Exiled crown prince: Islamic Republic ‘collapsing' in Iran
Reza Pahlavi, the exiled crown prince of Iran and son of the last Persian Shah, urged Iranians on Tuesday to prepare for the impending fall of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Islamic Republic as the country struggles to fight off attacks from Israel.
'The Islamic Republic has reached its end and is in the process of collapsing,' Pahlavi wrote on the social platform X. 'Khamenei, like a frightened rat, has gone into hiding underground and has lost control of the situation.'
'What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together, we will pass through this sharp turn in history,' he added.
The military conflict between Iran and Israel stretched into its fifth day Tuesday, with little signs of slowing as Israel hammers its Middle East rival over Tehran's nuclear pursuits.
President Trump departed the Group of Seven summit of world leaders in Canada late Monday — a day earlier than expected to return to Washington to monitor the ongoing conflict. He met with top security officials in Situation Room on Tuesday to assess the developments.
He has not ruled out the possibility of U.S. military involvement.
The Pahlavi dynasty ruled Iran from 1925 to 1979, when it was overthrown in the Islamic Revolution.
Pahlavi, penning his social media posts in English and Farsi, directed the message to his 'fellow countrymen' and encouraged an uprising.
'Now is the time to rise; the time to reclaim Iran,' he wrote. 'Let us all come forward … and bring about the end of this regime.'
Pahlavi advised that there is a plan to establish a democratic government in Iran within 100 days of the collapse of the Islamic Republic.
He also urged 'military, law enforcement, security forces and state employees' to join the effort to topple the government under Khamenei.
'Do not stand against the Iranian people for the sake of a regime whose fall has begun and is inevitable,' Pahlavi wrote. 'Do not sacrifice yourselves for a decaying regime.'
'By standing with the people, you can save your lives. Play a historic role in the transition from the Islamic Republic, and take part in building the future of Iran,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘They strike, we dance' — Iranians damn the regime amid Israeli barrage
Cries of 'death to Khamenei' filled the night air in Tehran on June 15, rising above the thunder of Israeli airstrikes. The same defiant chorus had echoed through the city the night before, as if the people were rehearsing for the fall of the very system they were raised to fear. After five inconclusive rounds of talks between Iran and the United States, Israel launched its military campaign against the Islamic Republic's leadership last week — and ordinary Iranians are not rallying around the regime. Advertisement Instead, many are now mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's fundamental miscalculation when he declared during President Donald Trump's first term, 'There will be no war, nor will we negotiate!' Neither prediction held true. A review of Persian-language outlets based outside Iran, which have broadcast a stream of comments and video updates from Iran residents in recent days, indicates that the conflict is widely seen as a war between Khamenei's regime and Israel, not as an attack on the populace. Advertisement Many of the callers are blaming Khamenei for 'dragging the people into a pointless war.' 'Ordinary Iranians are falling victim to the decision of one person: Ali Khamenei,' railed Farshid, who phoned in from Tehran. 'We are not compatriots with those who execute our kids,' exclaimed Artemis, who called Iran International — a London-based satellite channel popular among the Iranian diaspora — to voice her frustration with the regime's attempts to exploit Iranians' deeply held sense of patriotism and use it against Israel. The Islamic Republic has long been hostile to Iranian nationalism, criminalizing the observance of ancient Persian holidays and preventing people from visiting the tomb of Cyrus the Great. Advertisement It takes a great deal of effort to turn such a patriotic people against their government — and yet the regime has achieved exactly that. 'We trust that Israel will not strike us [ordinary people],' said one caller to a Persian-language outlet. Another told BBC Persian, 'These attacks are not targeting the people, they [aim] to eliminate [regime] leaders.' Social-media clips from the last few nights of airstrikes reflect similar sentiments among many Iranians, if not all. In one June 14 video, young people dance as they watch the Israeli air raids through their window. Advertisement 'They strike, we dance,' a woman comments. A similar clip posted the same day shows a few friends casually discussing the attacks on their balcony as the sky above them lights up with kinetic engagement, while a June 13 video shows people drinking alcohol over a festive picnic as the sky lights up with anti-aircraft fire. While callers understandably voice concern about civilian deaths, their comments cannot be mistaken for sympathy with the theocracy. The majority see the Islamic Republic as the instigator — not Israel. This growing divide between the people and the regime's anti-Israel fixation has been evident, especially among Iran's young people. 