Athletic director details how Purdue will distribute its $20.5 million to pay players
As part of the House vs NCAA settlement, athletic departments will pay out $20.5 million to players with a large percentage going to football and men's basketball.
Purdue athletic director Mike Bobinski shared details of where the Boilermakers are allocating money.
WEST LAFAYETTE — Purdue University 's commitment to football and men's basketball under the new revenue-sharing model will absorb most of the $20.5 million cap.
Purdue athletic director Mike Bobinski wouldn't detail how exact dollar figures or percentages will be allocated to sports for the 2025-26 school year, which officially surfaced with the House vs. NCAA settlement earlier this month allowing schools to pay student-athletes directly.
Bobinski did say Purdue has allocated revenue sharing funds for football, men's basketball, women's basketball and volleyball.
Additionally, Purdue has set aside "roughly" $300,000 for non-revenue sports "to either retain or recruit elite level athletes." Coaches in Purdue's non-revenue sharing sports can appeal for money in those instances and they'll be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Asked if Purdue will take a 75% for football, 15% for men's basketball approach that is somewhere in the neighborhood of the industry standard, Bobinski said it'll be a little less than that for football and more for men's basketball, citing Purdue's position in the national men's basketball landscape.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
How those programs divvy those funds is at their discretion, but Bobinski noted both are wisely holding some funding back for players in the spring transfer portal window.
Buy IndyStar's book remembering Purdue's 2024 Final Four run!
Non revenue-sharing sports will receive help by way of Alston support payments, which awards payments capped at $5,980 per school year for reaching academic benchmarks. With Purdue retaining funding of the Alston payments, $1.165 million will be cut from Purdue's $20.5 million revenue sharing limit, but Bobinski said he's uncertain if that will continue.
Bobinski has maintained his stance since the initial revenue sharing model discussions were introduced that Purdue would be a full participant. The $20.5 million figure will increase to $21.3 on July 1, 2026 ahead of the 2026-27 school year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Kirk Ferentz's take on college's new era may surprise you ahead of 27th Iowa season
IOWA CITY, Iowa — In the era of college athletics defined by unlimited free agency, revenue sharing and an expanding playoff system, it may be stunning to some that the longest tenured person leading a football program is comfortable with the new status quo. Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz will lead the Hawkeyes for a 27th season this fall and has acquired a vanilla reputation that can border on stale and resistant to change. But when it comes to paying athletes and allowing them to move around at a whim, Ferentz is more invigorated than many of his peers. Advertisement 'In some crazy way, I enjoy all the crazy stuff that's going on the last couple of years here with our game and the landscape and all that,' said Ferentz recently in an exclusive interview with The Athletic. 'It's almost like a challenge in some ways. And then the single best part is just the people you work with, and that hasn't changed.' The stress of paying athletes, some of whom take a nomadic journey as yearly free agents, has contributed to driving out national championship-winning coaches in football and men's basketball. Ferentz has chosen a different route. He has long supported athlete compensation, especially with soaring media rights revenues in college football. Iowa football, for instance, directly generated nearly $92 million in the athletic department's 2024 fiscal year financial statement and indirectly brought in around $50 million more in unspecified revenue. Yet in the same fiscal year, only $4.16 million went toward football scholarships. 'I think we all agree, at least I certainly do, that the revenue has really grown at a pace nobody really foresaw, other than maybe (former Big Ten commissioner) Jim Delany 15 years ago,' Ferentz said. 'So, it ought to be redistributed. Whatever the numbers are on that, that's for somebody else to decide. I think this is great. 'This is easily the most interesting time that we really have faced.' Iowa's competitors have used Ferentz's age against him in recruiting battles for a decade, but he approaches his 70th birthday on Aug. 1 knowing he is one victory shy of tying Ohio State legend Woody Hayes for the Big Ten career record. And not an ounce of quit in him. In the past, Ferentz responded to questions about his age with a self-deprecating quip or by shrugging it off entirely. Now, he brings up his age first, like anyone nearing a milestone, and he's both reflective and vulnerable. Advertisement 'I'm not sure how that happened,' Ferentz said. 