&w=3840&q=100)
Xi Jinping takes aim at US' protectionism in phone call with Brazil's Lula
A readout from Brazil's government said the two leaders spoke for about one hour and exchanged views on international affairs, including recent developments around the Russia-Ukraine war. Brazil's president, known universally as Lula, and Chinese leader Xi Jinping also agreed on 'upholding multilateralism' through the Group of 20 and Brics.
During the phone conversation on Tuesday morning in Beijing, Xi called for coordinated efforts against unilateralism and protectionism — language usually used by China to criticise US trade policy. He said China supports the Brazilian people in safeguarding their country's legitimate rights, describing ties between the two nations as being 'at their best in history,' according to Chinese state broadcaster CCTV.
China is willing to work with Brazil to strengthen coordination and set an example of 'unity and self-reliance among Global South nations,' CCTV cited Xi as saying.
The call caps an effort by Lula to build solidarity across the Brics club of major emerging nations, of which Brazil is a founding member along with Russia, China and India. Lula spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the past few days, as Brazil came under pressure from the US.
Brazil has become a target of Trump's trade war after he imposed higher tariffs in an effort to end the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro on charges that he attempted a coup. Lula's government has responded by seeking to expand trade with other partners, especially with China, India and Southeast Asia.
Xi's conversation with Lula also followed Trump's demand on Monday that China massively step up its purchases of US soybeans. Beijing has bought more of the legume from its top supplier Brazil in recent months, and is also testing trial cargoes of soybean meal from Argentina, to secure supplies of the animal feed ingredient.
Trump on Tuesday extended a pause of sky-high levies on Chinese goods for another 90 days into early November. Even so, Brics countries are among the nations that were hit the hardest by higher US tariffs that went into effect last week. Brazil holds the Brics rotating presidency this year.
Trump has slammed Brics as being anti-US. The group, established in 2009, expanded last year and now also includes Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia and Egypt.
Lula met Xi in May during a state visit to Beijing, where he signed more than 30 agreements for Chinese investment in mining, transport infrastructure and ports, among other deals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump-Putin summit: Why Russia sold Alaska to the US in 1867
US President Donald Trump will be meeting his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska on Friday (August 15). The location of the high-stakes summit assumes importance as the territory was once held by Russia. It later sold it to the US for just $7.2 million. Here's why Advertisement The US bought Alaska from Russia in 1867. Wikimedia Commons United States President Donald Trump is set to meet Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday (August 15). In a gaffe earlier this week, the American leader said on television that the high-stakes summit between him and Putin will be 'in Russia'. He would have been right if only it were over a century and a half back, when the Russian empire held Alaska. Russia sold the territory to the US in 1867. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But why? We will explain. Russia seizes Alaska In the mid-18th century, Siberian merchants and adventurers crossed the Bering Sea to arrive in Alaska for sea otter pelts. The fur traders set up hubs in Sitka, formerly known as New Archangel, and on Kodiak Island. A merchant called Alexander Baranov strengthened Russia's hold on the region in the late 18th century. He expanded settlements and brutally suppressed resistance, including from the native Tlingit, who gave him the nickname 'No Heart', as per The Guardian. Later, Russian Orthodox priests reached Alaska, establishing missions and churches. Missionaries baptised an estimated 18,000 Alaska Natives, reported Associated Press (AP). Russian settlers forced Alaska Natives to harvest sea otters and other marine mammals for their pelts, Ian Hartman, a University of Alaska Anchorage history professor, told the American news agency. 'It was a relationship that the Russians made clear quite early on was not really about kind of a longer-term pattern of settlement, but it was much more about a short-term pattern of extraction,' Hartman said. The Russian population in Alaska was less than 400 permanent settlers, as per the Office of the Historian of the US State Department. Why Russia sold Alaska to the US Alaska became an expensive outpost for the Russian empire by the mid-19th century, which it could no longer afford. By 1867, the otters had been hunted nearly to extinction, taking a toll on the profitability of the colony. Russia's defeat in the Crimean War to Britain, France, and Turkey had left it broke. The Russian tsar did not want to negotiate with Great Britain or for Alaska to be taken over by an enemy. Amid its changing economic prospects and geopolitical concerns, Russia decided to sell its colony. It then sought the only other potential buyer, the United States. They came together by a mutual hostility toward Great Britain and similar stances on most foreign policy issues, according to a Library of Congress article. Russia first made the offer to sell Alaska, then called Russian America, in 1859. However, the sale was delayed by the American Civil War, as per the US state department website. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US was interested in buying Alaska as it was looking to expand. In the 1840s, it took Oregon, Texas and California as its own territory. The Americans finally bought the Russian territory in 1867 for $7.2 million. What Russia-US thought of the deal In St Petersburg, the deal was criticised by some, who believed the price for the colony was insultingly low. The liberal paper Golos described the cheap sale as 'deeply angering all true Russians'. 'Is the nation's sense of pride truly so unworthy of attention that it can be sacrificed for a mere six or seven million dollar[s],' the paper wrote. In a letter to a friend in July 1867, Eduard de Stoeckl, the Russian envoy in Washington and chief negotiator of the sale, acknowledged: 'My treaty has met with strong opposition … but this stems from the fact that no one at home has any idea of the true condition of our colonies. It was simply a matter of selling them, or watching them being taken from.' The purchase of Alaska was viewed as 'Seward's Folly' in the US. American Secretary of State, William H Seward, who negotiated the treaty, was mocked for spending the sum on a frozen wilderness. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The New-York Daily Tribune dismissed the purchase as 'the nominal possession of impassable deserts of snow'. 'We may make a treaty with Russia, but we cannot make a treaty with the North Wind or the Snow King,' its editorial read. The US saw Alaska's worth in the late 1890s. Gold was discovered in the territory in 1896. Alaska became a state in 1959. In the 1950s and '60s, large oil reserves were found there. With this, it became one of US's most resource-rich territories. Upset with the cheap sale, some fringe nationalists in Russia still call for reclaiming Alaska. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ex-Diplomat Urges India to Stand Firm Against Trump's Tariff Pressure
