
California has known that disabled people need help in fires. After LA, can it better prepare?
When strong winds shattered the windows on the top floor of Nancy Busacca's Pasadena home, Michelle Hollis knew it was time to go.
Hollis, Busacca's caretaker for the past year, packed the essentials. She tried to remain as calm as possible so as not to frighten Busacca, who, weakened by esophageal cancer, could not walk.
As flames neared the home, Hollis first worried about smoke inhalation because Busacca used supplemental oxygen. At the same time, Hollis tried to figure out how she would lift Busacca into her SUV. Luckily, a second caregiver who had wrapped up her overnight shift had stayed to help.
Hollis recalled turning to the second caregiver: 'I said, 'Hey, do you have faith?' And she was like, 'Yeah.' I said, 'Okay, we're gonna get through this.''
They did, but their experience in the wildfires that ravaged two Southern California communities last month served as another reminder of the threat that natural disasters pose for people with disabilities and limited mobility as well as their caregivers, who often take on the role of first responders in these situations.
These dangers have been apparent for decades, especially since Hurricane Katrina, the most deadly natural disaster in recent U.S. history, leveled the Gulf Coast in 2005. In California, the deadly fires that struck Sonoma and Butte counties in 2017 and 2018 resurfaced these issues. A state audit from 2019 showed that historically, emergency response by state and county agencies have struggled to properly assist people with disabilities and limited mobility.
Several of the people who were killed in the most recent Southern California wildfires were disabled and the majority were over 70, news reports identifying the victims show. The stories are tragic, but not surprising, aging and disability advocates say.
'Older adults and people with disabilities are often disproportionately impacted by wildfires due to factors like mobility limitations, chronic health conditions and social isolation, and that appears to be the case again in Los Angeles,' advocates wrote in a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature.
In the letter, a coalition of 126 organizations that included the AARP, Justice in Aging and the Alzheimer's Association, asked the governor and lawmakers to prioritize disabled and older residents as the state distributes wildfire recovery funds. The request to the state is less about a specific dollar amount and more about creating a recovery process with this population in mind, said Hagar Dickman, director of long-term services and support advocacy at Justice in Aging.
Advocates and caregivers also want more resources and centralized planning to prepare for the next disaster. As climate change fuels more frequent and more devastating events, prompt action is key, they say.
County officials are still assessing the effect of the fires on people with disabilities and the elderly, said Laura Trejo, director of the Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities department. Part of that work, she said, is checking in with nursing homes and assisted living facilities on their relocation and reentry efforts; it also involves calling and checking in on people who live at home and receive county services or participate in a county program, such as in-home help or transportation services.
The biggest challenge has been the scale of it all, Trejo said. 'In over 35 years of doing this work in Los Angeles County, I have never had that many facilities evacuated at the same time, that was unprecedented.'
The January fires prompted some 2,500 people to be evacuated from nursing homes alone, according to Trejo's department's latest counts, she said. Nursing home and assisted living residents were temporarily sent to emergency shelters, and later relocated to facilities where they could stay more long-term.
It is unknown exactly how many people with a disability or limited mobility who were living at home were displaced by the fires because there isn't one centralized way to track them.
The governor's office referred questions about resources and plans specific to this population to the California Office of Emergency Services. The office did not reply to questions from CalMatters. In a press release from last month the governor's office listed a number of efforts that state agencies are participating in, including wellness checks on people with developmental disabilities and facility inspections on nursing homes and assisted living centers to ensure a safe reentry.
Tailoring emergency response for unique needs
People with physical and cognitive disabilities have needs that aren't usually met with traditional emergency response. Many cannot drive. Some may not fully understand the risk they are in.
'The thing for people with disabilities is that the ability to, at the last minute, throw something together and get out of harm's way, you cannot rely on that,' said Silvia Yee, policy director at the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund. 'That won't happen. So the planning has to be there.'
In a 2019 report, the state auditor said that California was not adequately prepared to protect and respond to vulnerable populations during a natural disaster. A look at three counties — Butte, Sonoma and Ventura — showed deficiencies in wildfire evacuation warnings. It also found that none of the counties had done assessments of their respective populations' needs or pre-arranged for evacuation assistance. 'Inadequate preparation likely hindered the counties' responses to the 2018 Camp Fire, the 2017 Sonoma Complex fires, and the 2017 Thomas Fire,' the report said.
The issues that people with disabilities face in emergency situations have been widely known for some time, but the urgency to improve plans seems to come and go, Yee said.