'It doesn't seem like it was that long ago when I was in my 40s or 50s. … 'Nobody can predict the future that way, but I guess I would say the odds are better (for) me being here in five years now than they were in '99 or 2000. I'm not trying to put a timeframe on this because nobody can answer that question. I don't know what it feels like to be 73 or 72 or 74. I know what I feel right now, and I feel pretty good. I feel like this is what I still enjoy doing. I enjoy the people I'm with every day.' But Ferentz can't go too long without invoking dry humor on the topic, especially related to retirement. Five years ago, when the world partially shut down due to the COVID-19 pandemic, he realized how much he loved his sport. He doesn't have hobbies like golf or fishing. Trying to work from home made him — and especially his wife of 45 years — grasp how miserable he could become once he stepped away from coaching. 'I don't want to speak for Mary, but she actually said that 'I'm not sure we're ready for, you know?'' Ferentz said. 'That's kind of her one requisite. Whenever I do quit, I need to have something to go to because she doesn't want me sitting home looking at her all day or asking her stupid questions.' Many observers would have predicted that day would have come by now. Instead, perhaps guided by his NFL background, Ferentz adapted to the open transfer portal and athlete compensation in part because of his experiences in 2022. Iowa's Swarm Collective debuted that summer, and it struggled to gain meaningful promotion from the school's athletic department. Ferentz called for the department to prioritize the collective, and when it received only a patronizing nod, the coach fully endorsed it publicly. He also took on an aggressive portal approach that ultimately landed an NCAA violation and a one-game suspension for contacting quarterback Cade McNamara before he entered the transfer portal. Advertisement Concurrently with his pursuit of McNamara, Ferentz also dealt with eight players leaving in the transfer portal in a two-day span, far more than he expected. He said that 'rocked my world a little bit.' 'It was more like a blow to your ego,' Ferentz said. 'It was kind of like getting rejected asking somebody to go to the homecoming dance, and eight girls in a row said no. 'Then two things happened there. No. 1, it dawned on me, if these guys aren't happy here, if they don't think this is the right place for them, it's probably better for all of us if they do transfer. … Then the flip side of that was I started thinking about some of the guys that had joined us.' Ferentz referenced the lower-level players he brought in previously as graduate or junior college transfers and how they made immediate contributions. He now views the transfer portal through a similar lens. The program can recruit players who are excited to compete for Iowa but do it in a way that fortifies the current roster. 'It's almost a good trade-off rather than having somebody on your team that's not sure they want to be there,' Ferentz said. 'Now you've got guys, they're just excited as hell to be here. So, hey, let's go for it.' Ferentz blends an aggressive, yet piecemeal, portal approach with his tenets of building a program through traditional recruiting. This offseason, Iowa competed for and landed South Dakota State quarterback Mark Gronowski, who was the FCS player of the year in 2023. The Hawkeyes also added potential starters at left tackle, wide receiver and defensive tackle, plus two backup quarterbacks. The constant challenges associated with paying athletes could temper the results. Seemingly every day, a player or an agent contacts Ferentz's staff wanting to renegotiate their shared revenue allotment, which has prompted many coaches to leave the industry. Although he hasn't spoken with former colleague Nick Saban, whom he worked with in Cleveland, Ferentz said he was 'intrigued' by men's basketball coaches Tony Bennett at Virginia and Jay Wright of Villanova stepping down in recent years. Advertisement But that's not for Ferentz, at least not yet. He remains inquisitive about new approaches and adjustments, but tries to focus on his daily tasks and players. 'One thing age teaches you is you become a little bit more aware of how much you don't know,' Ferentz said. 'There are certain days where you wonder if you know anything, especially with all the changes in the world. But there's always a puzzle to solve. There's always something to be working on, and I guess I enjoy that.' Ferentz is under contract through 2030, and neither he nor his program has shown signs of slowing down. Over the past decade, Iowa has 89 wins to rank 11th among Power 4 schools. Over that span, it has four 10-win campaigns and is one of only five programs nationally to win at least eight games in each of the last nine full seasons (Iowa was 6-2 during the 2020 season). 'I'm proud of what the record says over the last 10 years, wins and losses-wise,' Ferentz said. 'We probably don't advocate for ourselves a lot. We don't try to toot our own horns and all that stuff. It's more about the doing. And I know we live in a world right now, we all want to talk about what's going to happen. What's more important is what does happen, and then at least history will document that. And you're never gonna please everybody anyway.' Ferentz added: 'Some people have asked, why'd you stay? Why didn't you ever leave? I've never had a compelling time to leave. Fortunately, my health has been good enough, and I've got the permission of my wife so far. So those combinations have been good.'
