WWE NXT (August 12) Live Streaming: Preview, Start Time, Full Match Card - Lash Legend-Nia Jax fight to headline Tuesday night action
returns live with a loaded lineup promising intense action and major storyline developments at the
WWE Performance Center
in Orlando, Florida on Tuesday night. The main event spotlights a powerhouse showdown between
Lash Legend
and
Nia Jax
, as both look to cement their dominance in the women's division.
— WWENXT (@WWENXT)
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals
By Vaibhav Sisinity
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Tag team competition will heat up with
Jacy Jayne
&
Fallon Henley
joining forces against Kelani Jordan & Lola Vice - a clash that could influence the future pecking order of the division.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Are you from India? The Prices of Solar Panels Might Surprise You
Solar Panels | Search Ads
Get Info
In singles action,
Joe Hendry
takes on
Charlie Dempsey
in a matchup blending technical wrestling mastery with psychological warfare.
The night will also feature an all-out eight-man tag team battle as Trick Williams, Moose, Oba Femi, and Je'Von Evans square off against the ruthless faction
DarkState
, with bragging rights and momentum toward the next big NXT event at stake.
Live Events
— WWENXT (@WWENXT)
HOW TO WATCH WWE NXT LIVE IN US
Date: August 12, Tuesday
Venue: WWE Performance Center in Orlando, Florida
Start Time: 8PM ET/5PM PT
Channel/Streaming: CW Network in US and elswhere on Netflix
WWE
NXT FULL CARD
Eight-Man Tag Team Match: DarkState (Dion Lennox, Osiris Griffin, Saquon Shugars & Cutler James) vs Oba Femi, Trick Williams, Je'Von Evans & Moose
Singles Match: Lash Legend vs Nia Jax
Singles Match: Joe Hendry vs Charlie Dempsey
Tag Team Match: Lola Vice & Kelani Jordan vs Fatal Influence (Jacy Jayne & Fallon Henley)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
14 hours ago
- Hans India
He shaped Australian cricket, inspired the global game: Jay Shah pays tribute to Bob Simpson
ICC chairman Jay Shah has mourned the passing of former Australia captain Bob Simpson, praising his immense contributions to the game and stating that he will be remembered as a true legend of cricket. On Saturday, Cricket Australia (CA) said Simpson died in Sydney at the age of 89. "Bob Simpson was one of the true greats of our sport, and it is deeply saddening to learn of his passing. His legacy is immense. As a player, captain, and later as a coach, he shaped Australian cricket and inspired the global game," Shah said in a statement. "He nurtured and guided a generation of players who went on to become legends in their own right, and his influence extended far beyond the field. On behalf of the International Cricket Council, I extend our heartfelt condolences to his family, friends, and the entire cricket fraternity. His passing is a profound loss for the game, but his contributions will always be remembered and cherished," he added. An ICC Hall of Famer, Simpson played 62 Tests for Australia between 1957 and 1978, scoring 4,869 runs at an average of 46.81 with 10 centuries, 27 half-centuries and a highest score of 311. A fine leg-spinner, he took 71 wickets at 42.26 with two five-wicket hauls and best figures of five for 57. He was also an astute fielder, taking 110 catches. After retiring in 1968, Simpson made a famous comeback as Test captain in 1978 at the age of 41 to lead a weakened Australia side. After retirement, he became Australia's first full-time coach and was also a national selector. Simpson was also the consultant with the Indian team in 1999 and also coached Leicestershire and Lancashire in county cricket in England.