'Periodically, something happens,' Yee said. 'People are appalled. Advances are made, and then we just fall back. We don't advance in terms of implementation and enforcement.'
County officials and advocates have a number of improvements they'd like to see.
Dickman at Justice in Aging said one of her concerns during the January fires was the seeming lack of preparation in evacuation centers to accommodate disabled and older adults. When nursing home residents were taken to the Pasadena Convention Center, for example, news reports showed a shortage of cots and basic supplies, such as respirators and incontinence products.
'These are individuals who need a significant amount of support and durable medical equipment,' she said. 'Shelters or emergency centers need to be prepared to receive individuals from all kinds of areas with all kinds of needs.'
Trejo with the Los Angeles County's Aging and Disability department — a fairly new agency — said she'd like to expand emergency education efforts and take the 'vial of life' protocol to scale. A vial of life refers to a packet that includes all of a person's medical information. The state's Department of Aging has an emergency preparedness guide that includes a vial of life that people can print and fill out. Ideally every home would have one, Trejo said.
She'd also like to create a tool for people who want to self-identify as having unique needs. That way local agencies know where these people live even if they're not enrolled in a county program or service. Some disasters, such as earthquakes, hit without warning, but fires may allow for more thought-out evacuations.
'If we're pre-evacuating an area then we would know 'in this area we have 25 people that live alone who are mobility challenged and who we need to assist earlier,'' Trejo said.
Janie Whiteford, president of the California In-Home Supportive Services Consumer Alliance, is 80 years old and a quadriplegic. In the past she has relied on her local fire department in Los Gatos to help her or her husband.
'I think it is super important that your local fire department knows who you are,' Whiteford said. 'Our guys know me well because I've fallen out of my wheelchair a couple of times and I've called them when I can't get back up. I've said 'Put me on your list. If we have an earthquake and it's a bad one, I want you guys to call me or come and check on me.''
Whiteford imagines a system where first responders or a separate local agency can immediately call people with disabilities and check in. 'In a perfect world, you would have an organization that would have vehicles that could go out to help these people, or would know exactly who to contact,' she said. 'Some type of rapid response taxis.'
In large events, first responders may not be able to check in on individuals right away. For that reason it is also important for people and their caregivers to build their own response team of nearby family and friends or neighbors who know about people's limitations, said Yee at the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund.
'You have to build the community around you to survive this kind of situation,' Yee said, 'Because it's not always going to be the police or the fire department riding to the rescue.'
Training caregivers for the next disaster
Hollis didn't have an evacuation plan in place as the Eaton fire approached, but more than 30 years of experience as a caregiver both in California and in her home state of North Carolina prepared her to think quickly and keep calm in the face of the Eaton fire.
Her original plan was to get Busacca in the car and drive to a hotel. But as she packed, she and the second caregiver flagged down a police officer who was ordering residents to evacuate. The officer called for Emergency Medical Services to pick up Busacca. After about a 30-minute wait, Busacca was taken to the hospital for evaluation, Hollis said.
Hollis feels grateful they were able to get out safely. Busacca died on Jan. 31 from cancer; she was able to come home for her final days.
While difficult to plan a smooth evacuation, Hollis believes emergency training for caregivers could be of significant value in thinking through different scenarios.
In many ways, caregivers are also first responders, but emergency training for them is often overlooked. Some training courses for caregivers exist, although the availability of these can vary by county and depend on funding.
The Center for Caregiver Advancement creates and provides training programs for caregivers, including those who work in nursing homes and those who provide care at home. One of its courses focuses on climate change and emergency planning.
The organization is currently offering its emergency planning course to workers of the In-Home Supportive Services program in San Bernardino County as part of a partnership with the labor union SEIU, which represents caregivers. Corinne Eldridge, the chief executive at Center for Caregiver Advancement, said her organization has so far provided the emergency planning course to about 4,000 In-Home Supportive Services workers across the state since 2021 – that's out of approximately 600,000 caregivers in this workforce.
Stories of the victims in the LA fires show that more preparedness is needed, said Nairi Issagholian, an instructor with the center. The emergency course she teaches gets providers to assess their skills, abilities and communication plans. It helps them go over scenarios they may come across in an emergency, such as losing electricity and with that access to an elevator or ventilators.
The course also teaches providers how to recognize the signs of trauma following an emergency. The idea is to help caregivers feel more prepared and self-assured before, during and after, Issagholian said.