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
IMG Academy CEO: Why colleges should add sports teams after NCAA-House settlement
College sports face a tipping point — one that impacts millions of future student-athletes. On the heels of the recent House v. NCAA settlement, universities must grapple with an evolving economic model for sports. The knee-jerk reaction too often is to consider reducing rosters and teams. It doesn't have to be this way. Here's the counterintuitive truth: universities should add student-athletes and sports teams, not cut them. Sports education — without any media rights or ticket sales — can be economically self-sustaining and wildly successful for students. That's not sentimental optimism. It's a sound strategic play. Universities are grappling with the fact that they want to be in the 'business of education.' Yet, a (small) fraction of their sports teams and student-athletes are exceptionally good at entertaining adults. Entertaining adults is the 'business of sport.' WHAT'S NEXT?: NCAA commissioners pledge to follow NIL rules after settlement We need to turn over every available stone before we let the 'entertaining adults' side of sports come at the cost of educating fewer students through sports. In fact, we should use this moment to tip the conversation in a positive direction: add student-athletes and teams. The mission-aligned case for a university is this — student-athletes improve the educational makeup of a university, add to culture and graduate as tomorrow's leaders. According to Education Week, 57% of all high school students have played a sport, and student-athletes are the largest affinity group entering college by a wide margin; serving this group (varsity or otherwise) well serves a university's goals. Student-athletes also represent a future shift in education: with AI emerging, top skills of tomorrow include resilience teamwork, and self-motivation according to global hiring managers surveyed by the World Economic Forum. These are 'sports skills' and can be taught just like math and science. Student-athlete graduates have an outsized impact in the workforce, as demonstrated by the fact that 52% of C-suite women executives played sports in college, according to the EY Women Athletes Business Network and ESPN. While all of that should carry the day, it often doesn't. Why? The simple truth is that even non-profit universities need a business case — profits and losses — as the leading qualifier. There is also a strong economic case. Sports education — without any media rights or ticket sales — can be economically self-sustaining and wildly successful for students. The proven key to the model working for a university is to add more tuition-paying student-athletes and teams. SETTLEMENT FAQS: What you need to know about the college sports landscape Universities should understand the model, but it requires a shift in historical thinking. The first shift is to count tuition (tuition from paying student-athletes often exceeds scholarships) in the financial equation for sports. Case in point, sports are often called 'non-revenue' sports, even when most of the athletes are in fact tuition paying. Any aspect of a university would fall short of profit and loss goals if tuition was not counted. The second is to add more student-athletes — leveraging fixed facility investments and semi-fixed staffing costs — to improve the overall discount rate for the student-athlete population. For many universities, the discount rate for student-athletes can be more attractive than the university average. This is not a new concept but rather applies an existing concept to sports. Public universities support lower in-state tuition and financial aid by enrolling higher paying out-of-state applicants. Universities support domestic student financial aid and academic program expansion by enrolling high-pay international applicants. Universities willing to reframe the conversation and consider adding student-athletes will find great success, great students, great athletes and great economics. Right now, high school student-athletes are being squeezed out of college athletics by the trifecta of roster caps, longer eligibility for existing NCAA athletes and the transfer portal allowing college coaches to recruit college players over high school players. This is bad for millions of high school athletes, and it is adding to an already massive supply-demand imbalance in market (only 3% of high school student-athletes can find Division I rosters, and 5-7% find rosters of any kind). The upshot for universities: there are so many more tuition paying student-athletes that want to play, if offered a varsity or varsity-like student-athlete experience. A more detailed framework can be read at This framework is already circulating in universities, picking up steam, and outlines a 'Varsity Club' model and clear action plan that any university can run with, immediately. Let's not allow the business of entertaining adults to come at the cost of educating students through sports. This is a tipping point. A few voices can tip this in the right direction. Brent Richard is a career investor, operator and entrepreneur in sports and education, the CEO of IMG Academy, and a former Division I soccer player. This op-ed was developed in collaboration with Drew Weatherford, founder of Weatherford Capital, co-founder of Collegiate Athletic Solutions, and former Florida State starting quarterback.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