'No to Gaza, no to Lebanon, my life for Iran' was the youth protest chant of 2009; by 2018, their cries sharpened to 'Death to Palestine.' Soccer fans in Tehran repeated such anti-Palestinian slogans in the wake of Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 massacre, as did a group of students whose school administrators tried to lead them in a 'Death to Israel' chant. Advertisement Despite the challenges of polling under repression, various surveys have consistently shown that most Iranians reject the regime's anti-Israel foreign policy. A 2022 poll by the Paris-based Ipsos Group found that a majority of Iranians support better relations with Israel, while a 2021 study by the Netherlands-based GAMAAN research foundation revealed that most Iranians oppose the regime's 'Death to Israel' rhetoric. Pro-Israel sentiment has become so widespread in recent days that authorities have announced a crackdown on those posting content deemed to be 'in support of the Zionist terrorist regime' — a crime carrying a prison sentence of up to five years. State media have reported the arrests of at least 60 people across seven provinces for uploading videos of the attacks or for 'welcoming the Israeli strikes.' Advertisement Some are being held on Israel-linked espionage charges — and are reportedly facing death sentences. With the regime's propaganda machine in full gear and suppression intensifying, Washington must pursue maximum support for the Iranian people. The Islamic Republic's claim that it is merely defending the national interest has collapsed, and Iranians are making it clear — even in the face of arrest and execution — that Khamenei's war is not theirs. Janatan Sayeh, a Tehran-born research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, focuses on Iranian domestic affairs and the Islamic Republic's regional malign influence.
Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Japan to Protect Trade Interests And Not Rush Deal, Ishiba Says
By and Yoshiaki Nohara Save Japan will prioritize protecting its national interests in trade talks without rushing into a deal with the US, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said as he wrapped up two days of meetings at the Group of Seven gathering. Ishiba is set to leave Canada without a trade deal or a clear path toward achieving one with US President Donald Trump, who departed the gathering early in order to cope with rising tensions in the Middle East. The two had frank discussions but their views remained apart over some aspects related to trade.
Chicago Tribune
31 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
G7 leaders fail to reach ambitious joint agreements on key issues after Trump's exit
KANANASKIS, Alberta — Six of the Group of Seven leaders discussed Russia's war in Ukraine and the Israel-Iran conflict but failed to reach major agreements on those and many other top issues — wrapping up a summit that was forced to try and show how the wealthy nations' club might still shape global policy despite the early departure of U.S. President Donald Trump. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and his counterparts from the U.K., France, Germany, Italy and Japan were joined during Tuesday's final sessions by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO chief Mark Rutte. 'We need support from allies and I'm here,' Zelenskyy said, before adding, 'We are ready for the peace negotiations, unconditional ceasefire. I think it's very important. But for this, we need pressure.' The remaining leaders agreed to jointly attempt to combat what they called non-market policies that could jeopardize global access to critical minerals. They also pledged to limit the downsides of artificial intelligence on jobs and the environment, while still embracing the potential of the 'technological revolution.' There was consensus on other issues, but though the summit was meant to showcase unity on top global concerns, no joint statement on the conflict in Ukraine was released. Zelenskyy had been set to meet with Trump while world leaders were gathering in the Canadian Rocky Mountain resort of Kananaskis, but that was scrapped. The U.S. also previously signed an agreement granting American access to Ukraine's vast mineral resources. A senior Canadian official said the U.S. opposed a joint statement on Ukraine amid its efforts to promote negotiations with Russia. The official said it only became clear during the summit's first day on Monday that there wouldn't be a joint statement — though other attendees suggested no consensus agreement was seriously on the table. The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to not being authorized to discuss summit deliberations. In Trump's absence, the remaining six leaders held an extensive session on Ukraine. Lacking unanimity, individual leaders also met with Zelenskyy to reassure him of their support. The summit also was largely overshadowed by a showdown over Iran's nuclear program that could escalate. Israel launched an aerial bombardment campaign against Iran, and Iran has hit back with missiles and drones. French President Emmanuel Macron warned against the U.S. and other powers pushing for regime change in Iran, suggesting it could destabilize the greater Middle East. 'I believe the greatest mistake today would be to pursue regime change in Iran through military means, as that would lead to chaos,' Macron said. Before leaving, Trump joined the other leaders in issuing a statement saying Iran 'can never have a nuclear weapon' and calling for a 'de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.' Getting unanimity — even on a short and broadly worded statement — was a modest measure of success. Macron said Carney fulfilled his mission as G7 host by preserving the unity of the multilateral organization. 'We shouldn't ask the Canadian presidency to resolve every issue on earth today. That would be unfair,' said Macron, who will host the G7 next year. Carney said in his final remarks Tuesday evening that Trump's early exit was about the 'extraordinary' situation in the Middle East, not anything that occurred during the summit. 'There was no problem,' Canada's prime minister said. 'Mr. Trump felt it was better to be in Washington, and I can understand that.' Carney said Canada would impose new economic sanctions against Russia and was releasing its own statement offering 'unwavering support for a secure and sovereign Ukraine.' Asked if the U.S. pushed to soften any possible joint statement from the gathered leaders on Ukraine, Carney said he consulted with Trump while preparing the language his own country used. Still, Trump's departure only served to heighten the drama of a world on the verge of several firestorms — and of a summit deprived early of its most-watched world leader. ` 'We did everything I had to do at the G7,' Trump said while flying back to Washington. But things were getting awkward even before he left. After the famous photo from the G7 in 2018 featured Trump and then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel displaying less-than-friendly body language, this year's edition included a dramatic eye-roll by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni as French President Emmanuel Macron whispered something in her ear during a Monday roundtable. That, and concerns about the Russia-Ukraine war, little progress on the conflict in Gaza and now the situation in Iran have made things all the more tense — especially after Trump imposed severe tariffs on multiple nations that risk a global economic slowdown. Members of Trump's trade team remained in Canada to continue discussing tariffs, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who sat at the table as world leaders met with Zelenskyy. Trump's stance on Ukraine also put him fundamentally at odds with the other G7 leaders, who are clear that Russia is the aggressor in the war. The U.S. declined to join new sanctions against Russia, with Trump saying, 'When I sanction a country, that costs the U.S. a lot of money, a tremendous amount of money.' Trump also said at the summit that there would have been no war in Ukraine if G7 members hadn't expelled Putin from the organization in 2014 for annexing Crimea. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the G7 now looks 'very pale and quite useless' compared to 'for example, such formats as the G20.' Additionally, the U.S. president has placed greater priority on addressing his grievances with other nations' trade policies than on collaboration with G7 allies. He has imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum, as well as 25% tariffs on autos. Trump is also charging a 10% tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period set by him would expire. One bright spot for Trump during the summit came when he and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer signed a trade framework that was previously announced in May. Trump said British trade was 'very well protected' because 'I like them, that's why. That's their ultimate protection.' But, while announcing that agreement, Trump brandished pages spelling out the deal and dropped them. Starmer stooped to pick them up, later explaining that he was compelled to ditch diplomatic decorum because anyone else trying to help risked spooking the president's security team. 'There were quite strict rules about who can get close to the president,' Starmer said, adding that he was 'just deeply conscious that in a situation like that it would not have been good for anybody else to have stepped forward.'
