HostColor Expands Its AMD Dedicated Server Offerings in LA and New York
HostColor.com (HC), a globally recognized provider of cloud infrastructure and managed services, has announced the availability of custom-built, high-bandwidth, high-performance AMD dedicated server platforms in several new data center locations. HostColor's new primary New York City service location for delivering AMD CPU-powered servers is the DataBank data center, located at 111 Eighth Avenue in Downtown Manhattan in a telecommunications building owned by Google. Other new data center locations for delivering AMD CPU-powered bare metal servers include Equinix LA3 and CoreSite LA2 in Los Angeles.
The available AMD Ryzen processors at HostColor's new Manhattan, NYC service location are the Ryzen 9 5950X, Ryzen 9 7950X, Ryzen 9 9950X, and Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX.
The available server platforms with AMD EPYC CPUs feature: AMD EPYC 7C13, AMD EPYC 7443P, AMD EPYC 7662, AMD EPYC 9274F, AMD EPYC 9275F, AMD EPYC 9374F, AMD EPYC 9474F, AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD EPYC 9754.
Customers can customize their server configurations with IPv4 and IPv6 address space. They can also choose a network service with metered data transfer measured in terabytes (TB) transferred per month or unmetered bandwidth ports with allocations ranging from 100 Mbps to 10 Gbps. 'Unmetered bandwidth' means that the hosting infrastructure provider does not measure or limit the bandwidth used by the server. For example, at most of its Edge data centers, HostColor allows customers to use the full capacity of their dedicated servers' physical internet bandwidth port.
HostColor's AMD server customers benefit from unlimited data transfer up to the physical capacity of the internet connection ports. Unlike large hyperscale clouds, HostColor (HC) provides both Bare Metal Servers and dedicated cloud infrastructure with unmetered bandwidth ports and unlimited data transfer quotas, with no charges for inbound or outbound Internet traffic.
Compared to the infrastructure offered by the major hyperscale clouds, HC's Dedicated Cloud Hosting and bare metal offerings save a tremendous amount of financial resources. HostColor does not charge its customers for internet traffic, IOPS, DNS lookups, DNS zones, internet traffic zones, or infrastructure technical support.
All of HostColor's AMD-based server configurations provide customers with enterprise cloud computing and virtualization options, and they are compatible with Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, and other major cloud providers.
HC's AMD processor-based servers can handle large data sets and are ideal for AI-driven applications, software automation platforms, and large, complex database management systems that require data processing. They are also well-suited for various HPC workloads.
Free Infrastructure Technical Support
HostColor does not charge for access to technical support for the core functionality of its dedicated cloud hosting infrastructure. The company provides dedicated cloud servers with 'Free Infrastructure Technical Support' per Service Level Agreement (SLA). This support covers core service functionality related to network interfaces and the physical components of bare metal servers, such as CPUs, RAM, and storage drives. FITS also includes consultation on various infrastructure service use case scenarios. However, FITS does not cover maintenance and support for operating systems (OSs), custom configurations, or installed software applications. These are covered by the next level of SLA-defined technical support, Semi-Managed Dedicated Servers. This technical support agreement is based on the company's Edge Server hosting infrastructure platform.
Semi-Managed Dedicated Servers
In addition to FITS, all of HostColor's dedicated server hosting services are 'Semi-Managed' by the SLA. The provider is responsible for installing and configuring server instances according to the customer's custom configurations for Linux infrastructure environments. Additionally, HC Support reinstalls the server operating system (OS) upon request, configures and manages network settings, creates and maintains custom virtual private networks, and assists customers with troubleshooting any server-side issues related to the OS, network, or software configuration.
About HostColor
Since 2000, HostColor.com (HC) has been a global provider of semi-managed edge, bare metal, and cloud infrastructure and IT hosting services. HC operates virtual data centers and provides dedicated hosting and colocation services from over 100 data centers worldwide. Its subsidiary, HostColorEurope.com, provides cloud infrastructure and dedicated hosting services in 19 European countries. For more information, visit https://www.hostcolor.com.
Media Contact
PR Department
+1 888-222-1495
[email protected]
Attachment HostColor.com – AMD Dedicated Servers in Los Angeles and New York
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
12 hours ago
- Time Business News
Gemini vs ChatGPT: Comparing Strengths, Weaknesses, and Real-World Uses
If you're short on time, here's the essence: ChatGPT excels at creativity, storytelling, and natural conversations, while Gemini is designed for accuracy, real-time information, and seamless integration with Google's ecosystem. Think of ChatGPT as the imaginative writer who can draft essays, brainstorm ideas, and simulate engaging conversations. Gemini, on the other hand, is like a research assistant who always has the latest news, data, and Google-powered insights at hand. Which one is better? The answer depends on what you need most from an AI assistant. AI isn't just a buzzword anymore — it's becoming part of daily work, study, and even leisure. From helping students finish assignments to supporting businesses in decision-making, AI tools are shaping the way we live and work. With Google's Gemini entering the scene and OpenAI's ChatGPT already being widely adopted, the question isn't just about features. It's about trust, usability, and real-world value. Users want to know which model can best save them time, improve creativity, or provide reliable answers. That's why looking at Gemini vs ChatGPT side by side is so important. OpenAI launched ChatGPT as part of its mission to create AI that benefits humanity. Its foundation is built on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) models, which specialize in generating human-like text from prompts. Google's Gemini, however, is part of its DeepMind and AI-first strategy, aiming to combine cutting-edge research with practical applications. Gemini was designed not just to chat, but also to integrate across Google's massive ecosystem — from Docs to YouTube. This difference in origin also explains their strengths: ChatGPT leans toward conversation and creativity, while Gemini leans toward information accuracy and tool integration. ChatGPT is known for sounding natural, friendly, and often surprisingly human. It can role-play, tell stories, draft emails, and even write poetry with ease. Gemini, while conversational, tends to stay closer to facts. Its responses are polished, but you might notice they sometimes feel more formal or structured compared to ChatGPT's casual flow. If your priority is creative writing or brainstorming, ChatGPT usually has the upper hand. One of Gemini's biggest advantages is its ability to pull live data from the web. Ask about today's news, stock prices, or a trending video, and Gemini can bring you accurate, up-to-date answers. ChatGPT, on the other hand, relies on its training data unless paired with a browsing plugin or third-party integration. While the GPT-4 model has improved knowledge, it still cannot natively access the latest information in the way Gemini can. This makes Gemini especially valuable for researchers, journalists, or anyone who depends on real-time updates. When comparing Gemini vs ChatGPT, accuracy is one of the most debated aspects. ChatGPT can sometimes 'hallucinate,' meaning it generates information that sounds convincing but isn't factually correct. can sometimes 'hallucinate,' meaning it generates information that sounds convincing but isn't factually correct. Gemini, with its Google integration, has a stronger foundation for fact-based responses. It's less prone to fabricating details, though it can still simplify or omit complexities. If your work requires verified and up-to-date information, Gemini has the edge. But if you're more interested in creative problem-solving, ChatGPT often feels more flexible. Gemini was built to be multimodal from the ground up — meaning it can handle text, images, audio, and video input/output more natively. This aligns with Google's vision of AI being able to process the world the way humans do. ChatGPT has also added multimodal capabilities in GPT-4, such as analyzing images or generating visuals through integrations like DALL·E. However, Gemini's design is expected to push these features even further in the future. This makes Gemini potentially more powerful in fields like education, media, and accessibility, where AI must process different types of content seamlessly. Here's where Gemini truly shines: it's part of the Google ecosystem. Imagine drafting an essay in Google Docs, asking Gemini to fact-check it, then pulling in a YouTube video summary — all without switching tabs. ChatGPT doesn't have the same native integration with platforms like Google Workspace. However, it's widely used through third-party integrations, APIs, and plugins, making it extremely versatile for businesses, developers, and individual users. If you're already heavily invested in Google tools, Gemini might feel like a natural fit. If you prefer broader customization, ChatGPT offers more flexibility. People use ChatGPT for a wide range of tasks: Students use it to explain complex topics in simpler terms. Writers and marketers rely on it for brainstorming, drafting, and editing. Professionals turn to it for email writing, meeting summaries, and idea generation. In short, ChatGPT acts as a creative partner for anyone who needs text-based assistance. Gemini's strength lies in practical productivity. For example: Journalists use it to pull breaking news updates. Analysts leverage it for quick data interpretation from Google Sheets. Everyday users rely on it to summarize YouTube content or answer factual questions instantly. It's less about brainstorming and more about getting accurate, actionable information quickly. Neither Gemini nor ChatGPT is the 'final form' of AI. Both companies are in an arms race to improve usability, accuracy, and creativity. ChatGPT will likely continue leading in conversational depth and creativity . . Gemini will likely dominate in real-time data, integrations, and multimodal performance. For users, this means more choice, more power, and more ways to work smarter with AI. When it comes to Gemini vs ChatGPT, there's no universal 'winner.' The smarter choice depends on your personal or professional needs: Pick ChatGPT if you value creativity, natural conversation, and flexible brainstorming. if you value creativity, natural conversation, and flexible brainstorming. Pick Gemini if you prioritize accuracy, real-time information, and seamless Google integration. In reality, many people may find themselves using both — one as a creative companion, the other as a reliable researcher. 