Millions of Brits could get £1,000s in compensation from six lawsuits – from Mastercard fees to loans, can you claim?
RECLAIM YOUR CASH Millions of Brits could get £1,000s in compensation from six lawsuits – from Mastercard fees to loans, can you claim?
MILLIONS of Brits could get thousands of pounds in compensation after being overcharged on their loans or bills.
Several major collective lawsuits have been launched in the past year and consumers may be able to cash in.
1
You could be in line for compensation from one of these class action lawsuits
These legal cases are called class action lawsuits and help to chase compensation for millions of consumers that have been let down by companies.
In these cases one person usually takes a company to court on behalf of all consumers.
The cases have become popular in the UK after changes introduced in the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
The act allowed a new 'opt-out' collective action system in the UK, which lets groups of consumers pursue claims against companies for breaches of competition law, including fixing prices or restricting supply.
Scott Dixon, who runs The Complaints Resolver, said: 'Many familiar names including easyJet, VW and M&S have been caught up in these class action claims.
'You may only get a few hundred pounds, but it's power in numbers.'
It is worth noting that legal cases can take time to go to trial and pay out customers.
If you are affected by a class action lawsuit then you do not need to do anything to get compensation if the claim is successful.
We have rounded up the cases that are currently ongoing and those that could lead to you getting your money back.
Homeowners hit with 'secret' insurance charges
Some 20,000 people who own flats in the UK are taking legal action against the companies that own their apartment blocks.
Legal letters claim freeholders - the building owners - took commission fees when they arranged the building insurance.
The freeholders were allegedly paid the fees by insurance companies in exchange for buying their products.
These were then added to the cost of the buildings insurance by the freeholders or their agents, and the total amount was then charged to the flat owners in the form of service charges without their knowledge, the leaseholders claim.
The flat owners believe this was secretly added to the service charges they paid.
Collective claims for compensation
Lawsuits that result in compensation for many people are often referred to as "class actions".
In England and Wales a Group Litigation Order (GLO) is often used for this kind of lawsuit.
Collective Proceedings Orders (CPOs) are also used for claims of breaching competition law.
Collective action has been made easier under the UK's Consumer Rights Act 2015.
It means the courts can treat similar claims as one, rather than having hundreds or even thousands of separate individual claims.
There are a number of stages to bringing this kind of lawsuit, including the courts needing to give permission.
Both sides can also appeal decisions at various stages making it a lengthy process with no guarantee of a payout.
Lawyers have urged Brits to join several other collective claims for compensation in recent years.
There is no cost to sign up, but the firm will usually take a cut of any payout if the claim is successful to cover legal costs.
There's no guarantee of a payout and collective claims of this type have not yet been fully tested in court.
Lawyers have suggested that each flat owner could be awarded up to £3,500 in compensation.
They have also suggested that up to 900,000 homeowners who own flats in multi-occupancy blocks could be affected.
Velitor Law, the firm taking the class action lawsuit, has written to four of the UK's largest freeholders - E&J Estates, Consensus Business Group, Long Harbour and Ground Rents Income Funds - to recoup the fees.
It is expected that around two dozen landlords, who control the leaseholds for close to 900,000 homes, may be subject to the Leaseholder Action claim.
The claim seeks to recover a minimum of six years' worth of commissions from landlords.
However, lawyers have applied to suspend the usual period of limitation, which in certain cases could see the claim stretch back as far as 1997.
Liam Spender, the lawyer at Velitor Law, said: 'This first set of landlords are now on notice of this claim and they are now going to have to answer in court.'
The firm said a second tranche of legal letters to landlords will be issued before the end of the year.
The Sun has contacted all four freeholders involved for comment.
They all deny any wrongdoing.
Shoppers overcharged by credit card companies
Millions of shoppers are due to receive £70 each after a tribunal approved a settlement in a lawsuit against Mastercard.
The verdict came after a long-running legal case dating back almost a decade.
The action was brought by Walter Merricks, a former financial ombudsman, who argued that shoppers were charged higher prices after fees were wrongly levied on transactions made between 1992 and 2008.
You do not need to have owned a Mastercard at any point to be eligible for compensation.
Consumers can claim compensation if they lived in England, Wales or Northern Ireland for at least three months between June 1997 and June 2008.
They need to have bought goods or services from UK businesses that accepted Mastercard credit cards.
For those who live in Scotland the starting point is May 1992.
The settlement is worth £200million and half of this has been ringfenced for consumers, who have until the end of the year to claim.
Around 2.5million people are expected to come forward.
