Hong Kong pension funds plan to cut Treasuries if US loses last AAA rating
Managers of the city's HK$1.3 trillion Mandatory Provident Fund system can only invest more than 10 per cent of their funds in Treasuries if the US has a top credit rating. PHOTO: REUTERS
HONG KONG – Hong Kong's pension fund managers have formed a preliminary plan to sell down their Treasury holdings within as soon as three months if the United States loses its last recognized top credit rating, according to people familiar with the matter.
Industry groups including the Hong Kong Investment Funds Association and the Hong Kong Trustees' Association discussed the proposal with the pensions regulator on June 11, the people said, asking not to be identified as the meeting was private.
Under local regulations, managers of the city's HK$1.3 trillion (S$213 billion) Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) system can only invest more than 10 per cent of their funds in Treasuries if the US has a AAA or equivalent rating from an approved agency.
The downgrade of US sovereign debt by Moody's Ratings in May left Japan's Rating & Investment Information as the only remaining approved firm with the highest score. While R&I has said it isn't considering cutting its US rating, the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority in May urged pension fund managers to draw up 'contingency plans' in case of a downgrade.
London Stock Exchange Group's FTSE Russell, which runs the MPF World Government Bond Index, a key benchmark that pension fund managers widely use for exposure to Treasuries, formulated an analysis of the divestment plan at the request of the industry groups earlier this month, according to the people.
Ka Shi Lau, chair of Hong Kong Trustees' Association, said a deck of materials on the potential impacts and analysis was given to the regulator. Mr Lau also confirmed the June 11 meeting.
Representatives from the MPF Schemes Authority and FTSE Russell declined to comment. The Hong Kong Investment Funds Association didn't respond to a request for comment.
The situation highlights the risks of the US falling foul of the unusually strict investment mandates governed by Hong Kong regulations. The bulk of global investors don't require the top-tier rating to invest freely in US Treasuries, minimizing the risk of forced sales.
While any potential forced sales in Hong Kong are unlikely to materially rock the global market for US Treasuries given its size and liquidity, it's a headache for portfolio managers who must contemplate an overhaul of their investment strategies. For funds focusing exclusively on government debt, options are limited given the lack of large issuers comparable to the US.
Concerns about demand for long-end Treasuries have caused the yield on 30-year bonds to spike to some of the highest levels since 2023. An auction on June 12 will be closely watched for clues about investor appetite at a time when the Trump administration's tax-and-spending bill is expected to swell the nation's debt.
Pension fund managers proposed to be given three to six months to rebalance positions in the event of a downgrade, the people said. Allocations would shift to other sovereign bonds of issuers with AAA ratings, and those with large market values, the people added. Germany and Singapore, which are in the FTSE index, are rated AAA by major agencies.
Pension fund managers had earlier asked the authority to reconsider the rule. But the regulator pushed back with its request for trustees to develop contingency plans and make 'timely and orderly' adjustments to their asset allocations in response to possible market developments.
