logo
Seattle woman arrested for pit bull attacks: ‘Let him do his thing'

Seattle woman arrested for pit bull attacks: ‘Let him do his thing'

Yahoo15-04-2025

The Brief
Seattle Police arrested a woman who claimed her pit bull was "the Chupacabra" and allowed it to attack other dogs.
One victim of the attacks took her dog to an animal hospital.
Investigators said the suspect even attempted to stop people from breaking up the fights.
SEATTLE - Seattle Police arrested a 30-year-old woman for letting her pit bull attack other people's pets on Friday.
A viral post on Reddit shows video of one of the attacks.
What we know
In the video, you can see a woman screaming as she tries to keep her dog away from the pit bull.
You can also see a person — matching the description of the suspect in the video — doing nothing to stop the attack.
Police reported the owner of the aggressive pit bull is Sydney Kelly.
What they're saying
According to the Seattle Police report that FOX 13 Seattle obtained, the victim tried to move her dog to the other side of the street to avoid the off-leash pit bull, but the dog charged her.
"The dog was off-leash and out of control. [The pit bull owner] was just kind of screaming, and running around following it, but then not grabbing him. Then she would intermittently grab him and let him go," said Alyssa Maenza.
Maenza lives where the attack happened. She tells FOX 13 Seattle she did not see the incident captured in the viral video.
However, she did see another similar attack from the same owner on the same day.
According to the police report, Kelly's dog attacked several pets on Friday.
"It's not a dog, it's the Chupacabra."
Investigators reported Kelly said her pit bull was not on a leash because "It's not a dog, it's the Chupacabra," according to the police report.
Investigators also reported Kelly was shouting "let him do his thing," as her dog was attacking, and that she tried to stop other people from breaking up the fight.
Kelly was arrested and charged with animal cruelty.
Seattle Animal Control tells FOX 13 Seattle her dog is in their custody.
According to Seattle Animal Control, there were at least 637 dog attacks in 2024.
Those numbers include dogs attacking dogs, dogs attacking humans, and dogs attacking other animals.
However, those numbers do not represent cases that Seattle Police respond to exclusively, or incidents where no case is filed, which usually happens when an owner leaves before investigators arrive.
If you have experienced an emergency involving an animal, you can report the cases through Seattle's Animal Control website.
The Source
Information in this story comes from original reporting by FOX 13 Seattle reporter AJ Janavel, with details from the initial Reddit post.
Drunken night caught on bodycam costs Mercer Island cop his rank
FEMA denies $34M in funds for WA bomb cyclone relief, gives no explanation
1997 WA cold case victim identified; Gary Ridgway not ruled out
2 charged in brutal Burien kidnapping, attempted murder
Watch: Coyote gets 'booped' by its potential rodent dinner
Red Robin launching Bottomless Burger Pass for National Burger Month
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Walmart customer calls cops after his self-checkout avocado mishap charged $1,300
Walmart customer calls cops after his self-checkout avocado mishap charged $1,300

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Walmart customer calls cops after his self-checkout avocado mishap charged $1,300