If this number does make a claim they will each receive £45.
But if fewer people apply then the payments will be capped at £70 per person.
iPhone users could get share of £3billion lawsuit
Consumer group Which? is leading a claim against Apple on behalf of 40million UK customers.
The £3billion class action lawsuit claimed the tech giant breached competition law by 'forcing its iCloud services on customers'.
It said Apple encouraged users to sign up for an iCloud subscription to store photos, videos and other data, which meant it favoured its own products.
Which? argued the company also made it difficult for customers to use other products, which ultimately stifled competition.
The consumer group said it is acting on behalf of all UK consumers that used iCloud from October 1, 2015.
The first court date in the claim will be heard in the Competition Appeal Tribunal on November 19-21.
During the hearing the tribunal will decide whether Which?'s legal claim against Apple is appropriate to go ahead on a 'collective' basis.
Energy bill-payers could be due hundreds of pounds
A former head of the UK's gas regulator is leading a claim against energy companies on behalf of customers.
Clare Spottiswoode has been authorised by the Competition Appeal Tribunal to act as the class representative in the lawsuit, which she hopes will prove that households were overcharged for their energy between 1999 and 2009.
The overcharging comes as a result of companies which sold high voltage and underwater electricity cables running a cartel.
They were fined for doing this by the European Commission in 2014.
Anyone who has paid an energy bill in Britain since 2001 is eligible to be included in the lawsuit.
Lawyers hope to recoup hundreds of millions of pounds.
Victims of data breaches could get thousands
There are several actions against firms that have been negligent by allowing data breaches, which put customer information at risk.
Among them is a collective action against Marks & Spencer after its data breach earlier this year.
The proceedings are being led by Patrick McGuire, a partner at Thompsons Solicitors, on behalf of Scottish victims of the hack.
The hack exposed sensitive customer information and left hundreds of people worried about their online safety.
It is unclear how much victims could be entitled to as the case is still in its early stages.
Compensation for mis-sold car finance loans
Thousands of motorists will get a share of £20billion in compensation for undisclosed broker commission arrangements.
The Court of Appeal ruled in October that the firms broke the law by not telling borrowers about the broker commission terms.
This is because banks allowed car dealerships and brokers to set their own interest rates on loans.
Under these now-banned discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs), dealerships and brokers had a financial incentive to charge higher interest rates, as this would increase their commission.
But many customers were not aware of this practice.
The case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was decided that customers will be compensated.
Lenders are all now liable to pay out £20billion in compensation.
It is not yet clear when customers will begin to receive this compensation, which is likely to be administered through a formal redress scheme.
What are class action lawsuits?
Lawsuits that result in compensation for many people are often described as 'class action'.
In England and Wales, a Group Litigation Order (GLO) is often used for this type of lawsuit.
Class action lawsuits have become easier after the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
It means that courts can group similar claims together, rather than having to deal with hundreds or even thousands of separate claims.
There are several stages to bring this type of lawsuit, including the courts needing to give permission for a GLO.
Both sides can appeal a decision at various stages, which can make the process lengthy without a guarantee of a payout.
The Mastercard case was the first of these big claims to be launched after the changes were introduced in 2015.
It was first launched in 2017 and consumers have not yet received compensation.
Lawyers have urged Brits to join several other class action claims for compensation in the past few years.
There is no cost to sign up but the firm will usually take a cut of a payout if the claim is successful.
This money is used to cover legal costs and it can be as high as 30%.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Three major car brands slash £1,500 off EV prices in huge boost for millions of Brits
The German car manufacturer has introduced a 'grant guarantee' scheme for some of its all-electric vehicles PLUGGED IN Three major car brands slash £1,500 off EV prices in huge boost for millions of Brits Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THREE major car brands have slashed the price of some of its electric cars by £1,500, giving a boost to millions of Brits. The move by the Volkswagen Group includes brands from Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra and comes ahead of the Government's new EV scheme. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 A £650million grant will knock up to £3,750 off the price of low-priced EVs - with concerns raised over taxpayer funding and infrastructure issues Credit: Getty 4 The Volkswagen ID.3 will see it's price slashed by £1,500 Credit: Getty A new Electric Car Grant will see taxpayers foot the bill for EVs costing under £37,000, and only models from brands that have committed to a so-called Science-Based Target (SBT) for emissions. The grant worth £650million in total, which was announced by the government recently, will see prices slashed for some fully electric cars although it is so far unclear which models will be eligible for £1.500 or £3,750 off their respective price tags. It will be dependent on a complex sustainability criteria which is not entirely clear. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed the Government's new scheme last month. The Electric Car Grant will offer between £1,500 and £3,750 off qualifying electric vehicles, depending on how sustainably they are made. However, it's not available yet, as carmakers must apply for approval — a process that could take weeks. The Volkswagen EVs that come under the firm's new £1,500 'Grant Guarantee' include the ID.3 in Pure, Pro and Pro trim levels, as well as the ID.4 in both Pro and Pure versions but excluding the GTX from both. The grant of £1,500 means the entry-level ID.3 Pure Essential's price drops to £29,360 while the ID.4 Pure Match is reduced to £38,090. Meanwhile, the Skoda's brands covered by the grant are the Elroq and Enyag, in SE, SE L, Edition and SportLine trim. The grant means the Elrog's price will start at £30,010 while the Enyag begins at £38,190. Volkswagen launch its new entry-level electric car, the Cupra's models covered by the grant is for the Born hatchback on V1, V2 and V3 trim levels, dropping the asking price to £34,190. The £1,500 'Grant Guarantee' for all three badges runs until August 31. Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra all state the grant 'will honour the £1,500 grant on the vehicles specified, even if the government's grant is not awarded'. However, buyers won't be able to get both the 'Grant Guarantee' and the government's Electric Car Grant on any of the models, Auto Express reports. The move by the German car manufacturer follows similar deals or incentives from the likes of Hyundai, Alfa Romeo, Kia and Leapmotor. According to Auto Express, fewer than 50 new EV models would be eligible for the grant - provided they pass the necessary criteria. The scheme will also provide additional support for electric car purchases for Motability customers - as revealed in The Sun's recent report - offering substantial discounts. Find Your Next Car by What You Can Actually Afford Sun Motors has created the UK's First Finance-First Marketplace *Finance Powered by DSG Finance who are a Credit Broker Not A Lender. Representative 12.9%. Your rate may differ depending on individual circumstances You can check in less than 60 seconds if you are eligible for financing, and then search for your dream used car within your monthly budget. Here's how... Soft credit check , with no impact on your score , with no impact on your score 60-second decision , get a real finance decision in less than a minute , get a real finance decision in less than a minute Instant match , only see cars that fit your real budget , only see cars that fit your real budget AI-powered help, get tailored advice, suggestions, and instant answers from an AI advisor called Theo Find out what you can afford in just 60 seconds here. This has raised concerns among some critics, who argue that taxpayers may effectively be contributing twice - once through the Motability scheme and again through the EV grant subsidies. Furthermore, some welfare users have expressed difficulties with EVs, with issues such as limited home charging facilities and inadequate public charging infrastructure causing frustration for some. There are also several key points to keep in mind before you set out to choose your shiny new discontinued EV. Firstly, the scheme will not be immediately accessible - even though it officially launched on July 16. This is because car brands must apply for eligibility for the vehicles in their ranges, rather than buyers being able to register grants at the point of purchase. Also, not all grants will amount to £3,750 as the scheme adopts a two-tier system, with the value deducted from the recommended retail price (RRP) depending on how environmentally friendly the manufacturing process is for each model. According to the RAC, these restrictions encourage drivers to choose models that are not only cost-effective, but also more sustainable for the planet. Transport Minister Lilian Greenwood has warned that vehicles made in China may not be eligible. Speaking previously on the BBC's Today programme, she said factories powered by coal are unlikely to meet the Government's strict criteria. She added that only brands reaching minimum environmental standards will be approved for taxpayer support. 4 Skoda's Elroq will also see it's price slashed Credit: PR Handout
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
‘I charge my seven-year-old son rent even though he's still at school'
Mum Samantha Bird has revealed that she charges her son rent despite the fact that he's only seven years old and still at school, explaining why she thinks this measure will benefit him in the long run While more than half (61 per cent) of Brits admit to charging their adult children rent, one mum is making her children pay up, and the youngest is only seven! But Asher Bird isn't your typical seven-year-old. He has an investment portfolio, a financial planning diary, and money goals. And his mum asks him for 12.5 per cent of his earnings to cover rent and utilities each month, according to Sky News. His mother, Samantha Bird, 31, from Michigan in the USA, said she might get a bit of stick for being stingy, but it's important to teach children how to survive in the real world. It comes as another woman explains why she lives in a retirement village despite only being 38. "I didn't grow up with a whole lot of financial education, and so going out into the real world, it was quite a shock, and I really struggled," she said. "I wanted to give my kids a little bit of a headstart in a way that was safe and in an environment that was light-hearted." Each of her children is paid $6 a week for chores but has to save $3 a month for expenses. That equates to around £4.52 and £2.26 respectively. And the thrifty mum reckons it's helping her kids develop financial confidence. "I've noticed a real sense of confidence in my kids with money," Samantha added, who runs Kids Money Skills, a social media channel educating parents on how to teach their children about their finances. She and her husband, Seth, found themselves $40,000 in debt in 2019 after mismanaging their finances and using credit cards. But after teaching herself about money, they got back on their feet in 2021 and don't want their children to make the same mistakes. "Now I need to make sure this doesn't happen with my kids," she continued. While her son's age makes this quite a shocking story, many parents charge their children rent when they get their first job or turn 18. Some 61 per cent of parents confessed to charging their adult children rent in a Compare the Market survey in 2023. While many parents do so to teach their kids how to manage money in the real world, approximately two in five of those parents said they asked for money to cover the bills. Among those who can afford to choose, some told Sky News they would "rather be on the street" than ask for a contribution, while others said it made their children more financially disciplined. Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis is supportive when it comes to charging kids rent but suggests parents should consider charging a contribution towards household expenses, rather than full market rent. Especially if the child is saving for a specific goal like a house deposit.
