North Carolina couple nabbed after deputies find enough fentanyl to ‘potentially kill ... 13,000 people': cops
Two people were arrested last week in North Carolina after deputies discovered a quantity of fentanyl large enough to "potentially kill 13,000 people," authorities said.
The Burke County Sheriff's Office said Dustin McCurry, 41, and Kayly Allman, 33, were arrested on April 30 after deputies searched their vehicle and found a large amount of drugs during a traffic stop in the Clear Creek Access area of South Mountains State Park, according to a post on the department's Facebook page.
Father Whose Son Died From Fentanyl Warns Overdoses 'Can Happen To Anyone' As States Fight Deadly Crisis
Deputies allegedly found multiple items of drug paraphernalia in Allman's possession, along with approximately 13.59 grams of a crystalline substance that field-tested positive for methamphetamine.
Officials said McCurry was found in possession of drug paraphernalia and approximately 26.96 grams of a substance suspected to be fentanyl.
'Major Drug Trafficker' Gets Lengthy Prison Sentence After Leaving Od Victims To Go To Wendy's: Authorities
Read On The Fox News App
"In this case, the suspect, McCurry, was found in possession of over 26,000 milligrams of fentanyl – enough to potentially kill approximately 13,000 people," the sheriff's office said.
According to law enforcement, just 2 milligrams of fentanyl can be a lethal dose.
Republican Ags Urge Trump To Crack Down On Obscure 'Loophole' Cartels Use To Flood Us With Fentanyl
"The Burke County Sheriff's Office remains dedicated to protecting the safety and well-being of our community by proactively addressing illegal drug activity," the sheriff's office said. "It should be noted that the estimated lethal dose of fentanyl is approximately 2 milligrams (mg), depending on individual tolerance and the purity of the substance."
Both Allman and McCurry were out on pretrial release at the time of the incident, officials said, and as a result, neither was issued a bond, pending judicial review.
"This investigation is a powerful reminder of the severe threat fentanyl poses to public safety and highlights the critical need for ongoing vigilance and enforcement," the sheriff's office said.Original article source: North Carolina couple nabbed after deputies find enough fentanyl to 'potentially kill ... 13,000 people': cops
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
7 minutes ago
- Fox News
Biden-appointed judge blocks deportation of Boulder attack suspect's family despite visa violations
In an emergency ruling, a Biden administration-appointed federal judge in Colorado halted the deportation of the wife and five children of Mohamed Soliman, the Egyptian national under federal investigation for the Boulder firebombing attack. The temporary restraining order (TRO), issued by U.S. District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher, prevents federal immigration authorities from removing Soliman's wife, Hayem El Gamal, and the couple's five children from the country—at least for now. "Defendants are temporarily restrained and enjoined from removing Hayem El Gamal and her five minor children from the State of Colorado or the United States," Gallagher wrote in the order. The ruling will remain in effect until a scheduled hearing on June 13. The order came after El Gamal's friend, Susanna Dvortsin, sought emergency legal protection for the family. She argued that the family faced imminent deportation by the Trump administration without the opportunity to present their case in court. Gallagher agreed, writing that the family's deportation would cause "irreparable harm." The judge ruled that Dvortsin must submit a supporting legal brief by June 6, with government attorneys required to file a response by June 11. A hearing is set for June 13 at the Byron G. Rogers Courthouse in Denver. According to Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin, citing sources, El Gamal and her five children have all overstayed their visas. However, an asylum application had already been submitted on their behalf by Soliman. The central question is whether deportation should move forward in spite of the family's pending asylum claim. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has publicly addressed the detention and potential deportation of El Gamal and her five children. In a social media video Tuesday, Secretary Noem confirmed that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had taken Soliman's family into custody. "Mohamed's despicable actions will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but we're also investigating to what extent his family knew about this horrific attack," Noem said in the X post. "If they had any knowledge of it or if they provided any support to it." The Boulder attack triggered a political firestorm in Washington and Colorado, as Republican lawmakers have slammed it as a lack of immigration enforcement through sanctuary policies and poor management during the Biden administration. "This is a direct result of failed sanctuary states like Colorado and California," Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Colo., said in the aftermath of the attack. "For the sake of our state, Democrats MUST stop putting illegals ahead of Americans. There are lives on the line." Meanwhile, Gov. Jared Polis' office said they were never aware of any threat from the suspect." "The reality is that Colorado is not a sanctuary state and state, federal and local law enforcement work together closely to apprehend criminals, whether they are from this country or not," a spokesperson for Polis' office told Fox News Digital, adding that the governor "expects to see the suspect prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." "There were no requests from federal law enforcement agencies regarding this individual, and if there had been then the state would have eagerly cooperated. Reports indicate that this person's legal presence ended in March, nearly three months ago, and we are not aware of any attempt by any federal agency to deport him," the spokesperson added. In addition, some Democrats in Colorado also faced scrutiny for attending a fundraiser with Rep. Ilhan Omar in nearby Denver roughly 30 minutes after the attack, as she's had a past history of anti-Semitic remarks and intense criticism of Israel.