'When the emergency happens, just that sense of a little control can make you feel like 'I'm prepared. I know what I'm doing,'' she said. 'It can give you that confidence.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Texas bill allocates $13M for animal spay and neutering services
The Brief The budget passed by the Texas Legislature allocates $13 million to a pilot program to spay and neuter cats and dogs. Gov. Greg Abbott has yet to approve this funding. This builds off of recently passed legislation, Senate Bill 1568, which created specialty license plates to fund animal sterilization. Texas lawmakers passed a budget that sets aside $13 million for animal spaying and neutering services in order to limit the spread of infectious diseases. If approved by the governor, the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) would lead a statewide pilot program over the next two years. What we know The program was created in an effort to reduce the prevalence of infectious diseases such as rabies, toxoplasmosis, and leptospirosis. These diseases, which can be transferred from animals to humans, can cause adverse side effects in people. What they're saying Shelby Bobosky, executive director of the Texas Humane Legislation Network (TLHN), said the pilot program is a crucial step forward in protecting both animals and people. "Shelters, veterinarians, and local communities have long struggled with limited resources to manage stray and feral animal populations," she said. "This funding is not only indispensable, but it also reflects a clear understanding by the Legislature that animal welfare is a vital part of our public health infrastructure." Bobosky believes the effort will help to tackle Texas' pet overpopulation problem while working to improve community health. The backstory The pilot program is a continuation of previous legislation the TLHN led: Senate Bill 1568, which passed on May 24, 2025. This bill, authored by State Senator Judith Zaffirini, a Democrat from South Texas, created specialty license plates to promote public participation in animal sterilization. The new license plates would include the phrase "Spray. Neuter. Adopt." The sales of this license plate would support the Animal Friendly Account to help fund programs and organizations that support animal sterilization in order to reduce stray populations. What's next If signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott, the DSHS will begin forming the plans and procedures to implement the pilot program over the upcoming months. The TLHN plans to work with animal shelters, veterinary professionals, rescue organizations, and local municipalities to collect feedback to share with the DSHS. The Source This information was gathered from Texas Policy Research, as well as a news release sent by the Texas Humane Legislation Network.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
These Are The States On The Brink Of A Caregiver Crisis — And Trump Medicaid Cuts Could Make It Worse
Some days are quiet and peaceful. Other days, Jenise Griffin's brother Michael Griffin spends hours talking to himself out loud or laughing uncontrollably. Auditory hallucinations, episodes of paranoia and other outbursts also aren't uncommon throughout the day. Michael, 59, was diagnosed with schizophrenia in the 1990s, and spent 23 years at state hospitals and jails, including one in their hometown of Naples, Florida. For the past three years he has lived with Jenise, 67, in Riverview, a small city about 20 minutes from Tampa, where she has been his full-time caregiver. Even though she works from home, balancing caregiving for Michael with her own busy work schedule has been a challenge for Jenise. 'I have to take care of his medications, doctors' appointments, therapists and case worker schedules, so his needs constantly interrupt my day,' she said. It has also taken a toll on her health: Jenise was diagnosed with bradycardia —a heart rate that's slower than normal — in December 2023 and had to get a pacemaker. She has moderate asthma and takes medication to manage her depression. 'The stress of taking care of him has made me sick,' she said. Jenise is far from alone. Although it's difficult to determine how many caregivers there are in the United States, AARP estimates that there were 53 million in 2020. Caregivers can be family members or hired professionals, paid or unpaid, full time or part time. But unlike professional home health aides, the labor family caregivers provide is unpaid, and often invisible yet expected by other members of the family. In many cases, the only support family caregivers receive comes from state or local programs that require jumping through multiple hoops in order to get the most basic services or financial assistance. According to a new report from the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, where you live can make all the difference—and 48% of states are on the brink of a caregiving emergency. After assessing the urgency of local caregiving needs, the authors of the Columbia report, titled 'America's Unseen Workforce: The State of Family Caregiving,' classified all 50 states, plus the District of Columbia, into four categories: critical, high risk, safe for now, and well-supported. States in the 'critical' category include: Florida Alabama Arkansas Georgia Louisiana Nevada South Carolina Tennessee States in the 'high risk' states are: Arizona California Hawaii Idaho Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi New Hampshire New Mexico North Carolina Oklahoma Oregon Texas Virginia West Virginia 'These states didn't land in a crisis by chance,' Stacey B. Lee, professor at Johns Hopkins Carey Business School with a joint appointment at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, told HuffPost. 