Farm ministry apologizes over erroneous rice supply and demand forecasts
The lawmakers argue that the errors have eroded public trust in the government and should have been caught earlier.
'We have been operating under the assumption that Japan had enough rice. However, we now know that a gap in supply and demand has occurred as a result of our faulty forecast. We would like to offer our apologies to you here today,' said Vice Minister Tsuyoshi Watanabe at an LDP policy panel.
The farm ministry's forecasts for rice demand was off by 370,000 metric tons for rice produced between July 2024 and June 2025, and by 230,000 tons for the harvest between July 2023 and June 2024.
Watanabe's remarks came after Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba acknowledged on Tuesday that the sharp rise in rice prices over the past year was the result of insufficient domestic production and the government's failure to accurately forecast demand.
Ishiba said that Japan will boost its rice harvest in a reversal of a long-standing policy of limiting production — a measure that has been in place since around 1969 in response to chronic oversupply.
Lower House lawmaker Yasushi Kaneko, head of the LDP's agriculture policy committee, gives opening remarks at a meeting on Aug. 8 at party headquarters. |
Himari Semans
The farm ministry plans to increase production by consolidating and enlarging crop sizes using artificial intelligence, robots, drones and other 'smart farming' technologies.
It will also forecast supply and demand 'with a margin of safety' and assess the current situation to make supply chains more transparent.
Farm minister Shinjiro Koizumi also apologized to the public on Friday to take partial responsibility for causing the rice shortage.
'I admit that the rice shortage was undeniably caused in part by the farm ministry. That being said, we need to improve the way we forecast supply and demand,' Koizumi said.
At the LDP meeting, lawmakers vented their concerns over the ministry's sudden admission — a complete reversal of the government's earlier explanation, which had blamed the rice shortage on supply chain disruptions.
'Why did it take so long for (the ministry) to figure this out?' Lower House lawmaker Kaoru Fukuda, a former bureaucrat at the ministry, said.
Others pointed out that the ministry's overdue realization undermines public confidence.
Some LDP lawmakers were frustrated with the lack of communication between the government and the ruling party.
'The government announced (the decision to boost rice production) before listening to our opinions. The facts are being delivered in misleading ways and causing confusion. We get together in these meetings as the receiving end of complaints. This happens too often,' said Lower House lawmaker Jun Tsushima.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
China detains senior diplomat Liu Jianchao for probe, WSJ reports
Liu Jianchao, a senior Chinese diplomat widely seen as a potential future foreign minister, has been taken away by authorities for questioning, The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday. Liu was taken away after returning to Beijing in late July from an overseas work trip, WSJ reported, citing people familiar with the matter. China's State Council Information Office, which handles media queries for the Chinese government, and the Chinese Communist Party International Liaison Department did not immediately respond to request for comment. Liu, 61, has led the Communist Party's body in charge of managing ties with foreign political parties. Since taking the role in 2022, he has traveled to more than 20 nations and met officials from more than 160 countries. Liu's busy schedule, especially his meetings with the former U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Washington, stoked expectations that the former ambassador and ministry spokesman was being groomed to be the next foreign minister. His detention marks the highest-level probe involving a diplomat since China ousted Qin Gang, its former foreign minister and President Xi Jinping's protege, in 2023 following rumors of an extramarital affair. Born in the northeastern province of Jilin, Liu majored in English at Beijing Foreign Studies University and studied international relations at Oxford before taking up his first post as a translator with the Foreign Ministry. He has served in China's mission to Britain and later as ambassador to Indonesia and the Philippines. During his time as ministry spokesman, he was known for humorous off-the-cuff comments while making a no-nonsense defense of China's interests.
