
Canada just can't win in trade war with Trump
Try as it might to appease President Donald Trump, Canada remains a prized target in his trade wars and subject to the whiplash of his changes of heart.
The giant North American neighbors are rushing to conclude a new trade accord by July 21 but the process is proving painful for Canada.
On Thursday, Trump threatened to slap a 35 percent tariff on imports from Canada starting August 1.
But products complying with an existing accord, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), are expected to remain exempt, a Trump administration official and a source in Canada told AFP.
"An agreement is of course possible but that shows how difficult it is for the Canadian government to negotiate with the U.S. president," said Daniel Beland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal, referring to Trump's sudden announcement.
Six months of ups and downs
Canada has been a key trading partner and ally of the United States for decades. But along with Mexico, it now wears a bull's eye for Trump in his second stint in the White House as he tries to reorder the global system of largely free trade by slapping tariffs on friends and foes alike to address what he calls unfair trading practices.
Trump has also spoken frequently of his idea of absorbing Canada to make it the 51st U.S. state, a concept most Canadians find repugnant.
Canada was rocked by Trump's first attacks after he took power in January. And bad blood between him and then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau seemed to pour gas on the fire.
Some degree of hope emerged when Mark Carney was elected in late April to replace Trudeau, pledging to stand up to Trump and defend Canada, its jobs and its borders.
Since then, Carney and Trump have held two more or less cordial meetings -- at the Oval Office in May and at a Group of Seven summit in western Canada last month.
Many people thought a new era was opening, and Carney won praise for his diplomatic and negotiating skills.
During the second of those meetings, the two sides agreed to sign a new trade agreement by July 21.
But in late June Trump angrily called off the trade talks, citing a new Canadian tax on U.S. Big Tech companies.
Canada scrapped the tax two days later so the trade talks could resume. Now they have been rocked again by Trump's new threat of 35 percent tariffs on Canadian goods.
Canada has taken to not reacting to everything Trump says. After Trump's latest outburst, Carney simply said, "the Canadian government has steadfastly defended our workers and businesses."
But among Canadian people, Trump's threat-rich negotiating style elicits contrasting reactions, said Beland.
"There are people who want a firmer response while others want to keep negotiating," he said.
Since the beginning of this tug of war, Canada has responded to US action by imposing levies of its own on certain American products.
Philippe Bourbeau, a professor at HEC Montreal, a business school, said people have to realize Trump has an underlying strategy.
"You can criticize the aggressiveness of the announcements and the fact that it is done out in the open, but it is a negotiating tactic," said Bourbeau, adding that the relationship between the two countries is asymmetrical.
"It is illusory to think this is a negotiation between parties of the same size. Canada will surely have to give up more to reach an agreement," he said.
Before Trump came to power, three quarters of Canada's exports went to the United States. This was down to 68 percent in May, one of the lowest such shares ever recorded, as shipments to other countries hit record levels.
"We are Donald Trump's scapegoats," said Genevieve Tellier, a professor of political science at the University of Ottawa.
"He sees us as vulnerable, so he increases the pressure. He is surely telling himself that it is with us that he will score the big win he wants on tariffs," Tellier said.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Diplomat
4 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Trump Is Reshaping Southeast Asia's Future. Does He Realize That?
Trump and his team appear to pay little attention to the region, but whether by accident or design his policies are fundamentally altering Southeast Asia's trajectory. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio meets with the press in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 10, 2025, on the sidelines of the 58th ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was handed an unenviable task on his visit to Malaysia for ASEAN meetings last week. He needed to signal U.S. commitment to the region at the same time President Donald Trump was releasing tariff decisions on social media. Despite claiming that many ASEAN countries would receive better tariffs than other parts of the world, Rubio was handed a diplomatic rebuke by ASEAN foreign ministers, who declared that unilateral tariffs are counterproductive and 'pose complex challenges to ASEAN's economic stability and growth.' The awkward timing around Rubio's visit perhaps reflects a deeper problem: Trump and his team appear to pay little attention to the region. When it comes to global affairs, the Middle East, Ukraine, and trade with China have occupied much of their focus. Likewise, Trump's Cabinet has had only limited engagement with the region to date. In addition to Rubio's visit, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has visited Singapore and the Philippines. When U.S. officials do visit Southeast Asia, they've rolled out talking points about U.S. commitment to the Indo-Pacific that have done little to reassure regional countries struggling to deal with U.S. unpredictability. Despite the apparent disinterest in the region, whether by design or accident the Trump administration is making decisions that are fundamentally altering Southeast Asia's future. The question for ASEAN member states is whether they will take steps individually and collectively to avert the worst possible future. Trump is exacerbating divisions within ASEAN. Unity in the bloc has always been paper thin. It has struggled to deal with difficult issues like the South China Sea or the conflict in Myanmar. As current ASEAN chair, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has called on member states to take a coordinated approach to negotiating U.S. tariffs. The opposite has happened as each country has tried to strike its own deal with the United States. Vietnam was first out of the blocks, with others continuing bilateral talks. The United States has also widened existing differences within the bloc on how to engage China by doubling down support for its close partners and alienating others. The delicate dance that ASEAN member states do as they hedge between the U.S. and China is becoming trickier. Hegseth was vocal in his support for the Philippines, talking about an 'ironclad' alliance in the face of China's aggression in the South China Sea. Meanwhile, higher U.S. tariffs appear to be targeted at countries that are seen as leaning toward China: Laos (40 percent), Cambodia (36 percent), and Thailand (36 percent) have been hardest hit. If the main game for the U.S. is to compete