logo
Goodbye, $165,000 tech jobs. Student coders seek work at Chipotle.

Goodbye, $165,000 tech jobs. Student coders seek work at Chipotle.

Miami Herald14 hours ago
Growing up near Silicon Valley, Manasi Mishra remembers seeing tech executives on social media urging students to study computer programming.
'The rhetoric was, if you just learned to code, work hard and get a computer science degree, you can get six figures for your starting salary,' Mishra, now 21, recalls hearing as she grew up in San Ramon, California.
Those golden industry promises helped spur Mishra to code her first website in elementary school, take advanced computing in high school and major in computer science in college. But after a year of hunting for tech jobs and internships, Mishra graduated from Purdue University in May without an offer.
'I just graduated with a computer science degree, and the only company that has called me for an interview is Chipotle,' Mishra said in a get-ready-with-me TikTok video this summer that has since racked up more than 147,000 views.
Since the early 2010s, a parade of billionaires, tech executives and even U.S. presidents has urged young people to learn coding, arguing that the tech skills would help bolster students' job prospects as well as the economy. Tech companies promised computer science graduates high salaries and all manner of perks.
'Typically their starting salary is more than $100,000,' plus $15,000 hiring bonuses and stock grants worth $50,000, Brad Smith, a top Microsoft executive, said in 2012 as he kicked off a company campaign to get more high schools to teach computing.
The financial incentives, plus the chance to work on popular apps, quickly fed a boom in computer science education, the study of computer programming and processes like algorithms. Last year, the number of undergraduates majoring in the field topped 170,000 in the United States -- more than double the number in 2014, according to the Computing Research Association, a nonprofit that gathers data annually from about 200 universities.
But now, the spread of AI programming tools, which can quickly generate thousands of lines of computer code -- combined with layoffs at companies like Amazon, Intel, Meta and Microsoft -- is dimming prospects in a field that tech leaders promoted for years as a golden career ticket. The turnabout is derailing the employment dreams of many new computing grads and sending them scrambling for other work.
Among college graduates ages 22 to 27, computer science and computer engineering majors are facing some of the highest unemployment rates, 6.1% and 7.5% respectively, according to a report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. That is more than double the unemployment rate among recent biology and art history graduates, which is just 3%.
'I'm very concerned,' said Jeff Forbes, a former program director for computer science education and workforce development at the National Science Foundation. 'Computer science students who graduated three or four years ago would have been fighting off offers from top firms -- and now that same student would be struggling to get a job from anyone.'
In response to questions from The New York Times, more than 150 college students and recent graduates -- from state schools including the universities of Maryland, Texas and Washington, as well as private universities like Cornell and Stanford -- shared their experiences. Some said they had applied to hundreds, and in several cases thousands, of tech jobs at companies, nonprofits and government agencies.
The process can be arduous, with tech companies asking candidates to complete online coding assessments and, for those who do well, live coding tests and interviews. But many computing graduates said their monthslong job quests often ended in intense disappointment or worse: companies ghosting them.
Some faulted the tech industry, saying they felt 'gaslit' about their career prospects. Others described their job search experiences as 'bleak,' 'disheartening' or 'soul-crushing.'
Among them was Zach Taylor, 25, who enrolled as a computer science major at Oregon State University in 2019 partly because he had loved programming video games in high school. Tech industry jobs seemed plentiful at the time.
Since graduating in 2023, however, Taylor said, he has applied for 5,762 tech jobs. His diligence has resulted in 13 job interviews but no full-time job offers.
The job search has been one of 'the most demoralizing experiences I have ever had to go through,' he added.