IMG Academy CEO: Why colleges should more sports teams after NCAA House settlement
College sports face a tipping point — one that impacts millions of future student-athletes. On the heels of the recent House v. NCAA settlement, universities must grapple with an evolving economic model for sports. The knee-jerk reaction too often is to consider reducing rosters and teams. It doesn't have to be this way. Advertisement Here's the counterintuitive truth: universities should add student-athletes and sports teams, not cut them. Sports education — without any media rights or ticket sales — can be economically self-sustaining and wildly successful for students. That's not sentimental optimism. It's a sound strategic play. Universities are grappling with the fact that they want to be in the 'business of education.' Yet, a (small) fraction of their sports teams and student-athletes are exceptionally good at entertaining adults. Entertaining adults is the 'business of sport.' WHAT'S NEXT?: NCAA commissioners pledge to follow NIL rules after settlement We need to turn over every available stone before we let the 'entertaining adults' side of sports come at the cost of educating fewer students through sports. In fact, we should use this moment to tip the conversation in a positive direction: add student-athletes and teams. Advertisement The mission-aligned case for a university is this — student-athletes improve the educational makeup of a university, add to culture and graduate as tomorrow's leaders. According to Education Week, 57% of all high school students have played a sport, and student-athletes are the largest affinity group entering college by a wide margin; serving this group (varsity or otherwise) well serves a university's goals. Student-athletes also represent a future shift in education: with AI emerging, top skills of tomorrow include resilience teamwork, and self-motivation according to global hiring managers surveyed by the World Economic Forum. These are 'sports skills' and can be taught just like math and science. Student-athlete graduates have an outsized impact in the workforce, as demonstrated by the fact that 52% of C-suite women executives played sports in college, according to the EY Women Athletes Business Network and ESPN. While all of that should carry the day, it often doesn't. Why? The simple truth is that even non-profit universities need a business case — profits and losses — as the leading qualifier. There is also a strong economic case. Sports education — without any media rights or ticket sales — can be economically self-sustaining and wildly successful for students. The proven key to the model working for a university is to add more tuition-paying student-athletes and teams. SETTLEMENT FAQS: What you need to know about the college sports landscape Advertisement Universities should understand the model, but it requires a shift in historical thinking. The first shift is to count tuition (tuition from paying student-athletes often exceeds scholarships) in the financial equation for sports. Case in point, sports are often called 'non-revenue' sports, even when most of the athletes are in fact tuition paying. Any aspect of a university would fall short of profit and loss goals if tuition was not counted. The second is to add more student-athletes — leveraging fixed facility investments and semi-fixed staffing costs — to improve the overall discount rate for the student-athlete population. For many universities, the discount rate for student-athletes can be more attractive than the university average. This is not a new concept but rather applies an existing concept to sports. Public universities support lower in-state tuition and financial aid by enrolling higher paying out-of-state applicants. Universities support domestic student financial aid and academic program expansion by enrolling high-pay international applicants. Universities willing to reframe the conversation and consider adding student-athletes will find great success, great students, great athletes and great economics. Right now, high school student-athletes are being squeezed out of college athletics by the trifecta of roster caps, longer eligibility for existing NCAA athletes and the transfer portal allowing college coaches to recruit college players over high school players. This is bad for millions of high school athletes, and it is adding to an already massive supply-demand imbalance in market (only 3% of high school student-athletes can find Division I rosters, and 5-7% find rosters of any kind). Advertisement The upshot for universities: there are so many more tuition paying student-athletes that want to play, if offered a varsity or varsity-like student-athlete experience. A more detailed framework can be read at This framework is already circulating in universities, picking up steam, and outlines a 'Varsity Club' model and clear action plan that any university can run with, immediately. Let's not allow the business of entertaining adults to come at the cost of educating students through sports. This is a tipping point. A few voices can tip this in the right direction. Brent Richard is a career investor, operator and entrepreneur in sports and education, the CEO of IMG Academy, and a former Division I soccer player. This op-ed was developed in collaboration with Drew Weatherford, founder of Weatherford Capital, co-founder of Collegiate Athletic Solutions, and former Florida State starting quarterback. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Colleges should add sports teams after NCAA House settlement