The MPF, introduced in 2000, has more than 4 million contributing members, with various financial institutions managing funds under the system. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
Hong Kong-listed ESR gets shareholders' nod for privatisation
[HONG KONG] Shareholders of ESR Group on Friday (Jun 13) approved the scheme resolution proposed by a consortium of investors to acquire and privatise the real estate fund manager. The company is expected to delist from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKSE) on Jul 3, said ESR in a statement. At the scheme meeting held on Friday, over 99.97 per cent of the votes cast by disinterested shareholders in person or by proxy gave their nod of approval. All resolutions related to the scheme were also approved at the extraordinary general meeting. Shareholders will receive the scheme consideration of HK$13 a share in cash – 55.7 per cent higher than the closing price of HK$8.35 a share on Apr 24, ESR's last trading day before the submission of its non-binding privatisation proposal. Overall, the proposed offer is valued at HK$55.2 billion (S$9.5 billion) on an equity basis, making it the largest privatisation from the HKSE since 2021. ESR had received a non-binding and conditional privatisatsion proposal in April last year. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up A consortium of investors led by Starwood Capital Group, Sixth Street Partners and SSW Partners then made an offer to take the real estate fund manager private last December. The consortium includes private equity fund Warburg Pincus, sovereign wealth fund Qatar Investment Authority and ESR co-founders Stuart Gibson, Charles de Portes and Jeffrey Shen. In a statement then, the consortium highlighted that the company needed to transition to an asset-light platform, re-focus on new economy sectors, simplify its current portfolio, realise cost synergies and optimise its balance sheet. But these may come with short-term earnings fluctuations and are therefore best executed in a private setting. 'The (proposed privatisation), if successful, would transform the company's shareholder register to include highly experienced world-class investors, whose long-term capital will support (the company's) strategic transformation and growth, while maintaining a prudent and effective governance structure that protects minority shareholders.' Stuart Gibson and Jeffrey Shen, co-founders and co-chief executive officers of ESR, added in the Friday statement that the soon-to-be private company would be better positioned to focus on its long-term strategic transformation and value creation for all stakeholders. ESR, which sponsors four real estate investment trusts in Singapore, has over US$150 billion in assets under management. It focuses on real estate assets such as warehouses and data centres in markets including Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore and South Korea.
Business Times
13 hours ago
- Business Times
Pop Mart's 200% stock rally spurs rush to hike price targets
WALL Street analysts are rushing to raise price targets on Pop Mart International Group following the success of its Labubu dolls. At least five brokerages, including Deutsche Bank AG and Morgan Stanley, have lifted projections on the Hong Kong-listed stock this week. Citigroup hiked its price target by 90 per cent to a street high of HK$308 apiece, citing the growing influence of the company's intellectual properties globally. Pop Mart shares rose as much as 3.5 per cent on Friday, putting them on track for a fresh record close. The growing popularity of Pop Mart's toothy monster dolls is boosting sales prospects for the firm. THE MONSTERS blind-box series, with Labubu at its center, generated more than 3 billion yuan in sales for Pop Mart last year, accounting for almost one-fourth of the company's revenue. Pop Mart is trading above the 12-month average analyst price target tracked by Bloomberg and the rally has pushed shares to overbought territory. While valuations at 45 times forward earnings have topped that for peers like Sanrio and Walt Disney, some analysts are optimistic that shares can continue to rise after tripling so far this year. The stock is the best performer on the MSCI China Index this year after making it among the biggest gainers on the gauge in 2024. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
15 hours ago
- Business Times
Jetstar Asia's demise shows that Singapore could do more to attract and keep airlines at Changi
JETSTAR Asia's departure shows that Singapore cannot take its competitiveness as an air hub for granted – and suggests that it can do more to attract and retain airlines. On Wednesday (Jun 11), Jetstar Group announced that its Singapore-based low cost carrier (LCC) Jetstar Asia (JSA) will cease operations this Jul 31. Changi's high airport fees were one reason cited, along with increased supplier costs and regional competition. With the loss of JSA, the only remaining Singapore-based carriers are those of the Singapore Airlines Group: Singapore Airlines, Scoot and Singapore Airlines Cargo. As at the first week of June, JSA operates around 180 weekly services at Changi. This is about 5 per cent of total weekly passenger services, and forms about 3 per cent of passenger traffic, said the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS). While Singapore Airlines Group is ramping up flights to cover JSA's exit, Changi may also need to reassess its strategy. JSA's withdrawal brings the spotlight back to the fact that while Singapore is a leading regional air hub, it is also expensive compared to its rivals. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Star struck Started in 2004, JSA is owned by Singapore-based holding company Westbrook Investment (51 per cent) and Australia's Qantas group (49 per cent). Temasek previously held as much as 33.5 per cent, but divested in 2009. JSA is expected to post a loss of S$35 million in underlying earnings before interest and taxes in the financial year ending Jun 30. Jetstar did not specify how airport fees affected its bottom line, but aviation industry observers told The Business Times that these were likely an important reason for the closure. To use airports, airlines pay passenger fees – added to ticket prices – as well as landing, parking and aerobridge (LPA) charges. Such fees go towards the operation, maintenance and expansion of airport infrastructure. Singapore's airport passenger fees are higher than many of its regional rivals, and set to keep rising. CAAS and airport operator Changi Airport Group (CAG) announced fee hikes for both passengers and airlines over the next five years. Currently, a passenger departing Changi pays S$65.20. This will rise to S$79.20 in 2030. This is several times what a passenger pays in nearby rivals: 700 baht (S$27.64) in Bangkok, 25,000 won (S$23.58) in Seoul, and up to 70 ringgit (S$22) in Kuala Lumpur. Regionally, Hong Kong's fees are closest to Singapore's, at HK$355 (S$57.98). Last year, JSA chief executive officer John Simeone told the media that Singapore was becoming a 'very expensive' location to operate from, whether in terms of airport, operating or ground service charges. In response to media queries, CAG said that airport fees are applied equally to all carriers and constitute a small component of airlines' total operating cost. But industry observers noted that higher passenger fees hit LCCs harder than full-service or legacy carriers. As LCCs have lower ticket prices, airport fees represent a large share of the total. LCCs may also incur higher fees due to their point-to-point service model of flying directly between destinations. This means passengers pay airport departure fees rather than the transit fees of S$12 in Changi. Passengers on legacy carriers may pay the lower transit fee, due to these airlines' hub-and-spoke approach of flying into a major hub and having passengers take onward connecting flights. Higher supplier costs may also contribute to making Changi pricier than its rivals. Qantas group CEO Vanessa Hudson said that JSA has seen some 'supplier costs increase by up to 200 per cent'. These include suppliers that provide supporting services to aircraft, such catering and baggage handling. In Singapore, these suppliers face rising wage pressures, compliance cost and renewed investment in facilities and sustainability infrastructure, said Awad Khireldin, assistant professor of the aviation management degree programme at the Singapore Institute of Technology. To cope with their own costs, suppliers have been charging airlines more. Generating lift CAG said it has been working with airlines, including JSA, to enhance productivity and cost-efficiency. But wider efforts to draw airlines here may be needed. Singapore has ambitious plans to scale Changi's operations further, with Terminal 5 in the mid-2030s. Changi's passenger air traffic reached an all-time high of 68.4 million for the year ended March 2025, with its maximum capacity being around 90 million now. T5 will expand capacity to around 140 million. Yet, growth may be difficult if LCCs avoid the Republic because of high costs. While Apac is predicted to lead global aviation's growth in the coming years, airlines have thin margins. The International Air Transport Association projects that Asia-Pacific airlines' net profit margin per passenger will be just 1.9 per cent, or US$2.60, in 2025. Airlines may not choose Singapore if the cost base is not controlled, and instead head to where they can preserve profits. Granted, CAAS is taking steps to ease the fee hike, such as a 50 per cent LPA fee rebate to airlines from April to September. But perhaps it could go beyond short-term relief, and instead give long-term incentives to airlines that base themselves or increase the scale of their operations in Singapore. Asked if airlines receive benefits to base themselves here, CAAS director for air transport Sidney Koh replied only that Singapore-based airlines enjoy air traffic rights in Singapore's Air Services Agreements with other countries, which can be used to operate flights to those countries. Here, the aviation sector could apply lessons from the maritime industry. Under existing schemes, maritime and shipping companies receive tax breaks and harbour fee rebates, among other things, if they establish operations and register ships here. Changi could explore similar measures and scale them by the size of airline operations. After all, while passenger fees are needed to fund infrastructure improvements, it is counterproductive if they themselves limit passenger numbers. To be fair, fees were only one factor in JSA's descent. Other crucial factors were a lack of scale and the inability or unwillingness to quickly expand due to aircraft shortages. But as competition grows, airlines will be eager for any edge they can get – such as receiving benefits to operate in one of the most strategic, well-run air hubs in the region.
