logo
Home Economics: Can I evict my tenants for anti-social behaviour under the new rules?

Home Economics: Can I evict my tenants for anti-social behaviour under the new rules?

Under the new tenancy rules being brought in, if my tenants are causing anti-social behaviour and need to be evicted, what are my rights in that situation now?
Answer
Yours is one of very many queries I'm receiving over the new rules applying to both landlords and tenants which the Minister for Housing is in the process of implementing.
That serves only to emphasise how confusing it all is, so hopefully precise and clear information will emanate to all parties sooner rather than later.
The legislation will take effect (we are told) from March 1, 2026, and apply in different ways to 'small' and 'large' landlords.
I will assume for this purpose you are the former – that is, having three or fewer tenancies.
Under the current, and new, arrangements, it is only 'no fault' evictions which are mentioned. That means circumstances where the tenant has done nothing wrong, but the landlord wants to sell up or evict for his own personal reasons, such as a family member needing the property, or because the lease is up.
You remain entitled to end a tenancy if a tenant doesn't meet their obligations, which includes circumstances where, for instance, they don't pay their rent or have caused damage.
Normally you must give a written warning 28 days before the Notice of Termination is issued; however, according to Citizens Information, if the behaviour is seriously anti-social, you do not have to give a warning notice but can issue notice to vacate with seven days' notice.
You are advised to issue a warning letter outlining the unacceptable behaviour and give them a 'reasonable opportunity' to amend it
The legislation defines anti-social behaviour as that which 'constitutes the commission of an offence that is reasonably likely to directly affect the well-being or welfare of others; causes (or could cause) fear, danger, injury, damage or loss to any person living, working or otherwise lawfully in the dwelling concerned or its vicinity, including violence, intimidation, coercion, harassment or obstruction of or threats to any such person'.
If the behaviour falls short of this conduct, but is persistent or has interfered with another tenant or neighbour's right to enjoy peaceful occupation of their property, you are advised to issue a warning letter outlining the unacceptable behaviour and give them a 'reasonable opportunity' to amend it.
Failing to do so means you can then issue notice on them with 28 days' notice that the tenancy is ending.
The Residential Tenancies Board (rtb.ie) has great material and sample letters to download so that the tone and letter of the law are met.
None of that is changing with these new rules.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If long-term renting is such a good solution, why don't more politicians do it?
If long-term renting is such a good solution, why don't more politicians do it?

Irish Times

time01-07-2025

  • Irish Times

If long-term renting is such a good solution, why don't more politicians do it?

The Government has opted to reject suggestions from various quarters, including some of its own , that it should establish a fund to allow Irish savers to finance the development of affordable housing for sale. Instead, it's going to entice international investors to do so. It will just be housing for rent, not sale, and it won't be affordable for most. Oblivious to the contradictory position of luring landlords while simultaneously persisting with the fantasy of being parties that support home ownership, Government policy is engineering a decline in people owning their own homes, and a commensurate rise in numbers renting. Hundreds of thousands of households will become poorer, and a small cohort of landlords will become a lot wealthier . Is this private rental sector into which more and more households are going to be corralled even fit for purpose? One issue is the fact that there is no deposit protection scheme in Ireland, despite the issue of deposits consistently being the second most common reason for disputes between landlords and tenants. These are schemes run in other countries by private companies or state agencies into which tenants pay their deposits, instead of handing them over to their landlord. The scheme then returns the deposit at the end of the tenancy, if all is well in the interim. Complaints of landlords not returning deposits to tenants drop significantly under such schemes. READ MORE There were 474 applications to the Residential Tenancies Board to resolve disputes about deposit retention in the first three months of 2025 alone. There has been a provision in Irish legislation for the establishment of such a scheme for a decade, but the section of the Residential Tenancies (Amendment) Act 2015 has never been commenced. Last February, People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy introduced a Bill to force the Government to establish the scheme. Nothing has happened since. There is also no definition of rent in Irish legislation to say what is included or not included under it. This lack of clarity facilitates large landlords in levying – according to recent media reports – up to an extra €200 per month for the use and upkeep of common areas. Common areas are places that tenants do not occupy exclusively and have no control over. In the US, large landlord Greystar (which is also present here) is facing a a class-action lawsuit after the Federal Trade Commission accused the company of imposing hidden 'junk' fees , which it denies. The FTC's lawsuit states that the fees 'make it impossible to actually rent from Greystar for the advertised prices'. It accuses the commission of over-reach. Such additional charges allows for circumvention of rent caps. Regardless of recent Government bluster about increasing security for tenants during the reform of Rent Pressure Zones, the fact remains that tenants of a 'small landlord' can face eviction for essentially spurious reasons such as the probably unprovable 'personal hardship ' of the landlord, or because a member of the landlord's family might need the property. The Government's strategy is that in order for rents for already financially stressed tenants to fall, rents for financially stressed tenants must first be allowed to rise Most renters in Ireland live a very legally precarious existence, regardless of how good their landlord is. Ireland is an outlier in this regard, compared to many countries with an established rental sector. Rent inflation in Ireland is 39 per cent higher than the European average , and housing costs in general are more than double this average when utility bills are factored in. Those hardest hit by affordability issues also include better-off renters. According to the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), in 2023 'middle-to-higher-income renters in Ireland are more likely to face high housing costs than their European counterparts'. Fourteen per cent of the richest Irish renters pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent, versus 3 per cent on average elsewhere. Sixteen per cent of the next-wealthiest renters pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent compared to 9 per cent on average elsewhere. The Government's strategy is that in order for rents for already financially stressed tenants to fall, rents for financially stressed tenants must first be allowed to rise. High rents will then attract international investment, which will then build apartments for rent, which will then reduce rents across the board. Ignoring for a moment the significant pain that will be inflicted on all tenants while enacting this strategy of building housing that the majority of renters do not want , recent research from Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies found that the benefits of the construction of new apartments for rent does not find its way down to help those who need affordable rents. Given previous rent inflation, it is highly unlikely rents will fall here in any meaningful way, if at all. On the regulatory front, local authorities are charged with inspecting private rented sector accommodation to ensure it is safe and compliant with regulations. They each have a target to inspect 25 per cent of the private rented dwellings in their area. In 2023, just nine out of 31 local authorities hit that target (Meath achieved 45 per cent), and nine failed to meet it. Galway City Council managed to inspect less than 3 per cent of the private rented stock in its area. In 2023, 23 local authorities reported that more than 90 per cent of inspected dwellings were found to be non-compliant with the required standards. There are other concerns: tenancies being misrepresented as less secure licence agreements; landlords wilfully ignoring legal requirements including having to provide their names to tenants; and investigations that take years by an under-resourced RTB. The fact is that whether renting from the Government's white knights – international investors – or the traditional small landlord, there are serious issues with the private rented sector that need to be addressed before the State can legitimately expect people to willingly rent a home instead of owning one. The minuscule proportion of Government politicians who rent (in a country where one in five people in the population generally are in the private rental sector) tells its own story. If more politicians don't choose to rent long-term, why do they believe so many of us should? Dr Lorcan Sirr is senior lecturer in housing at the Technological University Dublin