A Walmart employee claimed a customer called the police after he — the customer — accidentally overcharged himself for avocados at the self-checkout kiosk, then accused the store of 'robbing' him. The unusual incident was documented on a Reddit page dedicated to all things Walmart. Advertisement User 'Lore-Archivist' wrote about the confrontation, prompting others to share their own odd self-checkout interactions. As 'Lore-Archivist' told the story, a man 'came up with a bunch of stuff' and claimed an item on the shelf that was priced at $9.99 was showing up on the register at $19.99. The Reddit writer said a Walmart team leader was able to get it fixed for the man. However, it happened again with item after item that couldn't be changed, 'Lore-Archivist' said. Advertisement 'Then he had avocados,' the man wrote. 'I guess he accidentally hit 999 avocados instead of the 9 he intended.' 'I guess he accidentally hit 999 avocados instead of the 9 he intended. His total jumped up to over $1300.' 4 A Walmart employee documented an unusual incident on a Reddit page about a customer who was trying to buy avocados at the self-checkout kiosk. Christopher Sadowski Advertisement 4 'I guess he accidentally hit 999 avocados instead of the 9 he intended. His total jumped up to over $1300,' the worker said about the customer, who 'freak[ed] out' and called the police because Walmart was 'robbing' him. Christopher Sadowski That's when the customer 'freak[ed] out' and started yelling before stating that he was 'calling the cops' because Walmart was 'robbing' him, the Reddit writer said. The customer called 911 and the police showed up, as the thread documented. 'This dude creates a whole circus, then shows everyone the self-checkout screen' — again claiming that Walmart 'is robbing him.' Advertisement Walmart employees worked to try to appease the customer, 'but he still [wouldn't] shut up,' the man wrote. The customer was warned that he needed to leave or would be arrested for trespassing — but the man refused to go unless Walmart compensated him 'for pain and suffering and distress.' Eventually, 'his own cops [that] he called put him in handcuffs and [took] him outside,' 'Lore-Archivist' wrote. 4 The customer was warned that he needed to leave or would be arrested for trespassing, but refused to go unless Walmart compensated him 'for pain and suffering and distress.' Christopher Sadowski Fox News Digital reached out to Walmart for comment. Several Redditors revealed how they've handled similar situations at their jobs. 'My go-to response was always, 'Would you like to use our phone to do that?' Never had anyone actually take me up on that after,' one person wrote. Advertisement 'Never had anyone actually follow through on calling the cops.' 'I had a customer who was causing a disturbance and making it very hard to work. They kept threatening to call the cops.' Another user wrote, 'I had a customer who was causing a disturbance and making it very hard to work. The [person] kept threatening to call the cops. I dialed the number and handed them the phone. It's amazing how quickly they left.' Advertisement A different Walmart employee said shoppers at the self-checkout often 'complain about having to 'do our job' or say we just get paid to stand there.' User 'nikoab94' wrote that 'on busy days I'm running in circles fixing device errors, price corrections, ID checks, filling low bags, etc.' 'All that and having to go behind customers like I'm their mom cleaning up messes they leave at the registers,' the user continued. 'Bags thrown everywhere, abandoned items, smears of God only knows what all over the register/screen, putting back empty carts and baskets people leave behind. It bothers me they act like we don't do anything.' Another user and former Walmart employee claimed to have 'picked a fight with a lady' who walked into the self-checkout area and started yelling, '[I don't know] what to do, you need to do this for me.' Advertisement 4 Other Redditors revealed how they've handled similar situations at their jobs in response to the post. Christopher Sadowski The user claimed to have confronted the woman and told her, 'You don't treat people like that,' leading to a back and forth between the woman, her husband and the ex-Walmart employee. 'I'm not one for confrontation, but after working retail for so many years, I can find my backbone quickly if someone is [going to] demean people working a job just because they think they hold all this power of being able to call corporate and get someone fired,' the Redditor wrote. Advertisement The writer said it was 'sickening' in terms of 'the amount of 'I'm gonna call corporate' scenarios that play out over the pettiest nonsense.' 'Makes me wish I went to Walmart more often just to be able to tell people off on behalf of the workers there,' the user added. 'I know I would've appreciated a customer like me when I was stuck at Walmart.' Fox News Digital reached out to 'Lore-Archivist' for additional comment about the story described in the thread.

Reddit Lawsuit Against Anthropic AI Has Stakes for Sports
Reddit Lawsuit Against Anthropic AI Has Stakes for Sports

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Reddit Lawsuit Against Anthropic AI Has Stakes for Sports

In a new lawsuit, Reddit accuses AI company Anthropic of illegally scraping its users' data—including posts authored by sports fans who use the popular online discussion platform. Reddit's complaint, drafted by John B. Quinn and other attorneys from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, was filed on Wednesday in a California court. It contends Anthropic breached the Reddit user agreement by scraping Reddit content through its web crawler, ClaudeBot. The web crawler provides training data for Anthropic's AI tool, Claude, which relies on large language models (LLMs) that distill data and language. More from Prime Video NASCAR Coverage Uses AI to Show Hidden Race Story Indy 500 Fans Use Record Amount of Data During Sellout Race Who Killed the AAF? League's Demise Examined in Latest Rulings Other claims in the complaint include tortious interference and unjust enrichment. Scraping Reddit content is portrayed as undermining Reddit's obligations to its more than 100 million daily active unique users, including to protect their privacy. Reddit also contends Anthropic subverts its assurances to users that they control their expressions, including when deleting posts from public view. Scraping is key to AI. Automated technology makes requests to a website, then copies the results and tries to make sense of them. Anthropic, Reddit claims, finds Reddit data 'to be of the highest quality and well-suited for fine-tuning AI models' and useful for training AI. Anthropic allegedly violates users' privacy, since those users 'have no way of knowing' their data has been taken. Reddit, valued at $6.4 billion in its initial public offering last year, has hundreds of thousands of 'subreddits,' or online communities that cover numerous shared interests. Many subreddits are sports related, including r/sports, which has 22 million fans, r/nba (17 million) and the college football-centered r/CFB (4.4 million). Some pro franchises, including the Miami Dolphins (r/miamidolphins) and Dallas Cowboys (r/cowboys), have official subreddits. Reddit contends its unique features elevate its content and thus make the content more attractive to scraping endeavors. Reddit users submit posts, which can include original commentary, links, polls and videos, and they upvote or downvote content. This voting influences whether a post appears on the subreddit's front page or is more obscurely placed. Subreddit communities also self-police, with prohibitions on personal attacks, harassment, racism and spam. These practices can generate thoughtful and detailed commentary. Reddit estimates that ClaudeBot's scraping of Reddit has 'catapulted Anthropic into its valuation of tens of billions of dollars.' Meanwhile, Reddit says the company and its users lose out, because they 'realize no benefits from the technology that they helped create.' Anthropic allegedly trained ClaudeBot to extract data from Reddit starting in December 2021. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is quoted in the complaint as praising Reddit content, especially content found in prominent subreddits. Although Anthropic indicated it had stopped scraping Reddit in July 2024, Reddit says audit logs show Anthropic 'continued to deploy its automated bots to access Reddit content' more than 100,000 times in subsequent months. Reddit also unfavorably compares Anthropic to OpenAI and Google, which are 'giants in the AI space.' Reddit says OpenAI and Google 'entered into formal partnerships with Reddit' that permitted them to use Reddit content but only in ways that 'protect Reddit and its users' interests and privacy.' In contrast, Anthropic is depicted as engaging in unauthorized activities. In a statement shared with media, an Anthropic spokesperson said, 'we disagree with Reddit's claims, and we will defend ourselves vigorously.' In the weeks ahead, attorneys or Anthropic will answer Reddit's complaint and argue the company has not broken any laws. Reddit v. Anthropic has implications beyond the posts of Reddit users. Web crawlers scraping is a constant activity on the Internet, including message boards, blogs and other forums where sports fans and followers express viewpoints. The use of this content to train AI without knowledge or explicit consent by users is a legal topic sure to stir debate in the years ahead. Best of College Athletes as Employees: Answering 25 Key Questions

