Musk says xAI to take legal action against Apple over App Store rankings
'Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation. xAI will take immediate legal action,' Musk said in a post on his social media platform X.
Musk did not provide evidence to support his claim. Apple, OpenAI and xAI did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
ChatGPT currently holds the top spot in the App Store's 'Top Free Apps' section for iPhones in the US, while xAI's Grok ranks fifth and Google's Gemini chatbot sits at 57th.
ChatGPT also leads the rankings on the Google Play Store, according to Sensor Tower data.
Apple has a partnership with OpenAI that integrates ChatGPT into iPhones, iPads and Macs.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Hey @Apple App Store, why do you refuse to put either X or Grok in your 'Must Have' section when X is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps? Are you playing politics?,' Musk said in an earlier post on Monday.
Musk's comments come as regulators and rivals intensify scrutiny of Apple's control over its App Store.
In April, a US judge ruled that Apple violated a court order requiring it to allow greater competition in its App Store and referred the company to federal prosecutors for a criminal contempt investigation, in a case brought by 'Fortnite' maker Epic Games.
Apple was handed a 500 million euro (S$755 million) fine by the EU antitrust enforcer in April, saying its technical and commercial restrictions prevented app developers from steering users to cheaper deals outside the App Store in breach of the Digital Markets Act. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia News Network
5 hours ago
- Asia News Network
AI ‘waifus' pose grave emotional risks
August 8, 2025 BEIJING – Our everyday life is being increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence, and the line between reality and fantasy is becoming ever blurrier. Recently, Grok, a free AI assistant designed by xAI to 'maximize truth and objectivity', introduced a 'waifu' character — a virtual anime-style character designed to gain user affection, potentially at the expense of real-life relationships. This raises deep concerns: Is technological innovation now outpacing ethical regulation? Are we witnessing Big Tech racing to the bottom? While this feature may seem harmless entertainment or, more cynically, Grok's marketing strategy to compete with OpenAI's new AI Agents, which can plan and organize your trip to attend a wedding party, it raises bigger questions about AI companies' emotional manipulation, their impact on social well-being, and the future of human relationships. Leshner et al. (2025) have studied how people form intimate connections with fictional characters, particularly within the anime fandom where 'waifus' (idealized female characters) and 'husbandos' (idealized male characters) are prominent. Their study revealed that men tend to form sexual connections, often driven by physical appearance, while women are more likely to form emotional connections, shaped by personality traits and perceived similarity. These findings suggest that the psychological mechanisms underpinning human-human relationships, such as attraction, emotional bonding and even love, can extend to fictional entities. The study underscores the human capacity to form meaningful connections, even when the 'partner' exists only on a screen or in a narrative. But what happens when these connections are no longer one-sided? When AI characters like Grok's 'waifu' are designed to actively engage, flatter and adapt to users' desires, the line between para-social relationships (one-sided emotional bonds with fictional characters) and real-life intimacy becomes dangerously ambiguous. As Leshner et al. highlight, these connections can be deeply meaningful and, in some cases, rival or displace real-life relationships. While the idea of a personalized AI companion is evocative — recalling films like Her — the ethical implications of such technologies are serious. By exploiting well-documented psychological tendencies, such as men's preference for physical attractiveness or women's desire for emotional connection, AI systems risk fostering unhealthy emotional dependencies. AI 'waifus' are not just characters on a screen; they are tools explicitly designed by leading AI companies to engage, manipulate and blur the lines between authentic human connection and commercial profit. The stakes are particularly high for educators and parents. Such systems have the potential to distort young people's understanding of relationships, intimacy and consent. As Leshner et al. observe, para-social relationships, while often harmless, can teach individuals about intimacy. Yet when such relationships are shaped by profit-driven AI systems, they risk promoting distorted and idealized models of human interaction, potentially undermining relational skills and emotional development. As AI technology evolves, it becomes imperative to critically examine their implications. If AI developers cannot be persuaded by civil society to adopt an ethical approach, regulation must step in. But what can we, as linguists, educators and parents, do in the meantime? One immediate step is to foster critical AI awareness among our students and communities. Open conversations about the distinctions between real and fictional relationships, as well as the psychological impact of para-social bonds, are essential. Educators can incorporate discussions of AI's ethical implications into their curriculums, helping young people critically evaluate their interactions with these systems. At the same time, we must raise our collective voices to question AI companies: Are we steering AI innovation in a direction that enhances humanity, or are we creating tools that erode the very fabric of human connection? The answers will depend on the values we choose to uphold and the vigilance we maintain against this rapidly advancing field. As Leshner et al. show, humans have an extraordinary capacity to form meaningful connections, even with fictional characters. But with this capacity comes a profound responsibility: ensuring that these connections enrich our lives rather than replacing them. As Yuval Noah Harari, author of Sapiens, aptly observes, 'If the only intimacy we can form is with a non-human AI, then we have no intimacy at all.' Let's take up this call with urgency. Will the corporate empire of AI listen to civil society? Chances are it won't, given the imperative to optimize profit at all (human) costs. Will governments step up regulation? The US government recently passed a bill forbidding states from regulating AI. We're witnessing corporate and national interests combined to take precedence over human interests. By raising critical AI awareness, we can perhaps, at least, work toward, even if in a small way, a future where AI technology serves humanity's best interests, rather than compromising them.