'The Columbia Caregiving Index shows a consistent pattern: a lack of paid leave, low Medicaid reimbursement rates, [Home- and Community-Based Services] HCBS waitlists, and the absence of caregiver tax credits.' So why are some states faring so much worse than others? One reason for this, according to Holly Wiberg, Ph.D., assistant professor of operations research and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz College, is that the current landscape of policies to support family caregivers is fragmented, with limited national coverage and a lot of variation on the state level. 'This fragmentation has multiple consequences,' Wiberg explained. 'First, caregivers have inconsistent protections with disparate impacts on their own lives and those of their patients. Second, this creates a challenging landscape to navigate, involving multiple agencies, which imposes a further burden on caregivers. The current model is unsustainable and places an undue burden on caregivers, both unpaid and underpaid.' That's been the case for Elizabeth Miller, 53, of Georgia, who spent years juggling caring for her aging parents while raising school-age children and working full time. 'They were some of the most exhausting and emotionally challenging years of my life,' she said. 'I felt completely overwhelmed, isolated and unprepared. I had no prior caregiving experience to draw from, and every day felt like a steep learning curve.' Trying to balance caregiving with parenting and a career meant a demanding schedule for Miller. 'I constantly felt pulled in two directions — guilty when I had to step away from work to care for them, and distracted and depleted when I was at work, worrying about everything that still needed to be done at home,' she said. What Miller and Jenise experience likely sounds familiar to anyone who has been a family caregiver. In fact, it's in line with the findings of a 2023 study from The Arc of the United States, in which 90% of participants reported some impact on their employment related to their caregiving responsibilities, while 54% indicated that they felt 'very' or 'extremely' stressed as a caregiver. After both her parents passed away, Miller became a support caregiver for her 62-year-old brother, who was born with an intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). 'The challenges are different now, but just as complex — and still incredibly isolating,' Miller said. 'There are few resources tailored to older adults with developmental disabilities, and even fewer that support sibling caregivers. Despite working in the care economy for over a decade, I still find navigating care for my brother incredibly frustrating and unnecessarily difficult.' Situations like Miller's and Jenise's aren't unusual in Georgia and Florida, nor in other parts of the country. 'The United States remains one of the least supportive high-income countries for caregivers,' Lee said. 'Policies fall short because they were never built to treat caregiving as essential labor. They assume it will happen informally, unpaid, and out of view, usually by women. That's not support — that's systemic erasure.' According to Lee, the systems currently in place assume that caregiving is 'endless, free, and invisible.' Plus, as Wiberg pointed out, caregiving roles are not equally distributed across the population. 'The burden falls hardest on women, especially Black and Latina women, and on low-income families with no access to institutional support,' Lee said. On top of all the emotional and logistical challenges of caregiving, it can be a huge financial strain on family members — who are typically paid little or nothing for their services. In Georgia, for example, family caregivers like Miller can only receive compensation if the care recipient qualifies for a Medicaid waiver — a process she says is grueling, confusing, and comes with long waitlists. 'I believe that any family caregiver who is actively providing care and can demonstrate it should be eligible for compensation and tax relief, regardless of Medicaid status,' she said. 'We are saving the system money — yet paying the price physically, emotionally and financially.' Miller is absolutely right: The Columbia report estimates that the labor of the country's unpaid caregivers is valued at $890.56 billion. But the countless hours that family caregivers essentially donate to the government don't seem to factor into financial support for caregivers and those requiring care. Each month, Jenise's brother Michael gets a $932 disability payment from Social Security and about $132 in food stamps. 'He is 270 pounds, so that doesn't cover the food he eats monthly,' she said. 'He had been giving me $400 a month, but I spend much of that on extra food, his pharmacy co-pays, his life insurance, and other necessities.' And like so many others who require care, Michael depends on Medicaid for health care. But Jenise and other caregivers fear that a reduction in benefits is imminent. That's at least in part because in a few short months, the Trump administration has been taking significant steps towards dismantling Medicaid as we know it. At this point, it's unclear how much damage these laws and policies will do, but it's safe to say things won't be getting better. If signed into law, the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed in the House of Representatives on May 22, would make the biggest cuts to Medicaid in the program's 60-year history. It's estimated that the bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $625 billion, causing 10.3 million people to lose their Medicaid coverage by 2034. 'The caregiver crisis is fueled by years of underinvestment — and it's about to get worse,' said Kim Musheno, senior director of Medicaid policy at The Arc of the United States. With caregivers already burned out and stretched thin financially, even minor cuts to Medicaid would make a major difference. 