
Sebi extends deadline for optional T+0 settlement for QSBs to Nov 1
on Tuesday extended the timeline for implementation of the optional T+0 rolling settlement cycle for qualified stock brokers (QSBs) to November 1. Earlier, the deadline for operational readiness as mandated under the December 10, 2024 circular was May 1, 2025.
The extension came after Sebi received feedback from QSBs and subsequent consultations with stock exchanges, clearing corporations, depositories and the brokers themselves.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Co-Founder of Google Brain, Andrew Ng, Is Reported To Have Read Every...
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
"In order to ensure smooth implementation, it has been decided to extend the timeline for QSBs for putting in place the necessary systems and processes for enabling seamless participation of investors in optional T+0 settlement cycle, to November 1, 2025," the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) said in a circular.
Sebi's earlier framework said "stock brokers who are designated as QSBs and meet the parameter of minimum number of active clients for qualification as QSB as on December 31, 2024 shall put in place necessary systems and processes for enabling seamless participation of investors in optional T+0 settlement cycle".
Further, new QSBs have three months to adopt these systems after any list updates.
Live Events
While extending the deadline, the regulator clarified that all other provisions of the December 10, 2024 circular will remain unchanged.
Sebi has directed market infrastructure institutions (MIIs) to make necessary amendments to relevant rules and byelaws, implement the new provisions, and disseminate the information widely to market participants and investors.
In December last year, Sebi expanded the optional T+0 (same day) settlement in the equity cash market to the top 500 scrips by market capitalisation.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) introduced an optional T+0 settlement cycle for 25 scrips in March 2024. Initially, it was available only to non-custodian clients.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sebi may raise minimum block deal size, widen permissible price range
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is considering a fresh round of reforms to its block deal framework, with proposals to raise the minimum trade size and widen the permissible price range, according to people familiar with the matter. The markets regulator, according to the sources, is weighing an increase in the minimum block deal size to ₹25 crore, from the current ₹10 crore, in a bid to channel smaller trades towards the regular cash market. The existing threshold was set in 2017, when Sebi last carried out a major overhaul of the framework.' Another significant change under discussion concerns the price band for block deals. At present, trades can be executed within a 1 per cent band on either side of the previous day's closing price. Sebi is understood to be considering a wider band of up to 3 per cent for non-derivative stocks, while retaining the 1 per cent band for futures and options (F&O) scrips to reduce the risk of market manipulation. A separate dispensation is also being examined for SME-listed stocks, the sources said. The proposals were discussed at a recent meeting between the regulator, stock exchanges, and other market participants. Sebi had earlier constituted a working group to review the block deal framework. Emailed queries to the regulator remained unanswered until the time of going to press. Market experts said raising the minimum block deal size is a good step given that a ₹10-crore trade can be comfortably executed through the normal trading window. 'The 1 per cent up/down price range from the previous day's price was quite limiting. It prevented block discounts to market price as well as premiums. Now the 3 per cent range gives a little more flexibility to buyers and sellers to price a block,' said Kaushik Mukherjee, partner at IndusLaw. Mukherjee said retaining the existing band for F&O stocks was 'a mindful move', aimed at preventing manipulation through block deals that could create artificial demand to profit from F&O bets on the same stock or on indices whose volatility depends on the price of that stock. Pranav Haldea, managing director of PRIME Database, said thresholds should be reviewed periodically, 'preferably every five years, so they remain aligned with market growth.' He added that the block deal mechanism had provided comfort to foreign investors by allowing smoother exits. Block deals remain an important avenue for large institutional trades. In 2025 so far, block deal transactions have aggregated around ₹1.32 trillion, with the highest monthly activity in June at ₹77,000 crore. Volumes in August have so far stood at around ₹4,300 crore. Vivek Boray, partner at King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates and Attorneys, cautioned that while the proposed framework could aid transparency and price discovery, it might reduce options for mid-sized investors. 'The discussions reflect Sebi's broader push to deepen liquidity in Indian markets,' he said. Currently, exchanges operate two 15-minute block deal windows on all trading days -- from 8.45 am to 9.00 am, and from 2.05pm to 2.20pm. Orders in these windows must be placed within 1 per cent of the previous day's closing price. The key advantage is that sellers are able to place shares directly with their preferred buyers.

Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
NCLT seeks Vedanta reply after petroleum ministry flags co's demerger plan
Mumbai: The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Wednesday asked Vedanta Ltd to respond within four weeks after the Union ministry of petroleum and natural gas objected to its upcoming demerger, potentially delaying the process and injecting uncertainties into the company's plan first announced two years ago. The case, heard by a bench of justices Mohan Prasad Tiwari and Charanjeet Singh Gulati, is next listed for hearing on 17 September. The development could push back the timeline for Vedanta's demerger. The company had first announced its plan to demerge into six separately-listed entities in September 2023. It had aimed to complete the demerger by March 2025. However, last December, it estimated that the demerger would be delayed to September 2025 due to pending regulatory approvals—particularly from the NCLT. A spokesperson for Vedanta confirmed that the petroleum ministry had filed a representation before the NCLT. 'Further, Sebi (Securities and Exchange Board of India) in its affidavit has confirmed that it has no further comments on the merits of the (demerger) scheme and that the tribunal may proceed to adjudicate the matter. Also, Vedanta has already received NOC (no-objection certificate) from the stock exchanges on the modified scheme,' the spokesperson said. Mint independently could not ascertain the details of the petroleum ministry's objections. However, market regulator Sebi's assent to the demerger stands, said a person aware of the matter. Shares of Vedanta Ltd settled 1% lower at ₹ 445.45 apiece on the BSE on Wednesday. On 13 August, Sebi had issued an administrative warning to Vedanta, as per regulatory disclosures made by the company. The market regulator said that the company changed or modified its demerger plan after getting a no-objection certificate from the BSE without the written consent of Sebi. The changes pertain to the now-cancelled demerger of its base metals business. Originally, the company planned to demerge into six separately-listed entities. However, in December last year it decided to retain the base metals business in the parent firm and changed the demerger plan to five companies. The five firms will be Vedanta Aluminium, Vedanta Oil & Gas, Vedanta Power, Vedanta Iron and Steel and Vedanta Ltd, which will continue as the parent entity and hold the shares of Hindustan Zinc. Shareholders of Vedanta will receive one share in each of the new companies. 'The above non-compliance has been viewed seriously. Accordingly, the Company is hereby warned and advised to be careful in future to avoid recurrences of such lapses,' Sebi wrote in its letter, a copy of which was uploaded by Vedanta Ltd on the stock exchanges. The letter did not mention what the change or modification to the demerger plan was. The court has asked Sebi to file its affidavit within two weeks. Earlier, Viceroy Research, a US-based short-seller firm had accused Vedanta Group of alleged financial misconduct and misrepresentation, making empty promises to shore up share prices, manipulating asset values, raising off-balance sheet loans, and corporate governance issues. The short-seller first published its note on Vedanta on 9 July and has since published 21 notes on the Vedanta group. Viceroy has a short position against the London-based Vedanta Group's holding firm Vedanta Resources' bonds. It claims to have no exposure to the group's two listed firms in India.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is starting a business more rewarding than studying at Harvard? Why one student is considering betting big on India's growth story
A 26-year-old Harvard MBA candidate is thinking of quitting the programme to move to India. Her friend posted on X, calling her 'very sharp, generalist' and saying she wants to 'bet on the India story.' This isn't a whim — she is exploring operator roles in Seed, Series A or Series B startups and inviting founders and VCs to reach out. The post struck a chord. AI and infra B2B leaders rushed to the comments. One wrote, "Great decision. If she is interested in working on the frontlines of the AI/infra B2B market in one of the fastest growing markets at one of the best positioned startups to win this space. It would be great to be introduced." They see real potential. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo Voices urging caution Not everyone agreed with stepping away from Harvard now. "If she's a close friend, tell her not to drop out. Period. The India story is multidecadal; there will still be many many years to bet on it after a year or two." Live Events Another said, "Dropping out is a bad idea! Can do better after 2 years too." Startup ecosystem beyond the buzz So what is she joining? India's startup ecosystem is substantial and growing. As of mid-2025, India hosts around 120 unicorns privately held companies valued over $1 billion, placing it among the top global ecosystems, as per previous news reports. From 2014 to mid-2024, startups in India attracted more than $150 billion in funding. Top hub, Bengaluru, Delhi NCR and Mumbai, garnered nearly 90 per cent of that. India recognised over 159,000 startups by mid-2025. Since 2016, those startups generated 1.7 million direct jobs and nearly half are in tech, as reported by a Business Insider report. In Hyderabad, STPI's network has backed over 1,400 startups through funding and facilities, with 44 per cent led by women. And these startups raised more than ₹574 crore, as per The Times of India . Venture funds are pouring in. Artha India Ventures closed a ₹432 crore fund to back Series B and C firms, as per an earlier report by The Economic Times . Bat VC launched a $100 million fund to support early-stage AI, fintech and enterprise startups across India and the US, according to the Business Insider . She'd be jumping into a rich and expanding ecosystem. India is not just producing unicorns, it is building structures. Thousands of jobs. A surge of funding. More diverse regions now getting attention, not just big cities. The advice she's getting captures it all. One view says don't rush. India's growth isn't one moment in time, there will be chances afterward. The other side sees less waiting, more doing. And both have something real. ( This article is based on a user-generated post on Twitter. has not independently verified the claims made in the post and does not vouch for their accuracy. The views expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views of . Reader discretion is advised.)