The electronics firm where he had a software engineering internship last year was not able to hire him, he said. This year, he applied for a job at McDonald's to help cover expenses, but he was rejected 'for lack of experience,' he said. He has since moved back home to Sherwood, Oregon, and is receiving unemployment benefits.
'It is difficult to find the motivation to keep applying,' said Taylor, adding that he was now building personal software projects to show prospective employers.
Computing graduates are feeling particularly squeezed because tech firms are embracing AI coding assistants, reducing the need for some companies to hire junior software engineers. The trend is evident in downtown San Francisco, where billboard ads for AI tools like CodeRabbit promise to debug code faster and better than humans.
'The unfortunate thing right now, specifically for recent college grads, is those positions that are most likely to be automated are the entry-level positions that they would be seeking,' said Matthew Martin, U.S. senior economist at Oxford Economics, a forecasting firm.
Tracy Camp, executive director of the Computing Research Association, said new computer science graduates might be particularly hard hit this year because many universities were just now starting to train students on AI coding tools, the newest skills sought by tech companies.
Some graduates described feeling caught in an AI 'doom loop.' Many jobseekers now use specialized AI tools like Simplify to tailor their resumes to specific jobs and autofill application forms, enabling them to quickly apply to many jobs. At the same time, companies inundated with applicants are using AI systems to automatically scan resumes and reject candidates.
To try to stand out, Audrey Roller, a recent data science graduate from Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts, said she highlighted her human skills, like creativity, on her job applications, which she writes herself, unassisted by chatbots. But after she recently applied for a job, she said, a rejection email arrived three minutes later.
'Some companies are using AI to screen candidates and removing the human aspect,' Roller, 22, said. 'It's hard to stay motivated when you feel like an algorithm determines whether you get to pay your bills.'
Recent graduates looking for government tech jobs also report increased hurdles.
Jamie Spoeri, who graduated this year from Georgetown University, said she majored in computing because she loved the logical approach to problem-solving. During college, she also learned about the environmental impacts of AI and grew interested in tech policy.
Last summer, she had an internship at the National Science Foundation, where she worked on national security and technology issues, like the supply of critical minerals. She has since applied for more than 200 government, industry and nonprofit jobs, she said.
But recent government cutbacks and hiring freezes have made getting federal jobs difficult, she said, while AI coding tools have made getting entry-level software jobs at companies harder.
'It's demoralizing to lose out on opportunities because of AI,' said Spoeri, 22, who grew up in Chicago. 'But I think, if we can adapt and rise to the challenge, it can also open up new opportunities.'
Prominent computing education boosters are now pivoting to AI. President Donald Trump, who in 2017 directed federal funding toward computer science in schools, recently unveiled a national AI action plan that includes channeling more students into AI jobs.
Microsoft, a major computing education sponsor, recently said it would provide $4 billion in technology and funding for AI training for students and workers. Last month, Smith, Microsoft's president, said the company was also assessing how AI was changing computer science education.
Mishra, the Purdue graduate, did not get the burrito-making gig at Chipotle. But her side hustle as a beauty influencer on TikTok, she said, helped her realize that she was more enthusiastic about tech marketing and sales than software engineering.
The realization prompted Mishra to apply cold for a tech company sales position that she found online. The company offered her the tech sales job in July.
She starts this month.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Acer's Swift Go 14 AI laptop is perfect for college students on the go — here's how it stacked up in our tests
Acer's Swift Go 14 AI laptop is perfect for college students on the go — here's how it stacked up in our tests