'If it becomes law, it will blow a hole in the safety net,' Musheno explained. 'Medicaid is the main source of long-term care in this country, including home- and community-based services that allow people with disabilities to live at home instead of in institutions. And when states face cuts, history tells us what happens: services that help families — like respite care, personal care assistants, and other supports — are the first to go.' Lacking adequate support from the state or federal government, caregivers like Miller have formed their own communities. 'There is a beautiful, grassroots network of caregiver-led organizations out there offering real help,' said Miller, whose Atlanta-based group, Happy Healthy Caregiver, helps caregivers find local resources and navigate the complicated systems in Georgia. But these groups are no replacement for laws and policies that provide actual resources and programs for caregivers. 'Without sustainable financial support and infrastructure, I worry these vital lifelines will burn out, just like so many caregivers do,' she explained. In order for that not to happen, Miller knows what she needs. 'What I need most as a caregiver — and what so many of us are lacking — is time back,' she said. 'Real respite options, financial compensation that reflects the value of our work, and a community of support that truly understands what we're navigating every day.' According to Miller, true respite is more than a day off. 'It means having the financial and practical resources in place to ensure your loved one is safe and well cared-for while you take a real break,' she said. 'Without that, respite is just another wishlist item.' So what would it take for caregivers to get actual support, in the form of programs and services that would genuinely make their lives easier? 'The biggest issue is simple: funding,' Musheno said. 'Good ideas don't go far if there's no money to make them real.' There also has to be a general shift of mentality, away from viewing caregiving as expected and invisible labor, and toward it being seen as legitimate and essential work. 'Unless we commit to federal caregiving infrastructure — paid leave, portable benefits, caregiver tax credits, and living wages for home care workers — we are not solving this crisis. We are institutionalizing harm,' Lee said. Though the situation is looking especially bleak at the moment, there are things you can do to help support caregivers. First, Miller suggests talking to caregivers to get an idea of what they're going through, and sharing their stories. You can also let your voice be heard through the ballot box by voting for candidates who support paid family leave, caregiver tax credits and respite programs. Additionally, Lee recommends organizing within churches, faith-based networks and community health centers. 'These institutions often carry more political and cultural weight in Southern states than formal lobbying efforts, and they're increasingly vocal on elder care and caregiver equity,' she explained. You may also want to seek out volunteering opportunities with organizations for caregivers. Finally, if you know a caregiver, ask how you can support them directly. This might mean grocery shopping, running errands, or spending time with their loved one so they get a much-needed break. 'At the end of the day, caring for the people we love shouldn't be this hard,' Miller said. 'The system should work with us — not against us.' The 1 Truly Difficult Part About Being A Caregiver That Often Gets Overlooked Our Daughter Was Born With A Rare Genetic Difference. Here's The Secret To Keeping Our Marriage Strong As Caregivers. I Was My Mom's Caregiver When She Was Terminal. I Was Shocked By What I Didn't Know About Dying.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
House won't override DeSantis' ‘free kill' repeal veto
A trio of flashing billboards less than two miles from the Florida Capitol is slamming Gov. Ron DeSantis for vetoing the "free kill" bill on medical malpractice. (Photo credit: Christine Sexton/Florida Phoenix) House Speaker Daniel Perez said Thursday the chamber will try again next year to pass a repeal of the 'free kill' statute following Gov. Ron DeSantis' veto of the proposal. DeSantis on May 29 vetoed the Legislature's attempt to remove the bar on parents of adult children and the adult children of single parents from suing hospitals and physicians for non-economic damages for the deaths of loved ones. The governor said repealing 'free kill' would increase health care costs for Floridians and make it harder to keep physicians in the state. 'Of course, the governor has in his right the power to veto this bill, and he chose to do so,' Perez told reporters. 'I disagree with the veto, and we will be bringing that bill back next year for a continued conversation.' Lawmakers passed HB 6017 with bipartisan support. Repealing the ban on suits to recover non-economic damages is one of the perennial arguments in Tallahassee, as business interests and medical groups oppose the move. Perez said he remains opposed to placing caps on the pain-and-suffering damages, which is something that DeSantis said could make him support the repeal in the future, along with caps on attorneys' fees. The family members barred from suing for pain-and-suffering damages can recover economic damages, such as lost wages, medical bills, and funeral costs. 'I don't think that we should determine how much a person's life is worth when someone negligently ended it,' Perez said. The Senate also rejected a bid to cap the damages at $1 million on April 30. Florida, for now, remains the only state banning the recovery of pain-and-suffering damages for parents of adult children and adult children of single parents. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX