Jail for ex-insurance agent after misappropriating $20k from long-time client and got scammed
Jail for ex-insurance agent after misappropriating $20k from long-time client and got scammed
SINGAPORE - An insurance agent with AIA Singapore abused the trust of her long-time client, who was also her friend, when she misappropriated $20,000 of the latter's money.
Zaibun Nesa Haji Adam, 65, later lost more than $13,000 of that amount to a scam.
On April 25, she was sentenced to eight months and two weeks' jail after she pleaded guilty to one count of criminal breach of trust.
Now unemployed and no longer working with the insurance firm, Zaibun had made a voluntary restitution of $1,000 to the 68-year-old female victim who had been her client for more than 10 years.
AIA reimbursed the remaining $19,000 to the victim out of goodwill. Zaibun had not made any restitution to the firm, the court heard.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ryan Lim told the court that in late June 2021, the victim contacted Zaibun as she wanted to buy an insurance plan for her old age and retirement.
The victim had previously bought several insurance policies from AIA through Zaibun, said the prosecutor.
When the two women met the next month, Zaibun proposed that the victim invest between $12,000 and $20,000 in a policy.
The victim opted to invest $20,000 and was deceived into directly transferring the money to Zaibun's bank account.
Zaibun had claimed that the AIA centre was closed and the funds would have to be transferred by proxy through her, DPP Lim said.
She misappropriated the money soon after, using nearly $13,600 of her ill-gotten gains to pay a 'release fee' for a purported overseas investment, in which she was promised US$6.2 million (S$8.1 million) in profits.
This 'overseas investment' later turned out to be a scam, and Zaibun lost this portion of the money that the victim had entrusted to her.
The DPP said that it was unclear what Zaibun did with the rest of her ill-gotten gains.
The victim's application for the investment policy eventually lapsed as the $20,000 was not paid to AIA.
Zaibun's offence came to light when the victim made a complaint to the firm over the lapsing of her policy, and an insurance investigator alerted the police in August 2022.
On April 25, DPP Lim asked the court to sentence Zaibun to between eight and nine months' jail, stressing that she had not made an adequate restitution.
He added: 'The victim had previously purchased policies through the accused for both her and her family and considered (Zaibun) a trusted friend.
'Indeed, intimate human relationships such as friendships are based, first and foremost, on trust. An abuse of one's position of trust and friendship should be taken seriously.'
Lawyers Tang Shangwei and Warren Tian from WongPartnership, who represented Zaibun pro bono, pleaded for their client to be given five months' jail.
They stated in court documents she had been struggling with various medical conditions including diabetes and irritable bowel syndrome between June and August 2021.
The court heard that she is also the sole caregiver of her husband, who has various health issues including colon cancer.
According to the lawyers, foreign scammers had duped their client into putting money in an investment scam in early 2020.
They added: ' (Zaibun's) state of mind was far from motivated by greed or financial gains.
'This is given that (she) was in despair from the health issues she and her husband were battling with, the financial struggles she was facing to support her family, and the pressure she was facing from the foreign scammers.'
Zaibun's bail was set at $15,000 on April 25 and she is expected to surrender herself at the State Courts on June 25 to begin serving her sentence.
Shaffiq Alkhatib is The Straits Times' court correspondent, covering mainly criminal cases heard at the State Courts.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
6 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on July 3 in case involving ex-transport minister
Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on July 3 in case involving ex-transport minister Source: Straits Times Article Date: 11 Jun 2025 Author: Nadine Chua The 79-year-old property tycoon was previously scheduled to plead guilty on April 2. Billionaire Ong Beng Seng, who is facing two charges in a case linked to former transport minister S. Iswaran, will be pleading guilty on July 3. The date was set after his pre-trial conference on June 10. The 79-year-old was previously scheduled to plead guilty on April 2, but the case was adjourned after his lawyers asked for more time to obtain his medical reports. The property tycoon was charged on Oct 4, 2024, with abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and with abetting the obstruction of justice. Under Section 165, it is an offence for a public servant to accept anything of value from any person with whom he is involved in an official capacity without payment or with inadequate payment. According to court documents, the businessman had in December 2022 allegedly arranged for Mr Iswaran to fly on Ong's private plane from Singapore to Doha. The flight was valued at US$7,700 (S$10,400). Ong is also said to have arranged for Mr Iswaran a one-night stay at Four Seasons Hotel Doha, valued at $4,737.63, and a business-class flight from Doha to Singapore, valued at $5,700. Court documents showed it was allegedly Ong who alerted Mr Iswaran that the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau had seized the flight manifest for the December 2022 trip. It prompted Mr Iswaran to ask the tycoon to bill him for the flight to avoid investigations. For this alleged offence, Ong was charged with the abetment of obstruction of justice. The businessman is known as the man who brought Formula One (F1) to Singapore in 2008 – the first night race in the sport's history. Mr Iswaran was chairman of the F1 steering committee and the Government's chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters related to the race. The two men had worked in the mid-2000s to convince then Formula One Group chief executive Bernie Ecclestone to make Singapore the venue for the sport's first night race. On Oct 3, 2024, Mr Iswaran was handed a 12-month jail term after he pleaded guilty to five charges, including obtaining valuable items as a public servant from Ong and Mr David Lum Kok Seng, managing director of construction company Lum Chang Holdings. Mr Iswaran was placed on the Home Detention Scheme on Feb 7, 2025. On June 6, the Singapore Prison Service said he completed his emplacement on the Home Detention Scheme and that he was no longer under prison custody. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Inside an animal abuser's mind: What drives such cruelty and why some say penalties aren't enough
In Your Opinion Podcast Inside an animal abuser's mind: What drives such cruelty and why some say penalties aren't enough SINGAPORE – In May, four gruesome cat deaths in the neighbourhoods of Yishun, Punggol and Tampines occurred within a month, stoking fears that a killer was on the loose. While the authorities have since attributed three of these deaths to road accidents instead of deliberate acts of cruelty, the string of cases re-ignited calls for Singapore to toughen its laws and enforcement against animal abuse. Some have even suggested heavier penalties like mandatory jail time and caning. But can such stiff punishment deter a person bent on hurting animals? On May 27, I sat down with psychiatrist Lim Boon Leng and criminal lawyer Josephus Tan to unpack these dark impulses and how society can help to curb them. Here are edited excerpts from our conversation. Why would anyone want to harm animals? Dr Lim: It's quite important to understand that not everyone who is an animal abuser has a mental illness. A lot of people do it out of malice, anger or boredom, or they are just thrill-seeking. This can come from a place of unresolved trauma or they are displacing their anger. There are three categories of people: The first are impulse abusers who lash out because of their poor ability to regulate emotions. The second are neglectful abusers. I suspect that most animal abusers fall within this group. They fail to care for pets due to ignorance and indifference. The last group is the sadistic abuser, which I think accounts for a minority of cases. This is the group that we tend to worry about because they really derive pleasure or a sense of control from inflicting pain. Individuals with antisocial personality disorder, commonly known as psychopaths, are more likely to resort to animal cruelty. They are typically quite deceitful. They are also quite emotionally distant. Therefore, if they inflict pain on animals or other people, they do not have empathy. Are there any red flags that indicate a person is more likely to abuse animals? Dr Lim: History is the best way to predict the future. So when children or adolescents harm pets, stray animals or even insects, when there are repeated incidents – these are very big warning signs. Then there are people who show very little empathy towards other human beings and animals. They have this indifference, and fail to recognise animals as sentient beings. They could feel that animals are objects and treat them as such. Another red flag is someone who finds violence fascinating. Most of us will cringe when watching violent videos, but these people actually enjoy them and sometimes even seek them out. There is the risk that they will re-enact these acts, which I think can be quite dangerous. Many times when you talk to them, they may lack remorse. Mr Tan: Legally speaking, based on cases that I have handled and heard about, there can be no tell-tale signs. A person can look really normal and yet have an antisocial personality disorder. You would not be able to tell until something triggers it, and this probably occurs in a private setting. You would not know unless you are living with that person – that's when you can pick up certain habits that can appear different from others. Where do you think the gaps are in how Singapore tackles cases of alleged