A mirror of the present, say Opposition leaders as India marks 50 years since Emergency
New Delhi: As India observes 50 years since the declaration of the Emergency, key Opposition leaders from the Congress, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), and Shiv Sena (UBT) on Wednesday launched a scathing attack on the ruling BJP, alleging that the authoritarianism of the present government mirrors that in 1975.
RJD MP Manoj Jha called June 25, 1975 a 'dark chapter' in India's democratic journey, but cautioned against reducing it to a historical footnote. 'This day should be a mirror, not a memory,' Jha told IANS.
'I've written today itself, if Ramnath Goenka were alive, he'd ask media houses not to turn this into a symbolic day. We must ask – what is the current situation? People are jailed for speaking up. Criticism of one individual is seen as criticism of the country.'
Jha argued that authoritarianism now thrives under the guise of democracy.
'There's barely any difference between the dictatorship of that era and what we are witnessing today. Whenever you criticise someone else's past, hold up a mirror to your present,' he added.
Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Ayodhya Poul Patil said that while the Emergency of 1975 was declared officially, the present day reflects an 'undeclared Emergency' in action.
'Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had at least declared it. Today, over the past 11 years, we've seen a silent, creeping Emergency. People are picked up arbitrarily, central agencies like the CBI, ED are unleashed without reason, and even small financial transfers of Rs 10 or Rs 100 are under scrutiny. This is no less than an undeclared Emergency," she told IANS.
Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar criticised the BJP for 'celebrating' the day while allegedly trampling the very Constitution they claim to uphold.
Speaking to IANS, Wadettiwar said, 'The way BJP is observing this day, not as a day of reflection, but as a moment to divert attention from how they are killing the Constitution meant for future generations. They are the same people who never participated in the freedom struggle, who sided with the British, and who opposed Babasaheb Ambedkar while framing the Constitution.'
He added that the BJP's ideological ancestors attempted to bring in the Manusmriti instead of the Constitution, and sought to deny voting rights to women and the poor.
'Those who never believed in the Constitution, who talk of changing it openly, and who undermine it daily, are today speaking of protecting it. How ironic is that?' he told.
The Emergency, imposed on the night of June 25, 1975, came just days after the Allahabad High Court invalidated Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's 1971 Lok Sabha election, prompting massive protests led by Jayaprakash Narayan.
The next morning, senior Opposition leaders including Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Lal Krishna Advani, Morarji Desai, Charan Singh, and Devi Lal were arrested under the draconian Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA).
In a sweeping crackdown, not just Opposition figures but even internal critics from within the Congress, like Chandra Shekhar and Krishan Kant, were jailed. Civil liberties were suspended, Press freedom was crushed, and thousands of ordinary citizens were imprisoned, their lives thrown into turmoil.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
24 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Bombay High Court dismisses petition alleging discrepancies in Maharashtra Assembly elections
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition demanding that the results of last year's Maharashtra Assembly elections be set aside due to alleged discrepancies in the polling process. A bench of Justice GS Kulkarni and Arif Doctor refused to entertain the writ petition filed by a man named Chetan Chandrakant Ahire. The court said that the petition deserved to be dismissed with costs, but it refrained from doing so. The petitioner claimed that about 76 lakh votes, or 6.8% of the total votes, were polled after the official closing time of 6 pm. He contended that these votes were illegal as the Election Commission had no data about them. Ahire, in his petition filed through advocate Prakash Ambedkar, alleged discrepancies between the number of votes polled and the number of votes counted in over 90 constituencies. He claimed that returning officers neglected Election Commission norms by not reporting these alleged discrepancies. The petitioner sought an order setting aside the results across all 288 Assembly constituencies in the state due to alleged violations in the polling process. He also sought the details of the voting tokens after 6 pm, a constituency-wise breakdown of votes cast outside official hours and the revocation of election certificates for successful candidates. The bench, however, did not accept these contentions. It said that it was 'quite astonished' about how the petition was filed based merely on an opinion piece and a newspaper report, which it said contained unsubstantiated claims. 'Except such limited material, there is no other material whatsoever, much less of any authenticity, to the effect that there was any malpractice, fraud or complaint of any nature in regard to the voting at the closing hours of the poll i.e. at about 6 pm..' it said. The court also said that the hearing of the matter took a whole day, due to which urgent cases had to be left aside. The bench said that the petition was unsustainable on several grounds. It noted that the petitioner had not approached the Election Commission making his 'demand for justice' before invoking its writ jurisdiction, which made the petition not maintainable, it said. 