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Why It's Been Such a Slow Congressional Retirement Season
The odd-year summer break from legislative action on Capitol Hill can be a tense waiting period to see how incumbents feel back home. These lawmakers, particularly those who run every two years in battleground House districts, get extended time in front of their constituents to gauge how their party's agenda is faring with voters. Plus, perhaps more important, they get a long stretch of time to determine whether they want to continue the breakneck pace for the next 16 months, with the reward being another two-year term for a job that can be quite frustrating. The question now is whether this summer and fall will play out like 2017, when a flood of Republican retirements set in motion a Democratic takeover during President Donald Trump's first midterm in 2018. Or it could play out more like 2024, when many retirees came from politically safe seats in both parties – and those so-called open seats had little impact in determining the House majority, which the Republicans maintained with the narrowest edge in almost 100 years. One new wrinkle is all the states discussing drawing new congressional districts to give their side a better chance at the majority come November 2026. That could freeze the decision-making process for several more months. Some safe incumbents want to know whether they are getting moved into politically untenable new districts, in which case they might head for the exits rather than run hard when defeat is certain. For now, eight Democrats and 11 Republicans are retiring from the House at the end of their terms next year, but 15 of them are actually running for higher office. Another, Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D), will retire at the end of this year if she wins the New Jersey governor's race in November. Just three of those 20 come from battleground districts: Reps. Don Bacon (R-Nebraska), Angie Craig (D-Minnesota) and John James (R-Michigan). But Craig and James are running next year for senator and governor, respectively, in their states. So far Bacon, from a district that favored Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the last two elections, is retiring from elective politics entirely and vacating a true swing seat. After the 2024 elections left the House in a near tie – 220 Republicans, 215 Democrats – some longtime political analysts question whether it matters if an incumbent is on the ballot at all, because the deciding voters tend to have low information about politics and, if they vote, side with the party out of power. 'This country is evenly divided, which often leads to an evenly split House. Additionally, House races have become increasingly close to being parliamentary – who the candidates are is of less importance than the party they represent,' Charlie Cook, founder of the Cook Political Report With Amy Walter, wrote in late July. 'Among the tiny slice of voters in the middle, when they do vote, they are far more likely to vote against a candidate than for someone.' Regardless of such assessments, the operatives inside the two caucus's political arms – Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and its counterpart, National Republican Congressional Committee – always believe it's best to have their battle-tested incumbents running for reelection, as they are familiar to voters and comfortable raising the extreme amounts of money needed in today's politics. And there also tend to be domino effects among lawmakers who see longtime friends deciding to leave, prompting them to consider retiring rather than running for another term. Trump's first midterm election cycle provided a great example of this, as the return from August recess started with a retirement bang. Within five days in early September 2017, Reps. Dave Reichert (R-Washington), Charlie Dent (R-Pennsylvania) and Dave Trott (R-Michigan) announced they would vacate their suburban swing districts. Reichert and Dent had won seven terms, and Trott two. All three won in 2016 by wide double-digit margins. In his announcement, Dent cited a political climate dominated by 'disruptive outside influences that profit from increased polarization and ideological rigidity that leads to dysfunction.' Democrats won all three of those seats the following year. That set the tone for the remainder of the midterm elections, as seasoned GOP members bowed out, including two veteran California Republicans, Reps. Darrell Issa and Edward R. Royce, who announced two days apart in early January 2018 that they would not run for reelection. Democrats won both of those seats also, en route to an election in which they won 13 seats previously held by Republicans that had been left open by retirements, and one where the GOP incumbent lost his primary. Democrats won a net gain of more than 40 seats in 2018 and held the majority for four years. All told, 52 House members retired that election season, including the speaker, Paul D. Ryan (R-Wisconsin), the largest number in the past 30 years, according to the Brookings Institution. Almost three dozen more lost either in their primary or general elections, a massive turnover of more than 20 percent of the 435-member House. Sometimes the retirement wave does not start after the August recess and instead comes later in the odd year, around the Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday season. That's also the point at which veteran incumbents and their campaign operatives have a bit more political data about where the district stands, how it approves or disapproves of the president, and whether the lawmaker can win in the upcoming midterm. In mid-December 2009, Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tennessee), a 13-term veteran, joined a growing number of Democrats who saw a brutal 2010 taking shape and decided to depart. In Gordon's case, he had coasted to reelection every two years, not even facing a Republican opponent in 2008, but that year his voters had given John McCain a more than 20-point margin in the district over Barack Obama. He hit a reflective point in life and decided it was time to bolt. 'Turning 60 has led me to do some thinking about what's next,' Gordon said in a statement at the time. 'I have an 8-year-old daughter and a wonderful wife who has a very demanding job.' Gordon was one of four Democrats, with more than 60 years of combined experience, to announce retirement plans in the week of Thanksgiving or the two weeks following it. Obama had become deeply unpopular in the South. In spring 2010, just 42 percent of Tennesseans approved of his job performance. As a result, Republicans won Gordon's seat with 67 percent of the vote, and they have held it since without too much effort. Republicans won the three other seats as well, part of a 63-seat wave in terms of House seats gained. Today's swing-seat incumbents are dominated by a large number of relative newcomers, the type of people who are in quite different political circumstances than Gordon in 2010 or Reichert in 2018. Of the 18 House races that the Cook report rates as pure toss-ups, just three incumbents started serving before Trump ran for president in 2016: Reps. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Scott Perry (R-Pennsylvania) and David Schweikert (R-Arizona). Expanding out to include the next 22 most competitive races, only three incumbents began their House service before Trump entered politics. By and large, these incumbents have generational profiles like Reps. Michael Lawler (R-New York) and Emilia Strong Sykes (D-Ohio). Lawler, 38, defeated a Democratic incumbent in 2022, helping Republicans reclaim the House majority, and won again in 2024 even as Harris won his district over Trump. Sykes, 39, won a close race in 2022 and, in a presidential year in which Harris and Trump effectively tied in her district, she won by more than 2 percentage points. At this point, especially after Lawler decided against a bid for governor, both are running hard for reelection with no intent to retire. Yet each of their states gets mentioned when it comes to redistricting, with Republicans having full control of the Ohio state legislature and Democrats in charge of the New York legislature. If those states start redrawing the House districts, their seats would be prime targets for partisans to move the lines around to make easy pickups for the other party. Any massive revamping of these districts could prompt a flurry of new retirement announcements.