Boston Globe
29 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
DHS accuses Biden administration of politicizing TSA watchlist after senator's husband was removed
Advertisement The CBS report said that it was unclear why the person William Shaheen traveled with was placed on the terrorism list, and that the person was later removed by the FBI in 2023. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up A spokesperson for Senator Shaheen did not identify her husband's travel companion and said that the senator was unaware that the person was labeled a known or suspected terrorist. 'Senator Shaheen contacted the Transportation Security Administration after her husband was subjected to several extensive, invasive and degrading searches at airport checkpoints,' the spokesperson said. 'Senator Shaheen sought to understand the nature and cause of these searches.' Following the October incident, DHS said, Senator Shaheen had a meeting with then-TSA administrator David Pekoske, who served in that role during the first Trump administration and the Biden administration. Advertisement Two days later, William Shaheen was exempted from the Quiet Skies watchlist program — which involves undercover federal air marshals monitoring domestic travelers who are not suspected of a crime or on any terrorist watch list — and all other enhanced TSA surveillance programs. A Globe investigation uncovered the Quiet Skies program in 2018. At the time, several federal air marshals expressed concern to the Globe about the ethics and legality of Quiet Skies, saying they had shadowed people who appeared to pose no real threat. In the news release, DHS — which oversees TSA — said Shaheen was not the only person exempted from the enhanced screening. 'Members of foreign royal families, political elites, professional athletes, and journalists' were also exempted, the agency said. Shaheen's special status has been revoked by the Trump administration, DHS said. The Shaheen spokesperson said the senator wasn't aware that her husband had been monitored as part of Quiet Skies, 'nor was she aware of any action' to remove him from the list after she spoke with Pekoske. Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat turned Republican who now is the director of national intelligence, said last year that Advertisement Throughout his second term, the Trump administration has repeatedly retaliated against the president's perceived political enemies by launching investigations, revoking security clearances, and removing Secret Service protection. 'This program should have been about the equal application of security,' DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said in Wednesday's news release, 'instead it was corrupted to be about political targeting. Trump Administration will restore the integrity, privacy, and equal application of the law for all Americans, including aviation screening.' Julian E.J. Sorapuru can be reached at
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas lawmakers hear concerns about bill to require proof of citizenship for voting
Democratic lawmakers and Texas voters spent nearly four hours at a legislative hearing on April 24 demanding to know how a GOP-backed bill to require citizenship proof from voters would work, and warning that it could disenfranchise eligible Texans. Houston voter Jacqueline Altman told members of the House Election Committee that it recently took her two days to obtain a copy of her birth certificate from the county, a process that required her to miss work to sit in county offices. 'When decisions are being made about these kinds of documentation, I ask that we take all of that into consideration,' said Altman, one of around a dozen Texans who testified in opposition to the bill. House Bill 5337 goes further than the laws and proposals in some other states, in that it would apply retroactively to already-registered voters in Texas, not just new applicants, Votebeat says. Texas has more than 18 million registered voters. Officials with the Texas Secretary of State's Office told lawmakers on April 24 that they estimate around 500,000 currently registered voters who don't have a driver's license number or Social Security number in their voter registration record would have to provide proof of citizenship. That group could include many people who registered before the early 2000s, when federal voting laws began requiring people obtaining state-issued IDs or driver's licenses to provide proof of citizenship or lawful presence in the U.S. Election officials said many are likely elderly. HB 5337 is identical to Senate Bill 16, which passed the state Senate along party lines and with little debate earlier this month. The House version of the legislation is co-sponsored by 50 Republican lawmakers. The legislation is modeled after an Arizona law that requires proof of citizenship to vote in state and local elections. The Texas legislation would also bar voters who don't