Woman Ordered Drink at Restaurant After Feeling ‘Pressure' from Her Friends and Refused to Drink It. Then, She Walked Out on the Bill
Woman Ordered Drink at Restaurant After Feeling ‘Pressure' from Her Friends and Refused to Drink It. Then, She Walked Out on the Bill

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Woman Ordered Drink at Restaurant After Feeling ‘Pressure' from Her Friends and Refused to Drink It. Then, She Walked Out on the Bill

A 23-year-old woman wrote that she walked out without paying for her drink after her friends peer pressured her into ordering it at her friend's 21st birthday dinner The woman said on Reddit that her friends waved the waiter away as they persisted to convince her to order the drink Reddit users offered their thoughts in the comments section, saying she took on the responsibility for paying for the drink once she ordered it A woman is questioning her decision of not paying for a drink she was peer pressured into ordering. The 23-year-old woman said that her friends pressured her into ordering a drink she didn't want while attending a 21st birthday dinner. She alleged that her friends who range in ages from 21-26 were aware of the fact that she doesn't drink, but continued to pester her nonetheless. 'I'm not a drinker, have never been one, and will never be one,' the woman wrote on Reddit. While dining at a fancy restaurant in celebration of her friend Lily's 21st birthday, the birthday girl suggested the woman order an alcoholic beverage. The woman said she refused, but that response did not seem to please the rest of the group, who then began to chime in with the birthday girl. 'Once again I refuse,' the woman wrote. 'They know I don't drink and how I feel abt it. But basically them begging me to get a drink kept going on for about five minutes.' In the meantime, as the waiter came over to check on the table to see if they would like to place an order, the woman claimed that the group waved him away because the woman refused to give in to their pleas. The woman admitted that she weakens under peer pressure especially when multiple people are involved. They eventually wore her down and she gave in to their begging. The birthday girl suggested a drink for "beginners" the woman recalled from the night prior. She continued to insist that she didn't want anything to drink and that no matter what they ordered her she wasn't going to like it. 'They said I will…' the woman told forum users in her Reddit post. The drink eventually came, the woman tasted it and unsurprisingly, she didn't like it. 'One sip and I wanted it gone.' Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Regardless, the group of women didn't stop there but continued in their persistence to pressure her into drinking the cocktail. They finally had enough of her refusing and dropped the matter, until the bill came. At the end of the meal, the woman explained that she subtracted the drink from her portion of the bill, justifying it since she didn't want it to begin with. But her move didn't sit well with the rest of the group, as they questioned her reasoning. The woman tried explaining to her friends that she wasn't going to pay for the drink because she 'didn't willingly get it.' 'Lily said I could've said no.. I DID!! Many times at that,' the woman said. The argument continued and the woman said she eventually got up and left the restaurant leaving the drink unpaid for. 'I sent the money for my meal to Lily and stated that if she or no one else was going to buy the drink then they shouldn't have begged me to got it,' she penned on the forum. After confiding in her husband about the evening out with her girlfriends, she said that he agreed with her decision to pass on paying for the drink while encouraging her to distance herself from them. 'However the texts messages from all four of them haven't stopped," the woman writes. Fellow forum users offered their opinions in the comments, many saying she should have just stuck with her 'no.' 'You ordered it, regardless of the why, you ordered it, making it your responsibility. If you didn't want to order it, you should have stuck to your guns, but when you gave in, it became your responsibility,' one user wrote. Another user says the woman walked out at the wrong moment. 'You should have scrammed when they were relentlessly bullying you to get a drink,' wrote another user. 'Period. The fact that you decided to walk out only when they wanted you to pay for it seems misplaced.' 'And these aren't your friends. No is a full sentence and why behind the no doesn't matter. You said no to alcohol and your so-called-friends didn't agree and pressured you,' wrote another user in the comments. Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store