Japan Times
4 hours ago
- Japan Times
U.S. and Japan working to announce tariffs won't stack
The United States is working to finalize an announcement that would end the stacking of universal tariffs on Japanese goods, a senior Trump administration official said Friday. The plans, detailed on the condition of anonymity, would resolve prolonged confusion over how U.S. President Donald Trump intended to impose levies on a key trading partner after striking a deal, and match public comments made by Ryosei Akazawa, Tokyo's top trade negotiator, after a meeting on Thursday with his counterparts in Washington. The announcement, which could take the form of a joint statement from the two countries, would clarify that Japan — like the European Union — would see its 15% reciprocal tariff rate incorporate existing most-favored nation duties. Akazawa, who met with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, said U.S. officials expressed regret that the stacking rule had been applied to Japan despite a verbal agreement, and said Washington would refund any overpaid levies, he said. "We've strongly urged our counterparts to promptly implement these measures,' Akazawa told reporters on Saturday, shortly after returning to Tokyo. He declined to comment on when a decision will be made, but made mention of the U.S.-U.K. trade pact and how it took 54 days to take effect. "Keeping such things in mind when it comes to timing, we believe every day matters,' Akazawa said. Japan was hit with higher-than-expected universal tariffs as part of the wave of new levies introduced by the Trump administration Thursday. While the scale of the discrepancy was likely minor, the confusion sparked renewed criticism of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who already faces calls to step down over a poor election showing. "We have confirmed that when the U.S. side takes measures to revise the executive order on universal tariffs, they will issue another order to reduce tariffs on cars and auto parts,' Akazawa said. "We will continue to urge the U.S. side, through all available means and channels' to make those things happen, he said. He added that he wasn't sure when the orders would be issued, but he didn't expect it to take as long as six months or a year. Under the stacking system, the 15% tariff applied to Japan is being added to existing levies on its products. When Japan receives an exemption, Akazawa said that the 15% rate would apply to items that previously had levies of less than 15%, while items that in the past had tariffs of more than 15% will no longer face additional levies. More importantly for the Japanese economy, carmakers are still struggling with tariffs at 27.5% — a combination of a previous 2.5% rate and a new 25% levy applied by Trump. "With each day that passes, the losses incurred by Japanese companies are mounting,' Akazawa said, adding that some companies are seeing an hourly loss of ¥100 million ($679,000), without citing which companies they are. "In this respect, there is no change to what we have been saying previously. We are seeking the issuance of the executive order as quickly as possible — whether by a day or even by a moment,' he said. The lack of clarity on the timing of a promised cut to 15% is making it hard for the car companies, mainstays of the economy, to plan ahead. The auto sector employs roughly 8% of the nation's workforce and is a trend setter for wage growth, which has supported the central bank's gradual interest rate hikes. Japan's benchmark Topix index climbed as much as 1.7% after Akazawa spoke, with a measure of automakers among sectors providing the biggest boost. Toyota and Honda each rose more than 3%. Akazawa chalked up the discrepancies over the stacked tariffs as a misstep introduced during the administrative processing of the agreement, insisting that Japan and the U.S. were aligned on the trade deal agreed in late July. He also defended his call not to draw up the agreement in writing — a decision that has been questioned by opposition lawmakers as confusion mounted over the finer details of the deal. Still, he did not give an indication of when the lower across-the-board and reduced auto tariffs may come into effect, instead saying it will happen "in a timely manner.' He hinted that he may continue to travel to Washington, and said he'd invited his U.S. counterparts to Japan. "As I understand it, the U.S. side will handle the matter in a reasonable manner. That is why we are saying the tariffs will be implemented 'in due course',' he said.