'This apart, we wonder as to how the petitioner can have a locus standi to seek such wide, sweeping and drastic reliefs to question the entire elections of the State Legislative Assembly,' it said. 'It is a relief, too far fetched, that too on the basis of no cause of action as the facts clearly demonstrate.' The court also noted that the petition was barred under Article 329(b) of the Constitution. This provision bars courts from interfering with election proceedings and states that challenges to elections can only be undertaken through an election petition presented to the appropriate authority. 'These provisions constitute a code by itself and cannot be by-passed in questioning the solemnity of the elections as conducted by the ECI [Election Commission] within the constitutional setup,' the court said. The bench said that the petition was based on suspicion and rejected it. The dismissal came two days after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi alleged that ' vote theft ' had taken place in the Maharashtra Assembly elections in November. Gandhi demanded the immediate release of machine-readable digital voter rolls and CCTV footage of the election. The Bharatiya Janata Party-led Mahayuti alliance had defeated the Maha Vikas Aghadi, which includes the Congress, in the Assembly polls.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Himachal: Emergency was murder of Constitution, says Jai Ram, Cong hits back
Calling the imposition of emergency, the 'dark chapter of democracy', leader of Opposition Jai Ram Thakur on Wednesday said, 'It was the murder of the Constitution. Such a step was never taken by any democratic government in the world in the past. This is due to one person, her ambitions and becoming bigger than the Constitution of the country,' terming the emergency day as a 'black day'. Himachal leader of Opposition Jai Ram Thakur (File) 'Emergency was the product of the Congressmen's evil mentality. The country's then Prime Minister, late Indira Gandhi, mistook the Constitution of India as the Constitution of Indira,' said former chief minister. Thakur said, 'Unfortunately, even today the Congress does not accept its wrongdoings. That is why when the Sukhu government came to power, it brought the first Bill in the legislative assembly to stop the 'Loktantra Prahari Samman' amount started by our government.' 'Slogans like 'Indira is India and India is Indira' reflected that mentality of Congress,' former state president and MP Suresh Kashyap said, while speaking at a programme in Baddi. Kashyap said that the declaration of Emergency in 1975 was not the result of any national crisis, but it was a strategy of a scared Prime Minister to save power, which was imposed due to the challenge posed by the judiciary. 'Indira Gandhi misused Article 352 under the pretext of 'internal disturbance', while at that time there was no war, no rebellion and no external attack, it was just the stubbornness to neutralise the decision of Allahabad high court to cancel Indira's electoral membership and save her chair,' said Kashyap. Indira Gandhi used the hammer of emergency: Bindal BJP state president Rajiv Bindal said, '50 years ago, emergency was imposed in India. It was a dark chapter in the history of Independence.' 'Prime Minister of the country, Indira Gandhi, to save her throne, bypassed the decision of the HC and imposed emergency in the country and transformed the whole country into a dictatorship. After 50 years, the whole country should know about that horrific decision,' said Bindal. Sukhu lashes out at BJP Himachal chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu lashed out at the BJP for observing Emergency Day as a 'black day', saying the BJP was tarnishing the very Constitution that gave it power. 'Congress established democracy and framed the Constitution. Today, BJP is observing 'Murder of Democracy Day' by defaming that very Constitution. It is this Constitution that brought them to power, and now they are disrespecting it,' said Sukhu, taking a direct dig at the BJP's campaign.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Swamiji to sardarji: When PM Modi disguised himself to evade arrest during Emergency
NEW DELHI: Covert activities, innovative tactics and code words for secret meetings like 'Chandan ka Karyakram' - the unconventional methods used by a young RSS pracharak, and now PM, during Emergency had left many surprised, even authorities. 'The Emergency Diaries - Years that Forged a Leader', published by BlueKraft, chronicles Modi's role after speaking to several people associated with him at that time. Evading detection as a member of the banned RSS during Emergency, Modi travelled in disguises - in one instance as a "swamiji" to visit a jail to speak to incarcerated activists. He was there for nearly an hour, according to the book, released at an event to mark 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas' by home minister Amit Shah. In the book, RSS volunteer Hasmukh Patel talked about Modi's keen mind for innovative outreaches, noting that he suggested placing anti-Emergency literature in barber shops where people from different walks of life gathered, and with religious leaders as followers came to listen to them. "He not only ensured regular publication of anti-Emergency literature, but also took on the perilous responsibility of distributing it throughout Gujarat. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo His 'sardarji' disguise was so convincing even his close acquaintances failed to recognise him," the book said. Long-time RSS volunteer Nagar Bhai Chavda said Sangh members often organised meetings and called them 'Chandan ka Karyakram'. Modi introduced them to these terms, he said, adding that the young pracharak carefully selected houses where they met. For example, during Emergency, Modi would only stay in houses with two or more exits.