provide citizenship proof from voting in presidential elections; a similar restriction in Arizona has so far been blocked by federal courts. The Texas bills would also require local election officials to continually check the citizenship status of voters on their rolls—and subject the officials to potential felony charges if they lapse. In Arizona, a state error tracking proof of citizenship recently left election officials struggling to consistently administer the requirement. Republican lawmakers in Texas have for months been responding to a nationwide GOP campaign to raise alarm about the threat of noncitizen voting, even though available evidence shows it is extremely rare. In December, the Texas Secretary of State told the Legislature that in 2024, election officials cancelled 63 registrations for noncitizenship and 124 for failing to respond to a notice requesting proof of citizenship. Voters who failed to respond to a notice could still be citizens. During the Elections Committee hearing on April 24, state Rep. Carrie Isaac, a Dripping Springs Republican leading the push for the House version of the legislation, said the goal is to prevent all noncitizens from registering to vote. Isaac cited an announcement by Gov. Greg Abbott last fall that 6,500 noncitizens had been removed from Texas voter rolls prior to 2024. An investigation by Votebeat, Texas Tribune and ProPublica found Abbott's numbers were inflated and, in some instances, wrong. In a span of three years, the state actually removed 581 people as noncitizens. The remaining 6,000 or so were people who had failed to respond to a notice asking to confirm their citizenship, which doesn't mean they weren't citizens. The investigation indeed found that some eligible citizens had been flagged as potential noncitizens and removed from the rolls. State Rep. John Bucy, a Democrat from Austin and vice chair of the Elections Committee, described the data Isaac cited as 'misleading' and pointed out that election officials already check the rolls for potential noncitizens. 'The system we have is working,' Bucy told Isaac. 'We're catching people. We're cleaning the rolls, and they're not voting.' Isaac said the number of documented cases of noncitizens voting 'may seem small,' but said there was no reliable way to measure the scope of it 'because the current system doesn't require documentation of citizenship.' The bill would cost state officials nearly $2 million over the next five years to implement, according to the bill's fiscal note. That number doesn't include the costs for local election officials. Research suggests that lack of accessible citizenship documentation could be a more widespread issue than noncitizen voting. In Texas, Republicans are more likely than Democrats to lack documented proof of citizenship, a 2024 study by the Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement at the University of Maryland found. One percent of Republicans do not have it, the researchers found, and 7% cannot easily access their documents, while nearly all Texas Democrats have documented proof, and 4% cannot easily access it. The study also found that younger Texans are three times more likely to have trouble accessing their documented proof of citizenship than older Texans. Under the legislation, voters could fulfill the requirement by providing any of the following: a copy of a U.S. passport; a passport card; a certified copy of a birth certificate issued by a U.S. state or territory; 'United States citizenship papers'; identification issued by the U.S. agency responsible for citizenship and immigration; or for citizens born outside the U.S., a consular report of birth abroad. Anyone who shows up to the polls who has yet to provide proof of citizenship will have six days to provide it in order for their full ballot to count. If a voter does not provide it, only the votes in congressional races will be counted. The list of accepted documents does not include tribal documents, which Arizona does accept. Cecilia Flores, the tribal council chairwoman for the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, which is located in East Texas, asked lawmakers on April 24 to include tribal documents in that list. In Arizona, a Votebeat analysis found voters living on tribal land were more likely to wind up on the federal-only voter list, signaling they may struggle to provide citizenship proof. 'While many of our tribal citizens may possess a proper birth certificate, my mother was born in 1928 and I have never seen her birth certificate,' Flores said. Bucy asked Isaac and other Republicans on the committee to consider amendments to the bill that would expand the type of acceptable IDs and documents. The House bill was left pending on April 24. The House and Senate must both pass the same version of the legislation, which would then go to Abbott for his signature. This story was produced by Votebeat and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