/ Aug 13, 2025, 08:25PM IST Former diplomat Vikas Swarup has hit back at US President Donald Trump's 50% tariff move on India, calling it a deliberate pressure tactic. He cites three main triggers: India's BRICS membership, refusal to acknowledge Trump's claimed role in the India–Pakistan ceasefire, and resistance to US demands on dairy, agriculture, and GM crops. Swarup also links the tariffs to Trump's Nobel Peace Prize ambitions and frustration over stalled Russia sanctions. While he says Pakistan has briefly gained favour in Washington, India's ties with the US remain strategic. He urges New Delhi to stay firm ahead of the high-stakes US–Russia talks in Alaska.#vikasswarup #donaldtrump #ustariffs #indiausrelations #brics #indiapakistan #nobelpeaceprize #russiaukraine #pakistan #strategicautonomy #gmfoods #dairytrade #agriculturetrade #alaskatalks #uspolitics
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Toxic Spill at China-Owned Zambian Mine 30 Times Worse Than Estimated
The partial collapse of a waste dam at a Chinese state-owned copper mine in Zambia may have released 30 times more toxic sludge into the environment than previously reported, according to an independent evaluation of the disaster. At least 1.5 million tons of the poisonous substance escaped when a reservoir failed at the Sino-Metals Leach Zambia Ltd. mine near the northern city of Kitwe, findings from the company hired to assess the environmental damage showed. That would fill more than 400 Olympic-sized pools and rank the incident among the mining industry's worst catastrophes globally. The government and the company have previously said 50,000 tons spilled in the February disaster. Video evidence from social media and field data show this to be 'grossly inaccurate,' Drizit Zambia Ltd. — hired by Sino-Metals to conduct an environmental audit of the accident — said in a June 3 letter seen by Bloomberg and verified by the company. Drizit described the event as a 'large-scale environmental catastrophe' that threatened drinking water, fishing stocks and farmland in the area. Sino-Metals, which has terminated its contract with Drizit, questioned the methodology used by the company to assess the magnitude of the spill. The disaster risks undermining Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema's plan to more than triple copper output to 3 million tons in the coming years. China Nonferrous Mining Corp., SML's parent, in 2023 pledged to invest $1.3 billion to expand output in the southern African nation, the continent's second-biggest producer of the metal. The incident also complicates Lusaka's ties with Beijing, at a time when Hichilema's administration is working to conclude restructuring deals with Chinese lenders for about $5.6 billion of debt. The US Embassy flagged concern about the scale of the disaster last week, when it ordered the immediate withdrawal of its officials from Kitwe and some surrounding areas, citing newly available information that revealed the extent of the contamination. In an Aug. 6 email to staff seen by Bloomberg and verified by the US government, US Ambassador to Zambia Michael Gonzales said the disaster appeared to be the sixth-worst in history, and that toxic substances including arsenic, cyanide, uranium will continue to pose threats to humans and animals until removed. The US Embassy declined to comment. 'Without immediate intervention, the consequences for future generations of Zambians will be severe and long-lasting,' Drizit said in the letter. The company declined to comment beyond verifying the letter, citing legal reasons. Drizit's parent company in South Africa has been in the environmental risk-mitigation industry since 1975. Sino-Metals said it terminated its contract with Drizit because of unspecified contractual breaches, and that Drizit had time to remedy these but failed. 'The dam where the tailings escaped from is still there and the amount of tailings that escaped can be ascertained by the volume of the dam,' a spokesman for the company said. 'However, if Drizit were able to calculate the amount of spillage by using social media footage, that is quite interesting methodology.' Mike Mposha, Zambia's green economy and environment minister, declined to immediately comment. Zambia's government last week played down concerns about the incident, saying there was no cause for panic and that water quality in the affected areas has been restored. Senior officials appeared on state media at the weekend drinking tap water from Kitwe to prove it was safe. No deaths or confirmed cases of heavy metal poisoning have been reported, the government said. The disaster unfolded when a dam wall breached after heavy rains on Feb. 18, releasing a torrent of sulphuric acid-bearing material used to extract copper into the nearby Mwambashi River. Preliminary assessments showed the river measured a pH as low as 1, Collins Nzovu, Zambia's water and sanitation minister, told lawmakers Feb. 21. Fluid with that level of acidity is strong enough to dissolve human bones. Water from the Mwambashi flows into the Kafue River, which passes through one of Africa's biggest national parks. Zambia's capital, Lusaka, relies on the river for much of its water supply. In the immediate aftermath of the incident, the government began dumping hundreds of tons of lime into the rivers to neutralize the acid, which had wiped out aquatic life for miles, along with crops growing alongside them. While the acidity may have returned to normal, heavy metals pose a persistent threat, especially to the 800 individuals still living near the fallout zone, Drizit's letter said. The South Africa-based company said its engagements with SML had been difficult. 'From the outset, they have actively sought to disrupt the assessment process and have made attempts to influence the outcomes of our findings,' it said. 'SML has accused us of breaching the contract and has since terminated the agreement just days before its conclusion, seemingly with the intention of preventing our report from reaching the proper authorities.' With assistance from Taonga Mitimingi. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