ICMSA calls for €1,000 student fee reduction to be retained
ICMSA calls for €1,000 student fee reduction to be retained

Agriland

time01-07-2025

  • Agriland

ICMSA calls for €1,000 student fee reduction to be retained

The Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers' Association (ICMSA) has called for a reduction of €1,000 in the student contribution fee to be retained in Budget 2026. The student contribution fee has been charged at a reduced rate for the last number of years and was originally announced in Budget 2023 as part a response to the escalating cost of living. The €1,000 reduction has been continued at each subsequent budget. However, according to the Citizens Information website, the maximum rate of the student contribution fee for the coming academic year (2025-2026) will be €3,000, the rate it stood at before the reduction was introduced. Minister for Further and Higher Education James Lawless has also indicated in media interviews in recent days that the fee reduction will not continue in Budget 2026. Responding to this, the ICSMA has expressed 'serious concerns' about the impact on farm families and students. Pat O'Brien, the chairperson of the ICMSA Farm Businesses Committee, said: 'The government suggested before the last election that further education would become more affordable. 'Many families voted for this government with that in mind. 'How have the tables turned so completely? Now we're facing even higher costs to send our kids to college,' O'Brien said. The ICMSA said that the €1,000 fee reduction was introduced as part of Budget 2023 to 'alleviate the cost-of-living' crisis. However, the farm organisation cited the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising 7.4% from the time of that announcement to May of this year. According to O'Brien, removing the fee reduction now 'would place additional strain on families already grappling with soaring expenses'. 'Reducing student contribution fees is actually written into the Programme for Government. There's a clear contradiction here if you ask me. Rent for student accommodation is astronomical,' he said. O'Brien added: 'Families can easily spend upwards of €8,000 a year on college accommodation alone. 'If you're sending more than one child to college, the financial pressure is immense and everyone should have the opportunity to attend further education.' The ICMSA is calling on the government to ensure that the €1,000 student fee reduction is part of the next budget, and to consider increasing the reduction.

Home Economics: Can I evict my tenants for anti-social behaviour under the new rules?
Home Economics: Can I evict my tenants for anti-social behaviour under the new rules?

Irish Independent

time27-06-2025

  • Irish Independent

Home Economics: Can I evict my tenants for anti-social behaviour under the new rules?

Under the new tenancy rules being brought in, if my tenants are causing anti-social behaviour and need to be evicted, what are my rights in that situation now? Answer Yours is one of very many queries I'm receiving over the new rules applying to both landlords and tenants which the Minister for Housing is in the process of implementing. That serves only to emphasise how confusing it all is, so hopefully precise and clear information will emanate to all parties sooner rather than later. The legislation will take effect (we are told) from March 1, 2026, and apply in different ways to 'small' and 'large' landlords. I will assume for this purpose you are the former – that is, having three or fewer tenancies. Under the current, and new, arrangements, it is only 'no fault' evictions which are mentioned. That means circumstances where the tenant has done nothing wrong, but the landlord wants to sell up or evict for his own personal reasons, such as a family member needing the property, or because the lease is up. You remain entitled to end a tenancy if a tenant doesn't meet their obligations, which includes circumstances where, for instance, they don't pay their rent or have caused damage. Normally you must give a written warning 28 days before the Notice of Termination is issued; however, according to Citizens Information, if the behaviour is seriously anti-social, you do not have to give a warning notice but can issue notice to vacate with seven days' notice. You are advised to issue a warning letter outlining the unacceptable behaviour and give them a 'reasonable opportunity' to amend it The legislation defines anti-social behaviour as that which 'constitutes the commission of an offence that is reasonably likely to directly affect the well-being or welfare of others; causes (or could cause) fear, danger, injury, damage or loss to any person living, working or otherwise lawfully in the dwelling concerned or its vicinity, including violence, intimidation, coercion, harassment or obstruction of or threats to any such person'. If the behaviour falls short of this conduct, but is persistent or has interfered with another tenant or neighbour's right to enjoy peaceful occupation of their property, you are advised to issue a warning letter outlining the unacceptable behaviour and give them a 'reasonable opportunity' to amend it. Failing to do so means you can then issue notice on them with 28 days' notice that the tenancy is ending. The Residential Tenancies Board ( has great material and sample letters to download so that the tone and letter of the law are met. None of that is changing with these new rules.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store