1. Is Gemini more accurate than ChatGPT? Yes, Gemini is generally more accurate for real-time facts because it pulls data from the web, while ChatGPT relies on trained data unless extended with browsing. 2. Can ChatGPT generate more creative content than Gemini? Yes, ChatGPT is often better at writing stories, brainstorming ideas, or creating content that requires imagination. 3. Which is better for students: Gemini or ChatGPT? Students may benefit more from ChatGPT for essays and explanations, while Gemini is useful for research and fact-checking. 4. Does Gemini replace ChatGPT? Not necessarily. Gemini complements ChatGPT by excelling in areas like real-time accuracy and Google tool integration. 5. Will both Gemini and ChatGPT keep improving? Absolutely. Both Google and OpenAI are investing heavily in AI, meaning users can expect faster, smarter, and more capable versions in the future. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Trump's unprecedented, potentially unconstitutional deal with Nvidia and AMD, explained: Alexander Hamilton would approve
'We negotiated a little deal,' President Donald Trump told reporters on August 11, about the developing situation with leading chip makers Nvidia and AMD continuing to do business in China. He explained that he originally wanted a 20% cut of Nvidia's sales in exchange for the company obtaining export licenses to sell H20 chip to China, but he was persuaded to settle at 15%. The H20 chip is 'obsolete,' Trump added … 'he's selling a essentially old chip.' The chips do appear to be quite significant to China, considering that the Cyberspace Administration of China held discussions with Nvidia over security concerns that the H20 chips may be tracked and turned off remotely, according to a disclosure on its website. The deal, which lifted an export ban on Nvidia's H20 AI chips and AMD's MI308, and followed heated negotiations, was widely described as unusual and also still theoretical at this point, with the legal details still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce. Legal experts have questioned whether the eventual deal would constitute an unconstitutional export tax, as the U.S. Constitution prohibits duties on exports. This has come to be known as the 'export clause' of the constitution. Indeed, it's hard to find much precedent for it anywhere in the history of the U.S. government's dealings with the corporate sector. Erik Jensen, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University who has studied the history of the export clause, told Fortune he was not aware of anything like this in history. In the 1990s, he added, the Supreme Court struck down two attempted taxes on export clause grounds (cases known as IBM and U.S. Shoe). Jensen said tax practitioners were surprised that the court took up the cases: 'if only because most pay no attention to constitutional limitations, and the Court hadn't heard any export clause cases in about 70 years.' The takeaway was clear, Jensen said: 'The export clause matters.' Columbia University professor Eric Talley agreed with Jensen, telling Fortune that while the federal government has previously applied subsidies to exports, he's not aware of other historical cases imposing taxes on selected exporters. Talley also cited the export clause as the usual grounds for finding such arrangements unconstitutional. Rather than downplaying the uniqueness of the arrangement, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been leaning into it. In a Bloomberg television interview, he said: 'I think you know, right now, this is unique. But now that we have the model and the beta test, why not expand it? I think we could see it in other industries over time.' Bessent and the White House insist there are 'no national security concerns,' since only less-advanced chips are being sold to China. Instead, officials have touted the deal as a creative solution to balance trade, technology, and national policy. How rare is this? The arrangement has drawn sharp reaction from business leaders, legal experts, and trade analysts. Julia Powles, director of UCLA's Institute for Technology, Law & Policy, told the Los Angeles Times: 'It ties the fate of this chip manufacturer in a very particular way to this administration, which is quite rare.' Experts warned that if replicated, this template could pressure other firms—not just tech giants—into similar arrangements with the government. Already, several unprecedented arrangements have been struck between the Trump administration and the corporate sector, ranging from the 'golden share' in U.S. Steel negotiated as part of its takeover by Japan's Nippon Steel to the federal government reportedly discussing buying a stake in chipmaker Intel. Nvidia and AMD have declined to comment on specifics. When contacted by Fortune for comment, Nvidia reiterated its statement that it follows rules the U.S. government sets for its participation in worldwide markets. 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide. America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race.' The White House declined to comment about the potential deal. AMD did not respond to a request for comment. While Washington has often intervened in business—especially in times of crisis—the mechanism and magnitude of the Nvidia/AMD deal are virtually unprecedented in recent history. The federal government appears to have never previously claimed a percentage of corporate revenue from export sales as a precondition for market access. Instead, previous actions took the form of temporary nationalization, regulatory control, subsidies, or bailouts—often during war or economic emergency. Examples of this include the seizure of coal mines (1946) and steel mills (1952) during labor strikes, as well as the 2008 financial crisis bailouts, where the government took equity stakes in large corporations including two of Detroit's Big three and most of Wall Street's key banks. During World War I, the War Industries Board regulated prices, production, and business conduct for the war effort. Congress has previously created export incentives and tax-deferral strategies (such as the Domestic