Business Insider

time5 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Acer's Swift Go 14 AI laptop is perfect for college students on the go — here's how it stacked up in our tests

When I started looking for new college laptops to test, the Acer Swift Go 14 AI was nowhere on my radar. Most Windows laptops use Intel or AMD processors, but this model uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU, which hasn't traditionally been viewed as a top-tier option. But thank goodness I gave it a look, because the Swift Go 14 AI is one of the most exciting laptops I've reviewed. Its impressive performance has completely changed my opinion of Snapdragon CPUs, and convinced me that Microsoft's line of "Copilot Plus" PCs (which includes this laptop) is more than just a marketing gimmick. But if all the Swift Go 14 AI had was a solid CPU, it wouldn't be worth the money. Luckily, Acer backs up the processor with a slim frame, a bright screen, and an absolutely bonkers amount of battery life. This all adds up to a fantastic productivity laptop that's perfect for work and school. The laptop looks basic, but it feels great to use In an age when every laptop company is trying to reinvent the MacBook, the Swift Go 14 AI's design isn't anything new. It's colored a dull silver-gray with black membrane keys, has visible hinges, and is covered in fan vents. Nothing special. But in the places that count most, the laptop shines. Its light weight — about three pounds — and slim frame make it easy to slip into a backpack or briefcase, or even just carry around under your arm. That portability is one of its greatest strengths. It helps that the laptop charges using a basic USB-C cable. This means you don't have to worry about dealing with bulky AC adapters or charging bricks that weigh you down. A terabyte of included solid-state storage also means less worrying about external drives. The black membrane keyboard I mentioned might not look fancy, but it feels just fine. I've spent hours typing on it, and haven't felt any strain or ache. It also includes an adjustable backlight, although it's pretty dim. For whatever reason, vibrant displays are a rarity on most laptops — here, however, the screen is a highlight. The 14.5-inch LCD screen boasts a 120Hz refresh rate and 2560x1600 resolution. Those are surprisingly good specs for a productivity-focused laptop like this, and give this model a little something extra for those who want to use it for casual gaming or content creation. It's also brighter than the industry average, maxing out at about 400 nits. Also worth shouting out is the webcam. It's QHD (1440p), meaning its video is four times the resolution of the industry standard 720p, and captures almost two times the total number of pixels of a 1080p camera, which is often considered a luxury. It also includes a privacy shutter, which is always a nice extra. However, some parts of the Swift Go 14 AI's design disappoint. The built-in speakers aren't awful — I've definitely heard worse on cheaper laptops — but they have a tinny quality that makes bass-heavy songs sound shallow. And when the laptop's fans rev up to full speed, which they often do during system updates, they create a surprisingly loud roar. Performance exceeded my expectations Going in, I expected the Acer Swift Go 14 AI to be slow and sluggish. Thankfully, it's anything but. While most Windows laptops use either Intel or AMD processors, this laptop uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus. The Snapdragon brand isn't new, but previous models haven't been known for their power. In the past, you'd usually find them in Android phones or tablets. It wasn't a name that inspired confidence in the laptop market. Consider me surprised to find that the Snapdragon X Plus not only excels at most tasks, but also outperforms some pricier laptops. Geekbench testing has it coming in at an average CPU score of 11,152, which is on par or better than almost any Intel Core Ultra chip and within striking distance of many top-tier Intel Core i9 and AMD Ryzen mobile chips from the previous generation. This plays out in practice, too. Programs, folders, and files run quickly. Boot times are also low. I found very few programs that didn't run well on it. Even the 3D-modeling app Blender runs remarkably smoothly, only lagging when it comes time to shade or render models. It boasts 16GB of RAM, which isn't an outstanding achievement — 16GB should really be the minimum in any computer these days — but it does help with performance. Admittedly, the laptop does struggle in the graphics department. It's not the PC of choice for 3D games released in the last few years, and video editing could prove to be a problem. And despite the "AI" branding, it's definitely not made for any sort of serious AI image- or video-generation work. Even integrated Intel graphics outpace it. Other sorts of AI tools, like live transcription or real-time webcam enhancements, work much better, although I didn't find them any faster or otherwise superior to the AI tools on other laptops with similar specs. So the Snapdragon X Plus offers good processing power but subpar graphical power. If that was the whole story, it wouldn't be that impressive — but to truly understand the Snapdragon X Plus' appeal, you have to look at the battery life. It has unbelievably long battery life I've been reviewing laptops for years, and I've come to accept that most great laptops also have middling-to-horrible battery life. Under usual load, the average Intel- or AMD-powered laptop will last about three to nine hours. The Acer Swift Go 14 AI can last between six to 23 hours. That's not an exaggeration. The Snapdragon X Plus is specifically designed to use less power than more standard chips, and it succeeds at this goal. I've had the Swift Go 14 AI last for entire work shifts, even at max brightness. It's shocking to notice a low battery warning, only to check and see that your laptop still has five hours of life left. It's this impressive battery performance that makes the Swift Go 14 AI such a great portable device. Even if you don't have a charger, you don't have to worry about your laptop suddenly dying. It's a worthwhile tradeoff for the laptops' disappointing graphical power. A small selection of Windows apps might not run Though I was impressed by its power, the laptop's Snapdragon processor has a specific limitation, which could prove inconsequential or major depending on how you use it. Most computers are built with "x64" processors, and nearly every PC program is built to run on those chips. But some modern laptops (like the Swift Go 14 AI) are built with "ARM64" processors instead, which emphasize battery life over power. Having an ARM64 processor won't be an issue for most apps. Popular Windows programs, from Spotify to Google Chrome to the Microsoft 365 suite, are all supported without any problems. These days, it's much harder to find a program that won't work with ARM64 than one that will. However, a few x64 programs still don't support ARM64, including design apps like AutoCAD. Some Adobe apps might also run a bit slower since they're being emulated, but Adobe is actively working on improving this. More and more companies are developing ARM-supported apps each day, so as ARM processors get more popular, this will be less of an issue. But if there are niche apps you rely on for work or school, it's worth checking to see if they have ARM versions before you buy a Snapdragon-powered laptop. Should you buy the Acer Swift Go 14 AI? The Swift Go 14 AI isn't a supercomputer, especially when it comes to graphical performance. But when it comes to being a reliable productivity and media machine — the kind you'll want by your side at school or work — it's a fantastic choice. This is particularly true given recent discounts, which have seen this model drop to $750. The battery life is really what helps this laptop stand out. Modern devices have increasingly traded battery life for faster performance, and it's refreshing to find a laptop that prioritizes both. I'm excited to see how Qualcomm continues to improve its Snapdragon processors. One day, it might be legitimate competition to high-end Intel and AMD offerings. Acer sells other "Swift" and "Swift Go" laptops, each of which has slightly different specs — and many of which feature Intel or AMD CPUs. But notably, the ARM-powered Swift Go 14 AI is the only one Acer brags about the battery life on.

