Trump comes across as a chauvinist but does respect women, says Reform MP
After a Westminster press conference that focused on women's safety, Sarah Pochin also said her party leader Nigel Farage was 'quite right' to have backed former Reform MP James McMurdock, despite his conviction for assaulting his girlfriend.
The Runcorn and Helsby MP said: 'Donald Trump certainly comes across at times, when I look at him through the television or the media, as possibly a bit of a chauvinist or whatever.
'But look at his team: I mean, his press secretary (Karoline Leavitt) is awesome.
'He has a lot of very senior women in his team, so actually, he clearly does respect women and promotes women in his team, as Nigel is very much doing, as you've seen today with four senior women hosting this press conference.
'So, Reform are doing what they're doing, and as we've made it very clear this morning we are the only party that are putting the safety of women and children first.'
Ms Pochin went on to say that Mr McMurdock, who was convicted of repeatedly kicking his girlfriend in 2006, is a 'shining example of someone who turned his life around'.
She told PA: 'I think he was very young when that happened.
'But look, he's married, he's got five children, and he became a Member of Parliament…
'Once you start down and you're in trouble with the courts, it's so easy to go into a world of crime, but somebody like James turned his life around.'
She added that he is a 'lovely chap' and Mr Farage was 'quite right at the time' to support him.
Mr McMurdock now sits as an independent MP after allegations surfaced about his business dealings during the pandemic.
The Reform leader of Kent County Council, Linden Kemkaran, said: 'He (Mr McMurdock) committed a crime in his youth. He was charged, convicted, served time for it, and since then, he's had a blameless life.
'I think in this country, we do need to have a little bit of forgiveness if somebody has done something silly. We all make mistakes. Some mistakes are bigger than others, obviously.
'I'm not condoning violence against women at all, obviously, but I just think it's, you know, where do you draw the line when someone's rehabilitated and when they're not, after having committed a crime and served time for it.'
She added: 'I don't really see why people keep going on about it.'
Both women went on to defend Reform UK's decision to vote against bereavement leave for pregnancy loss after 24 weeks.
Ms Pochin said: 'It's clearly tragic when that happens. I'm a mother, I've got two grown-up boys, so I certainly can understand how people or mums or parents generally may feel absolutely distraught when that happens.
'But, you know, these things do happen. People have a lot of tragedy in their lives, and part of the human condition is that we pick ourselves up and we get on with it.'
When asked whether she was saying that people who experience pregnancy loss should just 'get on with it', she said: 'That's not what I've said.
'I made it very clear that it's tragic and I feel compassionate as a mother towards anyone that that's happened to.'
Ms Kemkaran added: 'I think we have to be careful about giving people too much specialist leave for lots of special conditions.
'About losing a pregnancy, obviously, it's a devastating thing to happen to any woman. I completely understand that. It's absolutely devastating.
'I think it's probably up to the individual employer to make sure their policies reflect their workforce.'
Meanwhile, the Reform Mayor for Greater Lincolnshire Dame Andrea Jenkyns told PA she nearly quit after the the police 'let off' a man who 'wanted to kill' her.
She said: 'The guy who was walking around the streets of Morley looking for me… he wanted to kill me.
'I was in the hairdresser's at the time, got a phone call, police telling me to stay there.
'And literally, the guy, they got hold of him, he said he was bored and got let off.
'But it's like, all that police time wasted. Nobody should be, even if it's a caution, nobody should actually be allowed to do these things.
'And, you know, I nearly quit then, because when you're a mummy yourself, it might have been a joke to this person, but you take safety personally.'