animal cruelty? Mr Tan: If you have a designated community space for feeding, then maybe that's where surveillance cameras can be targeted at so you know who is in that area. If you understand cats, they are quite skittish in nature. So I think, within calculated speculation, that a killer or a group of killers probably have to lower a cat's guard with food and toys before committing a cruel act, or torture or kill them. There are police community cameras everywhere, but they do not cover every corner. There are blind spots. So that is where, when I read about all these cases over the years, I think more can be done by having surveillance cameras at designated feeding areas. Dr Lim: My concern as a psychiatrist is that as our society progresses, if we are better educated as a whole, why are numbers not coming down? Why is it that such acts continue to be prevalent? A lot of times we have to question if this is the tip of the iceberg. Is our society too stressed out? Are people venting their anger on animals? What are we teaching our children? They may be top mathematicians and scientists, but are they taught empathy? Are they top in values? Mr Tan: If people want to own a pet, we should make sure that they are serious about it. In countries where the rights of animals are heavily protected, there are many hurdles to cross to buy a puppy or a kitten. But in Singapore, I can just walk into the shop right now and pay a few hundred dollars, and I can just get a young life. So I think that is something which only legislation can overcome. Apart from increasing punishment against animal abuse, I think we should go a step further to do away with selling live animals at pet shops in the shopping mall. Do you think the law needs to be tougher? Dr Lim: Laws are actually quite a good way of education as well. It defines what we think is right and wrong in society. Laws are just one aspect of it. So I think there are those who can be rehabilitated and do better. For young children and youth, there's a greater propensity for them to be rehabilitated. I suppose we have to look at animal abuse in a more holistic way. So basically, animal abuse is basically just a gateway behaviour. I think there's a deeper symbolic meaning to it for the whole of society. Are people becoming more cruel and non-empathetic as a whole? And how much of this empathy education are we having? We do not have to teach people how to be kind to animals. We just have to teach people how to be kind. Mr Tan: I feel that it's timely to introduce caning. The whole idea about caning is to instil pain. We inflict pain on you so that you can register the lesson. Right? This is really the long and short of it. Dr Lim: I think in terms of cognition, if you are going to commit an act, and you know that the consequences are severe, you will have a second thought. Highlights (click/tap above): 1:45 Inside an animal abuser's mind 5:29 Understanding psychopathy and spotting red flags 10:19 Gaps in enforcement and how criminals exploit them 15:30 Do some abusers have a sadistic desire to get caught? 18:58 What animal abuse says about Singapore and its people 24:06 Can tougher laws and caning make a difference? 32:59 What the ordinary citizen should or shouldn't do Read ST's Opinion section: Follow Ang Qing on LinkedIn: Read her articles: Host: Ang Qing (aqing@ Produced and edited by: Hadyu Rahim Executive producer: Ernest Luis & Lynda Hong Follow In Your Opinion Podcast here and get notified for new episode drops: Channel: Apple Podcasts: Spotify: Feedback to: podcast@ Follow The Straits Times Podcasts on YouTube: Turn on notifications 🔔 to stay updated. -------------------- Discover more ST podcast channels: All-in-one ST Podcasts channel ➤ Get The Straits Times' app, which has a dedicated podcast player section: The App Store ➤ Google Play ➤ Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
New Paper
8 hours ago
- New Paper
Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on July 3 in case involving S. Iswaran
Billionaire Ong Beng Seng, who is facing two charges in a case linked to former transport minister S. Iswaran, will be pleading guilty on July 3. The date was set after his pre-trial conference on June 10. The 79-year-old was previously scheduled to plead guilty on April 2, but the case was adjourned after his lawyers asked for more time to obtain his medical reports. The property tycoon was charged on Oct 4, 2024, with abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and with abetting the obstruction of justice. Under Section 165, it is an offence for a public servant to accept anything of value from any person with whom he is involved in an official capacity without payment or with inadequate payment. According to court documents, the businessman had in December 2022 allegedly arranged for Mr Iswaran to fly on Ong's private plane from Singapore to Doha. The flight was valued at US$7,700 (S$10,400). Ong is also said to have arranged for Mr Iswaran a one-night stay at Four Seasons Hotel Doha, valued at $4,737.63, and a business-class flight from Doha to Singapore, valued at $5,700. Court documents showed it was allegedly Ong who alerted Mr Iswaran that the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau had seized the flight manifest for the December 2022 trip. It prompted Mr Iswaran to ask the tycoon to bill him for the flight to avoid investigations. For this alleged offence, Ong was charged with the abetment of obstruction of justice. The businessman is known as the man who brought Formula One (F1) to Singapore in 2008 - the first night race in the sport's history. Mr Iswaran was chairman of the F1 steering committee and the Government's chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters related to the race. The two men had worked in the mid-2000s to convince then Formula One Group chief executive Bernie Ecclestone to make Singapore the venue for the sport's first night race. On Oct 3, 2024, Mr Iswaran was handed a 12-month jail term after he pleaded guilty to five charges, including obtaining valuable items as a public servant from Ong and Mr David Lum Kok Seng, managing director of construction company Lum Chang Holdings. Mr Iswaran was placed on the Home Detention Scheme on Feb 7, 2025. On June 6, the Singapore Prison Service said he completed his emplacement on the Home Detention Scheme and that he was no longer under prison custody.
