Road schemes will ‘probably' be finished in under a decade
The Government on Tuesday announced the revival of major road and rail projects outside London and the South East, backed by £92 billion from last month's spending review.
Most have been in the works for several years and many have already received planning permission, but their future was thrown into doubt last year when Labour announced a review of transport infrastructure projects.
In a statement to Parliament, then-transport secretary Louise Haigh accused the Tories of leaving a £2.9 billion gap between improvements it had promised and what it had funded.
Almost a year after launching its internal review, the Government will now press on with five major road schemes, five rail projects and 28 smaller road schemes, which it says will cut journey times, ease congestion, create jobs and support new housing.
These include a widening of the A66 Trans-Pennine route, first proposed in 2016, the M54-M6 link, and junction improvements in places like Derby around the A38.
Asked whether the projects would be delivered within five years, Ms Alexander told Sky News most would 'start construction' within that period but take 'varying lengths of time.'
Pressed on whether they were in fact decade-long schemes, the minister replied: 'I don't believe that they will take a decade to deliver, no.
'I think they will be delivered more swiftly than that, but it is true to say that these are very significant schemes which will take a number of years to deliver, probably not stretching out as far as 10 years.'
She said estimates for when the three projects will finish are to be published when the Government releases its road investment strategy in March.
Preparatory work for some of the schemes has continued despite the pause, but Tuesday's announcement means they can now proceed in full.
The reopening of the railway between Portishead and Bristol, which has been the subject of a 25-year campaign, has also been given the green light.
The A66 upgrade was given planning permission in March 2024, but was delayed by an ultimately unsuccessful legal challenge and put on hold by the new Government's review.
Construction is now expected to start this winter.
Former prime minister Rishi Sunak, whose constituency is served by the A66, welcomed the announcement, saying it would improve 'journey reliability'.
The Portishead line, reopening a railway that was closed in the 1960s, was also thrown into question by the review, but then West of England mayor Dan Norris announced funding had been secured in February this year.
On Tuesday, the Government announced it would invest another £27 million in the project, which it said would 'connect an additional 50,000 people' and support 'a significant new housing development'.
Other major road schemes confirmed on Tuesday include the M54-M6 link, the M60 Simister Island junction near Manchester, the A38 Derby junctions and improvements to the A46 Newark bypass.
Both the Simister Island and Newark bypass projects are yet to receive planning permission.
The Government has also confirmed its commitment to build new stations at Wellington and Cullompton in the South West and Haxby in Yorkshire, which had all been part of the Conservatives' Restoring Your Railway project that was scrapped when Labour came to power.
Funding for the stations, along with the Midlands Rail Hub plan to add 300 trains a day to the West Midlands network, was previously announced at last month's spending review.
Other, smaller, schemes include improvements to the Middlewich Eastern Bypass, in Cheshire, and the A382 between Drumbridges and Newton Abbot, in Devon.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the investments were 'long overdue' and would 'transform local communities and improve living standards across the country'.
Ms Alexander said: 'Transport is the backbone of our economy, which is why we are giving them the record funding boost they need, putting taxpayers' money where it matters most and making everyday journeys easier.'
But the Conservatives accused the Government of using the announcement as a 'distraction tactic'.
Shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon said: 'Labour are re-announcing projects that are already under way in order to distract from their failing economic strategy of high tax and high borrowing. They just don't have a plan.
'Rachel Reeves's catastrophic economic mismanagement and Keir Starmer's total inability to control his own party has led to a string of unfunded U-turns, meaning that more tax rises are coming.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them
A 'failure of public policy' under the Tories saw former immigration minister Robert Jenrick brag about how fast he was securing hotel rooms as the asylum backlog grew and grew The Government faces an asylum hotel crisis as councils line up to launch legal challenges which could see thousands of people kicked out. On Tuesday the High Court granted a temporary injuction preventing the Bell Hotel in Epping from housing migrants after weeks of tension. Home Office lawyers had warned that such a ruling 'could put Britain's asylum hotel scheme at risk of falling apart' as ministers grapple to shut down venues. Dozens of local authorities are now exploring similar challenges, with the Government now drawing up contingency plans. Labour has vowed to end the use of hotels by the end of this Parliament after the Tories resorted to using them when the asylum system descended into chaos. Experts said a "failure of public policy", with years of not processing asylum claims by the Conservatives, led to people being put in expensive accommodation. In 2023, when the asylum backlog was a mammoth 175,000, more than 400 hotels were in use, housing over 56,000 people. At the time Robert Jenrick, who was immigration minister, bragged at the speed he was securing rooms. He said, in a quote dug up by Labour this week: "More hotels have been coming online almost every month throughout the whole of this year. So Suella Braverman and her predecessor Priti Patel were securing more hotels. What I have done in my short tenure is wrap that up and secure even more." The brazen Shadow Justice Secretary has been vocal on the issue of asylum hotels in recent weeks, joining demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel to protest about problems his party caused. The backlog swelled after the UK lost its legal right to return migrants to Europe after Brexit, while a string of botched laws under the Tories failed to drive down small boat crossings. The Conservatives pinned their hopes on being able to send people to Rwanda as the number of people in the asylum system grew and grew. Labour has pledged to get a grip of the chaos, but says it will take time to see the results. At the end of March this year there were 32,345 people living in asylum hotels, Home Office figures show. This was up from 29,585 when Labour came to power. It means 31% of asylum seekers were receiving asylum support earlier this year. Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the Government accepts that hotels are not the most appropriate place for asylum seekers to be housed. And in the immediate aftermath of the Epping judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said Labour had "inherited a broken asylum system". Dame Angela said the Government would "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns" around asylum hotels. Imran Hussain, from the Refugee Council, told Sky News: "Nobody thinks asylum seekers should be kept in hotels while their case is being assessed. "It's very expensive. It's not good for the asylum seekers. It's isolating. It's an isolating experince I think even before the protests, with the protests it's incredibly terrifying for people. "And of course as we've seen for local communities, there's a lot of tension, some of which is being exploited by people on the far- right. So no one thinks it's a good idea." And explaining how hotels came to be used, Mr Hussain continued: " This isn't a planning issue, really. This is a failure of public policy. For 20 odd years that we've supported asylum seekers through, the system worked perfectly well. "We had accommodation for people without using hotels. But the last few years there's been a huge backlog of cases that's grown up because the previous government (the Tories) stopped making decisions on cases because it wanted to send people to Rwanda. "The backlog has meant the accommodation that was existing was full and people have had to use hotels."