Indian Express
15 hours ago
- Indian Express
Mitchell Johnson slams Cricket Australia CEO's proposal to limit Test cricket to fewer teams: ‘Not the solution to save the format'
Former Australia pace spearhead Mitchell Johnson has slammed Cricket Australia (CA) CEO Todd Greenberg for his recent remarks urging the need to limit Test cricket to a select few nations and that the five-day format bring financial ruin to smaller cricket boards across the globe. Speaking to the BBC, Greenberg recently stressed that the expansion of the number of Test-playing nations was not a feasible option; rather the impetus must be enforced on marquee five-match series like the Ashes. 'I don't think everyone in world cricket needs to aspire to play test cricket, and that might be Ok. We're literally trying to send countries bankrupt if we force them to try to play test cricket. Scarcity in Test cricket is our friend, not our foe,' Greenberg had said. 'We need to make sure we invest in the right spaces to play Test cricket where it means something and has jeopardy. That's why the Ashes will be as enormous and profitable as it is — because it means something,' he added. Writing in his column for the West Australian, Johnson slammed Greenberg's comments as grossly missing the point of expanding the cricketing landscape. 'He's (Greenberg) not wrong when he says it's under threat. He's not wrong when he says we need to think smart. 'But there's a line in there that stuck with me: 'I don't think everyone in world cricket needs to aspire to play Test cricket, and that might be OK…literally we're trying to send countries bankrupt if we force them to try to play Test cricket',' wrote Johnson. 'Here's the thing — if that's the fear, then we've already missed the point. The solution to saving Test cricket isn't to scale it down to three or four rich countries. It's to lift the rest up. Help them. Grow the game. Back them. 'This is where real leadership starts — not by pulling up the ladder, but by building a stronger base.' 'Because let's be clear: these nations want to play Test cricket. The players want it. The fans want it. So why are we making it so hard?' Johnson added. Johnson also highlighted the need for accountability from the Big Three powers, urging them to not merely blanket the cricket calendar. 'I don't have all the answers, that's not in my pay grade, but I can say from an ex-player's point of view that we need as many countries playing Test cricket as possible. If it wasn't for Test cricket and its initial financial support, we don't see Twenty20 cricket like it is today. 'The big three — India, England and Australia — have the money, the reach, the leverage. So don't just dominate the schedule — shape it. 'We talk about 'meaningful' Test matches. Well, meaning doesn't come from a marketing department — it comes from what it represents. A Sri Lanka v Pakistan series might not break streaming records, but to the players, the fans and the groundsmen who spend months preparing that pitch — it means everything,' the 2013 Ashes hero pleaded.
Mint
17 hours ago
- Mint
AI plush toys promise screen-free play for kids— but at what cost?
The company Curio, located in Redwood city, California is bringing a new kind of toy to market: chatbots wrapped in stuffed animals. Its founders, Misha Sallee and Sam Eaton, have created plushies — Grem, Grok and Gaboo, with each one of them having a Wi-Fi enabled voice box hidden inside. This voice box connects the toy to an Artificial Intelligence (AI) language model designed to talk to young children. These toys, which are priced at $99 each are joining a growing number of other AI-enabled objects marketed to kids. This trend is set to expand, as OpenAI has partnered with Mattel to develop AI-powered products based on popular brands like Barbie and Ken, said Amanda Hess from the New York Times. Curio promotes its products as an alternative to screen time, appealing to parents who are busy and want to keep their kids off tablets and phone screens. The company's co-founder, Eaton described the plushies as a 'sidekick' who could make children's play 'more stimulating,' freeing up parents from having to sit their children in front of a TV. However Hess questioned this premise. While children already talk to their toys, the AI plushies add a layer of complexity. During a demonstration, Hess notes a bizarre conversation with one of the toys named Grem, which suggested a game of 'I Spy,' despite not being able to see. She also points out the irony of these toys being an alternative to screens when they operate on a similar technological foundation. The idea of a mechanical friend is already familiar to children, because as they watch television, they are served stories about artificially intelligent sidekicks and their wondrous deeds. TV shows like "Adventure Time' and "Sesame Street,' feature characters like BMO and Smartie who are personified technological devices that help the main characters. Hess also cited the character Toodles from 'Mickey Mouse Clubhouse' as a prime example. As compared to older Disney cartoons where physical objects posed vexing challenges for Mickey and friends, Toodles in a sentient tablet that instantly solves every challenge with 'Mouseketools.' This trend teaches children that the answer to every human problem is a voice-activated command away and the ultimate endpoint for their curiosity is inside a device, she argued. By bringing these characters into children's physical spaces, in the form of cuddly toys, the terrifying specter of 'the screen' has been obscured. Yet playtime is still tethered to a technological leash, as the toy's conversations with a child are back-channeled to a large language model, she said. Other than the psychological aspects of using an AI-powered toy, these products also raise concerns about privacy and parental control. Curio, for instance, ensures that every conversation with its chatbots is transcribed and sent to the guardian's phone. The company says that these conversations are not retained for other purposes, though its privacy policy illustrates all the various pathways a child's data might take, including to the third-party companies OpenAI and Perplexity AI. The author also questions what happens when a child 's transitional object, such as a security stuffed animal or blanket is no longer a safe space for private thoughts, but a source of surveillance and a tool of parental influence. Hess concludes her exploration by removing the voice box from the plushie, transforming it back into a simple stuffed animal. When her children find it, they invest their own imaginative games, confirming her theory that the most magical toys are the ones that don't need a voice box at all.