She added: 'We've got to have zero tolerance policing, just like Rudy Giuliani did in the US, where no crime is too small to get punished.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fury over newly installed 'killer kerb' causing thousands of pounds worth of damage to cars daily
Drivers are furious with a council over a new foot-high 'Killer Kerb' which has caused thousands of pounds of damage to cars. The new installation was designed to create a 'more welcoming environment for pedestrians' but has instead become so notorious that it has been listed as a tourist attraction on Google Maps. It has caused so much damage that a Facebook page has been dedicated to the carnage it has caused. The Lib Dem-led Wiltshire Council was built in October 2024 as part of a £3.2 million project. It was 'renewed' last year under a scheme the county council said would 'create a more welcoming environment for pedestrians' when they walk towards the city centre from the railway station. One video of a car bumping over the kerb had been viewed more than one million times on social media. Since it was installed the council has faced a slew of compensation claims from motorists who have damaged their vehicles on the kerb. However, some locals say that the drivers are themselves to blame. The 'killer kerb 'sits around 100 metres from Salisbury train station in Wiltshire at a mini roundabout at the junction of two major roads. Since opening in October 2024 eight compensation claims relating to it have been made compared to zero in the three previous years. Tom Curtress, 34, from Berkshire, is one of several people who have damaged their cars on the kerb. He said: 'It will be two new doors and some panel work. It's not exactly a bit of varnish and some paint work. 'Other people will do the same thing; they will have a great weekend, drop someone off at the station and then prang their car.' After hitting the kerb in his Ford Focus in March he noticed a BMW do something similar 15 minutes later. He added: 'That BMW car door's going to cost more than a Ford Focus one. 'It was an identical issue, coming from the station. It's not just causing a little scuff. It's causing dents. 'If you drive from the station, you can't see the kerb from the driver's side. It's a tight turn and you don't want to go into the oncoming traffic. 'I took one video where around 50 percent of the cars, to avoid it, had their driver's side on the other side of the road.' Retired military pilot Anthony D'Arcy-Irvine, 82, caused £4,000 worth of damage after hitting his Volkswagen on the kerb in June. When he took his car to the garage he was told he was the 'third car that day'. Mr D'Arcy-Irvine, from Enford, Wilts, said of the incident that led to the damage: 'I was going to get crushed. If I had stayed where I was, I would have been hit by the vehicle coming the other way. 'I have lived in Salisbury for 50 years and I have used that roundabout regularly, I think it is very badly marked. 'When you pull out of the way of a truck coming the other way, there's not sign of where it is. You cannot see it. Other people have rung me and said the same thing. 'Wiltshire Council and Highways have a responsibility to make sure it is safe for driers as well, and it isn't. They have a duty of care for road users.' Heather Armstrong, who owns nearby Gullicks Florists, added: 'Literally everyday a vehicle will go into the kerb and people get stuck on it. 'If someone gets stuck on there it does cause problems with traffic building up. 'I know it's there, so I know to pull out further. For some people, it's not that visible. 'When there was a railing there it gave some more guidance. You have to swing out the other way, and sometimes with traffic coming the other way, that's not possible.' One Facebook page dedicated to the kerb has over 4,200 members, more than 10 percent of the historic city's population. However, viewers are split over who to blame for the damage. One commentator, Jo Earley, saying 'Can we stop blaming the kerb and start blaming the idiots behind the wheel?' Another user, Patrick Day, commented: 'This group isn't for 'victims'. It's for people to laugh at the ones who can't drive and mount it.' However Jonathan Hodgetts wrote: 'Installing a curb like this is crazy but I am amazed people get caught so often. Mind you we all make mistakes so must not be too critical.' One anonymous user said: 'You should have your licence taken away from you if you can't negotiate a corner, dumbass.' Samantha Stokes added: 'Far too much time is being spent on this bloody kerb. I can't wait for the traffic lights to come for the idiots can't turn a corner without smashing their car up.' One social media member even suggested setting up a viewing area on the other side of the road to mock road users. After months of complaints, a safety audit has now been completed by Wiltshire Council and work is due to start next week to improve the kerb. The gradient of the footpath is set to be reduced and a bollard put in place to guide people around the 90-degree corner. 'Deterrent paving' will also be insalled to assist drivers. Councillor Martin Smith, cabinet member for highways at Wiltshire Council, said: 'This is a key junction providing access to the railway station and city centre, with approximately 11,000 vehicles passing under the Fisherton Street railway bridge each day. 'It is important that the infrastructure installed at this location supports pedestrian safety, especially with the recent opening of Fisherton car park for SWR customers, which has increased footfall in the area.'
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Schumer on the ropes: Weak Trump responses see Democratic leader suffer worst-ever slide in polls
If he can't make it here, can he make it anywhere? A new poll from Siena College shows that half of New Yorkers do not like how Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is handling the second Donald Trump presidency. The survey finds that 50 percent of New Yorker state voters have an unfavorable opinion of Schumer — who has served in the Senate since 1999 and became minority leader in 2017 — and just 38 percent have a favorable opinion of him. Schumer faced considerable criticism from many in his party in March after he voted for a stopgap spending bill that Republicans jammed through the Senate despite a majority of the Senate Democratic caucus and all but one House Democrat voting against it. In the days leading up to the vote and even after, numerous Senate Democrats voiced their strong opposition despite the fact that voting against it would lead to a government shutdown. And many Democrats mocked Schumer for seeming out of touch and geriatric after he led a fairly milquetoast protest in front of the Treasury Department in February chanting, 'We will win.' In the spring, he received even more criticism when he told CNN's Dana Bash on State of the Union that he'd sent a 'very strong letter' with 'eight very strong questions' that even had the journalist near rolling her eyes. The polling represents the 74-year-old Schumer's lowest numbers since he became a senator, according to Siena College, which has tracked his approval back since February 2005. Prior to his time in the Senate, he served in the House of Representatives for 18 years. During his time as majority leader, Schumer held together a tenuous coalition of 50 Democrats in the first two years of Joe Biden's presidency, passing Covid-19 relief legislation, the first major piece of gun legislation in almost 30 years, an initiative to promote the manufacturing of semi-conductors in the United States and the Inflation Reduction Act, Biden's signature climate and health care law. During the next two years, Schumer focused heavily on confirming Biden's judicial nominees. But many Democratic voters see him as ill-equipped to stand up to Trump. In January, 45 percent of New Yorkers had a favorable opinion of him and 41 percent had an unfavorable opinion of Schumer. The decline in favorability appears to come from a drop among Democrats and residents of New York City. In January, 68 percent of Democrats had a favorable opinion of him, with 23 percent of Democrats having an unfavorable opinion of him. But his favorable number among Democrats dropped to 49 percent and 39 percent of Democrats have an unfavorable opinion of him. Schumer also seemed to see a decline in support in his hometown of New York City. In January, 55 percent of New York City residents had a favorable opinion of him and 35 percent had an unfavorable opinion of him. Now, 39 percent of residents of New York City have a favorable opinion of him and 46 percent have an unfavorable opinion of Schumer. One of the few groups where his approval increased came among Jewish voters. Earlier this year, Schumer released a book about antisemitism and he remains an outspoke supporter of Israel even as many in his party continue to criticize the war being prosecuted against Gaza by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In Januaty, 45 percent of Jewish New Yorkers had a favorable opinion of him and 47 percent had an unfavorable opinion of him. Now, 52 percent of Jewish New Yorkers have a favorable opinion of Schumer and 43 percent have an unfavorable opinion of him. Schumer does not face re-election until 2028, when there will be another presidential election. Democrats face long odds to retake the Senate in 2026 and are hoping to flip states like North Carolina and Maine as they pray for miracles in Ohio, Texas and Iowa. But many have hoped that a more progressive Democrat like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the democratic socialist congresswoman who represents the Bronx and Queens, will stage either a primary challenge or run if Schumer retires.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
BBC apologises to Jenrick over suggestions he is xenophobic in Radio 4 broadcast
The BBC has apologised to Robert Jenrick after a refugee charity boss suggested the shadow justice secretary is xenophobic during Radio 4's Today programme. Mr Jenrick has accused the broadcaster of smearing 'millions of worried citizens as 'xenophobic' for their completely understandable fears'. While appearing on the radio on Wednesday, Krish Kandiah, a director of Sanctuary Foundation, claimed Mr Jenrick had increased 'fear of the stranger' among people. Mr Kandiah added: 'The technical name for this is xenophobia. 'All phobias are by definition irrational. Nevertheless, they have a huge impact. 'Over the past year, xenophobia has fuelled angry protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers, deepening divisions in our communities.' In a letter to the Conservative MP, the broadcaster's head of editorial standards Roger Mahony said the comments went 'well beyond' what is expected of its Thought For The Day segment. Mr Mahony said: 'I have concluded that, while its reflection on fear in society from a faith perspective is broadly in line with expectations of Thought For The Day, some of the language it used went beyond that. 'I have asked for the two references to xenophobia to be edited from the programme on BBC Sounds. Please accept my apology for their original inclusion.' The content has since been removed from the programme on BBC Sounds. Mr Jenrick said: 'Illegal migration is obviously fuelling crime and the public are right to be concerned about it. 'It's extremely disappointing the BBC thought it was acceptable to smear millions of worried citizens as 'xenophobic' for their completely understandable fears about undocumented men entering illegally.' A series of protests have been held outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, over recent weeks after an asylum seeker was accused of attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies the charges of sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. In a statement, the BBC said: 'During this episode of Thought For The Day, criticism was made of recent comments by shadow secretary of state for justice Robert Jenrick, about hotels housing asylum seekers. 'While the programme's reflection on fear in society from a faith perspective was broadly in line with expectations of Thought For The Day, some of the language used went beyond that and we apologise for its inclusion. 'It has been removed from the version on BBC Sounds.'