Daily Mirror
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Urgent Matalan recall of popular items as women warned 'do not wear'
The high-street retailer has ordered customers to return seven products over fears they could cause cuts and bleeding Women have been warned they are in danger of suffering cuts and other injuries if they wear one of seven types of bikini tops. The items, sold by Matalan, have been urgently recalled after the high-street retailer found serious manufacturing defects within them. The underwiring from seven sets of bikini tops could come loose from their casing when worn, resulting in customers getting scratches and cuts to the skin. The findings were reported in a statement released by the Government's Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS). The timing of the recent recall could not have come at an unfortunate time for Matalan as millions of women are enjoying their summer holidays. It is also the third time this summer the retailer has ordered a recall. Just two days ago, Matalan and Next were forced to take back a range of Miss Summer dresses and outfit sets over fears the dress cords were too long and could pose a "strangulation" risk. In June, Matalan ordered customers to return three types of boys' swimwear – again, because of a strangulation hazard. The latest recall primarily affects bikini tops from the Spring Mainstream and Mainstream Postcard ranges, all of which were sold between November 14, 2024 and June 26 this year. A full list of affected items, together with their barcodes, can be found at the end of this story. Customers have been ordered to return them to their nearest Matalan branch for a full refund. In a further gesture of good will, the retailer confirmed that no receipt would be required to get your money back. Matalan said in a statement: "It has come to our attention that the above bikini tops do not meet our usual high standards for quality and safety, as there is risk that the underwire can protrude from the casing and cause injury. "As customer safety is our highest priority, we are immediately recalling these bikini tops. If you've bought any of the bikini tops shown above, please do not use the product and return it at your earliest convenience to your nearest Matalan store where our staff will be happy to give you a full refund. You will not need to produce a receipt to claim a refund." The retailer has advised affected customers to call its customer care team on 0333 0044444 or email customercareceo@ It also urged those who gifted the items to others to let the affected parties know. "If you have bought the above for someone else or know someone who has one then please let them know immediately about this notice," it added. "We pride ourselves on delivering great quality at great prices and we're really sorry for any inconvenience caused. Please note this recall does not affect any other Matalan product." The OPSS report said: "The products present a risk of injuries as the underwiring can protrude from the casing during use, which may result in the user receiving scratches or cuts to the skin. The products do not meet the requirements of the General Product Safety Regulations 2005." The Mirror has contacted Matalan for further comment. Affected items Spring Mainstream Underwire (UW); Line code: F422691 Barcodes: 3422691000058, 3422691000065, 3422691000072, 3422691000089, 3422691000102, 3422691000119, 3422691000126, 3422691000133, 3422691000140 and 3422691000157 Spring Mainstream DD; Line code: F422690 Barcodes: 3422690000035, 3422690000042, 3422690000059, 3422690000066, 3422690000080, 3422690000097, 3422690000103, 3422690000127 and 3422690000134 Navy Floral Cupped; Line code: F422601 Barcodes: 3422601000055, 3422601000062, 3422601000079, 3422601000086, 3422601000109, 3422601000116, 342260100012, 3422601000130, 3422601000147 and 3422601000154 MS DD Bikini Top Multi; Line code: F422607 Barcodes: 3422607000035, 3422607000042, 3422607000059, 3422607000066, 3422607000080, 3422607000097, 3422607000103, 3422607000110, 3422607000127 and 3422607000134 MS Underwire Bikini Top Multi; Line code: F422627 Barcodes: 3422627000053, 3422627000060, 3422627000077, 3422627000084, 3422627000107, 3422627000114, 3422627000121, 3422627000138, 3422627000145 and 3422627000152 Mainstream Postcard DD; Line code: F422724 Barcodes: 3422724000031, 3422724000048, 3422724000055, 3422724000062, 3422724000086, 3422724000093, 3422724000109, 3422724000116, 3422724000123 and 3422724000130 Mainstream Postcard UW; Line code: F422725 Barcodes: 3422725000054, 3422725000061, 3422725000078, 3422725000085, 3422725000108, 3422725000115, 3422725000122, 3422725000139, 3422725000146 and 3422725000153
Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
Switzerland moves to strengthen its competitiveness after US tariffs
ZURICH, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Switzerland is intensifying efforts to strengthen its attractiveness as a business location, its government said on Wednesday, after being hit with some of the highest U.S. tariffs worldwide. Efforts will focus on regulatory relief for Swiss companies, and new rules incurring high costs for businesses could be pushed back, the government said in a statement. U.S. President Donald Trump this month imposed U.S. import tariffs of 39% on Swiss goods, though pharmaceuticals and some other sectors have so far been spared the duties. "(The government) wants to decisively press ahead with its economic policy agenda and is focusing on reducing the regulatory burden on companies," the government said. Geographical diversification and Swiss companies' access to alternative international markets should also be strengthened, the statement said. The new U.S. levies currently affect around 10% of Swiss goods exports, and could have potentially severe consequences for some companies, the government said. Switzerland does not anticipate a recession akin to the global financial crisis or the pandemic, it added.