Unleashing Your Wedding Business Potential: Creative Marketing Strategies That Actually Work
Unleashing Your Wedding Business Potential: Creative Marketing Strategies That Actually Work

Time Business News

time42 minutes ago

  • Time Business News

Unleashing Your Wedding Business Potential: Creative Marketing Strategies That Actually Work

The wedding industry is more competitive than ever. With thousands of planners vying for attention from engaged couples, standing out requires more than just beautiful Instagram photos and a decent website. Many wedding planners struggle to convert social media followers into actual clients, while others spend hours creating content that hardly anyone ever sees. Some wedding pros even invest in expensive advertising with minimal return. At Enji, we've developed specialized wedding planner marketing tools that address these exact pain points, helping countless professionals transform their businesses. The secret isn't working harder, but working smarter with creative marketing strategies tailored specifically for wedding professionals. Modern couples don't just flip through wedding magazines anymore. They're scrolling Pinterest at midnight, watching wedding TikToks during lunch breaks, and DMing planners at odd hours with questions. Wedding pros must meet clients where they actually hang out online, not where conventional wisdom says they should be. Some clients still love Facebook groups while others live on TikTok. Research shows that couples typically consult 3-5 different platforms before reaching out to a wedding professional, making a cohesive cross-platform presence essential. The wedding industry is drowning in 'timeless, luxury, unforgettable' buzzwords that all blend together after a while. Couples can smell generic branding from a mile away. Wedding pros need to dig deeper and figure out what truly makes them different. Maybe a planner isn't just 'detail-oriented' but actually has a background in project management for music festivals, bringing a totally different vibe to wedding coordination. Or perhaps they specialize in helping neurodivergent couples navigate wedding planning with minimal stress. Common branding mistakes include trying to appeal to everyone, copying competitors, or focusing too much on services rather than the unique experience and perspective the planner brings to the table. Clients don't just hire wedding planners for task management, they hire people they connect with and trust. Wedding professionals often struggle with content creation because they're trying to be everywhere at once. Start with just one platform and one type of content, like a monthly blog post sharing planning advice from a professional's perspective. Before-and-after content works amazingly type of content showcases skills far better than just telling potential clients what services are offered. Content calendars don't have to be complicated. Even planning just two pieces of content per week can build momentum. Topics that typically perform well include: Budget breakdowns for real weddings Day-of emergency kit essentials Questions to ask potential venues Timeline templates for different types of celebrations Not all platforms deserve equal attention from wedding professionals. Wedding pros often make the mistake of only posting final, perfect images. Couples actually love seeing the messy behind-the-scenes reality. A quick video taken while steaming tablecloths at 6am shows the dedication and hard work that goes into creating dream weddings. Wedding pros should aim for consistency over frequency. Posting three quality Instagram posts weekly with thoughtful captions is better than daily posts with little substance. And despite what some marketing gurus say, wedding planners don't need to jump on every trend. Couples want to see expertise and personality, not the latest dance challenge. A common mistake is treating social media as a portfolio rather than a connection point. The goal isn't just to showcase beautiful work, but to start conversations and build relationships with potential clients who might be quietly watching for months before reaching out. Marketing a wedding planning business doesn't require a complete overhaul overnight. Start with one strategy, master it, then add another. Authenticity matters more than perfection, and consistency trumps occasional viral moments. The most successful wedding planners aren't necessarily the ones with the most followers or the fanciest websites. They're the ones who clearly communicate their unique value and consistently show up where their ideal clients are looking. Enji tools are designed to complement these strategies, providing templates, time-saving shortcuts, and professional resources that make marketing manageable even during the busiest wedding seasons. The wedding industry rewards those who market creatively and authentically, especially when backed by the right tools and approach. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