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Millions of Brits could get £1,000s in compensation from six lawsuits – from Mastercard fees to loans, can you claim?
Read on to find out which lawsuits are ongoing and if you are due compensation RECLAIM YOUR CASH Millions of Brits could get £1,000s in compensation from six lawsuits – from Mastercard fees to loans, can you claim? MILLIONS of Brits could get thousands of pounds in compensation after being overcharged on their loans or bills. Several major collective lawsuits have been launched in the past year and consumers may be able to cash in. 1 You could be in line for compensation from one of these class action lawsuits These legal cases are called class action lawsuits and help to chase compensation for millions of consumers that have been let down by companies. In these cases one person usually takes a company to court on behalf of all consumers. The cases have become popular in the UK after changes introduced in the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The act allowed a new 'opt-out' collective action system in the UK, which lets groups of consumers pursue claims against companies for breaches of competition law, including fixing prices or restricting supply. Scott Dixon, who runs The Complaints Resolver, said: 'Many familiar names including easyJet, VW and M&S have been caught up in these class action claims. 'You may only get a few hundred pounds, but it's power in numbers.' It is worth noting that legal cases can take time to go to trial and pay out customers. If you are affected by a class action lawsuit then you do not need to do anything to get compensation if the claim is successful. We have rounded up the cases that are currently ongoing and those that could lead to you getting your money back. Homeowners hit with 'secret' insurance charges Some 20,000 people who own flats in the UK are taking legal action against the companies that own their apartment blocks. Legal letters claim freeholders - the building owners - took commission fees when they arranged the building insurance. The freeholders were allegedly paid the fees by insurance companies in exchange for buying their products. These were then added to the cost of the buildings insurance by the freeholders or their agents, and the total amount was then charged to the flat owners in the form of service charges without their knowledge, the leaseholders claim. The flat owners believe this was secretly added to the service charges they paid. Collective claims for compensation Lawsuits that result in compensation for many people are often referred to as "class actions". In England and Wales a Group Litigation Order (GLO) is often used for this kind of lawsuit. Collective Proceedings Orders (CPOs) are also used for claims of breaching competition law. Collective action has been made easier under the UK's Consumer Rights Act 2015. It means the courts can treat similar claims as one, rather than having hundreds or even thousands of separate individual claims. There are a number of stages to bringing this kind of lawsuit, including the courts needing to give permission. Both sides can also appeal decisions at various stages making it a lengthy process with no guarantee of a payout. Lawyers have urged Brits to join several other collective claims for compensation in recent years. There is no cost to sign up, but the firm will usually take a cut of any payout if the claim is successful to cover legal costs. There's no guarantee of a payout and collective claims of this type have not yet been fully tested in court. Lawyers have suggested that each flat owner could be awarded up to £3,500 in compensation. They have also suggested that up to 900,000 homeowners who own flats in multi-occupancy blocks could be affected. Velitor Law, the firm taking the class action lawsuit, has written to four of the UK's largest freeholders - E&J Estates, Consensus Business Group, Long Harbour and Ground Rents Income Funds - to recoup the fees. It is expected that around two dozen landlords, who control the leaseholds for close to 900,000 homes, may be subject to the Leaseholder Action claim. The claim seeks to recover a minimum of six years' worth of commissions from landlords. However, lawyers have applied to suspend the usual period of limitation, which in certain cases could see the claim stretch back as far as 1997. Liam Spender, the lawyer at Velitor Law, said: 'This first set of landlords are now on notice of this claim and they are now going to have to answer in court.' The firm said a second tranche of legal letters to landlords will be issued before the end of the year. The Sun has contacted all four freeholders involved for comment. They all deny any wrongdoing. Shoppers overcharged by credit card companies Millions of shoppers are due to receive £70 each after a tribunal approved a settlement in a lawsuit against Mastercard. The verdict came after a long-running legal case dating back almost a decade. The action was brought by Walter Merricks, a former financial ombudsman, who argued that shoppers were charged higher prices after fees were wrongly