with China, it's unclear why it is imposing hefty tariffs that will push regional countries closer to it. The Trump administration isn't just exacerbating regional divisions, it is altering the economic outlook. Tariff decisions will amplify and accelerate long-term economic trends, creating winners and losers. Take Indonesia. President Prabowo Subianto's 8 percent growth target is as distant as ever and even 5 percent growth seems challenging. The rupiah has weakened, the stock market has backed away from the highs of last year and the middle class is under pressure. Trump's 32 percent tariff will further weaken Indonesia's outlook. Growth will take a hit and foreign investors may look at other markets that received better tariff rates. If these trends hold long-term, Indonesia will struggle to achieve its goal of becoming a middle income country by 2045. In contrast, the strong economic outlook for Vietnam and the Philippines will be bolstered by their tariffs of 20 percent, the lowest rates in ASEAN. The tariff on Vietnam (which rises to 40 percent for transshipped goods) is likely to put a dint in its 6 percent-plus forecast growth in 2025. However, foreign investment should hold up as the tariff rate maintains Vietnam's attractiveness relative to other ASEAN economies. Likewise, forecasted growth of over 6 percent in the Philippines is likely to take a hit. As with Vietnam, the impact will be temporary and the 20 percent tariff rate will likewise strengthen its attractiveness to foreign investors relative to ASEAN peers. If these trends hold, Trump may help Vietnam and the Philippines escape the middle income trap while Indonesia becomes increasingly stuck. Nothing is ever set in stone with Trump. He's flagged yet another deadline of August 1 before the tariffs come into effect, so countries still have a chance to negotiate better deals. Of course, Southeast Asian countries have agency and are not completely beholden to Trump's whims. Individually they can choose to undertake structural reforms, adjust their growth model, and diversify trading partners. Collectively, there's room to rethink ASEAN's norms and procedures. But all these changes take time and political will. There will also be plenty of twists and turns to come, as we are not even a year into Trump's presidency. But if existing trends continue, the long-term impact will be a region that is more divided politically and economically.

Nikkei Asia
5 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Apple inks $500m deal with MP Materials for rare earth magnets
(Reuters) -- Apple has signed a $500-million deal with Pentagon-backed MP Materials for the supply of rare earth magnets, an agreement underscoring corporate America's growing alignment with U.S. industrial policy support for critical minerals projects. MP shares jumped 19% on Tuesday morning to an all-time high, while Apple's stock gained just under 1%. The multi-year supply deal, announced on Tuesday, is part of a broader push by Apple to bring iPhone production to the United States amid a push from the Trump administration to produce fewer electronics in China. MP last week agreed to a multibillion-dollar deal with the U.S. Department of Defense that will see the Pentagon become MP's largest shareholder and financial backstop. Rare earths are a group of 17 metals used to make magnets that turn power into motion, including the devices that make cellphones vibrate. They are also used to make weapons, electric vehicles, and many other electronics. China halted rare earths exports in March following a trade spat with U.S. President Donald Trump that showed some signs of easing late last month, even as broader tensions underscored demand for non-Chinese supply. As part of the agreement, Apple will pre-pay Las Vegas-based MP Materials $200 million for a supply of magnets slated to begin in 2027. The magnets will be produced at MP's Fort Worth, Texas, facility using magnets recycled at MP's Mountain Pass, California, mining complex, the companies said. "Rare earth materials are essential for making advanced technology, and this partnership will help strengthen the supply of these vital materials here in the United States," Apple CEO Tim Cook said in a statement. Bob O'Donnell, president at market research firm TECHnalysis Research, said Tuesday's move "makes complete sense" given that Apple requires significant amounts of rare earth magnets for its devices. "Plus, by focusing on a U.S.-based supplier, it does help position Apple more positively in Washington," he said. Apple, which said the deal is part of its $500-billion four-year investment commitment to the U.S., has faced threats from Trump over iPhones not made in the U.S. But many analysts have said making the iPhone in the U.S. is not possible, given labor costs and the existing smartphone supply chain. MP already produces mined and processed rare earths and has said it expects to start commercial magnet production in its Texas facility by the end of this year. Last week's deal with the U.S. government includes a price floor for rare earths designed to spur investment in domestic mines and processing plants, which has been lagging partly due to low prices set in China.

Nikkei Asia
6 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Apple invests $500m in rare earths producer MP Materials
Apple said the MP investment is part of its $500 billion commitment to the United States. © Reuters (Reuters) -- Apple said on Tuesday it would invest $500 million into rare earths mine operator MP Materials MP.N, as the iPhone maker seeks to localize its mineral supply chain. The investment is part of a broader push to bring the production of its coveted iPhones to the United States and boost U.S. manufacturing amid a push from the Trump administration to cut reliance on China. Rare earths are a group of 17 metals used to make magnets that turn power into motion. China halted rare earths exports in March following a trade spat with U.S. President Donald Trump that showed some signs of easing late last month, even as broader tensions underscored demand for non-Chinese supply. Shares of Las Vegas-based MP Materials jumped 10% to $52.37 in premarket trading. MP last week agreed to a multibillion-dollar deal with the U.S. Department of Defense to boost output of rare earth magnets and help loosen China's market control. Apple said the MP investment is part of its $500 billion commitment to the United States. The agreement includes plans for Apple to purchase U.S.-made rare earth magnets from MP Materials' Texas facility. It would be the first supply deal for MP's magnets since the financial backstop agreement with Washington. MP already produces mined and processed rare earths and has said it expects to start commercial magnet production in Texas facility by the end of this year. The two companies would build another factory in Texas to produce magnets and a new recycling facility in Mountain Pass, California, near the company's existing mine. Last week's deal with the U.S. government includes a price floor for rare earths, designed to spur investment in domestic mines and processing plants, which has been lagging partly due to low prices set in China.