The Hype Gap: Why Most Organizations Aren't Ready For AI At Scale
The Hype Gap: Why Most Organizations Aren't Ready For AI At Scale

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

The Hype Gap: Why Most Organizations Aren't Ready For AI At Scale

Most companies I speak to about AI leadership are stuck in what I call pilot purgatory: an endless loop of small AI experiments that never seem to scale. This feels weird because the AI hype is loud. While the headlines promise transformation, inside many organisations, there is little more than isolated sparks of innovation Recently, I spoke to a senior leader at a global manufacturer with cutting-edge capabilities and a generous R&D budget. On paper, this was precisely the kind of organisation you'd expect to be leading the AI charge. In reality: no strategy, no governance, no roadmap. AI activity was fragmented, driven by curious employees running unsanctioned experiments in corners of the business. Top leadership was interested in the benefits, but ROI was unclear, and it wasn't a priority. Even industries in AI's direct line of fire are holding back. Take the law. Legal work runs on words - drafting, reviewing, interpreting - exactly what generative AI does best. Yet uptake is slow. Recent research shows 47% of private practice lawyers say their firm is slow or very slow to adopt new tech, with only 18% calling themselves fast movers. A quarter of law firm employees believe failing to embrace AI could harm their career; 1 in 10 would consider leaving over it. Restraint is understandable. Powerful technologies have always taken time to transform the economy. James Watt patented his steam engine in 1769, but steam didn't overtake water power until the 1830s. Electricity took decades to replace steam in factories. I suspect leaders are waitng for others to blaze a trail they might follow more easily. But AI is moving far faster. It's advancing at speed and organisational readiness - strategy, governance, skills, culture - is lagging badly. Market leadership can be built in this gap, while laggards are left behind. Hype vs. reality Like a badly dubbed movie, Silicon Valley's instant-value promises don't match the real story on the ground (that AI will take time, effort and skilled change leadership): The hidden revolution: shadow adoption A Gallup poll shows 33% of senior leaders use AI frequently, compared to 16% of individual contributors. But McKinsey's data tells the other side of the story: employees are using AI far more than their bosses know. Microsoft and LinkedIn report that 75% of knowledge workers now use AI daily - half starting in the past six months - many without telling their managers. Some even pay for premium tools out of their pocket: BYOAI (Bring Your Own AI). Without leadership recognition and guidance, much of that learning stays locked in individuals. Worse, it creates compliance, security, and reputational risks. That's why I urge leaders I'm working with, especially mid-career ones who may feel a confidence gap, to experiment personally. Using AI yourself builds credibility, gives you a tangible example of change, and offers first-hand insight into how teams can use the technology. The real bottleneck: trust, not tech As with much digital transformation, the most significant friction isn't the technology. It's trust. Even the most accurate AI will be ignored if its outputs aren't understood or believed. Employees hesitate because they distrust the black box, lack transparency on data, or fear for their jobs. Without trust, adoption stalls. Why boldness wins History favours the early movers: • Retail: Tesco's Clubcard launched in 1995, locking in loyalty before Sainsbury's and others caught up. • E-commerce: Amazon went online in 1995; established retailers hesitated and fell away. • Cloud computing: Netflix moved to the cloud in 2008; Blockbuster stayed tied to physical infrastructure and collapsed. The LEAD framework: from hype to value Here is a simple checklist for moving from pilots to scaled impact: L — Locate the Power Users Find the people already experimenting with AI. Learn what's working.E — Experiment Yourself Use the tools personally. Run small pilots with clear measures. Learn alongside your team.A — Acknowledge and Reward AI Talent Recognise those driving results. Promote them, learn from them, and make them role models.D — Define New Performance Measures Shift metrics from volume and speed to quality, originality, and strategic value. Right now, most organisations are still at the AI starting line. Those who adopt early - with strategy, governance, skills, and trust - will build compounding advantages in productivity, innovation, and market insight. The leaders who close the hype gap will be the ones who treat AI not as a plug-in technology, but as a culture shift they lead from the front.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store