levied on transactions made between 1992 and 2008. You do not need to have owned a Mastercard at any point to be eligible for compensation. Consumers can claim compensation if they lived in England, Wales or Northern Ireland for at least three months between June 1997 and June 2008. They need to have bought goods or services from UK businesses that accepted Mastercard credit cards. For those who live in Scotland the starting point is May 1992. The settlement is worth £200million and half of this has been ringfenced for consumers, who have until the end of the year to claim. Around 2.5million people are expected to come forward. If this number does make a claim they will each receive £45. But if fewer people apply then the payments will be capped at £70 per person. iPhone users could get share of £3billion lawsuit Consumer group Which? is leading a claim against Apple on behalf of 40million UK customers. The £3billion class action lawsuit claimed the tech giant breached competition law by 'forcing its iCloud services on customers'. It said Apple encouraged users to sign up for an iCloud subscription to store photos, videos and other data, which meant it favoured its own products. Which? argued the company also made it difficult for customers to use other products, which ultimately stifled competition. The consumer group said it is acting on behalf of all UK consumers that used iCloud from October 1, 2015. The first court date in the claim will be heard in the Competition Appeal Tribunal on November 19-21. During the hearing the tribunal will decide whether Which?'s legal claim against Apple is appropriate to go ahead on a 'collective' basis. Energy bill-payers could be due hundreds of pounds A former head of the UK's gas regulator is leading a claim against energy companies on behalf of customers. Clare Spottiswoode has been authorised by the Competition Appeal Tribunal to act as the class representative in the lawsuit, which she hopes will prove that households were overcharged for their energy between 1999 and 2009. The overcharging comes as a result of companies which sold high voltage and underwater electricity cables running a cartel. They were fined for doing this by the European Commission in 2014. Anyone who has paid an energy bill in Britain since 2001 is eligible to be included in the lawsuit. Lawyers hope to recoup hundreds of millions of pounds. Victims of data breaches could get thousands There are several actions against firms that have been negligent by allowing data breaches, which put customer information at risk. Among them is a collective action against Marks & Spencer after its data breach earlier this year. The proceedings are being led by Patrick McGuire, a partner at Thompsons Solicitors, on behalf of Scottish victims of the hack. The hack exposed sensitive customer information and left hundreds of people worried about their online safety. It is unclear how much victims could be entitled to as the case is still in its early stages. Compensation for mis-sold car finance loans Thousands of motorists will get a share of £20billion in compensation for undisclosed broker commission arrangements. The Court of Appeal ruled in October that the firms broke the law by not telling borrowers about the broker commission terms. This is because banks allowed car dealerships and brokers to set their own interest rates on loans. Under these now-banned discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs), dealerships and brokers had a financial incentive to charge higher interest rates, as this would increase their commission. But many customers were not aware of this practice. The case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was decided that customers will be compensated. Lenders are all now liable to pay out £20billion in compensation. It is not yet clear when customers will begin to receive this compensation, which is likely to be administered through a formal redress scheme. What are class action lawsuits? Lawsuits that result in compensation for many people are often described as 'class action'. In England and Wales, a Group Litigation Order (GLO) is often used for this type of lawsuit. Class action lawsuits have become easier after the Consumer Rights Act 2015. It means that courts can group similar claims together, rather than having to deal with hundreds or even thousands of separate claims. There are several stages to bring this type of lawsuit, including the courts needing to give permission for a GLO. Both sides can appeal a decision at various stages, which can make the process lengthy without a guarantee of a payout. The Mastercard case was the first of these big claims to be launched after the changes were introduced in 2015. It was first launched in 2017 and consumers have not yet received compensation. Lawyers have urged Brits to join several other class action claims for compensation in the past few years. There is no cost to sign up but the firm will usually take a cut of a payout if the claim is successful. This money is used to cover legal costs and it can be as high as 30%. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
