this month by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, according to a Bloomberg article. The group includes major US-based manufacturers like First Solar, Mission Solar Energy and Qcells. The plaintiffs allege that Chinese solar panel producers are flooding the US market with unfairly cheap goods made in factories in Indonesia, Laos and India. The petitions' filing has kicked off a process in which the Commerce Department has 20 days to decide whether to investigate the allegation that imports are unfairly priced or subsidised by a foreign government. Separately, the US International Trade Commission is to determine whether the imported solar panels harm domestic competition. If the commerce and trade authorities conclude that the imports are unfair and injurious. Washington might impose new duties on foreign-made solar panels. This process played out previously in April, when the US government imposed import duties of 3,521 per cent on certain solar power equipment from Cambodia, a year after the same industry alliance petitioned for protection of its members' operations. Three other South-East Asian countries, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam, were also imposed US duties of varying rates, depending on the manufacturer and the products' origin. China-based Trina Solar was subject to a 375 per cent tariff for its products manufactured in Thailand, while China's Jinko Solar was slapped with a 41 per cent tariff on its Malaysian-made products. The US imported solar equipment from the four countries totaling almost US$12 billion, the BBC reported in April, citing US Census Bureau figures. The antidumping and countervailing duties have caused a massive shift in the US solar industry supply chain, prompting an immediate decline in shipments from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam in May, with Indonesia and Laos picking up the slack. Indonesia and Laos saw its solar panel exports to the US balloon to 44 per cent in May from a figure of just 1.9 per cent n May 2024, Bloomberg reported. Meanwhile, India's solar panel exports to the US have been on the rise since 2022. Many Chinese firms have moved their operations to South-East Asia in recent years in a bid to avoid US tariffs since President Donald Trump's first term in 2017-2021. Anindya Bakrie, chairman of the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Kadin), and Shinta Kamdani, chairwoman of the Indonesian Employers Association (Apindo), both said they had not yet caught up with the matter when the Post contacted them for comments on Tuesday. Fabby Tumiwa, executive director of the Institute for Essential Services Reform, told the Post on Wednesday that US solar manufacturers had filed the trade petitions because they were unable to compete with imported solar products. 'The production cost of solar modules in the US is higher than in other countries. Compared to Southeast Asia, China or India, they're far more expensive,' he said. According to Fabby, Chinese solar technologies from were 60 per cent cheaper than those produced in the US. Likewise, Indian and South-East Asian solar panels cost only 20-30 per cent more than those made in China. Fabby suggested that US solar manufacturers were 'under heavy pressure', given that they had only recently commenced production and had therefore 'not reached the economies of scale'. Meanwhile they faced short deadlines, according to Fabby, who said manufacturers had to break even in three years as the industry was advancing rapidly, with new and more efficient solar technologies pushing out previous generations in a cycle of three to five years. 'If they cannot break even in three years, they'll certainly be left behind, because the Chinese move very fast,' he said. 'That's why it's in [US manufacturers'] best interest to shave imports, so they can utilise domestic capacity.' The condition of US solar manufacturers has been exacerbated by the 50 per cent import tariffs the Trump administration has imposed on aluminum and steel, two important precursors for solar technology, driving production costs even higher. While the pressure on the US solar industry was understandable, 'it's unfair to blame other countries [where] production costs are lower', said Fabby, adding that Indonesia's solar panel manufacturers had achieved competitiveness fair and square, without any government subsidies. - The Jakarta Post/ANN