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump says semiconductor tariffs coming soon, could reach 300%
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump said he would set levies on semiconductors in the coming two weeks. US President Donald Trump said he would set levies on semiconductors in the coming two weeks, the latest indication he is readying a substantial expansion of his tariff regime. 'I'll be setting tariffs next week and the week after, on steel and on, I would, say chips – chips and semiconductors, we'll be setting sometime next week, week after,' Mr Trump told reporters on Aug 15 aboard Air Force One en route to Alaska for a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. It w as not clear if Mr Trump misspoke about steel tariffs. He already hiked duties on steel and a luminium imports to 50 per cent in June. The president has repeatedly promised that levies on chips and pharmaceuticals are coming within weeks, but no formal announcements have yet been made. Both sectors have been under Commerce Department investigation since April, a prerequisite for Mr Trump to impose tariffs on national security grounds. That process can prove complicated and probes can take months or longer to resolve. Manufacturers and artificial intelligence firms have been eager for more clarity about his plans for semiconductor rates, since chips are included in a wide range of modern consumer products. Last week, Mr Trump said during an event with Apple c hief executive officer Tim Cook that he planned a 100 per cent tariff on semiconductors, while exempting products from companies that are moving manufacturing to the US. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Ong Beng Seng fined $30k in case linked to ex-minister Iswaran after judge cites judicial mercy Singapore Why was Ong Beng Seng fined instead of jailed? Key points from the case Asia Sun Haiyan, ex-China ambassador to S'pore, detained for questioning: Sources Singapore Love that saves lives: Seniors in Singapore overcome challenges to donate organs Singapore Over 600 orchids on display at Gardens by the Bay to mark 60 years of Singapore-Malaysia ties Singapore Father of 4 among S'poreans arrested in CNB raids; drugs worth over $128k seized The White House has not offered a subsequent explanation for how that exemption would work, but Mr Trump implied that Apple – which has pledged a US$600 billion (S$769 billion) domestic manufacturing initiative – could be exempt. On A ug 15, Mr Trump suggested the charge on imported semiconductors could be even higher. 'I'm going to have a rate that is going to be 200 per cent, 300 per cent?' Mr Trump said. The US president indicated that he could speak about tariffs with Mr Putin, and said he believed the Russian leader planned to bring business leaders to the summit. 'I noticed he's bringing a lot of business people from Russia, and that's good I like that because they want to do business,' Mr Trump said. 'But they're not doing business until we get the war settled.' Mr Trump in recent weeks has threatened to impose higher tariff rates on purchasers of Russian energy, including a pledge to impose a 50 per cent levy on goods from India. He has also suggested he could ratchet up economic costs on Moscow if the meeting does not go well. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
9 hours ago
- Business Times
Taiwan lifts 2025 growth forecast, defying US tariff worries
[TAIPEI] Taiwan raised its estimate for growth in 2025, easing some concern over the impact of US duties on an economy that has roared on tech exports. Gross domestic product is set to expand 4.45 per cent this year, the statistics bureau in Taipei said in a statement on Friday (Aug 15) – its first estimate since the Trump administration hit the archipelago's shipments with 20 per cent tariffs. The new figure is up from the 3.1 per cent predicted in May. In a sign the government is confident demand for Taiwan's products will persist, the bureau predicted exports will rise 24.04 per cent this year, up from the previous call of 8.99 per cent. Taiwan's economy has done well because its tech exports have been in great demand during the AI boom and companies front-loaded purchases before tariffs landed. The government in Taipei has said the 20 per cent tariff level is temporary and that it will continue negotiating with the US to get a better deal. In its first forecast for next year, the statistics bureau said GDP is seen expanding by 2.81 per cent. The prediction for 2025 consumer price index was trimmed to 1.76 per cent, from 1.88 per cent. The tariff blow could ultimately be smaller than feared for Taiwan. President Donald Trump has also said he planned to impose a 100 per cent levy on semiconductor imports but that firms investing in the US would be exempt. A Taiwanese official said earlier that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing– the self-ruled archipelago's largest company and a key supplier of advanced chips to Nvidia and Apple – shouldn't be subject to those duties because it has plants in the US. BLOOMBERG