International Sales Corporation and Foreign Sales Corporation Acts), but these measures incentivized sales rather than directly diverting a fixed share of export revenue to the government. Legal scholars stress that such arrangements were subjected to global trade rules and later modified after international complaints. Global lack of precedent The U.S. prohibition on export taxes dates back to the birth of the nation. Case Western's Jensen has written that some delegates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, such as New York's Alexander Hamilton, were in favor of the government being able to tax revenue sources such as imports and exports, but the 'staple states' in the southern U.S. were fiercely opposed, given their agricultural bent, especially the importance of cotton at that point. Still, many other countries currently have export taxes on the books, though they are generally imposed across all exporters, rather than as one-off arrangements that remove barriers to a specific market. And many of the nations with export taxes are developing countries who tax agricultural or resource commodities. In several cases (Uganda, Malaya, Sudan, Nigeria, Haiti, Thailand), export taxes made up 10% to 40% of total government tax revenue in the 1960s and 1970s, according to an IMF staff paper. Globally, most countries tax profits generated within their borders ('source-based corporate taxes'), but rarely as a direct percentage of export sales as a market access precondition. The standard model is taxation of locally earned profits, regardless of export destination; licensing fees and tariffs may be applied, but not usually as a fixed percent of export revenue as a pre-negotiated entry fee. Although the Nvidia/AMD deal doesn't take the usual form of a tax, Case Western's Jensen added. 'I don't see what else it could be characterized as.' It's clearly not a 'user fee,' which he said is the usual triable issue of law in export clause cases. For instance, if goods or services are being provided by the government in exchange for the charge, such as docking fees at a governmentally operated port, then that charge isn't a tax or duty and the Export Clause is irrelevant. 'I just don't see how the charges that will be levied in the chip cases could possibly be characterized in that way.' Players have been known to 'game' the different legal treatments of subsidies and taxes, Columbia's Talley added. He cited the example of a government imposing a uniform, across-the-board tax on all producers, but then providing a subsidy to sellers who sell to domestic markets. 'The net effect would be the same as a tax on exports, but indirectly.' He was unaware of this happening in the U.S. but cited several international examples including Argentina, India, and even the EU. One famous example of a canny international tax strategy was Apple's domicile in Ireland, along with so many other multinationals keeping their international profits offshore in affiliates in order to avoid paying U.S. tax, which at the time applied to all worldwide income upon repatriation. Talley said much of this went away after the 2018 tax reforms, which moved the U.S. away from a worldwide corporate tax, with some exceptions. The protection racket comparison If Trump's chip export tax is an anomaly in the annals of U.S. international trade, the deal structure has some parallels in another corner of the business world: organized crime, where 'protection rackets' have a long history. Businesses bound by such deals must pay a cut of their revenues to a criminal organization (or parallel government), effectively as the cost for being allowed to operate or to avoid harm. The China chip export tax and the protection rackets extract revenue as a condition for market access, use the threat of exclusion or punishment for non-payment, and both may be justified as 'protection' or 'guaranteed access,' but are not freely negotiated by the business. 'It certainly has the smell of a governmental shakedown in certain respects,' Columbia's Talley told Fortune, considering that the 'underlying threat was an outright export ban, which makes a 15% surcharge seem palatable by comparison.' Talley noted some nuances, such as the generally established broad statutory and constitutional support for national-security-based export bans on various goods and services sold to enumerated countries, which have been imposed with legal authority on China, North Korea, Iraq, Russia, Cuba, and others. 'From an economic perspective, a ban on an exported good is tantamount to a tax of 'infinity percent' on the good,' Talley said, meaning it effectively shuts down the export market for that good. 'Viewed in that light, a 15% levy is less (and not more) extreme than a ban.' Still, there's the matter, similar to Trump's tariff regime, of making a legal challenge to an ostensibly blatantly illegal policy actually hold up in court. 'A serious question with the chips tax,' Case Western's Jensen told Fortune, 'is who, if anyone, would have standing to challenge the tax?' In other words, it may be unconstitutional, but who's actually going to compel the federal government to obey the constitution? This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA (NVDA) Stock Gets Bullish Call Amid U.S.–China Chip Agreement Reports
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the . On August 12, Bank of America reiterated the stock as 'Buy.' The firm said that it is sticking with the stock after reports of a favorable deal for Nvidia to receive chip export licenses. 'Busy period of interactions between the US Government (USG)/White House (WH) and major US chipmakers. The critical nature of semis is likely to enhance these interactions that will continue to be both positive and a headwind/source of volatility. Recent news involves: 15% potential tax/levy on sales of specific AI chips in return for China approvals: a net positive and we maintain Buys on NVDA, AMD.' Analysts on Wall Street currently have a consensus 'Buy' rating on the stock. The average price target of $190 implies a 5.10% upside; however, the Street-high target of $250 implies an upside of 38%. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) specializes in AI-driven solutions, offering platforms for data centers, self-driving cars, robotics, and cloud services. While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
